A Look at the Flames Playoff Chances

Kent Wilson
March 11 2011 01:05PM

 

 

It's been a wild ride since the Flames bottomed-out in late December. Against long-odds, the club has ridden some bounces and strong play back into the post-season picture in the Western Conference. With just 12 games left on the schedule, the stretch drive looms on the horizon. Here's a look at what the Flames will need to do to complete their resurrection.

The Calgary Flames are currently sixth in the official standings with 81 points in 70 games played. Matt Fenwick has them one game up on the playoff march in his Baseball style standings, while Quisp has the Flames on the cusp in 8th in his "real" standings. In short, despite Calgary's incredible run since January, the team is still teetering on the edge.

No Western Conference playoff contender has played as many games as Calgary, nor have they won as many games in the shoot-out as the Flames. In fact, Calgary has the least amount of regulation/OT wins amongst the top nine hopefuls in the WC. What that means is the club is a good bet to lose the tie-breaker at the end of the year should they end up on even footing points-wise with any one else in the West. As such, Calgary must be the clear victor when the dust settles after game-82.

It's a fairly tenuous position. Projecting final standings can be tricky, but here's a look at how the WC will shake out should all the teams hold to their demonstrated points % through the rest of the year:

Flames slide into 8th alone with 95 points, which is about the cut-off we've been assuming all year. A 57.8% point ratio through the final 12 games relates to a record of about 6-4-2 or 7-5-0. Calgary can likely ensure themselves a place in the dance with seven wins or more in their final 12 games. 

Here's how the sched. looks from here on out:

VAN - L

PHX - W

COL - W

ANA - L

LOS - W

SJS - L

EDM - W

ANA - W

STL - W

COL - W

EDM - W

VAN - L

I've penciled in some "reasonable expectations" given the quality of the opponents. If the Flames can sweep the weaker sisters, beat LA and split with Anaheim, they're in like Flint without having to worry about beating San Jose or Vancouver. They might have room to lose one to the Blues, Oilers or Avalanches of the world, but will then definitely want to avoid giving up points to, say, Anaheim as much as possible.

Of course, we all know what "reasonable expectations" are worth in the pressure cooker that is the Western Conference, so take this with a pinch of salt. Considering how this season has played out thus far, it wouldn't surprise me at all if Calgary's post-season berth came down to that, final crucial game versus the Canucks.

39d8109299a9795cb3b41a4e9b49d501
Former Nations Overlord. Current FN contributor and curmudgeon For questions, complaints, criticisms, etc contact Kent @ kent.wilson@gmail. Follow him on Twitter here.
Avatar
#1 icedawg_42
March 11 2011, 02:19PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

reasonable expectations aside I'd LOVE to see the Flames win both against Vancouver, however unlikely. I only hope Vintage and Gange's wild chants of "CHUD CHUD CHUD" can spur them on to victory tomorrow. I have to agree with Pat, I dont like a 1 vs 8 seed if it shakes out the way you've listed, but if it happens, I hope the Flames take enough of a toll on the Canucks so that they fall out of it before the conference finals. I agree with your shakedown for the most part, the two games im iffy on are the PHX and LA you have listed as Wins...hopefully at least a point out of them. Looks like about a 7-4-1 should do it!

Avatar
#2 Pat Steinberg
March 11 2011, 02:53PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Dammit Kent, I just wrote the same thing on Fan960.com. Great minds?

Avatar
#3 todd
March 11 2011, 03:53PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Really Lamers you want us in the first round? I love how you guys forget that we DESTROYED you 7-2 in the libraryerrrrrrrrr I mean DOME. BTW WORST place to watch a game. Half your fans are to busy not cheering, while the other half are there just to be there. YIKES.

Let's say it is Flames vs Van round 1.

Matchups:

Bobby Lou Vs Kipper= Um no contest Bobby Lou. ONE gold medal and soon to be Veznia for this year.

D- I'll give the Flames a slight edge here because your 4=6 are better than ours, but our 1=3 are steller!

F= Iggy Vs Daniel= Um Daniel he's going to win Art Ross

Henrik vs Brendan Morrison- BAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Kesler Vs Jokinen- BAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Burrows vs Tanguay- I'll take our Alex anyday.

Raymond Vs Stajan- Can you say OVERPAID MATTY

Mule vs MOdin- No contest I'll take Sammy

Higgins Vs Glencross= I'll give you that one

Torres Vs Jackman= Raffi is a Flames killer

IN short Van would win in 5.

