Flames Scoring Chances - Game 2 versus St. Louis

Kent Wilson
October 10 2011 02:45PM

 

 

Final summary

Final Score: 5-2 Loss

Scoring Chances for NHL Game Number 20028

Team Period Time Note CGY Opponent  
STL 1 16:53 0 5 12 23 25 35 40 10 15 41 42 46 64 5v5
STL 1 15:40 0 5 16 17 23 35   20 27 41 42 44 74 4v5
STL 1 15:15 0 4 5 17 35 51   20 27 41 42 44 74 4v5
CGY 1 11:58 Glencross goal 5 13 20 22 23 35 10 15 41 42 46 64 5v5
STL 1 10:06 +1 5 12 23 25 35 40 10 15 41 42 46 64 5v5
CGY 1 9:48 +1 4 12 25 35 40 44 15 20 41 42 46 64 5v5
STL 1 1:09 +1 6 13 20 22 27 35 6 20 27 36 41 44 5v5
STL 1 1:08 Steen goal 6 13 20 22 27 35 6 20 27 36 41 44 5v5
STL 2 16:23 Shattenkirk goal 4 13 20 22 35 44 5 10 15 22 41 42 5v5
CGY 2 13:57 -1 4 10 16 18 35 44 5 12 25 41 64 74 5v5
CGY 2 10:43 -1 6 13 20 35 44   17 25 27 41 64   4v4
STL 2 10:10 -1 6 12 23 35 40   10 41 42 46 64   4v4
STL 2 9:37 -1 4 17 22 35 44   5 21 22 41 74   4v4
CGY 2 7:53 -1 5 13 17 35 40 51 20 27 41 64 74   5v4
CGY 2 7:28 -1 12 13 22 35 40 44 5 15 17 41 46   5v4
STL 2 6:47 -1 4 12 18 22 35 44 6 10 25 27 41 42 5v5
STL 2 6:13 -1 4 12 18 22 35 44 6 10 25 27 41 42 5v5
CGY 2 3:08 Iginla goal 5 12 22 25 35 40 5 12 17 41 46   5v4
STL 3 16:16 Stewart goal 4 10 13 35 44   6 10 25 27 41   4v4
STL 3 14:40 -2 4 6 16 22 35   20 21 22 41 44 74 4v5
STL 3 12:49 -2 4 10 15 35 44 51 5 10 15 22 41 42 5v5
STL 3 5:34 Arnott goal 4 22 25 35 40 44 5 20 22 36 41 44 5v5
STL 3 5:10 -3 4 22 25 35 40 44 5 20 22 36 41 44 5v5
CGY 3 3:10 -3 5 17 23 35 40 51 21 25 41 46 64 74 5v5

 

# Player EV PP SH
4 J. BOUWMEESTER 21:40 2 8 0:13 0 0 3:19 0 2
5 M. GIORDANO 15:32 2 2 2:40 2 0 1:51 0 2
6 C. SARICH 15:40 1 3 0:00 0 0 0:38 0 1
10 N. HAGMAN 9:24 1 2 0:00 0 0 0:00 0 0
12 J. IGINLA 20:06 1 5 1:38 2 0 0:00 0 0
13 O. JOKINEN 14:33 2 4 1:15 2 0 0:00 0 0
15 T. JACKMAN 10:08 0 1 0:00 0 0 0:00 0 0
16 T. KOSTOPOULOS 8:34 1 0 0:00 0 0 1:27 0 2
17 R. BOURQUE 11:25 1 1 1:31 1 0 2:44 0 2
18 M. STAJAN 9:58 1 2 0:00 0 0 0:00 0 0
20 C. GLENCROSS 13:10 2 3 0:45 0 0 1:21 0 0
22 L. STEMPNIAK 15:26 1 8 1:38 2 0 1:14 0 1
23 S. HANNAN 16:31 2 3 0:00 0 0 1:31 0 1
25 D. MOSS 14:44 1 4 1:09 1 0 1:23 0 0
27 D. SMITH 15:26 0 2 0:00 0 0 0:00 0 0
35 H. KARLSSON 52:01 5 13 3:09 3 0 4:50 0 3
40 A. TANGUAY 15:18 2 5 2:56 3 0 0:00 0 0
44 C. BUTLER 19:19 3 8 0:29 1 0 2:21 0 0
51 R. HORAK 10:01 1 1 1:31 1 0 1:31 0 1

 

Period Totals EV PP 5v3 PP SH 5v3 SH
1 2 6 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0
2 5 5 2 5 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 1 5 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Totals 8 16 5 13 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 0

For the second straight game, the Flames were punchless except this time they couldn't even muster anything in the third period while trailing. All the big guns were completely outclassed today, especially the Flames first line and defense pairing. Only Tom Kostoplous finished the game in the black (+1) in terms of scoring chances tonight.

Calgary's offensive game is about 5-steps back of where it left off last year. They'll need to significantly improve that to get anywhere.

39d8109299a9795cb3b41a4e9b49d501
Kent is a published author and the Nations Network Managing Editor. His work also appears at Hockey Prospectus. Catch him regularly on the FAN960 in Calgary and TEAM 1260 in Edmonton. For questions, complaints, criticisms, etc contact Kent @ kent.wilson@gmail. Follow him on Twitter here.
Sort comments by props
Avatar
Reply #1 Robert Cleave October 10 2011, 03:00PM
+1 0 props

Doesn't seem as if Moss is any answer for that first line. Can't say I'm shocked, of course. They might as well put him back with GlenX/Olli. At least they'd likely have one decent line most nights.

Avatar
Reply #2 Kent Wilson October 10 2011, 03:04PM
+1 0 props

@Robert Cleave

Yup. He's had two rough outings in a row.

Avatar
Reply #3 thymebalm October 10 2011, 05:39PM
+1 0 props

It was very very ugly today.

Hard to point the finger at anyone without pointing it at everyone.

We're safe to assume improvement is inevitable?

Avatar
Reply #4 Kent Wilson October 10 2011, 06:08PM
+1 0 props

@thymebalm

Yes. Not even a replacement level team would have their shots doubled every game.

Avatar
Reply #5 ChinookArch October 10 2011, 06:58PM
+1 0 props

I expect the experiment will continue with Moss, which is unfortunate. With these kinds of results, they should put Stajan on he top line, with some luck they might actually end up with 3 second line units.

Comments are closed for this article.