Flames in review: EV tied performance

Robert Cleave
April 20 2011 02:52PM

              

  

With another year complete, Flames Nation is in the midst of the post-mortems. Over the next couple of weeks, we'll look at some interesting EV data from timeonice that might shed a bit of light on why the season ended the way it did. First up, overall team performance and a look at Calgary's number one goalie.

 

I had a sense for most of the year that the Flames were a decent team, and likely a playoff team on balance, even if they were clearly outside the elite of the Western Conference. They ended the season in a slightly worse spot than that, so it seems reasonable to investigate potential reasons for things going sour.

 

One of the best ways to discern team strength is to look at EV shooting data when the game is tied. That eliminates any score effect, since teams that are trailing invariably attempt more shots while leading teams sit back a bit to defend that advantage. When the game is even, though, we get more light and less heat, if you will.

 

With that in mind, I collected the EV tied data for the top ten WC teams for this year from timeonice, so that covers the Canucks down to the Flames. The data collection scrapes away all empty net situations, but does include 4v4 play.

 

First, let's look at the general team numbers for all the squads, and I've arranged them by their Fenwick ranking, since we don't have scoring chance data for all the teams and Fenwick % matches to chance % slightly better than Shots% or Corsi%:

                                                                               

  Fenwick%
chi 0.540
van 0.539
sj 0.537
det 0.536
cgy 0.520
nsh 0.511
la 0.508
phx 0.499
dal 0.466
ana 0.464

 

The Flames were, at least by this metric, clearly ahead of Dallas, Phoenix and Anaheim, and slightly ahead of Nashville and the Kings, with a clear gap between Calgary and the elite of the conference. JLikens covered off in some detail how these metrics correlate with successful team performance here and here, so based on that criteria, the Flames should have expected a finish in the 5th to 7th place range.

 

Of course, as we all know, stuff happens. Percentages aren't always equally fair, so a team that isn't very good on the face of it, like the Ducks, can ride hot shooting and a superb PP to home ice in the first round. The Ducks' PP numbers have some backing, but at EV that just isn't the case, and EV play is about 75% of the game. The other obvious imposter here is Dallas, and the fact that they missed the post-season is nothing more than justice.

 

The percentages don't just inflate crap teams, either. They can accentuate differences between good teams as well. Here are the EVSH%, EVSV% and PDO for all ten clubs, with the ordering by SH%:

 

                                                                                      

  EVSH% EVSV% PDO
       
ana 9.2 0.927 101.9
la 8.7 0.933 102.0
det 8.5 0.922 100.5
van 8.2 0.939 102.1
dal 7.9 0.924 100.3
sj 7.2 0.942 101.4
cgy 7.1 0.910 98.1
phx 7.1 0.935 100.6
nsh 7.0 0.931 100.1
chi 6.5 0.919 98.4

 

 

As I said, the Ducks really rode the bounces, and the Hawks were openly unlucky. We often talk about PDO numbers ( the combination of EVSH% and EVSH%, expressed as a number based from 100), and if you add these totals, you might also note that Vancouver, beside being good, rode fate a touch as well. .939 and 8.2 gives a PDO number of 102.1. That's not ridiculously high, but it's high, and the Canucks took advantage of good play and good fate to amass a goal differential of +23 when the game was tied at EV. Calgary's full season differential in all situations was +11. Must be nice.

 

Calgary's PDO number was 98.1, and the Hawks were the only other team below 100 at 98.4. Even with the low PDO number, I suspect that a Hawk team that had been able to dress Dave Bolland before last night wouldn't be down 3-1 to the Canucks at the moment. Of course, if Quennville would have clued in as to how bad Marty Turco was a bit sooner, they wouldn't be facing the Canucks, but that's another story.

 

As for the Flames, the numbers paint an interesting picture. The team was a decent outshooting club, and weren't the worst SH% club when the game was in the balance, which does seem to point at one particular area for further examination.

 

The numbers don't often lie, and that EVSV% was a killer. Miikka Kiprusoff seems to have a certain teflon quality amongst the fan base and the local press, but his personal performance is likely what separated the Flames from the post-season.

 

Now, before any of you head for the hills yelling “shot quality”, I'd like to mention two things. First, if you can prove it exists in any meaningful way, head over to Behind the Net and relieve Gabe Desjardins of the 150 bucks. I'm certain he'll be happy to hear from you.

 

Second, even if there is the potential for high shot quality against to have affected Kipper, the one place that collects that sort of data, Hockey Numbers, doesn't help your cause. Chris Boersma's info suggests the Flames were the third best team in the league at limiting shot quality at EV. The team also allowed the 4th fewest shots/60 at EV, so again, he wasn't exactly peppered with an unstoppable amount of rubber.

