Flames Scoring Chances - Game 69 versus Dallas

Kent Wilson
March 09 2011 10:16PM

Scoring Chances for NHL Game Number 21006

Team Period Time Note CGY Opponent  
DAL 2 16:10   4 11 16 17 28 34 21 23 28 37 91   5v4
DAL 2 14:48 Ribeiro goal 5 10 18 19 27 34 6 10 14 44 63   5v4
DAL 2 8:29   4 12 25 28 34 40 3 10 14 33 63   5v4
DAL 2 8:02   5 6 13 17 20 34 3 10 14 33 63   5v4
DAL 2 7:56   5 6 13 17 20 34 3 10 14 33 63   5v4
CGY 2 7:40   5 6 13 17 20 34 3 10 14 33 63   5v4
DAL 2 6:08   4 12 25 28 34 40 3 14 27 33 81   5v4
DAL 2 3:57   4 11 15 16 27 34 10 14 28 37 63   5v4
CGY 2 2:02   12 18 28 33 34 40 3 14 15 17 33   5v4
CGY 2 1:32   5 6 13 17 20 34 6 16 21 44 91   5v4
DAL 3 19:02   5 6 12 25 34 40 6 10 15 32 44 63 5v5
CGY 3 19:45   5 6 13 17 20 34 6 10 14 32 44 63 5v5
CGY 3 18:34   12 25 27 33 34 40 6 15 16 29 32 44 5v5
CGY 3 16:12   5 6 13 17 20 34 10 21 28 32 37 63 5v5
CGY 3 13:59   5 6 10 18 19 34 10 14 28 32 37 63 5v5
DAL 3 12:29   4 13 17 20 28 34 6 10 14 32 44 63 5v5
DAL 3 11:46   5 6 10 18 19 34 3 21 23 32 33 91 5v5
DAL 3 11:45   5 6 18 19 25 34 3 21 23 32 33 91 5v5
CGY 3 11:18   12 25 27 33 34 40 3 14 17 29 32 33 5v5
DAL 3 4:19   5 6 12 25 34 40 3 14 15 29 32 33 5v5
DAL 3 4:11   5 6 12 25 34 40 3 14 15 29 32 33 5v5
DAL 3 1:31   5 17 20 33 34   10 21 32 33 63 91 4v5
DAL 3 1:28   5 17 20 33 34   10 21 32 33 63 91 4v5
DAL 3 0:48   5 17 20 33 34   10 21 32 33 63 91 4v5
CGY 4 3:09   5 6 12 20 34   3 21 33 91     4v3
CGY 4 1:55   12 18 28 33 34   6 14 15 44     4v3
CGY 4 1:54   12 18 28 33 34   6 14 15 44     4v3
CGY 4 1:38   10 18 28 33 34   14 15 33 44     4v3
CGY 4 1:37   5 10 18 33 34   14 15 33 44     4v3
DAL 4 1:10   4 12 17 27 34   3 15 33 91     4v3

 

# Player EV PP SH
4 J. BOUWMEESTER 11:25 0 1 10:31 0 5 2:47 0 0
5 M. GIORDANO 13:43 3 5 7:13 4 3 2:09 0 3
6 C. SARICH 13:40 3 5 4:58 3 2 1:14 0 0
10 N. HAGMAN 7:43 1 1 3:57 2 1 0:00 0 0
11 M. BACKLUND 5:22 0 0 3:17 0 2 0:00 0 0
12 J. IGINLA 10:57 2 3 7:57 4 3 0:00 0 0
13 O. JOKINEN 10:09 2 1 8:21 2 2 0:00 0 0
15 T. JACKMAN 5:37 0 0 4:16 0 1 0:00 0 0
16 T. KOSTOPOULOS 5:43 0 0 4:03 0 2 0:51 0 0
17 R. BOURQUE 9:23 2 1 8:15 2 4 1:20 0 3
18 M. STAJAN 8:34 1 2 5:21 5 1 1:02 0 0
19 F. MODIN 8:01 1 2 3:50 0 1 0:00 0 0
20 C. GLENCROSS 9:55 2 1 6:55 3 2 2:25 0 3
25 D. MOSS 9:55 2 4 4:45 0 2 2:22 0 0
27 S. STAIOS 8:36 2 0 8:27 0 3 0:00 0 0
28 R. REGEHR 11:16 0 1 9:24 4 3 2:47 0 0
33 A. BABCHUK 8:34 2 0 7:19 5 0 0:55 0 3
34 M. KIPRUSOFF 33:37 5 6 24:04 8 8 4:56 0 3
40 A. TANGUAY 9:32 2 3 6:43 1 2 1:52 0 0

 

Period Totals EV PP 5v3 PP SH 5v3 SH
1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 3 7 0 0 3 7 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 5 9 5 6 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0
4 5 1 0 0 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
Totals 13 17 5 6 8 8 0 0 0 3 0 0

Head to head ice

Corsi

Face-offs

*This is mainly a placeholder until we can get the full count in. In addition, the entire second period is being interpreted as a 5-on-4 situation for the Flames for some reason, so the count for each individual player is totally messed up. Hopefully this can be resolved in the near future.

In general - Flames got out to a big lead in the third thanks to some good finish, but fell way back in the second. They reeled it back a bit in the third but were technically lucky to make it to OT with the Stars pressing during their final PP. Calgary was the better team in extra time for sure though.

39d8109299a9795cb3b41a4e9b49d501
Kent is the Nations Overlord. For questions, complaints, criticisms, etc contact Kent @ kent.wilson@gmail. Follow him on Twitter here.
Sort comments by date
Avatar
Reply #1 Kent Wilson March 09 2011, 10:18PM
+1 0 props

Looks like Lehtonen disappeared from the NHL gamesheets in the 2nd, causing the erroneous results. Hopefully they fix that and we can do a re-count.

And it looks like the entire OT is considered a CGY PP as well. WTF??

Avatar
Reply #2 BCFLAME March 09 2011, 10:31PM
+1 0 props

Ha, maybe the NHL did get the second period right; it sure did look like a 5 0n 4 powerplay for the Stars during most of the second. However, the Flames were a better team in the other three periods, especially in the first and OT. Stars had a fluky goal in third to get the extra point, but outside of the late powerplay did not generate much in the final period.

Plus, when did Bourque get back from his extended vacation? I sure missed that guy!!!

Avatar
Reply #3 Kent Wilson March 09 2011, 10:49PM
+1 0 props

@BCFLAME

It's actually reading as a PP for the Flames.

Comments are closed for this article.