Surviving the First 10

Kent Wilson
October 13 2010 10:01AM

 

Any given 10 game segment from any given NHL season isn't going to tell you too much about a hockey team - there's a tiny signal-to-noise raio when it comes to a sample that small. That said, I would argue that games 1-10 is even less indicative of a team's true talents for a number of reasons.

There's the obvious stuff: players and coaches coming off of vacation, not "having their legs under them" etc. There may be something to that, although since it's true of every team to I don't know what kind if effect it would have on wins and losses.

What likely has a greater effect is off-season changes: new team members, new line mates, new coaches, etc. To one degree or another, decision makers and players are becoming familiar with each other through the first few weeks of the season. As coaches test to see what they have, the effect can be mis-matched pairings, mis-matched line-ups and poorly arranged assignments while the bench boss susses out who can do what.

Flames fans should be keenly aware of the deceptive "first 10" record. In 2001-02, the team got off to a franchise best start going 7-2-1 and charging out to the division lead...before rapidly falling of contention and the playoff picture altogether. Similarly, last year the club started well by the results, but not by the underlying numbers.

A shy high shooting percentage at both ES and on the PP cloudy the fact the Flames were outshot and outchanced through the first month or two last season, mainly because Brent Sutter was laboring under the perception that Iginla+Jokinen and a random winger could play against other top lines. Like 2001-02, the fantasy faded rapidly and the team missed the playoffs.

This season, the first 10 is likely to be just as misrepresentative of the club's abilities, but for a different reason. Thanks to all the injuries, the current iteration of the Flames looks nothing like it will once a few bodies start returning to the line-up.

As such, the analysis and projections yielded from the first month of Flames hockey should probably be restrained and muted, no matter which way the record falls. Come November, I'll consider any record at or above .500 a victory, but certainly not a true sign of things to come.

39d8109299a9795cb3b41a4e9b49d501
Former Nations Overlord. Current FN contributor and curmudgeon For questions, complaints, criticisms, etc contact Kent @ kent.wilson@gmail. Follow him on Twitter here.
Avatar
#1 dotfras
October 13 2010, 10:18AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

We have Florida, The Oilers X2, Nashville, Columbus, Detroit, San Jose, Colorado to round out the first 10 games.

Sharks, Wings & Avs are going to be the really tough ones, those are all at the end though so that's good. We shouldn't have trouble with Florida, hopefully we learned from our mistakes against the Oil. Nashville and Columbus should hopefully be teams we can beat as well.

Avatar
#2 Domebeers.com
October 13 2010, 10:19AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Signal to noise??? Kent's a closet marketer!!!!

also: "To one degree or another, decision makers and players are becoming familiar with each other through the first few weeks of the season."

or in our teams case, the entire season.

Avatar
#3 stephan
October 13 2010, 03:38PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Maybe the coaches should start the whole "most important game of the year" now so we don't play to the other guys strengths like the past few seasons. As for leafs fans don't get to crazy you haven't had number 3 around for a whole season yet. He brings a whole new meaning to "the big smoke"

Avatar
#4 SmellOfVictory
October 13 2010, 11:05PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Watching some interviews and whatnot on the Flames site, and it turns out Brett Sutter is actually a decent interviewee. Weird, considering his heritage.

Comments are closed for this article.