Flames Scoring Chances - Game 42 versus Detroit

Kent Wilson
January 07 2011 10:02PM

Scoring Chances for NHL Game Number 20609

Team Period Time Note CGY Opponent  
DET 1 19:44   4 8 17 25 28 34 5 23 35 40 44 96 5v5
CGY 1 16:47   4 8 17 25 28 34 17 26 28 35 52 93 5v5
CGY 1 12:21   5 6 12 13 34 40 5 17 23 26 35 93 5v5
CGY 1 11:17 Glencross goal 10 18 20 28 33 34 20 21 24 35 43 55 5v5
CGY 1 9:07   5 6 8 10 17 34 17 26 28 35 52 93 5v5
DET 1 5:25   5 6 16 17 34   17 26 28 35 55 96 4v5
DET 1 4:10   5 6 12 13 34 40 5 33 35 43 52 93 5v5
CGY 1 1:04   6 8 15 16 28 34 5 28 35 44 93 96 5v5
CGY 1 0:13   4 5 12 18 20 34 17 24 26 35 43 52 5v5
CGY 1 0:10 Iginla goal 4 5 12 18 20 34 17 24 26 35 43 52 5v5
CGY 2 18:52 Glencross goal 7 10 18 20 33 34 5 23 33 35 39 43 5v5
CGY 2 18:18   5 6 11 15 16 34 8 20 21 24 35 55 5v5
CGY 2 16:02   5 6 8 10 17 34 5 21 23 35 40 44 5v5
CGY 2 14:09   5 6 12 13 34 40 5 17 23 26 35 93 5v5
DET 2 13:20   5 6 12 13 34 40 24 35 40 44 55 96 5v5
DET 2 11:35   4 12 13 16 28 34 5 17 23 26 35 93 5v5
CGY 2 9:58   5 8 17 25 33 34 20 24 35 43 55   5v4
CGY 2 8:08   6 7 10 18 20 34 21 28 33 35 43 52 5v5
CGY 2 6:30   4 7 8 17 25 34 8 24 33 35 52   5v4
DET 2 4:10   4 5 11 15 34 40 17 24 26 35 55 93 5v5
DET 2 2:24   4 17 25 28 34   5 28 35 40 93 96 4v5
DET 2 2:20   4 17 25 28 34   5 28 35 40 93 96 4v5
DET 2 3:09   4 8 20 28 34   5 28 35 40 93 96 4v5
CGY 2 0:53   5 16 17 33 34   5 17 26 28 35 44 4v5
DET 3 15:24   4 20 25 28 34   5 28 35 40 93 96 4v5
CGY 3 13:24   4 12 13 33 34 40 17 24 35 43 55   5v4
CGY 3 12:26   4 12 13 33 34 40 5 8 20 35 52   5v4
CGY 3 12:23   4 12 13 33 34 40 5 8 20 35 52   5v4
CGY 3 9:55   6 7 12 13 16 34 8 17 21 23 35 55 5v5
DET 3 8:00   4 20 28 34     5 17 26 28 35 44 3v5
DET 3 6:45   4 20 25 28 34   35 40 52 55 93 96 4v5
CGY 3 4:47   4 5 12 13 16 34 5 8 35 40 55 96 5v5
CGY 3 0:31   4 8 10 12 28 34 5 24 35 40 93 96 5v5
CGY 3 0:24   4 8 10 12 28 34 5 24 35 40 93 96 5v5
CGY 4 3:45   4 10 13 28 34   24 35 40 55 93   4v4
CGY 4 3:05   5 6 8 17 34   5 8 17 35 52   4v4
DET 4 2:14   4 18 20 28 34   28 35 43 44 55   4v4
CGY 4 0:58   5 12 13 34 40   24 35 40 55     4v3
CGY 4 0:34   5 12 13 34 40   5 24 35 40     4v3

 

