Great American Victory Report Pt. 3: lol "Your Game" okay buddy

Ryan Lambert
February 22 2010 12:59PM


Howdy folks.

The Olympics are, of course, all about athletic competition, pushing to be the best, and coming together as a global community to celebrate peace and goodwill. But let's be honest here, it's also about winners and losers. Canada may have a couple gold medals now but I think it's time we took a look at the real winner so far: America.

As far as I know, I'm the only American (read also: non-loser) who writes for the various Nations, and that's why I have taken it upon myself to come here and remind you that the United States has and will continue to dominate "Your Olympics."

Here are five more very specific reasons why.

1. I told ya so.

 Look, I mean, I get it. Look at that roster you guys brought to the Olympics for hockey, which you laughably call, "Your sport." There's not one Oiler on it. So how could you not delude yourselves into thinking you were destined for some amount of success? Well, I forgive you. Not unconditionally of course. I will first be seeking apologies from the following Oilers/Flames Nation commenters, who foolishly predicted a Canadian win.

  1. Ender the Dragon, who said, "If (when) Canada beats the Americans in hockey..." WRONG
  2. Phil, who noted, "And besides, all that really matters is the USA will get embarrassed in a few days by the absolutely dominant Canadian squad in mens hockey. Fools are gonna get crushed." RAFALSKI'D
  3. GSC, who blabbed, "I just can't stand to see this kind of ethnocentric behavior. There's no reason for it, especially when it looks like USA Hockey will be an afterthought once more in Vancouver." INCORRECT
  4. GSC (again), who chattered, "...and the strong possibility that Hockey Canada brings home another gold." DISAPPOINTED
  5. Fellow Flames Nation contributor RossCreek, who blathered, "Sorry pal, but the USA battling for a bronze in men's hockey will be as good as it gets for you. Meanwhile, we up here in igloo-land will cherish our GOLD forever." DISCREDITED
  6. Ambassador humantorch, who yammered, "Also, I hope your hockey team enjoys getting the everloving snot beat out of it in the only Winter Olympic sport that matters. Say hi to 5th place for us!" SIXTH PLACED

I wonder what happened. I mean, last I saw the United States had creamed a bunch of future sod farmers in the World Junior title game and that was, I was led to believe, a major international ice hockey competition, right up until you lost it. I guess the same is now true of the Olympics. But hey, chin up, Canada. You only have to get through the Russians and Finns to compete for a medal. Over in the winners' bracket, I think the US is playing like South Africa or something. It's tough to tell between all these countries we could crush like bugs with our omnipotent military or, if they'd prefer, American Hero Ryan Kesler.

2. Even Bodie Miller can defeat the world.

Last time we dominated participated in the Winter Olympics, Bode Miller was made out to be the next Michael Jordan or, more appropriately, Ryan Miller of competitive skiing. And he went home without a medal or something like that I can't remember. The point is he embarrassed this country so badly that I secretly began to suspect he was a naturalized Canadian that had come to this wonderful country of mine in hopes of perhaps scrubbing off some of the failure stench with which all Canadian children are born, kind of like Original Sin but only for natives of the crummiest North American country (at least Mexico gave us the burrito, y'know?).

But nope, it turns out Bode Miller is an American after all. How else could you explain his gold in the men's supercombined, silver in the super-G, and bronze in the downhill? Answer: you couldn't. That's winner material right there, and thus immediately disproves my previous theories that he could have come from any country but the Good Ol' US of A.

3. You idiots get worked up over a gold in the skeleton.



Okay, okay. Congratulations to you, Canada. You won gold in the "sledding" event. I could have too if my mom hadn't called me in for supper when it started getting dark back in the days I was still in fourth grade.

But for real, you guys are gonna dominate at the Summer Games when they introduce hopscotch.

