Flames Scoring Chances - Game 43 versus Carolina

Kent Wilson
January 11 2011 08:04PM

Scoring Chances for NHL Game Number 20636

Team Period Time Note CGY Opponent  
CGY 1 18:25   5 6 10 18 20 34 7 15 30 44 53 59 5v5
CAR 1 16:05   4 12 13 28 34 40 4 11 12 25 26 30 5v5
CGY 1 15:48 Bouw goal 4 7 12 13 34 40 4 11 12 25 26 30 5v5
CGY 1 14:19   4 11 15 26 28 34 4 14 22 25 30 39 5v5
CGY 1 12:54   4 7 8 12 34 40 7 16 25 30 36 39 5v5
CAR 1 12:34   4 7 12 13 34 40 6 11 12 26 30 77 5v5
CAR 1 11:22   5 6 20 34 40   7 14 25 26 30 36 4v5
CGY 1 11:05   4 20 28 34     12 14 15 30 36 53 3v5
CAR 1 10:25   4 7 8 28 34   12 14 15 30 36 53 4v5
CAR 1 8:52   7 12 13 33 34 40 6 22 30 39 59 77 5v5
CGY 1 8:32   7 11 15 26 33 34 6 11 12 26 30 77 5v5
CAR 1 8:15 Ruutu goal 4 5 10 18 26 34 7 15 30 44 53 59 5v5
CGY 1 6:56   4 12 13 28 34 40 4 11 12 25 26 30 5v5
CGY 1 6:55 Iginla goal 4 12 13 28 34 40 4 11 12 25 26 30 5v5
CAR 1 3:32 Jokinen goal 7 12 13 33 34 40 4 16 25 30 36 39 5v5
CGY 1 2:13   7 11 15 26 33 34 7 14 20 22 30 44 5v5
CGY 1 0:16   5 6 10 18 20 34 4 15 25 30 36 39 5v5
CGY 2 19:18   5 6 20 25 34   4 12 15 30 53 77 4v5
CAR 2 17:45 Cole goal 4 8 12 13 28 34 7 14 25 26 30 36 5v5
CAR 2 16:31   5 6 10 18 26 34 4 14 20 22 25 30 5v5
CAR 2 13:50   5 6 12 13 35 40 6 16 30 36 39 77 5v5
CAR 2 13:11   4 10 18 20 28 35 7 11 12 26 30 44 5v5
CGY 2 11:13   5 12 13 26 35 40 6 16 30 59 77   5v4
CGY 2 8:46   4 5 10 18 20 35 4 16 25 26 30 36 5v5
CAR 2 8:26   5 6 12 13 20 35 4 6 11 12 26 30 5v5
CAR 2 5:11 Jokinen goal 5 6 11 15 26 35 6 16 30 36 39 77 5v5
CGY 2 3:13 Hagman goal 5 6 10 18 20 35 4 15 30 44 53 59 5v5
CGY 3 18:28 Glencross goal 7 10 18 20 33 35 4 15 25 30 53 59 5v5
CGY 3 17:54   6 7 12 18 20 35 7 15 25 30 53 59 5v5
CGY 3 17:06   5 6 12 13 35 40 7 16 25 30 36 39 5v5
CAR 3 15:09   5 6 10 20 26 35 7 15 25 30 53 59 5v5
CGY 3 13:18   7 10 13 28 35   4 12 25 26 30   4v4
CGY 3 12:21 Bourque goal 4 8 15 17 28 35 7 11 12 26 30 44 5v5
CAR 3 11:33   5 6 10 18 20 35 6 15 30 53 59 77 5v5
CGY 3 10:01   4 10 17 18 33 35 12 25 26 30 44   5v4
CGY 3 8:20   4 12 13 28 35 40 6 11 15 26 30 77 5v5
CGY 3 5:38   5 6 10 13 26 35 7 15 30 44 53 59 5v5
CAR 3 0:58   4 12 13 28 35 40 6 12 14 26 30 77 5v5
CAR 4 1:34   5 6 20 35     12 15 30 36 53   3v4
CAR 4 1:25   4 20 28 35     4 12 26 30 77   3v4
CAR 4 0:15   4 5 17 20 35   12 25 30 36 77   4v4

 

