Flames Scoring Chances - Game 27 vs Carolina Hurricanes

Kent Wilson
December 07 2011 01:03PM

 

 

 

Final Score: 7-6W

Final Summary

Corsi

Head-to-head ice

Face-offs

Scoring Chances for NHL Game Number 20398

Team Period Time Note CGY Opponent  
CGY 1 18:22 0 8 12 13 27 34 43 6 12 15 28 30 53 5v5
CGY 1 18:12 0 8 12 13 27 34 43 6 12 15 28 30 53 5v5
CGY 1 18:11 0 8 12 13 27 34 43 6 12 15 28 30 53 5v5
CGY 1 17:55 0 15 16 27 34 43 51 5 23 30 36 51 59 5v5
CGY 1 16:53 Iginla goal 7 8 12 13 23 34 6 16 19 28 30 39 5v5
CAR 1 16:18 +1 4 10 11 22 34 44 5 12 15 30 51 53 5v5
CAR 1 15:38 +1 4 17 23 34 40   4 12 13 25 30 53 4v5
CAR 1 15:37 +1 4 17 23 34 40   4 12 13 25 30 53 4v5
CGY 1 14:36 +1 4 16 17 23 34   15 23 28 30 36 51 4v5
CAR 1 11:28 +1 17 18 27 34 40 43 5 16 19 27 30 39 5v5
CGY 1 5:14 +1 15 16 27 34 43 51 4 12 13 25 30 37 5v5
CAR 1 4:05 +1 7 10 11 22 23 34 4 16 19 25 30 39 5v5
CAR 1 3:15 +1 4 8 12 13 34 44 4 12 15 25 30 53 5v5
CGY 1 1:53 +1 7 15 16 23 34 51 23 27 30 36 51 59 5v5
CGY 1 1:52 +1 7 15 16 23 34 51 23 27 30 36 51 59 5v5
CGY 1 1:09 Stempniak goal 4 10 11 22 34 44 4 12 25 30 37 53 5v5
CGY 1 0:57 +2 8 12 13 27 34 43 6 16 19 28 30 39 5v5
CGY 2 19:18 Morrison goal 4 8 12 13 34 44 4 5 12 15 30 53 5v5
CGY 2 17:06 +3 7 17 23 34 40 51 5 12 13 27 30 53 5v5
CGY 2 14:33 +3 7 10 11 22 23 34 16 19 25 28 30 39 5v5
CAR 2 14:21 Tlusty PS goal 7 10 11 22 23 34 16 19 25 28 30 39 5v5
CGY 2 12:39 +2 8 12 13 27 34 43 15 19 27 30 36 51 5v5
CGY 2 11:10 +2 4 8 12 13 34 44 4 12 13 25 30 37 5v5
CGY 2 10:27 +2 4 8 12 13 34 44 5 15 23 30 36 51 5v5
CGY 2 9:03 +2 4 17 18 34 40 44 6 12 28 30 53 59 5v5
CGY 2 9:01 +2 4 17 18 34 40 44 6 12 28 30 53 59 5v5
CAR 2 6:44 Brent goal 8 12 13 27 34 43 5 12 30 37 51 53 5v5
CGY 2 5:54 Bourque goal 7 17 18 23 34 40 4 15 23 27 30 36 5v5
CGY 2 5:05 +2 4 15 16 34 44 51 4 16 27 30 53 59 5v5
CAR 2 4:12 +2 4 10 22 34 44   4 12 30 37 51 53 4v5
CAR 2 3:11 +2 4 17 18 23 34   15 23 27 28 30 36 4v5
CAR 2 1:03 +2 7 15 16 23 34 40 5 6 15 30 36 59 5v5
CGY 3 16:10 +3 7 10 11 22 23 34 4 15 27 30 36 53 5v5
CGY 3 15:19 +3 4 8 12 13 34 44 5 6 12 19 30 37 5v5
CAR 3 13:20 McBain goal 7 15 16 23 34 51 4 15 30 36 51 53 5v5
CGY 3 11:03 +2 4 10 11 22 34 44 4 6 15 30 36 53 5v5
CGY 3 5:03 Backlund goal 4 17 18 34 40 43 4 6 12 19 37 70 5v5
CAR 3 6:18 Staal goal 7 10 11 22 23 34 12 13 28 39 51 70 5v5
CGY 3 5:23 +2 7 17 18 23 34 40 4 6 12 19 37 70 5v5
CAR 3 3:10 +2 8 11 22 23 34 44 4 12 13 27 39 70 5v5
CAR 3 0:33 +2 4 15 16 34 44 51 6 23 27 37 59 70 5v5
CAR 3 0:32 Larose goal 4 15 16 34 44 51 6 23 27 37 59 70 5v5
CAR 3 0:05 Staal goal 10 11 22 23 27 34 4 12 15 51 53 70 5v5

