Flames Scoring Chances - Game 68 versus Nashville

Kent Wilson
March 06 2011 08:39PM

Scoring Chances for NHL Game Number 20987

Team Period Time Note CGY Opponent  
CGY 1 19:47   5 6 13 17 20 34 6 10 11 20 29 35 5v5
CGY 1 18:19   11 15 16 28 33 34 4 13 22 25 35 55 5v5
NSH 1 17:14 Erat goal 4 13 17 20 28 34 7 8 10 11 29 35 5v5
CGY 1 16:50   5 6 12 25 34 40 6 12 20 27 35 74 5v5
NSH 1 14:39   4 20 28 34 40   6 12 20 27 35 74 4v5
NSH 1 14:15   5 16 25 33 34   4 7 10 11 29 35 4v5
NSH 1 12:00   10 18 19 27 33 34 7 8 10 11 24 35 5v5
NSH 1 11:52   5 6 13 17 20 34 7 8 10 11 29 35 5v5
CGY 1 9:44   5 15 16 18 33 34 4 5 24 33 35 55 5v5
NSH 1 6:45   4 11 15 16 28 34 5 7 8 24 33 35 5v5
CGY 1 6:28   5 6 13 17 20 34 7 8 10 11 29 35 5v5
CGY 1 5:39   4 12 25 28 34 40 6 12 20 27 35 74 5v5
CGY 1 4:51   10 18 19 27 33 34 4 13 22 25 35 55 5v5
NSH 1 4:03 Suter goal 5 6 12 25 34 40 6 10 11 20 29 35 5v5
CGY 2 19:02   4 12 25 28 34 40 6 12 20 27 35 74 5v5
CGY 2 19:01 Iginla PS goal 4 12 25 28 34 40 6 12 20 27 35 74 5v5
CGY 2 18:16   4 11 15 16 28 34 5 7 8 24 33 35 5v5
CGY 2 14:40   5 12 25 27 34 40 7 8 13 22 25 35 5v5
CGY 2 12:57   12 18 27 33 34 40 5 7 8 22 24 35 5v5
NSH 2 8:24   4 12 25 28 34 40 6 12 20 27 35 74 5v5
CGY 2 3:45   5 6 13 17 34 40 8 10 11 29 35 55 5v5
CGY 2 0:40   4 12 25 28 34 40 4 12 27 35 55 74 5v5
CGY 3 17:24   5 6 13 17 20 34 7 8 11 24 33 35 5v5
CGY 3 17:06   5 6 13 17 20 34 6 10 11 20 29 35 5v5
CGY 3 16:33   5 6 13 17 20 34 6 10 12 20 27 35 5v5
NSH 3 16:23   4 5 12 13 20 34 8 12 27 35 55 74 5v5
CGY 3 15:57   4 11 12 28 34 40 8 12 27 35 55 74 5v5
NSH 3 15:08   4 11 12 28 34 40 6 13 20 22 25 35 5v5
CGY 3 13:14   4 13 15 17 33 34 8 10 11 35 55   5v4
NSH 3 11:53   6 12 25 28 34 40 6 12 20 27 35 74 5v5
CGY 3 9:40   4 13 17 20 28 34 6 11 20 24 33 35 5v5
CGY 3 9:37 Glencross goal 4 13 17 20 28 34 6 11 20 24 33 35 5v5
CGY 3 9:24   4 12 25 28 34 40 7 8 12 27 35 74 5v5
CGY 3 9:14   13 17 20 27 33 34 6 10 11 20 29 35 5v5
NSH 3 4:17   5 6 13 17 20 34 6 10 11 20 29 35 5v5
NSH 3 0:14   4 12 13 28 34 40 6 10 12 20 27 74 5v5

 