# Player EV PP SH
4 J. BOUWMEESTER 23:56 8 7 1:31 1 0 4:02 0 2
5 M. GIORDANO 24:28 6 8 2:19 1 0 4:02 1 2
6 C. SARICH 23:00 6 6 0:00 0 0 3:38 1 2
7 A. PARDY 7:54 7 3 0:00 0 0 0:14 0 1
8 B. MORRISON 11:59 2 1 0:00 0 0 2:29 0 1
10 N. HAGMAN 15:02 7 5 1:23 1 0 0:00 0 0
11 M. BACKLUND 4:56 3 1 0:00 0 0 0:00 0 0
12 J. IGINLA 19:06 7 8 2:27 1 0 0:21 0 0
13 O. JOKINEN 19:01 7 8 2:27 1 0 0:13 0 0
15 T. JACKMAN 6:01 4 1 0:00 0 0 0:46 0 0
17 R. BOURQUE 13:05 1 1 1:41 1 0 3:09 0 0
18 M. STAJAN 11:25 6 4 0:16 1 0 0:00 0 0
20 C. GLENCROSS 14:28 6 5 0:00 0 0 3:05 1 3
25 D. MOSS 10:23 0 0 1:07 0 0 3:11 1 0
26 A. KOTALIK 7:10 4 4 2:04 1 0 0:00 0 0
28 R. REGEHR 20:32 6 4 0:01 0 0 3:44 0 2
33 A. BABCHUK 5:17 3 2 1:45 1 0 0:52 0 0
34 M. KIPRUSOFF 18:38 9 7 0:00 0 0 6:09 1 2
35 H. KARLSSON 33:33 9 8 3:50 2 0 2:00 0 2
40 A. TANGUAY 18:12 6 6 2:09 1 0 0:50 0 1

 

Period Totals EV PP 5v3 PP SH 5v3 SH
1 10 7 9 5 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0
2 4 6 2 6 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
3 8 3 7 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0
Totals 22 19 18 15 2 0 0 0 1 4 1 0

Head to head ice

Corsi

Face-offs

Flames were the better team and ended up losing in a shoot-out anyways for the second straight game. Kipper has cost the team some points over the last little while, although he was also victimized by some uncanny puck luck/bounces on the part of the Hurricanes tonight, Still, he needs to be better (assuming you want the Flames to win, that is).

Some surprising individual numbers tonight. The Iginla line had some really nice sequences this evening and probably could have had a couple more goals if Jokinen could put a puck in the ocean, but still ended up under water by the chance count. That's despite seeing the best zone start circumstances on the team as well.

Glencross and Hagman also had pretty good games with Stajan along for the ride. Moss, Bourque and Morrison were mostly deployed in a defensive role. Mikael Backlund looked alright to me through his first few shifts, but Sutter sat him down indefinitely once things got complicated. He played just 4 minutes, but still managed a positive differential. Honestly, the kid should be on the farm if he's going to play 5 minutes a night.

39d8109299a9795cb3b41a4e9b49d501
Former Nations Overlord. Current Fn contributor and curmudgeon For questions, complaints, criticisms, etc contact Kent @ kent.wilson@gmail. Follow him on Twitter here.
Avatar
#1 Robert Cleave
January 11 2011, 08:19PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

With the limited action that the bottom D pair got tonight, I wouldn't be surprised if we saw the return of the Steady One this week. I'm not advocating it, obviously, but the Flame D had a pretty poor outing.

Kipper? I don't know what's happening there, but whatever it is, it's not good. If he was playing at last year's level, the team would likely be a lot closer to the playoffs. If he stays on this level, the team might tank, as per the wishes of a few folks, but he'd be pretty much untradeable with three more years on his deal. As I said, not good.

Avatar
#3 Robert Cleave
January 11 2011, 08:43PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

@Kent Wilson

Agreed re: Backlund, and there's no significant reason for Morrison to be playing 2-3 times as much at EV, at least not based on what's been happening on the ice as of late.

Avatar
#5 negrilcowboy
January 11 2011, 09:20PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props
Kent Wilson wrote:

Hell, or Stajan for that matter.

Gotta give the kid some minute, ahead of stajan, and who is this hell guy.

Avatar
#6 wattree
January 12 2011, 08:58AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

The only reason to put Morrison and Stajan out in favorable situations for the amount of ice time they're getting is to showcase them to other teams. At least that's what I'm hoping. Give them a couple weeks to pad their stats. Either they're playing so well that we're legitimately in the playoff hunt, or they look like a piece that can help a contender.

Comments are closed for this article.