 

4. Our sissiest man could kill the strongest Canadian with his bare hands.

Evan Lysachek wasn't the favorite to win gold in men's figure skating. I'm not sure why, though. He clowned out some punkass Russian guy who came out of retirement just to lose to America like it was 1991 all over again. The Olympics are, of course, that wonderful time when the world gets together to act like it understands, ahem, "sports" in which it has no interest and of which it has no knowledge. Case in point: figure skating. If you're anything like me (I know, it's hopelessly optimistic for you to compare yourselves to a real live American, but see if you can wrap your head around it), you don't know squat about such a stupid event.

But even I knew that Lysachek slaughtered in this one. Women in the audience were actually fainting from how sexually aroused they were by his breathtaking performance, and several Canadian men reportedly committed suicide because they knew they could never aspire to this level of manliness. Imagine how rough it would have been for the average Canadian excuse for a boy in any school from Halifax to Nanaimo if Evan Lysachek walked in there lookin' for lunch money. Then keep in mind that this is the kind of kid Ryan Callahan was shoving into lockers every day of his high school life.

5. It is and will forever be about medal count.

Let's have another look at the medal table. I remember last Thursday the US had 15 medals to, of course, lead the entire world as we so richly deserve. So what's it looking like a couple days later? Oh that's funny. America is still on top.

And look at all these medals! Twenty-freaking-four of them. The next closest country is Germany. With 18. After that is Norway with 12. Then South Korea and Canada with nine each. South goddamn Korea? Weren't you Canadians supposed to "own the podium" or whatever? What happened with that? Hell, the US has more BRONZE medals than you guys do total.

I think it's time you guys just gave up, eh? I'm sure Seattle would be happy to host the remaining week of the games just to give you guys a break so you can think about the many, many ways in which you've blown it.

686dfac3780611cb7acad6ce5166c6c1
Yer ol' buddy Lambert is handsome and great and everyone loves him. Also you can visit his regular blog at The Two-Line Pass or follow him on Twitter. Lucky you!
Avatar
#101 RossCreekNation
February 23 2010, 10:14AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

@cableguy - 2nd Tier Fan

Psst... key words send posts into moderation.

Avatar
#102 bingofuel
February 23 2010, 10:15AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
cableguy - 2nd Tier Fan wrote:

interesting.

i make a comment that included someone jacking off to a sears catalogue, and it gets edited.

this one includes some rather "colorful" references to sexual orientation, yet is still here.

I am looking at you Wanye Gretz

We don't have the time to comb through comments all day long. That's why we purchased two robots for $20 ea. They sometimes don't work.

Max Powers, it's not cool to use that word, even if you manage to sneak it through the spam filter. You've been warned.

Avatar
#103 Dan the Man
February 23 2010, 10:17AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

Tom Brokaw's heartwarming take on Canada - US Relations.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tYoTJItSPt0

Avatar
#104 RossCreekNation
February 23 2010, 10:23AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

@ Banger, Crash... ah screw it... To Whom It May Concern:

So theoretically then, the entire continent of Africa could hypothetically put together a team (based on population of 1,000,000,000) that should kick everyone's arse, right? Right? WRONG!

I highly doubt the USA has 10x the population to draw from for the winter Olympics, so to say that they should win 10x as many medals is inaccurate, imo (do you really think States like Mississipi, Alabama, Louisianna, New Mexico, etc have a lot to offer?). BUT, they likely have say 5x (random arbitrary number) the population to actually draw from, so they should have say 5x (random arbitrary number) the medals.

Ya/No?

Avatar
#105 Max Powers - Team HME Evans
February 23 2010, 10:26AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
bingofuel wrote:

We don't have the time to comb through comments all day long. That's why we purchased two robots for $20 ea. They sometimes don't work.

Max Powers, it's not cool to use that word, even if you manage to sneak it through the spam filter. You've been warned.

*Sigh. Ok bingofuel, but I did think it was appropriate and for the record I never meant to use the word to offend anyone other than TLP.

Avatar
#106 Dan the Man
February 23 2010, 10:27AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

Does anyone have a buddy who is a Flames fan or a Canucks fan or a Leafs fan?

Don't you always bust each others balls about who's team better?