 

# Player EV PP SH
4 J. BOUWMEESTER 19:50 10 4 1:06 0 0 5:36 1 4
7 T. BRODIE 13:25 8 5 2:11 0 0 0:00 0 0
8 B. MORRISON 14:16 10 3 0:34 0 0 0:00 0 0
10 B. COMEAU 12:35 4 5 0:52 0 0 2:00 0 1
11 M. BACKLUND 13:39 4 6 0:52 0 0 0:47 0 0
12 J. IGINLA 14:08 10 2 2:25 0 0 0:06 0 0
13 O. JOKINEN 15:10 10 2 2:25 0 0 0:21 0 0
15 T. JACKMAN 9:53 5 4 0:00 0 0 0:00 0 0
16 T. KOSTOPOULOS 10:00 5 4 0:00 0 0 1:12 1 0
17 R. BOURQUE 12:47 6 1 1:51 0 0 2:53 1 3
18 M. STAJAN 12:16 5 1 0:00 0 0 1:20 0 1
22 L. STEMPNIAK 13:16 4 6 0:52 0 0 2:08 0 1
23 S. HANNAN 16:20 8 7 0:00 0 0 4:00 1 3
27 D. SMITH 17:17 7 3 1:00 0 0 0:24 0 0
34 M. KIPRUSOFF 50:29 25 13 3:17 0 0 6:00 1 4
40 A. TANGUAY 14:06 6 2 2:00 0 0 1:13 0 2
43 J. PISKULA 14:27 8 2 0:00 0 0 0:06 0 0
44 C. BUTLER 20:22 9 5 0:17 0 0 1:54 0 1
51 R. HORAK 10:02 6 3 0:00 0 0 0:00 0 0

 

Period Totals EV PP 5v3 PP SH 5v3 SH
1 11 6 10 4 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0
2 10 5 10 3 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0
3 5 6 5 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Totals 26 17 25 13 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 0

Flames have had entire games this season where they've managed only 10 scoring chances. Last night they did it twice in a single period. The Canes were the loosest team I've seen this year in terms of defensive zone coverage. The Flames cycled with ease in the o-zone and were given plenty of chances off the rush and in dangerous areas thanks to Carolina's penchant for bobbling pucks at inopportune times. Add in some good luck and bad goaltending and you have a seven goal evening. The final count was total domination for the Flames, even though they mailed in the last 5 minutes or so and let the Canes make things seem a bit more interesting.

Calgary's first line hit it out of the park despite relatively tough circumstances. I haven't seen Jarome have his way in the offensive zone quite like that all year. He's really starting to find his legs as evidenced by his continued good numbers the last week or two. The opposition has mostly been soft, but at least it looks like the worst days are behind him.

The Stajan line had decent chance numbers, but I thought he was the worst skater on the ice for Calgary last night (their possession numbers were worst on the team). Stajan gave up the puck numerous times in the neutral and offensive zone and the play died on his stick more often than not. Expect Morrison to stay in the line-up when Glencross returns and for Stajan to get the boot.

39d8109299a9795cb3b41a4e9b49d501
Kent is a published author and the Nations Network Managing Editor. His work also appears at Hockey Prospectus. Catch him regularly on the FAN960 in Calgary and TEAM 1260 in Edmonton. For questions, complaints, criticisms, etc contact Kent @ kent.wilson@gmail. Follow him on Twitter here.
Sort comments by props
Avatar
Reply #1 Tach December 07 2011, 01:41PM
+1 0 props

Is the official NHL scorer whacked out for this game or the script not working?

I see no PP chances, but Backlund's goal is counted as a chance. It is also recorded at a different time than the official scorer, and with different players on the ice.

Also, the Flames only generated 1, 1!!!, shot on the powerplay, in 3:17 seconds! WTF!

Avatar
Reply #2 Kent Wilson December 07 2011, 01:46PM
+1 0 props

@Tach

I must have screwed up the Backlund goal. It's a drop down type menu with the app, so I may have scrolled down incorrectly. Damn!

Avatar
Reply #3 Bob December 07 2011, 03:06PM
+1 0 props

So Kent, do we bask in the glory of the win, or do we lament the fact they played a pretty bad team and lowered their defenses the last 5 minutes?

Despite how well they controlled the play and had decent possession times, I wasn't happy to see certain guys get in the offensive zone and try to get cute, cut in, cut out and hung onto the puck too long then lose it or have it knocked off their sticks (Stajan).

But I guess 2 points are 2 points.

Avatar
Reply #4 Kent Wilson December 07 2011, 03:52PM
+1 0 props

@Bob

I say take the win. Flames legitimately dominated most of this game.

Comments are closed for this article.