Flames Scoring Chances - Game 7 versus Nashville

Kent Wilson
October 22 2011 04:43PM

 

 

 

Final score: 2-0 L

Final Summary

Corsi

 

Scoring Chances for NHL Game Number 20095

Team Period Time Note CGY Opponent  
CGY 1 18:45 0 6 8 17 27 34 40 7 8 13 22 25 35 5v5
CGY 1 17:03 0 5 8 12 17 34 40 7 8 11 24 35   5v4
CGY 1 11:43 0 6 17 18 25 27 34 2 15 27 35 38 74 5v5
CGY 1 10:26 0 4 13 20 22 34 44 6 15 20 27 35 74 5v5
NSH 1 2:50 0 4 8 12 34 40 44 6 11 20 24 33 35 5v5
CGY 2 18:39 0 4 13 20 22 23 34 6 13 15 20 22 35 5v5
NSH 2 18:04 0 5 13 20 22 23 34 2 5 13 22 35 38 5v5
NSH 2 17:26 Bergfors goal 6 17 18 25 27 34 2 5 18 23 35 38 5v5
CGY 2 14:44 -1 4 13 20 22 34 44 5 7 20 24 35   5v4
NSH 2 14:01 -1 4 20 22 34 44 51 6 11 27 35 38 74 5v5
CGY 2 13:40 -1 6 15 16 27 34 51 6 15 27 35 38 74 5v5
CGY 2 5:49 -1 5 8 17 22 23 34 6 11 20 24 33 35 5v5
CGY 2 3:29 -1 6 12 18 27 34 40 6 18 20 22 25 35 5v5
NSH 2 2:15 -1 16 23 25 34 44   6 11 20 27 33 35 4v5
NSH 2 2:14 -1 16 23 25 34 44   6 11 20 27 33 35 4v5
CGY 3 18:09 -1 4 8 17 22 34 44 7 8 13 15 22 35 5v5
CGY 3 18:06 -1 4 8 17 22 34 44 7 8 13 15 22 35 5v5
NSH 3 14:31 -1 6 15 16 27 34 51 7 8 13 22 25 35 5v5
CGY 3 12:38 -1 5 8 17 22 23 34 7 8 11 27 35 74 5v5
CGY 3 11:00 -1 4 12 13 20 27 34 7 8 13 22 25 35 5v5
NSH 3 5:24 Kostitsyn goal 4 12 13 20 34 44 7 8 15 24 35 74 5v5
NSH 3 4:36 -2 6 17 22 27 34 40 7 8 11 24 33 35 5v5

 

# Player EV PP SH
4 J. BOUWMEESTER 20:13 5 3 1:50 1 0 2:18 0 0
5 M. GIORDANO 15:27 2 1 5:53 1 0 2:36 0 0
6 C. SARICH 12:17 4 3 0:00 0 0 0:24 0 0
8 B. MORRISON 12:20 5 1 1:04 1 0 1:41 0 0
12 J. IGINLA 17:02 2 2 4:48 1 0 0:00 0 0
13 O. JOKINEN 15:03 3 2 5:20 1 0 0:00 0 0
15 T. JACKMAN 11:04 1 1 0:00 0 0 0:00 0 0
16 T. KOSTOPOULOS 9:20 1 1 0:00 0 0 1:18 0 2
17 R. BOURQUE 12:05 6 2 2:36 1 0 1:26 0 0
18 M. STAJAN 8:00 2 1 0:00 0 0 0:15 0 0
20 C. GLENCROSS 14:46 3 3 4:34 1 0 1:51 0 0
22 L. STEMPNIAK 12:24 6 3 2:22 1 0 2:02 0 0
23 S. HANNAN 14:43 3 1 0:00 0 0 2:51 0 2
25 D. MOSS 8:41 1 1 0:46 0 0 1:46 0 2
27 D. SMITH 14:21 5 3 0:29 0 0 0:01 0 0
34 M. KIPRUSOFF 46:09 11 7 7:10 2 0 5:10 0 2
40 A. TANGUAY 13:04 2 2 5:35 1 0 0:01 0 0
44 C. BUTLER 17:58 3 3 0:33 1 0 2:10 0 2
51 R. HORAK 10:13 1 2 0:00 0 0 0:00 0 0

 

Period Totals EV PP 5v3 PP SH 5v3 SH
1 4 1 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 5 5 4 3 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0
3 4 3 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Totals 13 9 11 7 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 0

The Predators did what the Predators do well: limited chances against and jumped on mistakes. Calgary grossly outshot Nashville, but only won the chances count by a thin margin. A couple of Flames forwards had good games by this metric (Stempniak and Bourque), but, again, the Flames need more from their first line. Two even strength chances in more than 17 minutes of ice just isn't good work from Jarome Iginla.

That said, the Flames win this game with better bounces or worse goaltending from Rinne. They had enough quality chances to take the victory, but the puck just didn't go in. They also limited the Preds to a handful of chances against (and shots), although pretty much every team in the league has done that so far.

39d8109299a9795cb3b41a4e9b49d501
Former Nations Overlord. Current Fn contributor and curmudgeon For questions, complaints, criticisms, etc contact Kent @ kent.wilson@gmail. Follow him on Twitter here.
Avatar
#1 ChinookArch
October 23 2011, 08:44AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

Ken,

I'm still a novice at reading the Corsi results. Can you please provide a quick overview on how to read the chart? Thanks,

Avatar
#2 Pfcoop
October 23 2011, 07:51PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

Sorry Kent, this stuff is mostly crap. I have had an open mind on this stuff for awhile now and while it describes the general ability/effectiveness of players, it is just that. Generalizations.

In the end, the flames did not win. There are many other times when they get out chanced and do not win. Or vice versa, they get out chanced and do win.

All of this stuff is what we know about players already anyway. There are just way to many variables to accurately describe the situation. It's like Jumbo Joe who always piles on the points but does not win. There is an "it" factor and some players have "it" and some do not. I'll keep reading but so far it hasn't told me much of anything I don't already know.

oh, and one other thing, can you litten up a little. The pessimism at times gets boring.

Fan in Van

Comments are closed for this article.