How is what TLP wrote any different? He is busting our balls. That's how I take it anyways. Many of you have been giving it back, that's great, that is what you are supposed to do.

If you don't find it funny, that's fine too, humour is subjective but to be insulted or threaten never to visit this site again is ridiculous and childish.

That is all.

Avatar
#107 Banger
February 23 2010, 10:28AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

@RossCreekNation

exactly.

Avatar
#108 Max Powers - Team HME Evans
February 23 2010, 10:30AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
Dan the Man wrote:

Does anyone have a buddy who is a Flames fan or a Canucks fan or a Leafs fan?

Don't you always bust each others balls about who's team better?

How is what TLP wrote any different? He is busting our balls. That's how I take it anyways. Many of you have been giving it back, that's great, that is what you are supposed to do.

If you don't find it funny, that's fine too, humour is subjective but to be insulted or threaten never to visit this site again is ridiculous and childish.

That is all.

I just want to point out that telling people who have threatened to leave that they are childish is counter productive since they have vowed not to return to this site anyways, so how are they going to argue or even read your point? Man I'm bored at work today.

Avatar
#109 RossCreekNation
February 23 2010, 10:32AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
Dan the Man wrote:

Does anyone have a buddy who is a Flames fan or a Canucks fan or a Leafs fan?

Don't you always bust each others balls about who's team better?

How is what TLP wrote any different? He is busting our balls. That's how I take it anyways. Many of you have been giving it back, that's great, that is what you are supposed to do.

If you don't find it funny, that's fine too, humour is subjective but to be insulted or threaten never to visit this site again is ridiculous and childish.

That is all.

x INFINITY

Avatar
#110 tlpisadouche
February 23 2010, 10:32AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

douche

Avatar
#111 Dan the Man
February 23 2010, 10:38AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
Max Powers - Team HME Evans wrote:

I just want to point out that telling people who have threatened to leave that they are childish is counter productive since they have vowed not to return to this site anyways, so how are they going to argue or even read your point? Man I'm bored at work today.

Touche!

Avatar
#112 Lebowski
February 23 2010, 10:46AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

Definition of "smack": offensive speech about another person. Just what I need to make my life happier. Visit ON to get offended. Being offended by TLP's offensiveness is not whining. I'd like to take TLP behind the barn and smack him.

Avatar
#113 Senator Theo
February 23 2010, 10:51AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
Dan the Man wrote:

Does anyone have a buddy who is a Flames fan or a Canucks fan or a Leafs fan?

Don't you always bust each others balls about who's team better?

How is what TLP wrote any different? He is busting our balls. That's how I take it anyways. Many of you have been giving it back, that's great, that is what you are supposed to do.

If you don't find it funny, that's fine too, humour is subjective but to be insulted or threaten never to visit this site again is ridiculous and childish.

That is all.

Totally agree. It seems like it's missed its mark here.

The one thing I might add is that when so much effort has to go in to explain why something is supposed to be funny, maybe it's not as funny as you thought it was.

I do get "it" though.

Avatar
#114 Dream_Theater
February 23 2010, 10:58AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

Prediction:

Team USA women win gold, America rubs in it, claiming hockey belongs to them, and we all suck, etc etc.

Team Canada women win gold, America claims to not care, it doesnt matter team USA men beat Canada on time in the last 6 games, hockey belongs to them, we all blow as canadians etc etc.

Avatar
#115 Petr's Jofa
February 23 2010, 10:58AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

@Senator Theo

Naw, it didn't miss it's mark. I think most of us got the point of the article but those 'marks' who didn't see in as a joke got their panties in a twist which made it even funnier. Remember, those who laugh last, think slowest.

I'm Canadian and I can't wait for 'the Great American Victory Report Pt. 4:' to see who is the first poster to miss the point and call it classess.

Avatar
#116 Crash
February 23 2010, 11:00AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
RossCreekNation wrote:

@ Banger, Crash... ah screw it... To Whom It May Concern:

So theoretically then, the entire continent of Africa could hypothetically put together a team (based on population of 1,000,000,000) that should kick everyone's arse, right? Right? WRONG!