# Player EV PP SH
4 J. BOUWMEESTER 18:32 7 4 2:53 4 0 5:57 0 5
5 M. GIORDANO 18:47 9 3 5:10 3 0 3:15 1 1
6 C. SARICH 19:31 9 2 0:00 0 0 2:47 0 1
7 A. PARDY 8:32 3 0 1:26 1 0 0:00 0 0
8 B. MORRISON 11:43 7 1 2:23 2 0 3:33 0 1
10 N. HAGMAN 10:38 8 0 0:46 0 0 0:14 0 0
11 M. BACKLUND 7:37 1 1 0:35 0 0 0:00 0 0
12 J. IGINLA 16:56 8 3 6:25 5 0 0:00 0 0
13 O. JOKINEN 15:14 5 3 5:37 5 0 0:00 0 0
15 T. JACKMAN 7:19 2 1 0:00 0 0 0:00 0 0
16 T. KOSTOPOULOS 11:55 4 1 0:00 0 0 3:33 1 1
17 R. BOURQUE 9:55 4 1 4:18 2 0 3:15 1 3
18 M. STAJAN 11:01 5 1 0:00 0 0 0:00 0 0
20 C. GLENCROSS 10:06 5 1 0:00 0 0 4:33 0 3
25 D. MOSS 8:13 1 1 3:02 2 0 3:17 0 4
28 R. REGEHR 18:18 6 3 0:00 0 0 6:10 0 5
33 A. BABCHUK 6:52 2 0 6:16 4 0 0:41 1 0
34 M. KIPRUSOFF 44:34 18 6 9:20 7 0 9:25 1 6
40 A. TANGUAY 11:53 2 3 6:19 5 0 0:25 0 0

 

Period Totals EV PP 5v3 PP SH 5v3 SH
1 7 3 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
2 8 6 5 3 2 0 0 0 1 3 0 0
3 7 3 4 0 3 0 0 0 0 2 0 1
4 4 1 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Totals 26 13 18 6 7 0 0 0 1 6 0 1

Head to head ice

Corsi

Face-offs

Perhaps Calgary's best performance of the year (considering the quality of opponent) ends in a loss thanks to some bad bounces and horrid goaltending. Calgary held the Red Wings to just six (!!) chances at ES, more than tripling that total themselves. You'll also notice that none of the Wings goals register in this count. That's because not a single one of them came inside the scoring area. I can't remember that ever happening before. Add in the fact they won the game in the skills competition, and you have perhaps their luckiest victory of the season.

Most of the Flames had a good game (aside from Kipper), but it was really a re-awakeing for Curtis Glencross. He drove things at ES and was excellent on the PK to boot. I don't know where he's been for the last five weeks, but it was nice to see him show up for a change. Iginla also had a nice night, especially on the PP where he was creating things with alacrity. Another welcome change.

Who knows why the Flames were so effective tonight or if it'll continue. Still, refreshing despite the result.

39d8109299a9795cb3b41a4e9b49d501
Former Nations Overlord. Current Fn contributor and curmudgeon For questions, complaints, criticisms, etc contact Kent @ kent.wilson@gmail. Follow him on Twitter here.
Avatar
#1 BCFLAME
January 07 2011, 10:27PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Why they were so effective, Kent? At the end of the day they lost. We are not a bad team, as the boys are capable out-chancing most teams if they put in the effort.

However, they can't finish!!! And even when they sporadically do, Kipper usually blows a tire.

This team is just not on the same page consistently, and that's why they are bottom feeders.

Thus, if I hear "stay the course" one more time, I'm going to set myself on fire outside the saddledome in an act of protest.

Avatar
#3 negrilcowboy
January 07 2011, 10:45PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Glennie's best performance of the season, maybe he should have been a shootout participant, he had the hot hand. Bourque fighting the puck once again.His first shift with an icing when all that was needed was one more step set the tone for his night.the wings looked rather mortal yet leave town with 2 points.

Avatar
#4 Harvdawg
January 08 2011, 12:34AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

I gotta say, I always look forward to your scoring chance, corsi etc. stats......but how can the wings third goal not be a scoring chance. I don't understand...it was a cross ice one timer back of the net on the power play type goal? maybe you can elighten.

keep up the good work.

Comments are closed for this article.