Why I'm a terrible Flames "fan"

Ryan Lambert
July 27 2009 04:05PM

The above picture is what the stereotypical "sports fan" looks like. And that's why I'm not one.

Earlier this morning, I posted on Puck Daddy that the belief that the Blackhawks are "more than equipped" to deal with Marian Hossa's prolonged absence due to injury was certifiably insane. And now I've been accused of "sour grapes" because Calgary lost to Chicago in the playoffs.

That's just crazy talk, and I realized that it's  because I barely like my favorite teams. This is a direct quote from my introduction post here at FN:

"I am not, however, one of those rah-rah “omg i luv Andre Roy”-type fans. On the contrary, being my favorite team in any sport comes with the great burden of my being hyper-critical and generally unaccepting of the team’s moves, or at least whatever seems popular within the general fanbase."

This can be seen in posts like this one from Puck Daddy, where I said it was "off the charts stupid" to pick anything less than a Chicago sweep, or this one from TLP wherein I actually predict a sweep. So sour grapes it was not. It was, I think you'll find, an objective outside opinion.

The reason I'm not a "good fan," I think, is because I eschew blatant homerism and settle, instead, for a remarkable amount of what you'd likely call pessimism but I'd call realism. And that's the thing most sports fans seem to forget: you can support a team, and want it to do well, without just blindly giving a thumbs up and drooling a bit on your shirt when someone asks you how you feel about Free Agent Signing X.

Actually, my feeling is that the entire POINT of sports is to be unhappy. That's why 29 teams don't win jack at the end of every season. What good would winning be if everyone got a trophy just for the hell of it? Y'know who's had it pretty easy the last few years? Red Wings fans. And have you ever sat down and actually read the things they talked about this season? It typically fell into three categories: 1) Bitching that no one is giving them their due respect; 2) How brilliant their management is; 3) How their No. 6-7 defenseman was ruining their chances to repeat. Do you really want to be like that? Of course not.

And besides, the term "fan" is, as some people are wont to point out at the slightest provocation, short for fanatic, a person who, according to Winston Churchill, "can't change his mind and won't change the subject." Fanaticism is best left to ideological and religious kooks.

That's why I'm not a "fan" of the Calgary Flames, Boston Red Sox or Liverpool Football Club. Instead, I am simply a supporter. Supporters, unlike fans, can (and should) be rational, and as such considerably more tolerable. I will, more often than not, back my team up, but not to the point of having disproportionately high standards for them or, indeed, the desire to harangue those that do not share my viewpoint. Would that more people were like this.

The sports world would be a lot better off.

686dfac3780611cb7acad6ce5166c6c1
Yer ol' buddy Lambert is handsome and great and everyone loves him. Also you can visit his regular blog at The Two-Line Pass or follow him on Twitter. Lucky you!
Avatar
#1 Wanye Gretz
July 28 2009, 12:29AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

"Actually, my feeling is that the entire POINT of sports is to be unhappy"

If this is actually the case, I am really getting the point of sports right now, as are hundreds of thousands of Oilers fans.

If it's any consolation, I don't think you are a terrible fan. You can tell everyone who lips you off on puck daddy to bite me.

*pats self on back for being so high and mighty*

Avatar
#2 freeze
July 28 2009, 12:36PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

for god's sake, don't listen to the yahoo yahoos. those comments are a poor mans 4chan.

I'm glad you can be rational about your team (unlike your hate for the Oil) and that is probably why I like reading Gregor and Brownlee at ON.

Comments are closed for this article.