Middle Kingdom

Robert Cleave
July 13 2010 10:31AM

                                           

Dominic Moore

There's been plenty of fuss about the Flames' dabbling in the free agent market, with the return of Olli Jokinen front and center. Darryl Sutter's recent press availability was the first time that news of Daymond Langkow's slowish recovery from his neck injury got an airing, and said injury was a reason that the boss used as partial justification for resigning the Finn.  

That may or may not be why Olli Jokinen will resume his career in Cowtown, but even with that, the Flames are in an uncertain spot if Langkow can't go to start the year. The automatic assumption, and it may well be correct, is that Mikael Backlund will simply fill in until Langkow can rejoin the club. That noted, and this is tea-leaf reading stuff on my part, the feeling I got from the Sutter presser was that the club might like Backlund to mature a bit more before they give him a permanent job.

Even if the Flames use their top prospect as a fill-in, the club likely needs a bit more quality than Ryan Stone in the 4C spot, particularly if Langkow is questionable for an extended period. Most teams serve up extra ice time to their 4th center as a PK guy and an extra face-off option in the defensive zone even when everyone is healthy, so that position shouldn't be handed over to a marginal player. The Hawks used John Madden in the sort of manner I'm referring to during the season and the play-offs if you're looking for a specific example. 

More to the point, anyone paying attention to the Flames should note that the team hasn't exactly been injury-free the last two seasons. Even if Langkow started the year healthy, that doesn't mean he or any of the other top-nine forwards are going to stay that way for six months. In 08/09, one of the things I noticed before the Jokinen acquisition was the fact that the club always appeared to have a rolling injury in the top nine. Having a cheap, useful 4C like Dustin Boyd to slot in allowed the club to ice an acceptable three lines all the way through the first 60 games of that season in spite of the nicks. There are only so many guys that you can pay, but I have no problem offering up Glencross money to a 10th forward given the possibility of injury. Having ten guys for your top nine is prudent planning if the dollars work, and there are going to be a few useful NHL vets that are going to get squeezed in the current market. Cheap depth is out there, in other words.

So, who? There are three players that come to mind from outside the Flames organization, and one old hand from within. I picked the three FAs based on potential availability and likely cost (1.5 million or less).

Brendan Morrison

The former Canuck has been a rumored player of interest for the Flames this summer, but there are a lot of red flags based on his 09/10 season. He certainly had pretty boxcars, with 42 points on the year, but they were almost exclusively the result of soft competition, easy ZoneStarts (54 percent) and an unsustainable PDO (105.1). His possession numbers were fairly meh for a player given those sorts of advantages. The Caps as a club are likely to have their numbers drop a bit, and Morrison's own career was headed straight down before jumping on the Caps' train of good fortune and talent. Pass, IMO.

Jeff Halpern

The well-traveled 34 year old has seen injuries and age catch him as well, but in fairness to Halpern, he played some pretty tough comp last year, particularly in Tampa before his move to L.A. He also faced some lousy starting positions, with a 43.1 ZoneStart. As well, his PDO was 96.8, which does suggest that he might be in line for a bounce-back. That said, he made 2 million last year, and even if he's willing to take a major haircut, he's hardly likely to be better than a guy that the Flames already know and have in their pocket.

Dominic Moore

Moore is likely too good for the role that Calgary would use him for. He's actually a decent 3rd C, capable of 30-35 point seasons against third liners, which isn't terrible. His ZoneStarts last year were punitive at 42.1%, and his Corsi against middling comp wasn't bad under the circumstances. His primary advantage, in my eyes, would be that he's still young enough that his production isn't as likely to hit an age related mine shaft. If Langkow is out for an extended period, Moore would be a handy guy to have around, and if he'd come to Calgary knowing that he could finish the year as the 4th C, he's good enough on the dot and on the PK that he would fill the needs of a healthy team very nicely. He only made 1.1 million last year, and as I noted earlier, there are some guys that will get squeezed. If the Flames could get him for roughly that number on a one year deal, they should do so. 

