Flames Scoring Chances - Game 30 versus Anaheim

Kent Wilson
December 10 2010 11:05PM

Scoring Chances for NHL Game Number 20424

Team Period Time Note CGY Opponent  
ANA 1 19:11   4 12 13 17 28 35 1 9 10 15 17 32 5v5
CGY 1 16:18   5 8 11 12 35 40 1 5 10 23 64   5v4
CGY 1 7:54   6 7 8 26 35 40 1 4 11 19 23 33 5v5
ANA 1 7:15 Visnov goal 4 12 13 17 28 35 1 9 10 15 17 32 5v5
CGY 1 3:59   6 12 13 17 28 35 1 9 10 15 17 32 5v5
CGY 1 3:58   6 12 13 17 28 35 1 9 10 15 17 32 5v5
ANA 1 2:02   4 8 16 28 35   1 4 11 15 17 19 4v5
ANA 1 2:01   4 8 16 28 35   1 4 11 15 17 19 4v5
ANA 1 2:00   4 8 16 28 35   1 4 11 15 17 19 4v5
ANA 1 1:39   5 6 17 20 35   1 4 11 15 17 19 4v5
ANA 1 1:09   4 12 28 35 40   1 11 17 22 32   4v4
CGY 1 0:29   5 12 13 35 40   1 3 22 32     4v3
CGY 2 19:10   12 13 17 33 35 40 1 3 15 22 32   5v4
CGY 2 18:54   12 13 17 33 35 40 1 3 9 15 22 32 5v5
ANA 2 16:00   5 8 10 26 33 35 1 3 11 22 32 33 5v5
CGY 2 10:55   5 12 13 33 35 40 1 9 10 15 17 32 5v5
CGY 2 10:31   4 12 13 28 35 40 1 9 10 15 17 32 5v5
ANA 2 8:45   4 5 15 16 25 35 1 3 5 16 22 28 5v5
CGY 2 6:29   4 5 11 35 40   1 4 10 15 17 19 4v5
ANA 2 3:32 Sexton goal 6 10 11 20 28 35 1 4 17 42 63 64 5v5
ANA 2 1:46   4 8 17 28 35   1 4 10 15 17 19 4v5
ANA 2 0:05   4 11 25 28 35   1 5 9 11 23 33 4v5
CGY 3 18:20   7 11 20 26 33 35 1 3 5 42 63 64 5v5
CGY 3 13:09   5 8 12 13 35 40 1 5 9 10 23   5v4
CGY 3 13:02 Jokinen goal 5 8 12 13 35 40 1 5 9 10 23   5v4
CGY 3 12:51   4 6 11 20 26 35 1 4 5 42 63 64 5v5
ANA 3 12:07   7 12 13 28 35 40 1 9 15 23 32 42 5v5
CGY 3 7:41   4 12 13 28 35 40 1 9 10 15 17 32 5v5
CGY 3 6:36 Iginla goal 5 12 25 33 35 40 1 5 10 11 17 33 5v5
CGY 3 6:05   5 6 15 16 25 35 1 3 5 16 22 28 5v5
CGY 3 5:04   6 11 20 26 28 35 1 3 5 42 63 64 5v5
CGY 3 5:03   6 11 20 26 28 35 1 3 5 42 63 64 5v5
ANA 3 0:47   4 12 13 28 35 40 1 9 10 15 17 32 5v5
ANA 4 3:27   5 6 10 13 35   1 4 11 19 23   4v4
ANA 4 3:18   5 6 10 13 35   1 4 11 19 23   4v4
ANA 4 1:22   5 6 20 35     1 10 11 15 17   3v4
ANA 4 0:41   4 28 35 40     1 10 11 15 17   3v4
ANA 4 0:36   4 28 35 40     1 10 11 15 17   3v4
ANA 4 0:20   4 8 28 35 40   1 10 11 15 17   4v4
ANA 4 0:06   5 6 12 13 35   1 4 9 32 63   4v4

 