# Player EV PP SH
4 J. BOUWMEESTER 20:54 9 6 0:54 1 0 3:43 0 1
5 M. GIORDANO 18:25 9 4 1:40 0 0 2:02 0 1
6 C. SARICH 16:24 7 4 0:13 0 0 1:03 0 0
10 N. HAGMAN 9:46 1 1 0:27 0 0 0:00 0 0
11 M. BACKLUND 10:28 3 2 0:05 0 0 0:00 0 0
12 J. IGINLA 17:33 9 6 1:17 0 0 0:00 0 0
13 O. JOKINEN 18:23 9 5 1:21 1 0 0:00 0 0
15 T. JACKMAN 9:05 3 1 0:40 1 0 0:00 0 0
16 T. KOSTOPOULOS 9:09 3 1 0:00 0 0 1:50 0 1
17 R. BOURQUE 16:26 9 3 0:56 1 0 1:36 0 0
18 M. STAJAN 10:19 3 1 0:22 0 0 1:31 0 0
19 F. MODIN 9:19 1 1 0:22 0 0 0:00 0 0
20 C. GLENCROSS 15:05 8 4 0:42 0 0 1:16 0 1
25 D. MOSS 12:49 7 3 0:55 0 0 2:09 0 1
27 S. STAIOS 13:53 4 1 0:00 0 0 0:00 0 0
28 R. REGEHR 20:14 10 6 0:05 0 0 3:35 0 1
33 A. BABCHUK 14:08 5 1 0:44 1 0 0:51 0 1
34 M. KIPRUSOFF 51:59 22 11 2:24 1 0 5:37 0 2
40 A. TANGUAY 17:10 10 5 1:17 0 0 2:52 0 1

 

Period Totals EV PP 5v3 PP SH 5v3 SH
1 7 7 7 5 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0
2 7 1 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 9 5 8 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Totals 23 13 22 11 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0

Head-to-head ice

Corsi

Face-offs

Unlike the last few contests, the Flames were the better club from top-to-bottom this evening. The first period was more or less equal, but Calgary pulled away in the second and left the Preds in their dust. No Flame finished in the red by this metric tonight and, more importantly, the money players were all above water. The newly formed Iginla, Moss, Tanguay line had a very able night at both ends of the rink, although being matched up against the Preds "2nd unit" of Fisher, Kostitsyn and Hornqvist didn't hurt.

Jokinen's line including Glencross and Bourque had their stuff run by Legwand's line early, but managed to turn the tide as the evening wore on. Bourque looked something of his old self again, particularly in the third, which helped assuaged the loss of Moss to the top line. I think Bourque's +6 number tonight is his best in a long time (perhaps the Heritage classic?). Here's hoping he can keep it up.

Anyways, great game all around. Ironically, the Flames were probably unlucky to only win by one.

 

39d8109299a9795cb3b41a4e9b49d501
Former Nations Overlord. Current Fn contributor and curmudgeon For questions, complaints, criticisms, etc contact Kent @ kent.wilson@gmail. Follow him on Twitter here.
Avatar
#1 Bustmeester
March 06 2011, 09:18PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

Another very important two points.

Avatar
#2 John F
March 06 2011, 09:40PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

I'm wonering if we will see any complimentary analysis and discussion from you and others who subscribe to the site on this on Jokinen and Babchuk. I think both have been major contributors to the Flames playoff drive. While Jokinen may rank near the bottom of the tea in +/- he consistently plays against the teams top lines, has been (along with Glencross) been driving the play regardless of who is the 3rd on the line, and must lead the league in posts hit (which is nothing but bad luck). Babchuk (no not Badchuk) has been raising his game. In addition to the heavy shot and offence he provides he has greatly improved his efensive game. I know both players, but in particular Jokinen have been mercilessly trashed here (I excuse Steinberg here as he wansn't as negative on either and I've seen him refer to both in a positive manner). For the sake of balance I would like to see Kent and many of those who were relentless in their criticism comment on these 2 players.

Avatar
#3 gt
March 06 2011, 09:48PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
John F wrote:

I'm wonering if we will see any complimentary analysis and discussion from you and others who subscribe to the site on this on Jokinen and Babchuk. I think both have been major contributors to the Flames playoff drive. While Jokinen may rank near the bottom of the tea in +/- he consistently plays against the teams top lines, has been (along with Glencross) been driving the play regardless of who is the 3rd on the line, and must lead the league in posts hit (which is nothing but bad luck). Babchuk (no not Badchuk) has been raising his game. In addition to the heavy shot and offence he provides he has greatly improved his efensive game. I know both players, but in particular Jokinen have been mercilessly trashed here (I excuse Steinberg here as he wansn't as negative on either and I've seen him refer to both in a positive manner). For the sake of balance I would like to see Kent and many of those who were relentless in their criticism comment on these 2 players.

i agree, i think both have been great

Comments are closed for this article.