I highly doubt the USA has 10x the population to draw from for the winter Olympics, so to say that they should win 10x as many medals is inaccurate, imo (do you really think States like Mississipi, Alabama, Louisianna, New Mexico, etc have a lot to offer?). BUT, they likely have say 5x (random arbitrary number) the population to actually draw from, so they should have say 5x (random arbitrary number) the medals.

Ya/No?

Actually read my post please before posting something like this....no not theoretically at all does your statement hold water

I talked of the US being a have nation...a nation with money that treats women on the same scale that they treat men...I also mentioned that the countries we were debating about were countries that competed in certain events based on climate and we also talked about funding...

To throw out a continent full of nations that are clearly not have nations and don't treat women on the same scale as a US and Canada do is assinine and completely irrelevant..

I'm also not the one to say that the US should have 10X the medals than Canada because it's not just a competition between Canada and the US...if you haven't noticed, there are many other nations involved which would affect the numbers...I also acknowledged that the US probably doesn't have 10X the number of people to draw athletes from for Olympic sports when I brought up Texas but they sure as hell do have many more to draw from than we do.

I was going to just leave it alone but seeing as how you brought it up again....Banger mentioned that if the US had 10X the population why don't they have 10X the number of athletes at the games...fact is you're only allowed so many competitors in each event so each country has to have their own competitions to decide who gets to go and who doesn't get to go. If the US could send more athletes I'm sure they would.

Lastly...if the competition was between just Canada and the US in all the events and the US could send all of their athletes and we could send all of ours I would be willing to suggest that they would likely have a much higher percentage of medals than we do....luckily we have other nations in the games who take some of those spots.

Avatar
#117 Petr's Jofa
February 23 2010, 11:01AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

I disagree.

Americans will never claim hockey as their own. If they win gold they will celebrate the victory and then forget about it for another 4 years.

As for your other point, if the Canadian men win gold and the women silver, will anyone in Canada care?

Avatar
#118 GSC
February 23 2010, 11:13AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
Dan the Man wrote:

Tom Brokaw's heartwarming take on Canada - US Relations.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tYoTJItSPt0

HERE, HERE!

Avatar
#119 Dyckster
February 23 2010, 11:15AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
Petr's Jofa wrote:

I disagree.

Americans will never claim hockey as their own. If they win gold they will celebrate the victory and then forget about it for another 4 years.

As for your other point, if the Canadian men win gold and the women silver, will anyone in Canada care?

"As for your other point, if the Canadian men win gold and the women silver, will anyone in Canada care?"

Absolutely some will, and yes I have a daughter who plays hockey. If I've mis-interpreted your comment as a bashing of women's hockey then I apologize in advance.

Avatar
#120 trloehr@hotmail.com
February 23 2010, 11:21AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
Dyckster wrote:

"As for your other point, if the Canadian men win gold and the women silver, will anyone in Canada care?"

Absolutely some will, and yes I have a daughter who plays hockey. If I've mis-interpreted your comment as a bashing of women's hockey then I apologize in advance.

Yeah sorry that post about women's hockey was unclear. I was replying to Dream_Theater's post where he wrote

"Team USA women win gold, America rubs in it, claiming hockey belongs to them, and we all suck, etc etc.

Team Canada women win gold, America claims to not care, it doesnt matter team USA men beat Canada on time in the last 6 games, hockey belongs to them, we all blow as canadians etc etc."

All I was tring to say is that the result of the women's game won't change who hockey belongs to.

Avatar
#121 Harlie
February 23 2010, 11:32AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

@ Lebowski

~ Mr. Jackie TLPhorn treats objects like women, man. ~

Avatar
#122 Greg MC
February 23 2010, 11:37AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

Filter , eh? How does fuzzy socksucker work for you, TLP? It's good enough for Spike TV!