# Player EV PP SH
4 J. BOUWMEESTER 25:25 3 6 3:26 0 0 5:33 1 7
5 M. GIORDANO 19:44 3 5 5:11 4 0 3:12 1 2
6 C. SARICH 13:16 7 4 0:11 0 0 2:07 0 2
7 A. PARDY 9:31 2 1 0:18 0 0 0:00 0 0
8 B. MORRISON 11:12 1 2 2:16 3 0 1:59 0 4
10 N. HAGMAN 11:58 0 4 1:20 0 0 0:00 0 0
11 M. BACKLUND 9:29 4 1 0:47 1 0 1:33 1 1
12 J. IGINLA 16:18 7 6 6:56 5 0 0:00 0 0
13 O. JOKINEN 16:36 6 7 5:37 4 0 0:31 0 0
15 T. JACKMAN 7:05 1 1 0:00 0 0 0:00 0 0
16 T. KOSTOPOULOS 6:48 1 1 0:00 0 0 1:55 0 3
17 R. BOURQUE 15:45 3 2 4:24 1 0 2:15 0 2
20 C. GLENCROSS 10:20 4 1 0:00 0 0 3:17 0 2
25 D. MOSS 8:23 2 1 0:00 0 0 0:35 0 1
26 A. KOTALIK 10:10 5 1 1:34 0 0 0:00 0 0
28 R. REGEHR 19:18 6 7 0:00 0 0 5:19 0 7
33 A. BABCHUK 7:26 4 1 2:47 1 0 0:51 0 0
35 H. KARLSSON 47:11 13 12 8:30 5 0 8:31 1 9
40 A. TANGUAY 13:17 6 4 7:08 5 0 2:57 1 2

 

Period Totals EV PP 5v3 PP SH 5v3 SH
1 5 7 3 3 2 0 0 0 0 4 0 0
2 5 5 3 3 1 0 0 0 1 2 0 0
3 9 2 7 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4 0 7 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0
Totals 19 21 13 12 5 0 0 0 1 9 0 0

Head to head ice

Corsi

Face-offs

The chance count may surprise some Flames fans given how close it is versus how much the Flames seemed to control things. Truth is, Calgary dominated possession more than chances through the first two periods  - they spent a lot of time getting shots from the edges of the scoring area rather than the middle. They broke through in the third period with the Ducks sitting back though - Flames beat the bad guys up by all measures in that frame. It was enough to tie the game and get things into OT.

On the flip side, the Flames were lucky to get out of extra time alive. The Ducks dominated 4on4/4on3 and probably should have ended things before the shoot-out.

What may also surprise Flames fans is the mediocre numbers for Iginla et al. They seemed decent by eye, but spent all night against the only Ducks line worth a damn (Getzlaf) and started more often in the defensive end at ES, so their so-so chance and corsi counts are justified if not overly impressive. That said, they were at least the ones to generate the actual tallies on the night for the Flames.

*aside - I have no idea how Hagman ended -4 in a game like this.

39d8109299a9795cb3b41a4e9b49d501
Former Nations Overlord. Current FN contributor and curmudgeon For questions, complaints, criticisms, etc contact Kent @ kent.wilson@gmail. Follow him on Twitter here.
Avatar
#1 Pat Steinberg
December 10 2010, 11:14PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

That is pretty much exactly what I thought we'd see in terms of chances...Calgary slowly tilted this game in terms of quality of chances, and it culminated in a dominant third period.

Avatar
#3 CitizenFlame
December 11 2010, 10:05AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

It seems as Iginla broke out of his early season slump Brent Sutter has been more prone to going to PvP. Or I guess on the road the opposing coach is keying on him more again. However, Sutter is definitely giving the Iginla line tougher zone starts. Iggy, Tanguay, Stajan aren't getting cushy zone start ratios anymore. It's impressive to see on most nights they are outchancing or atleast sawing off the other teams top lines. Unfortunately this is not translating into victories as the other lines play have dropped off considerably from the beginning of the year.

Comments are closed for this article.