GDFD No. 67: Dare to dream

Ryan Lambert
March 11 2010 05:30PM



Welcome to the Game Day Fire Drill, for this, Calgary’s 67th game of the season on March 11, 2010.

It may be too much to hope for, but wouldn't it be nice if the Flames could win their fourth in a row? Don't see any reason why they wouldn't.

Since winning 11 in a row — wait what — Ottawa is just 4-4-1 against the Maple Leafs, Flames B.S. (Before Staios), Capitals, Red Wings, Islanders, Rangers, Hurricanes, Maple Leafs (again) and Oilers. Not exactly the toughest competition, but they did beat the Caps.

For one thing, Calgary's offense looks near-competent again, and what a pleasant change of pace that is. A whopping 14 goals in the last three games against teams that are currently second, 10th and 19th in goals allowed per game? Sign me up for that. Plus they're not even playing poorly defensively to make up for the strong offense (not that they're playing especially well but you see my point). Only allowing 28 shots a game against New Jersey, Minnesota and Detroit is solid enough that you're giving yourself an excellent chance to win.

It's almost like this team wants to sneak into the playoffs after all. Couldn't have said that a week ago. 

Who

The Calgary Flames (33-24-9 for 75 points. Eighth! in the West, third in the Northwest) and the Ottawa Senators (37-25-5 for 79 points. Fifth in the East, second in the Northeast).

When

7:30 p.m. Mountain time and 9:30 p.m. Eastern time. All other time zones should be hostile about their celibacy.

Where

Pengrowth Saddledome, Calgary, Alberta.

Calgary is 16-15-3 at home this year, and are 7-1-2 against Eastern Conference teams this year. The Sens are 14-16-1 on the road, but handed the Flames their only regulation loss to a team from the East on Feb. 9, 3-2.

What (to hate about the Senators)

They also don't have Steve Staios — If you had told me that trading for Steve Staios would have GUARANTEED an undefeated record, I would have demanded that Darryl Sutter trade for him years ago. See, this is the reason he might get fired at the end of the year: lack of foresight. The math is real simple: The Stavior + Calgary = Wins. Boom.

Alex Kovalev — I just find him to be bothersome, though that's just personally. I would bet that he's very unlikeable if you are, say, a teammate of his.

Mike Fisher — Remember all that talk about how he should be on Team Canada for the Olympics. You guys are lucky you didn't saddle yourselves with him. He's not very good at all.

Why

Because Staios says so! Enjoy the game and ride Steve Staios to victory in the comments section.

686dfac3780611cb7acad6ce5166c6c1
Yer ol' buddy Lambert is handsome and great and everyone loves him. Also you can visit his regular blog at The Two-Line Pass or follow him on Twitter. Lucky you!
Avatar
Reply #1 Jean Lefebvre March 11 2010, 08:25PM
+1 1 props

Another reminder why the crossbar standard is so stupid on high-stick goal plays. Scorers rarely have the common courtesy to stand right next to the crossbar when they're tipping in pucks.

Avatar
Reply #2 Kent Wilson March 11 2010, 10:00PM
+1 1 props

Senators players go down easier than a Bangkok whore.

Avatar
Reply #3 Pat Steinberg March 11 2010, 11:35PM
+1 1 props

I'm not saying it means it totally makes sense, it just kinda adds a little background. Because I still agree...if he's not going to play, isn't it worth more to be playing games in the AHL?

Avatar
Reply #4 Kent Wilson March 11 2010, 06:21PM
+1 0 props

Looks like Detroit is going to beat Minny, so the Flames will have to win to keep pace.

Avatar
Reply #5 Jean Lefebvre March 11 2010, 07:17PM
+1 0 props
Kent Wilson wrote:

Looks like Detroit is going to beat Minny, so the Flames will have to win to keep pace.

Their playoff hopes were already marginal but losing to both Calgary and Detroit in a five-day span pretty much puts pennies on the Wildmen's eyes.

Avatar
Reply #6 Kent Wilson March 11 2010, 07:20PM
+1 0 props
Jean Lefebvre wrote:

Their playoff hopes were already marginal but losing to both Calgary and Detroit in a five-day span pretty much puts pennies on the Wildmen's eyes.

Yup, they're done. The first few months where the entire struggled were far too costly.

Avatar
Reply #7 Jean Lefebvre March 11 2010, 07:24PM
+1 0 props

Life's certainties — death, taxes and the early game going into overtime when the Flames play the back half of a TV doubleheader.

Avatar
Reply #8 Kent Wilson March 11 2010, 07:29PM
+1 0 props
Jean Lefebvre wrote:

Life's certainties — death, taxes and the early game going into overtime when the Flames play the back half of a TV doubleheader.

I'd probably lose faith if I was the fan of a team that couldn't take the Oilers in regulation.