As for Saturday Van 8 Calgary 2.

Avatar
#4 Monaertchi Gaudnett
March 11 2011, 04:06PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

My take on this is that you've got to round down when doing these things.

13.886 points in the remaining 12 games isn't 14 points, it's got to be counted as 13.

This means that the Flames projected final points is 94, or the same as Anaheim.

Either way, we probably won't know who we're playing in the playoffs, or if we're playing in the playoffs, until the very last minute.

Avatar
#5 Domebeers.com
March 11 2011, 04:15PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Yeah, last nights game really hurt the chances. Screw nice weather.

Wow Todd, it's really amazing what easy access to methadone will do to a person, isn't it?

Avatar
#6 FireOnIce
March 11 2011, 04:20PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

I can just see it now. Flames in 5th place to end the season, or even 6th, then bounced out due to tie in points and losing all tie breakers.

What a heart break that will be. My liver will be drowned in ethanolic beverages should that occur.

And Luongo isn't going to win the Vezina. Tim Thomas probably will, so boo hoo Vancouver, another lost trophy.

Avatar
#7 SmellOfVictory
March 11 2011, 05:31PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

@todd

I'd say the Flames' D have an edge in their top 3 (although Edler is pretty good).

As far as forwards, I have some disagreement with you: Tanguay is better than Burrows, Raymond/Stajan is a wash because Raymond has been pretty crap this year as well, and although D. Sedin is certainly performing better in the regular season than Iginla, Iginla has a history of being a playoff monster.

If a playoff series between the two teams were played a million times, Vancouver would probably win 70%+ of those series. However, all it takes is a couple of bad nights for Van or a little good luck for Calgary and they beat your team.

Avatar
#8 Charleston Kingsley
March 11 2011, 05:42PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

I think we'll finish in sixth and play San Jose...

Avatar
#9 StatsGuru
March 11 2011, 07:59PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Donkeys battling against donkeys for the final four playoff spots in both Conferences.

Avatar
#10 JAY
March 11 2011, 08:44PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props
todd wrote:

Really Lamers you want us in the first round? I love how you guys forget that we DESTROYED you 7-2 in the libraryerrrrrrrrr I mean DOME. BTW WORST place to watch a game. Half your fans are to busy not cheering, while the other half are there just to be there. YIKES.

Let's say it is Flames vs Van round 1.

Matchups:

Bobby Lou Vs Kipper= Um no contest Bobby Lou. ONE gold medal and soon to be Veznia for this year.

D- I'll give the Flames a slight edge here because your 4=6 are better than ours, but our 1=3 are steller!

F= Iggy Vs Daniel= Um Daniel he's going to win Art Ross

Henrik vs Brendan Morrison- BAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Kesler Vs Jokinen- BAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Burrows vs Tanguay- I'll take our Alex anyday.

Raymond Vs Stajan- Can you say OVERPAID MATTY

Mule vs MOdin- No contest I'll take Sammy

Higgins Vs Glencross= I'll give you that one

Torres Vs Jackman= Raffi is a Flames killer

IN short Van would win in 5.

As for Saturday Van 8 Calgary 2.

toad, go away, no one cares what u think

Avatar
#11 Palt
March 11 2011, 09:10PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Dude, why are you on a Calgary Flames site?

Avatar
#12 Palt
March 11 2011, 09:11PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

@todd

Dude, why are you on a Calgary Flames site?

Avatar
#13 Subversive
March 11 2011, 09:41PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Please don't feed the trolls, people.

Avatar
#14 B
March 12 2011, 12:06AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props
Charleston Kingsley wrote:

I think we'll finish in sixth and play San Jose...

...I second that prediction.

Avatar
#15 Canucks Suck
March 12 2011, 07:34AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props
Subversive wrote:

Please don't feed the trolls, people.

I think that guy is serious business. The flames could probably compete with any team in a 7 game series if they could get all for lines rolling of course if the playoffs don't make that happen I don't know what will.

Tim Jackman in the playoffs, if we make it this guy is going to be a force to be reckoned with.

Avatar
#16 Canucks Suck
March 12 2011, 07:34AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Also I have no idea where we will finish I gave up predicting this sport years ago.

Avatar
#17 Palt
March 12 2011, 10:42AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Flames recalled Lance Bouma again. Any idea how long Jackmans gonna be out?

Avatar
#18 todd
March 13 2011, 09:43AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Stick fork in them the FLAMERS are done

Comments are closed for this article.