Flames Scoring Chances - Game 7 versus Columbus

Kent Wilson
October 22 2010 07:51PM

Scoring Chances for NHL Game Number 20093

Team Period Time Note CGY Opponent  
CBJ 1 15:23   6 8 11 20 28 35 1 2 20 50 51 61 5v5
CGY 1 11:48 Hagman goal 5 10 13 17 28 35 1 2 50 51 61   5v4
CGY 1 7:02   5 8 10 13 17 35 1 3 18 26 97   5v4
CGY 1 5:11 White goal 3 4 12 18 35 40 1 15 24 25 35 51 5v5
CBJ 1 3:34 Dorsett goal 3 15 24 29 35 44 1 3 15 16 18 97 5v5
CBJ 1 0:37   4 8 17 28 35 44 1 3 20 50 51 61 5v5
CGY 1 0:29 Bourque goal 5 6 10 13 17 35 1 3 20 50 51 61 5v5
CGY 2 17:34   3 4 11 18 35 40 1 3 25 50 97   5v4
CGY 2 14:53 Bourque goal 4 11 17 28 35   1 6 16 20 50 61 4v5
CBJ 2 14:36   4 20 24 28 35   1 2 15 25 51 71 4v5
CBJ 2 12:39   4 5 15 24 35 44 1 6 20 35 50 61 5v5
CBJ 2 11:52   3 10 13 17 28 35 1 2 16 28 51 93 5v5
CGY 2 8:12   3 4 12 18 35 40 1 3 18 26 97   5v4
CBJ 2 5:49   6 15 18 20 28 35 1 3 25 51 71 93 5v5
CBJ 2 1:56   3 12 18 28 35 40 1 3 20 50 61 97 5v5
CGY 3 16:56   4 5 15 24 35 44 1 6 20 25 28 35 5v5
CBJ 3 16:00   6 10 13 17 28 35 1 2 16 51 61 93 5v5
CGY 3 13:42   3 10 13 17 28 35 1 2 20 25 28 51 5v5
CGY 3 12:50   4 5 12 18 35 40 1 3 16 61 93 97 5v5
CGY 3 12:43   4 5 12 18 35 40 1 3 16 61 93 97 5v5
CBJ 3 10:41   4 11 28 35 40   1 2 16 51 61 93 4v5
CBJ 3 10:40   4 11 28 35 40   1 2 16 51 61 93 4v5
CBJ 3 9:54 Hejda goal 6 8 17 20 29 35 1 6 24 26 35 71 5v5
CGY 3 8:18 Tanguay goal 3 12 18 28 35 40 1 3 15 18 50 97 5v5
CBJ 3 4:34   4 5 12 35 40   1 6 20 25 35   4v4
CGY 3 2:33   5 6 10 13 17 35 1 6 18 24 35 50 5v5
CGY 3 0:07 Bourque goal 6 12 17 18 29 35 1 2 16 35 61 93 5v5

 

# Player EV PP SH
3 I. WHITE 12:36 3 3 4:34 2 0 0:07 0 0
4 J. BOUWMEESTER 16:27 4 3 4:25 2 0 4:51 1 3
5 M. GIORDANO 13:56 5 2 6:24 2 0 1:47 0 0
6 C. SARICH 16:11 3 4 1:09 0 0 1:55 0 0
8 B. MORRISON 10:04 0 3 4:59 1 0 0:57 0 0
10 N. HAGMAN 12:08 3 2 6:12 2 0 0:00 0 0
11 M. BACKLUND 10:24 0 1 0:44 1 0 2:30 1 2
12 J. IGINLA 10:55 5 2 4:04 1 0 0:07 0 0
13 O. JOKINEN 11:46 3 2 6:04 2 0 0:00 0 0
15 T. JACKMAN 10:31 1 3 0:10 0 0 0:00 0 0
17 R. BOURQUE 11:17 4 4 6:49 2 0 0:09 1 0
18 M. STAJAN 10:38 5 2 4:39 2 0 0:21 0 0
20 C. GLENCROSS 9:43 0 3 0:10 0 0 3:32 0 1
24 C. CONROY 9:08 1 2 0:00 0 0 3:30 0 1
28 R. REGEHR 13:01 2 6 0:15 1 0 4:52 1 3
29 B. MIKKELSON 12:56 1 2 0:00 0 0 0:14 0 0
35 H. KARLSSON 42:14 9 10 10:53 4 0 6:53 1 3
40 A. TANGUAY 9:54 4 2 3:47 2 0 1:53 0 2
44 S. MEYER 8:28 1 3 0:00 0 0 0:47 0 0

 

Period Totals EV PP 5v3 PP SH 5v3 SH
1 4 3 2 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 3 5 0 4 2 0 0 0 1 1 0 0
3 7 5 7 3 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0
4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Totals 14 13 9 10 4 0 0 0 1 3 0 0

Head-to-head ice time at ES.

The chance count isn't reflective of the 6-2 score for a couple of reasons: firstly, the Flames went up by a lot early, meaning there wasn't much impetus for them to press for more later in the game. Secondly, Steve Mason was ghastly in net. It was one of those nights where pucks just went in for the Flames. Which is nice, because they've had a couple of games where things have gone the other way.

The worst game by the Glencross line at ES for awhile, although they didn't play much. They also spent a lot of their time against the BJ's first line. Jokinen et al had a better night on the scoreboard than on the chance count. They weren't under water or anything, but the fact that they scored on just about every chance they got is probably inflating the quality of their work in the eyes of some. In addition, the played against the "kid line" mostly, which is easily the BJ's worst outside the 4th unit. Iginla's line also had a decent night, partially because Arniel didn't hard match Nash against them.

39d8109299a9795cb3b41a4e9b49d501
Former Nations Overlord. Current Fn contributor and curmudgeon For questions, complaints, criticisms, etc contact Kent @ kent.wilson@gmail. Follow him on Twitter here.
Avatar
#1 SmellOfVictory
October 23 2010, 11:15AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

I was going to ask about that when I saw GlenX/Back's numbers. How did Mikkelson look?

Avatar
#3 SmellOfVictory
October 23 2010, 01:40PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

Nice. So same age as Pelech but better.

Comments are closed for this article.