Avatar
Reply #9 Kent Wilson March 11 2010, 07:34PM
+1 0 props

I think the fact that the Oilers have Jason Strudwick killing penalties in overtime is a perfect summation of their current situation.

Avatar
Reply #10 Kent Wilson March 11 2010, 07:41PM
+1 0 props

Well...this is ridiculous.

Avatar
Reply #11 Kent Wilson March 11 2010, 07:47PM
+1 0 props

I can't fathom why the Flames have Backlund up only to scratch him every game. Doesn't make a lick of sense.

Avatar
Reply #12 Jean Lefebvre March 11 2010, 07:53PM
+1 0 props

Must have heard wrong — game is delayed while the Saddledome crew cuts Tanner Glass?

Avatar
Reply #13 Kent Wilson March 11 2010, 07:55PM
+1 0 props

That's something the Canucks should have done.

Avatar
Reply #14 Jean Lefebvre March 11 2010, 07:58PM
+1 0 props

Along with Tanner Glass, old North Star Steve Payne also deserves a spot on the all-faulty-rink-delay team.

Avatar
Reply #15 Kent Wilson March 11 2010, 08:00PM
+1 0 props

You win. I can't think of a response to that one.

Avatar
Reply #16 Jean Lefebvre March 11 2010, 08:02PM
+1 0 props
Kent Wilson wrote:

You win. I can't think of a response to that one.

Surely somewhere in the Belorussian league there's some defenceman called Sergei Plexiglasskin.

Avatar
Reply #17 Kent Wilson March 11 2010, 08:03PM
+1 0 props

I can only think of Alexander Bumagin, but that's a different pun string I'd imagine.

Avatar
Reply #18 Jean Lefebvre March 11 2010, 08:09PM
+1 0 props
Kent Wilson wrote:

I can only think of Alexander Bumagin, but that's a different pun string I'd imagine.

Boy am I glad the game is starting.

Avatar
Reply #19 Kent Wilson March 11 2010, 08:09PM
+1 0 props

Terrible pinch by Regehr to start the game.

Avatar
Reply #20 Kent Wilson March 11 2010, 08:10PM
+1 0 props

Wow. The Flames look terrible.

Avatar
Reply #21 Kent Wilson March 11 2010, 08:16PM
+1 0 props

Well, nice to get a lead when you're playing this poorly.

Avatar
Reply #22 Jean Lefebvre March 11 2010, 08:17PM
+1 0 props

Two points in the wake of recent blogs by FlamesNation staffers ...

1) Mayers scores a goal

2) Carl Gunnarsson was plus-1 tonight

Avatar
Reply #23 Kent Wilson March 11 2010, 08:20PM
+1 0 props
Jean Lefebvre wrote:

Two points in the wake of recent blogs by FlamesNation staffers ...

1) Mayers scores a goal

2) Carl Gunnarsson was plus-1 tonight

haha. Take that critics!

Avatar
Reply #24 Kent Wilson March 11 2010, 08:24PM
+1 0 props

Flames have gotten very lucky to start this game. Hopefully they can take advantage.

Avatar
Reply #25 Kent Wilson March 11 2010, 08:27PM
+1 0 props

The Iginla line has had a thoroughly underwhelming period.

Avatar
Reply #26 Kent Wilson March 11 2010, 08:37PM
+1 0 props

Well, I waited a long time for this period to start, but I'd be just as glad to see it end. Neither club looks like it wants to be there so far.

Avatar
Reply #27 Kent Wilson March 11 2010, 08:49PM
+1 0 props

well, hopefully the boys got that out of their system. It's incredible they escaped that one with a lead.

Avatar
Reply #28 Kent Wilson March 11 2010, 09:04PM
+1 0 props

Ugh. Flames have to wake up at some point if they want to keep the lead. The start to the 2nd is just as uninspired.

Avatar
Reply #29 Jean Lefebvre March 11 2010, 09:09PM
+1 0 props

Weird game. These inter-conference meetings sometimes have that indescribable blah factor to them.

Avatar
Reply #30 Kent Wilson March 11 2010, 09:13PM
+1 0 props

Nystrom to the dressing room after the block?

Avatar
Reply #31 Kent Wilson March 11 2010, 09:20PM
+1 0 props

It's amazing the team that outplayed the Detroit Red Wings so drastically in their own building the other night can come out and look like this.

Avatar
Reply #32 RossCreekNation March 11 2010, 09:33PM
+1 0 props

Caught bits and pieces of the game thus far as we went out for my Dad's birthday. Luckily when we stopped at my sisters for cake, I got my paws on the remote.

I don't even recall much of the 1st period, and thanks to some of Kent's tweets I see that perhaps I'm not the only one...

One shot on net through the first hlaf of the period. For both teams. And there's been 2 PP's.