Craig Conroy

When it's all done, nothing would surprise me less than Conroy coming back for one last kick. He can still play in a bottom-six role, especially if it's as a cheap plug-in for 30-40 games. His underlying numbers weren't that bad last year, and his poor PDO was pretty much exclusively because he and David Moss couldn't hit a cow in the ass with a handful of wheat last year. In a 4th line role, Conroy losing his scoring touch isn't quite so important, and he has good enough wheels to be a useful PKer. If Langkow's injury is sufficiently healed that we'll see number 22 at full strength by sometime in October, Conroy will likely be a very cheap option, and the Flames certainly need cheap.

Summing up, if the Flames need a guy to play in the top nine for most of the year, they might take a look at Dominic Moore. If Langkow's injury doesn't look to be holding him back this fall, adding Craig Conroy to play a limited role wouldn't be the worst plan that the club could pursue. 

1a1030a8151ca7a0d81aea58f0fb1dbc
Robert Cleave is a perpetually grumpy Winnipegger.
Avatar
#1 Kent Wilson
July 13 2010, 10:42AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

How about Robert Lang? He's not young or swift of foot, but can still play the game to a respectable level. He can also still do some damage on the PP.

Not much of a PKer though.

Avatar
#2 Graham
July 13 2010, 10:54AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

Kotalik believes that he will be a Flame next year. If this is true, Glencross could well be our 10th forward. If Sutter had plans for dumping Kotalik, I think he would have signed Higgins at the $1.6 million mark that he received elsewhere.

If Langkow remains out, you have to think that Sutter will go with the player he knows; Conroy. As you mentioned, Conroy would also be the cheapest cap hit.

Avatar
#3 jess
July 13 2010, 10:58AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

I might get chastised for this, but why wasn't Jamal Mayers re-signed?

To my eyes he was a decent fourth liner, played better hockey than Ivanans and had one of the best face off percentages on the Leaf's team last season if I recall correctly. If I'm not mistaken he's an acceptable center and dropped the gloves when needs be, was a good PK'er, even if he took a large number of penalties himself, and brings a good amount of energy to the ice. I also saw him as a positive in the locker room, which isn't really a negative either. Plus he was able to score occasionally as well.

Avatar
#4 Kent Wilson
July 13 2010, 11:02AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
jess wrote:

I might get chastised for this, but why wasn't Jamal Mayers re-signed?

To my eyes he was a decent fourth liner, played better hockey than Ivanans and had one of the best face off percentages on the Leaf's team last season if I recall correctly. If I'm not mistaken he's an acceptable center and dropped the gloves when needs be, was a good PK'er, even if he took a large number of penalties himself, and brings a good amount of energy to the ice. I also saw him as a positive in the locker room, which isn't really a negative either. Plus he was able to score occasionally as well.

Sutter claimed at some point that they offered Mayers a contract but were rejected.

Mayers was a decent face-off guy, but he got killed in terms of scoring chances and possession. Both in CGY and TOR. Now, if he were to be signed instead of Ivanans or Jackman, that would make some sense. However, to have all three on the same line would make for one awful, awful trio.

Avatar
#5 jess
July 13 2010, 11:06AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

I suppose that makes sense. I just see a guy like Mayers playing better than a guy like Ivanans.

Avatar
#7 Luc
July 13 2010, 11:36AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

i only see ivanans playing 13th player role. i see him playing less then mcgratten last year.

who is everyone considering our top 9 now??? iggy, tangs, olli, bourque, hagman, stajan, backlund, moss, kotalik?? (langkow if hes back)

Avatar
#8 Casey
July 13 2010, 11:41AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

"couldn't hit a cow in the ass with a handful of wheat"

LMAO

Avatar
#9 dotfras
July 13 2010, 11:52AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

Ok, a few names that stick out on the FA list.

I think before Darryl thinks about signing anyone he's gotta make sure he can dump Staois & Kotalik.

Frolov is still available. He's a pretty good player but knowing our GM there's no chance of signing him.

How about Peter Mueller at C? Pretty sure he's an UFA, any word if Colorado has resigned him?

Jason Williams, a guy who you could sign for CHEAP who has put up some decent numbers in the past. Suffered a bad injury in '09 though.

Potulny? We just signed Stone why not pick him up to? was a managed .5 pts per game with little ice time on a horrible EDM team last year.