 

                 

 

The data is really grim when you examine how Kiprusoff stacks up against the other regular starters in the West. Here are the EVSV% tied numbers for the regular goalies on the ten teams in question:

 

Niemi 0.945
Hiller 0.941
Rinne 0.939
Luongo 0.933
Bryzgalov 0.933
Crawford 0.931
Quick 0.927
Lehtonen 0.927
Howard 0.923
Kiprusoff 0.912

 

Ouch. That sort of performance just won't do, and it marks the third time in four years that Miikka Kiprusoff has been substandard. A careful reader might also note that his cap hit is higher than every last one of those other gents, and he has three years remaining on his contract. Sigh.

 

To put these percentages in some context, the Flames allowed 676 shots on goal when the game was tied at EV. If Kiprusoff was as good as the goalie that finished next to last, Jimmy Howard, he would have permitted nine fewer goals in that game state. Normally, a nine goal cut in differential would result in three points in the standings, but I have a sense that nine fewer goals allowed when the game was tied might have a slightly greater impact. Oh, and on the list of things I never planned to write, the suggestion that the team would have fared better if Kipper had only been as good as Jimmy Howard would be right up there.

 

One final set of numbers seems worth looking at. I wanted to break down the year into three parts, largely because the season seemed to have three distinct sections. The first was the opening 35 games that had the world screaming “rebuild”, the second was the 30 game segment that calmed the waters, and final section was the scuffling 17 game finish from the March 2nd loss in Chicago onward. Here's Miikka Kiprusoff's full set of EV tied numbers in that order, and note that all figures are for when he was in net, so anything where Karlsson was playing has been excluded.

 

                                    

  Shots% Fwick% Corsi% EVSH% EVSV%
Games 1-35 0.527 0.526 0.525 4.4 0.927
           
Games 36-65 0.542 0.529 0.528 10.9 0.914
           
Games 66-82 0.515 0.519 0.495 6.6 0.878

 

 

That first set looks a lot like last year, doesn't it? Kipper was playing well, and nothing went in at the other end. Those outshooting numbers were quite good, so the suggestion by a few of us that the team wasn't a 14th place club was on fairly solid ground.

 

The middle section was where the club took off, and even with the juicy SH%, they weren't that bad of a value for their record. On a personal level, Kipper really struggled in mid-January before having a good finish to that stretch.

 

In the final set of games, losing Morrison and Moss certainly didn't help the outshooting numbers, but it wasn't like the Flames fell right off the cliff. When your goalie bats .878, though, you aren't winning anything, even if you're the 77/78 Canadiens. I don't necessarily buy the premise that fatigue was a factor, but that drop is surely troubling, no matter the cause.

 

As I mentioned earlier, Kiprusoff gets a lot of rope from the fans and media because of his past history, and he did have a fine season in 09/10. At some point, though, reality has to set in. You just can't pay 5.833M a year for this type of work, no matter how you want to sugar coat things.

 

I have no idea why Kipper's play has hit the ditch, but my guess is that the removal of Jamie McLennan isn't the solution, just like replacing Marcoux wasn't the solution, so the team is in a bit of a pickle. There can't be much of a market for a goalie that has played poorly and has a large contract, and hoping he just snaps out of this funk doesn't seem like any sort of acceptable plan, either.

 

Of course, the Flames have other players as well, and it wasn't like every skater covered themselves in glory, only to be foiled by their hapless stopper. In the next installment, we'll look at the position players of note on the roster using the same collection of data.

 

1a1030a8151ca7a0d81aea58f0fb1dbc
Robert Cleave is a perpetually grumpy Winnipegger.
Avatar
#1 Tach
April 20 2011, 03:18PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

I am sure Lawrence will be right in to explain to us how well justified Kipper's contract is.

For what it is worth, this jibes with the general sense I get is the Flames just can't seem to get all facets of their game rolling together for any extended period since...the Jokinen trade maybe?

Think Florida wants another high priced veteran goalie?

Avatar
#2 schevvy
April 20 2011, 03:32PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

Is there any teams that would take Kipper at his contract? My guess would be teams such as maybe Philadelphia, Washington might take him. If Bryzgalov walks from Phoenix would they be interested in Kipper? Of course it could be Winnipeg by then. Interesting scenario, if they can find a suitor to take Kipper, would you then maybe go after Bryzgalov? Just throwing it out there.

Avatar
#3 SmellOfVictory
April 20 2011, 03:58PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

@schevvy

Bryzgalov and Vokoun have to be snatched up before anyone even thinks of trading for Kipper.

This looks like pretty damning evidence, to me. I knew he was playing poorly, but I didn't know he was playing that poorly (or that the team was outshooting that well; it sure didn't look like it some nights). My theory: Kipper smokes too much. Seriously. No professional athlete, no matter how still you sit during a game, should be a chain smoker.

