The No. 1 centre debate (again)

Jean Lefebvre
January 25 2010 07:33PM

Quick -- when was the last time the Calgary Flames made it through an entire season without any braying about the top end of the depth chart at centre?

For some, the debate may go back as far as 20 years, when guys like Gilmour, Nieuwendyk and Otto were the men in the middle at the Saddledome.

There were thoughts (or perhaps they were crossed-finger wishes) the matter was finally put to rest a year ago when Olli Jokinen (the True No. 1 Centre™ the Flames had supposedly needed for years) finally joined the fold but if Jokinen is the answer, it's only to a question nobody has ever asked.

TSN analyst (and former Hartford Whaler) Ray Ferraro brings up the topic yet again in his three-point essay on the ills plaguing the Flames.

Their centre ice position is a mess. Daymond Langkow has 11 goals and leads the Flames in production in the middle. That's fine if you have say, 40 assists. But he doesn't. Olli Jokinen has not had any consistency and for $5 million plus, 10 goals are not nearly enough. The Flames can't seem to find the proper set of wingers for him. Craig Conroy has had his best days and he has two goals. This week, I helped call the Flames' game against the Blackhawks and they created very little offence, only seven shots in the first 30 minutes. Name the last team to win the Stanley Cup without a top end centre. Certainly none since the end of the lockout.

By and large, Ferraro makes valid points about Calgary's issues at centre but his conclusion -- or at least his implied conclusion -- is not very helpful. By semi-rhetorically asking about the last team to win a Cup without a premium centre, he's suggesting the Flames don't have one. Maybe that's true, but Jokinen and Langkow make nearly $10 million between them so if Ferraro's suggestion is that the Flames acquire that mythical No. 1 centreman to play with Iginla . . . well, that's a luxury a team paying $7 million to its top winger and $7 million more to its goalie and $22 million and change to its blue-line brigade simply can't afford.

It would obviously be helpful if Langkow and Jokinen picked up the goalscoring pace -- the area of the pivots' game of which Ferraro was especially critical -- but for better or worse, the Flames are pot-committed to these two chaps as their top two centremen. If that gives Calgary a pair of No. 2 centremen (and that point is certainly open for debate) instead of a bona fide No. 1, then so be it.

And just for the heck of it and just because Ferraro focused on goals as the questionable basis for criticizing Langkow and Jokinen, let's look at how many tallies the NHL's division leaders (and Calgary) have from their top two centres:

Capitals (38)
Blackhawks (33)
Avalanche (27)
Sharks (25)
Sabres (24)
Flames (21)
Devils (20)
 

32a247e515fecc03210581093e1a5ee8
Lefebvre is in that awkward stage of hockey following -- old enough to fondly remember the Cleveland Barons and too set in his ways to accept charity points and games where there's a winner but apparently no loser. As a long-time ink-stained wretch, he's also a firm believer in the old Bobby Knight quote about journalists: "All of us learn to write in second grade, but most of us go on to better things."
Avatar
#1 b1ackhat
January 25 2010, 09:46PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Fantastic article!

There Oilers fans - a comment to shut you the hell up.

Avatar
#2 RossCreekNation
January 25 2010, 10:58PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Trade Phaneuf for Lecavalier
Let Jokinen walk & sign Hamhuis
Move Sarich; add top 6 forward
Re-sign Bourque

Avatar
#3 Brent G.
January 26 2010, 12:26PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props
RossCreekNation wrote:

Trade Phaneuf for Lecavalier
Let Jokinen walk & sign Hamhuis
Move Sarich; add top 6 forward
Re-sign Bourque

I like you ideas although would tweak it a little bit:

Trade Phaneuf for Spezza

Let Jokinen walk (emphasize he sucks and ruined this franchises last 2 years and ask him to eat $h*t on Youtube so the fans and management can see some value for that $5.5 mill) & Sign nobody (they'll need most of the Jokinen money to pay for Bourque & out of all of the defensive depth they should be ready to bring AT LEAST 1 prospect up; I'm thinking Pelech - hopefully we can prime him fast enough to trade Regher before the rest of the hockey world notices he is mediocre, cant score, and rarely hits now unless its against Hemsky - all for the low low price of 4 mill) -->when that fool GM is found who is willing to make that trade proceeed to sell "snake oil" and other crap from the trunk of your car so that the owners can regain some of hte lost money for mediocrity

Move Sarich for a top 6 forward (perhaps Sarich & pick); retain Johnson (he is equivalent and a good enough 5/6 defender) --> again tell sarich to eat $h*t a la Jokinen

Re-sign Bourque; create a shrine so he will always know he is pure awesome the only not $h*tty thing to come from Lac La Biche and emphasize he should be #1 LW if B. Sutter would pull his head out of his @ss.

From there they should have very good scoring depth - assuming Moss decides not to suck/be injured

Avatar
#4 Brent G.
January 26 2010, 12:28PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Almost forgot:

Sign Lombardi in the Off-season. He'll replace Conroy. Get a bona fide 4th line center. Tell Boyd to not suck or get the hell out...

Comments are closed for this article.