And how about Bobby Ryan? Anaheim has very little on the blueline, Sarich, & 2 prospects for him? There's rumors going around that Toronto is in on Ryan, hope they aren't true.

Avatar
#10 Kent Wilson
July 13 2010, 12:09PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

Ryan and Mueller are RFA's. Can't see either of their teams letting go of them. Especially not for a package involving the likes of Sarich.

Potulny was decent for EDM last year, although we already have someone similar in Stone. Williams appears broken to me.

Avatar
#11 SmellOfVictory
July 13 2010, 12:19PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
Kent Wilson wrote:

Ryan and Mueller are RFA's. Can't see either of their teams letting go of them. Especially not for a package involving the likes of Sarich.

Potulny was decent for EDM last year, although we already have someone similar in Stone. Williams appears broken to me.

Agreed. Ryan or Mueller's rights would probably require Gio or White.

Avatar
#12 dotfras
July 13 2010, 12:39PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

White & Prospect for Ryan? I think our defense without White is good enough. Only problem is that it wouldn't free up any cap space.

Avatar
#13 Kent Wilson
July 13 2010, 12:52PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
dotfras wrote:

White & Prospect for Ryan? I think our defense without White is good enough. Only problem is that it wouldn't free up any cap space.

Yeah...in fact, it would add to the issues since Ryan is reportedly looking for something in $5M/year realm. I like him a lot as a player, but I can't see the Flames being able to do that contract.

Avatar
#14 Greg
July 13 2010, 12:59PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

I highly doubt Ryan is going anywhere, at least not for anything on our team (barring a package including Backlund).

I just noticed how questionable Buffalo's blue-line is and got thinking a trade between us (too much blue-line depth, not enough offense) and them (lots of offensive depth, not enough d-men) should be a fit.

What about a Sarich-for-Hecht deal? The contracts are about equal, they could use a big shut-down guy, and we could use the re-allocation of dollars from the back-end to the front. I'm not a big Hecht fan, and it doesn't really address the Langkow fill in problem, but Tanguay + Hecht + a full season of Hagman and Stajan SHOULD be enough to get our goals-for back to a respectable level, no?

Avatar
#15 Kent Wilson
July 13 2010, 01:13PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

Actually, Greg, Hecht is hecht of a suggestion (sorry, couldn't resist).

Seriously, a very capable player. Center, plays decent level of comp, good possession stats and actually has some offensive upside. He would be a decent enough Langkow replacement should Daymond be out for awhile. He could also move into the top 6 in case of injury.

Avatar
#16 dotfras
July 13 2010, 01:30PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

That would be a nice move for the Flames.

I could see Sarich going to NYI, he would fit in to their top 4, would probably be more effective in the East, and the Isles have a bunch of guys they could part with. Rob Schremp anyone? He's an RFA and the Islanders have strength in the C position. With guys like Bailey, Tavares, Weight, Park, and Nielsen all ahead of him on the depth chart I think they could afford to part with him.

Avatar
#17 Kent Wilson
July 13 2010, 02:38PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

No one in NYI interests me outside of Trent Hunter or Frans Nielsen.

As for Schremp, he remains what he always was - a moderate PP option and a terrible ES one.

Avatar
#18 Greg
July 13 2010, 02:57PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
Kent Wilson wrote:

Actually, Greg, Hecht is hecht of a suggestion (sorry, couldn't resist).

Seriously, a very capable player. Center, plays decent level of comp, good possession stats and actually has some offensive upside. He would be a decent enough Langkow replacement should Daymond be out for awhile. He could also move into the top 6 in case of injury.

In that case, anyone have a way to get this trade into Sutter's hands? Or Feaster's? :)

Avatar
#19 Luc
July 13 2010, 03:05PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

i know its not an option but the game when jersey was here playing i thought danius zubrus was a beast out there. just a random thought that has nothing to do with anything

Avatar
#20 Canucks Suck
July 13 2010, 03:11PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

I hope connie is on the team next year, if he is I could totally see him putting up better numbers too.

Avatar
#21 jess
July 14 2010, 11:52AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

Nielsson is the only player on the NYI I would even consider, hell I'd go 1-for-1 with him and Sarich. Looks like not very many GM's want to give up anything until Kovalchuk signs.

Comments are closed for this article.