Avatar
#123 Hemmercules
February 23 2010, 11:42AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

Forgive me for not finding it funny when TLP crap's on our heads and half the people play it off as a big joke. Joke or not, I find comments like "....scrubbing off some of the failure stench with which all Canadian children are born, kind of like Original Sin but only for natives of the crummiest North American country" to be in poor taste for a canadian sports website. Is this honestly needed here?? I get that America has to be better than everyone at everything to keep their ego's in check but to see it on ON caught me a little off guard.

Avatar
#124 StrangePhD
February 23 2010, 12:11PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

This whole debate reminds me a little of the controversy when the South Park movie was released, featuring "Blame Canada". Some were up-in-arms declaring it un-funny, unnecessary and distasteful when in fact the entire message exploits and makes fun of the outrageous stereotypes that (unfortunately) still exist in some segments of the population. While Wanye (and the vast majority of readers) have played along, knowing that this is a piece of satire, I truly hope that the humour/fun/harmless nature of the article is not lost..... but on that note: ~does anyone else blame the Canada loss on a distinct lack of Oilers?~

Avatar
#125 David S
February 23 2010, 12:12PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
Hemmercules wrote:

Forgive me for not finding it funny when TLP crap's on our heads and half the people play it off as a big joke. Joke or not, I find comments like "....scrubbing off some of the failure stench with which all Canadian children are born, kind of like Original Sin but only for natives of the crummiest North American country" to be in poor taste for a canadian sports website. Is this honestly needed here?? I get that America has to be better than everyone at everything to keep their ego's in check but to see it on ON caught me a little off guard.

A) Yet you're not offended by the "failure stench" of the current edition Oilers?

B) Its a joke. Lighten up Francis.

Avatar
#126 RossCreekNation
February 23 2010, 12:26PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

@Crash

Whoa... chill, man. When I clicked on this page, the last comment was "#93 cableguy February 23 2010, 09:34AM". After reading through all the comments I had missed, I had a reaction to your discussion with Banger, but I decided to respond to the above comment first. When I did, a whole new set of comments popped up, and you're right, I didn't read yours because I jumped to the bottom to write mine (without checking to see if you had made additional comments in the seven that I missed). I hereby apologize ;-)

Avatar
#127 Hemmercules
February 23 2010, 12:36PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
David S wrote:

A) Yet you're not offended by the "failure stench" of the current edition Oilers?

B) Its a joke. Lighten up Francis.

A) nothing to do with the Oilers

B) 1 article is a joke, 3 is just Canada bashing.

I get whats going on here, it's just lost its funny in my opinion.

Avatar
#128 Crash
February 23 2010, 12:51PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
RossCreekNation wrote:

Whoa... chill, man. When I clicked on this page, the last comment was "#93 cableguy February 23 2010, 09:34AM". After reading through all the comments I had missed, I had a reaction to your discussion with Banger, but I decided to respond to the above comment first. When I did, a whole new set of comments popped up, and you're right, I didn't read yours because I jumped to the bottom to write mine (without checking to see if you had made additional comments in the seven that I missed). I hereby apologize ;-)

Consider me chilled...

Avatar
#129 Eric Johnson
February 23 2010, 12:54PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
Hemmercules wrote:

A) nothing to do with the Oilers

B) 1 article is a joke, 3 is just Canada bashing.

I get whats going on here, it's just lost its funny in my opinion.

Sensitive much? Is this an inferiority complex rearing it's head?

I laughed. Others laughed, you didn't. chill.

OMIGAWD!

Tip to all sensitive sally's that don't like TLP's blogs.

Don't read them, if you know you don't like it, DON'T CLICK ON IT!

FFS

Avatar
#130 cableguy - 2nd Tier Fan
February 23 2010, 01:03PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
bingofuel wrote:

We don't have the time to comb through comments all day long. That's why we purchased two robots for $20 ea. They sometimes don't work.

Max Powers, it's not cool to use that word, even if you manage to sneak it through the spam filter. You've been warned.

you should harness the power of the loser idiots that are here everyday anyways...

****rubs hands together at the thought of getting infinite interweb powers****

Avatar
#131 Hemmercules
February 23 2010, 01:06PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
Eric Johnson wrote:

Sensitive much? Is this an inferiority complex rearing it's head?