This game is as sloppy and passionless as a pre-season tilt.

Haha. I see why I 'missed' the 1st.

Avatar
Reply #33 RossCreekNation March 11 2010, 09:34PM
+1 0 props
Kent Wilson wrote:

Nystrom to the dressing room after the block?

Is Nystrom done or did he return?

Avatar
Reply #34 Kent Wilson March 11 2010, 09:38PM
+1 0 props

Well, at least the PK's been good...right?

Chances were 6-5 for OTT in that period.

Avatar
Reply #35 Jean Lefebvre March 11 2010, 09:40PM
+1 0 props

Can't wait for a seven-game Stanley Cup final between these clubs.

Avatar
Reply #36 RossCreekNation March 11 2010, 09:58PM
+1 0 props

I really haven't noticed Kotalik as much as I thought I would since joining the Flames. I figured I'd notice him in a bad way. I haven't really noticed much of him in either a good or bad way.

Avatar
Reply #37 Kent Wilson March 11 2010, 09:58PM
+1 0 props

Shudder.

Avatar
Reply #38 RossCreekNation March 11 2010, 10:04PM
+1 0 props

I've always liked the Ruutu's (sans Christian), but if I had to play against Jarkko, niether of us would finish the game. If he was an Oiler, I just may commit a murder...

Avatar
Reply #39 Kent Wilson March 11 2010, 10:06PM
+1 0 props

Steve Staios on the PP...really?

Avatar
Reply #40 RossCreekNation March 11 2010, 10:08PM
+1 0 props

Peter Regin... or Pat Riggin? That was terrible!

Avatar
Reply #41 Kent Wilson March 11 2010, 10:09PM
+1 0 props

Scoring chances are 6-0 for the Sens this period. Flames in full-on "hang on for dear life" mode.

Avatar
Reply #42 Pat Steinberg March 11 2010, 10:09PM
+1 0 props
Kent Wilson wrote:

I can't fathom why the Flames have Backlund up only to scratch him every game. Doesn't make a lick of sense.

I had it explained to me today, it makes a litle more sense. Once the deadline passes, you get just 4 recalls. Once you use those up, you can only make emergency recalls, which are apparently tough to get. So, the Flames don't want to send him down, call him in a week and waste a recall.

So, I guess sort of makes sense.

Avatar
Reply #43 RossCreekNation March 11 2010, 10:12PM
+1 0 props

Looks like Higgins cracked the seal with the empty netter the other night, lol.

Avatar
Reply #44 Kent Wilson March 11 2010, 10:13PM
+1 0 props

haha, wow. The Flames first and only scoring chance in the period finds the back of the net.

Avatar
Reply #45 RossCreekNation March 11 2010, 10:14PM
+1 0 props
Pat Steinberg wrote:

I had it explained to me today, it makes a litle more sense. Once the deadline passes, you get just 4 recalls. Once you use those up, you can only make emergency recalls, which are apparently tough to get. So, the Flames don't want to send him down, call him in a week and waste a recall.

So, I guess sort of makes sense.

Well... that is a sensible reason. BUT, you know what looks even less sensible now, after hearing that? Ready Kent? On 3. 1... 2... 3... the Dustin Boyd trade!

Avatar
Reply #46 Kent Wilson March 11 2010, 10:15PM
+1 0 props
Pat Steinberg wrote:

I had it explained to me today, it makes a litle more sense. Once the deadline passes, you get just 4 recalls. Once you use those up, you can only make emergency recalls, which are apparently tough to get. So, the Flames don't want to send him down, call him in a week and waste a recall.

So, I guess sort of makes sense.

I...guess? Still think it would be better for him to be playing in Abbotsford rather than watching in Calgary.

Avatar
Reply #47 RossCreekNation March 11 2010, 10:19PM
+1 0 props

@Pat Steinberg

If they wanted to keep the extra body around, yet don't want to play Backlund regularly, then the most sensible thing to do would've been to let Backlund keep playing/developing in the 'A' and let Boyd stick around as an extra body, no?

Avatar
Reply #48 Kent Wilson March 11 2010, 10:31PM
+1 0 props

Looks like we're going to escape with this one.

Avatar
Reply #49 Kent Wilson March 11 2010, 10:34PM
+1 0 props
RossCreekNation wrote:

If they wanted to keep the extra body around, yet don't want to play Backlund regularly, then the most sensible thing to do would've been to let Backlund keep playing/developing in the 'A' and let Boyd stick around as an extra body, no?

Beyond the Boyd trade, I don't understand why the Flames consider 4 recalls precious with 19 games remaining in the season when they have 2 extra NHL forwards on the sidelines already.

Avatar
Reply #50 Kent Wilson March 11 2010, 10:36PM
+1 0 props

Chances ended up 8-4 in favor of OTT in that period.

Comments are closed for this article.