Gameday Preview: Detroit Red Wings

Kent Wilson
November 03 2010 09:48AM

The puck rolls across the jersey of Calgary Flames goalie Miikka Kiprusoff and into the net on a goal by Detroit Red Wings Johan Franzen during the third period of their NHL hockey game in Detroit, Michigan October 21, 2010.  REUTERS/Rebecca Cook (UNITEDSTATES - Tags: SPORT ICE HOCKEY IMAGES OF THE DAY)

The last time these two teams met, the script went about how we predicted: Calgary's depth played well enough to make things interesting but in the end the Wings top-end talent prevailed. What wasn't expected, however, was just how vulnerable the Wings bottom-end would be. That's a weakness the Flames will likely hope to exploit in the second meeting tonight.

Calgary outplayed Detroit in the first period previously, spurred by the utter dominance of the Glencross-Backlund-Morrison trio. The rookie scored his first (and only two) goals of the season and the three of them probably could have had more besides.

While we've become used to the Flames third line creating havoc over the last year or three, it was somewhat eye-opening to see just how soft Detroit's soft underbelly is. Daniel Cleary has been a quality player since he revived his career in the motor city and the return of Jiri Hudler was supposed to add another weapon to an already stocked arsenal, but things haven't turned out for whatever reason. Cleary, Hudler and Modano have all struggled relative to their teammates, despite being fairly sheltered. In the case of Modano and Hudler, both guys have a zone start at about 60% thus far and yet are underwater in terms of possession. That's remarkably bad given the fact that Datsyuk, Zetterberg and Franzen do all of the heavy lifting on the club.

DALLAS - OCTOBER 14: Mike Modano  and Jiri Hudler  of the Detroit Red Wings walk out to the ice before the third period against the Dallas Stars on October 14, 2010 at the American Airlines Center in Dallas, Texas. The Dallas Stars defeated the Detroit Red Wins 4-1. (Photo by Elsa/Getty Images)
 

What's more, the Wings have a fairly suspect bottom defensive pairing in Jakub Kindl and Doug Janik. The former is a 23-year old rookie still trying to compete at the NHL level while the latter is mostly an AHL journeyman who has bounced around the league for the last decade or so. Kindl in particular is getting hammered, as sometimes happens to guys taking their first steps in this league.

In order to exploit these issues, the Flames will need their top-end guys to saw things off with the big guns at the other end. It's a tall order, particularly with the Red Wings top-six depth: Detroit's aforementioned "big three" are some of the best forwards in the league and it means Babcock can send two hard minutes lines over the boards on any given night. Which is the reason, despite their underwhelming bottom-six, the Red Wings continue to be one of the best in Western Conference (it also helps that Lidstrom is apparently immortal).

In short, the Wings are excellent but there's a chink in the armor. If the likes of Iginla and Jokinen can fend of Datsyuk et al, Calgary has a good chance to prevail.

39d8109299a9795cb3b41a4e9b49d501
Former Nations Overlord. Current FN contributor and curmudgeon For questions, complaints, criticisms, etc contact Kent @ kent.wilson@gmail. Follow him on Twitter here.
Avatar
#1 jess
November 03 2010, 10:33AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Datsyuk scares me.

I've noticed a trend of Kipper having a knockout game after getting knocked out the game before, so hopefully that gives the Flames a boost tonight, but I would look to see some secondary scoring from Bourque/Hagman tonight, and another point from Morrison. I'm also going to go out on a limb and say that Jackman will be on the boxscore tonight as well.

Otherwise this is most likely a blowout.

Avatar
#2 Rain Dogs
November 03 2010, 10:42AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

If the likes of Iginla and Jokinen can fend of Datsyuk et al, Calgary has a good chance to prevail.

True, but just reading it makes me hang my head and think..."Oh crap."

Avatar
#4 PrairieStew
November 03 2010, 11:09AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Which Flame gets the McGuire McLovin treatment tonight ? Giordano ? Bourque ? or Chuckwagon Curtis Glencross ? Tune in to TSN to find out.

Avatar
#5 JF
November 03 2010, 11:51AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

@Kent Wilson

Kinda surprised that Moss is going to start out on a line that will be expected to log at least middling minutes. I'd have thought that he'd start out with Conroy and Jackman until we know that he has his game legs back.

Disappointed to see Glencross seemingly in the dog house... prior game deadheaded penalty aside he's been probably our best overall forward.

Avatar
#7 Pat Steinberg
November 03 2010, 12:27PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Janik is not in tonight, instead Ericsson does get back into the lineup. Shameless plug: all the details in Wednesday's edition of FGD.

Avatar
#8 Parallex
November 03 2010, 01:30PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

@Kent Wilson

You really think Backlund's going to have a different role tonight? Are you thinking BBM will be the tough minute unit? Regardless, if Moss is able to play at full capacity and is as willing to continue to be the garbage collecting front-of-net guy I could see that line working out in the O-zone.

At any rate the keys to the game are the same as last time and always. Play the wings top 6 to a draw at EV and let the lower half of the line-up make up the winning difference, that and stay out of the sin bin.

Avatar
#9 Rain Dogs
November 03 2010, 02:04PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

It seems to me that Brent may be smarter than we give him credit for.

Tangs-Stajan-Babysitee#1

RBQ-Babysitee#3-Moss

Hagman-Babysitee#2-Morrison

GlenX-Conroy-Jackman

Oh Red Wings fans, please don't laugh in my face for saying this if you win 6-0, but is it possible that Brent is just going for balanced lines, protecting the three exploitable players, and trying to...gulp..."out depth" the Wings?

Um.. 2-1 Flames..please?

Comments are closed for this article.