I laughed. Others laughed, you didn't. chill.

OMIGAWD!

Tip to all sensitive sally's that don't like TLP's blogs.

Don't read them, if you know you don't like it, DON'T CLICK ON IT!

FFS

Actually this was the first one I read of the three "America is the best everthing" articles. I had to look back at the others to see if they were this stupid. Don't worry, I never will or never have felt inferior to the USA. I know he's trying to be funny, I just found it odd to see all this on ON 3 times.

Avatar
#132 TonyT
February 23 2010, 01:16PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

TLP are you one of the majority of Americans who complained about G.W. Bush after voting him in to office...twice?

Avatar
#133 RossCreekNation
February 23 2010, 02:02PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

You know what I find ironic? If TLP had written a piece before the game basically saying 'may the better team win', what would we have done to him IF Canada had won? Bust his balls, maybe? Give him some real original 'George Bush smack'? Make numerous America is FAT references? Maybe some "take that America, its our game!" talk or "not only is our hockey team better, but so is our health care" yammer. Whatevs peeps. Out.

Avatar
#134 Canada bashing is so funny
February 23 2010, 02:04PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

To everyone that thinks Canada bashing is funny

I will not read any more blogs by TPL. Simple!

You are a retard yes retard if you find it funny the third time. Retard. Yesthe first time same but the second and now the third. Come on.I hope another oilers site starts up. This one has become [too awesome for my liking] - lovingly edited by bingofuel.

Avatar
#135 Harlie
February 23 2010, 02:13PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

what's with all these immature morons who can't laugh at themselves?

Avatar
#136 bingofuel
February 23 2010, 02:17PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

@Harlie

I'm not saying TLP is like Stephen Colbert, but that's the kind of tone with which I read these articles. IT'S WHY I LAUGH.

Avatar
#137 TonyT
February 23 2010, 02:23PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
RossCreekNation wrote:

You know what I find ironic? If TLP had written a piece before the game basically saying 'may the better team win', what would we have done to him IF Canada had won? Bust his balls, maybe? Give him some real original 'George Bush smack'? Make numerous America is FAT references? Maybe some "take that America, its our game!" talk or "not only is our hockey team better, but so is our health care" yammer. Whatevs peeps. Out.

I find it ironic that someone is complaining about others being too sensitive...

Avatar
#138 RossCreekNation
February 23 2010, 02:31PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
bingofuel wrote:

I'm not saying TLP is like Stephen Colbert, but that's the kind of tone with which I read these articles. IT'S WHY I LAUGH.

Exactly. I've used the Colbert reference myself. If you don't find Colbert or that type of humor funnt, then I guess I can understand that its not 'your' type of humor. I get that. Different strokes for different folks. But IF you find Colbert funny (or Jon Stewart or any type of satirical/sarcastic humor) and you take offence to *THIS*, then the 'sensitive' comments apply.

Avatar
#139 Max Powers - Team HME Evans
February 23 2010, 03:50PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
RossCreekNation wrote:

Exactly. I've used the Colbert reference myself. If you don't find Colbert or that type of humor funnt, then I guess I can understand that its not 'your' type of humor. I get that. Different strokes for different folks. But IF you find Colbert funny (or Jon Stewart or any type of satirical/sarcastic humor) and you take offence to *THIS*, then the 'sensitive' comments apply.

It's a lot easier for Colbert to be taken lightly when you can see his expressions and hear his tone. I'm not trying to stick up for the 'sensitive sallies' or anything, I'm just sayin'...

Avatar
#140 Crash
February 23 2010, 03:59PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

New gold medal count

US 7 Canada 6

closing in on the mighty yanks for actual winning of events

Could be interesting down the stretch

Avatar
#141 jess
February 23 2010, 04:47PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

I can't wait for the next one!

And the ensuing comment thread!

Avatar
#142 papaburgundy
February 23 2010, 04:53PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
Dyckster wrote:

I agree with Crash,

10X the population theoretically would mean they have 10X the people to select from for each individual sport. Thus giving them a way better opportunity to pick the best of the best. Where some smaller contries may have to settle on the best of the worst.

Related to the almighty game of hockey...Two communities are tasked with selecting a Bantam AAA boys team (seemingly the top 13 - 14 year old kids available). Team 1 is picked from Edmonton, training camp consists of 400 potential players trying out for 20 available spots. Team 2 is from Fort Sask. they have 50 players trying out for 20 available spots. Rationale would dictate that Edm will have a far superior team as they have a larger group to select from.

I would agree with you for the most part but there are always the exceptions. Yes, the more population to choose from should theoretically give you the better team but there are some locales that have put together better teams from a smaller population. My brother played for a small town Bantam AA team that drew from a few communities around the town for their players and they had to compete at the AAA level for provincials because of the combined population of the towns that made up the AA team but the population of the towns was nowhere near that of Sherwood Park or Fort Saskatchewan. Anyway, they beat the larger city teams but did lose to Ft. Sask in a close provincial final game. So population doesn't always dictate the result, but I will concede it does play a factor in the strength of the team.

Avatar
#143 Max Powers - Team HME Evans
February 23 2010, 06:24PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
Crash wrote:

New gold medal count

US 7 Canada 6

closing in on the mighty yanks for actual winning of events

Could be interesting down the stretch

Ha! take that TLP! We rule, U.S.A. sucks. You're inferior! it's official, Canada is way better than the U.S.

Avatar
#144 libbers
February 23 2010, 06:32PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

those "rockets with red glare" that the yanks sing about need to be shoved up TLP's backside

Avatar
#145 Zamboni Driver
February 23 2010, 07:47PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

This one just wasn't as funny, that's all. To the well once too often.

And I'm VERY glad we can brag about a skiing gold now vs. The "sport" of ice dance.

Avatar
#146 David S
February 24 2010, 12:25AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
Zamboni Driver wrote:

This one just wasn't as funny, that's all. To the well once too often.

And I'm VERY glad we can brag about a skiing gold now vs. The "sport" of ice dance.

X-Games sports are about a half step above ice dancing. The Olympic Committee only started to include them because they didn't want to lose the youth demographic. And now there's talk of Olympic Pole Dancing.

The end is near.

Avatar
#147 dano
February 24 2010, 08:58PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

ready or not....here we come assh#le!

Avatar
#148 vino
February 24 2010, 10:18PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

wow tlp...looks like canada has just as many gold medals as the all mighty doucher americano's. your boys looked pretty shaky against the swiss today, while our boys bent over the russians and absolutey shut down OV. not too shabby for playing back to back. and damn rights i'm proud of montgomery for laying his body on the line and rocketing down an ice track at a million miles...sorry kilometers per hour to win olympic gold. i bet more than half the people in the US couldnt point out vancouver on a map...so next time you beak the canadians for being proud...maybe remember that the most popular sport in your country is nascar. clap clap clap...

Avatar
#149 OilFan
February 25 2010, 07:41PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

Great game vs the States. Canada with the Gold. Hey TPL is it just me or do you also think the USA womens team is better then there men's team?

Oh yeah you guys beat us in a game that meant nothing, your crowned

Avatar
#150 Colin
February 26 2010, 09:58PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
1
props
Crash wrote:

New gold medal count

US 7 Canada 6

closing in on the mighty yanks for actual winning of events

Could be interesting down the stretch

New gold medal count:

Canada: 10 USA:8

2 head to head match ups this week-end for gold too (hockey and skating)--Canada with a legit shot for 13 to tie USSR for most golds at a winter games---13 (martin goes for curling gold too) and an outside shot at 14 (2 sleds in top 6 after 2 heats of 4 man bobsled).

Also canada will at least tie it's best medal performance of 2006 (24 medals) as 3 more are guaranteed. If there was less choking earlier in the games, there would have been a legit shot at 1st overall--I'm satisfied with that if not excited---2014 might be interesting....hope we keep funding our athletes.

Comments are closed for this article.