Regarding shot quality, I know it's difficult/impossible to prove without scoring chance data, but I wouldn't be surprised if it played some role in these things. You look at the Flames early in the year, and they did take a lot of shots from the outside; they've always been a team where that seemed like a bit of an issue (although that could be bitter fan bias as well).

Avatar
#4 schevvy
April 20 2011, 04:04PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

The bad thing is, after reading these numbers, if Kipper plays just a little better, we make the playoffs.

Avatar
#5 Pat Steinberg
April 20 2011, 04:30PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

Those numbers do not paint a pretty picture. I thought there were spans were Kiprusoff played well, especially during the run. But over the long haul, he wasn't good enough.

Avatar
#6 NateBaldwin
April 20 2011, 04:56PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

@Robert Cleave

To be honest I didn't watch many games this year after about game 20 but is there any chance that Kip's poor EVSV% is the result of a greater number of 1-on-0/2-on-1/3-on-1 etc. chances given up by the Flames defensively, as compared to other teams?

I don't know (admittedly I haven't looked too deeply) if any of the metrics used consider this.

Avatar
#7 mikeecho
April 20 2011, 04:56PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

@SmellOfVictory

re: chain smoker... Dale Hawerchuk would disagree!

Avatar
#8 Kent Wilson
April 20 2011, 05:07PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
NateBaldwin wrote:

@Robert Cleave

To be honest I didn't watch many games this year after about game 20 but is there any chance that Kip's poor EVSV% is the result of a greater number of 1-on-0/2-on-1/3-on-1 etc. chances given up by the Flames defensively, as compared to other teams?

I don't know (admittedly I haven't looked too deeply) if any of the metrics used consider this.

Probably not Nate. I mean, we may at one point go through all the goals scored on Kipper this season (NHL.com has them all) and tally which ones were high quality chances like that and which weren't. As Bob mentioned though, the Flames were pretty good at limiting shots against this year, so it's not very likely.

Also, for those not aware...Fenwick = corsi - blocked shots.

Finally, thanks for this Bob. Great work.

Avatar
#9 SmellOfVictory
April 20 2011, 06:29PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

By the way, do any of y'all have a decent idea of the correlation between Fenwick and scoring chance ratio, or has that sort of analysis been done?

Avatar
#11 Kent Wilson
April 20 2011, 06:48PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

@SmellOfVictory

That's something else we and some of the other egg heads will continue to look into this summer when all the chance counts are looked at no doubt.

Avatar
#13 negrilcowboy
April 20 2011, 08:04PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
Pat Steinberg wrote:

Those numbers do not paint a pretty picture. I thought there were spans were Kiprusoff played well, especially during the run. But over the long haul, he wasn't good enough.

hey pat trick, you play behind cory soritch for a season, kipper probably was contemplating homicide on some nights.having to deal with cory and the a bomb as defensemen would make ya wanta smoke, crack that is not marloburrows

Avatar
#14 SmellOfVictory
April 20 2011, 10:49PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

That's even higher than I'd have expected. Incredible.

Avatar
#15 FireOnIce
April 21 2011, 01:19PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

@mikeecho

Carey Price disagrees too...

Avatar
#16 Marcelo Costa
April 21 2011, 05:42PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

Dear Webmaster,

My name is Marcelo Costa, and I’m a Senior Affiliate Manager at Frontline Gaming Partners, exclusive affiliate partner of industry leading gaming site betED.com. Online for more than 10 years, betED.com Sportsbook, Casino & Poker is well known for easy deposits, fast payouts, amazing software and large cash bonuses!

I am writing today in hopes of having you join our vast network of affiliates already promoting betED to earn a 30% commission on the lifetime value of your referrals. betED is a featured advertiser on the largest sport gaming information sites in North America including Covers.com (where it has been the #1 rated sportsbook for over 3 years), VegasInsider, DocSports, Gambling911, TheRX and countless others and we'd love to be a part of your site.

To register and start earning commissions immediately, simply fill out our online form: http://www.frontlinegamingpartners.com/signup.php

Some reasons your referrals will love to play at betED:

- Up to $250 FREE CASH on every deposit! - 24/7 top notch customer service! - 50% Sportsbook Win bonus for every new account! - The easiest to use & most powerful Sportsbook software online! - A huge 70+ game casino! - An active poker network for a little Hold 'Em between matches!

betED has been featured by countless mainstream media outlets including MSNBC, USA Today, Las Vegas Review Journal, LA Times, New York Daily News, Chicago Tribune and many others. The site accepts Instant Check (ACH), Credit Cards, NETELLER, moneybookers, Money Transfers and Bank Wires.

I am here to answer any questions you may have about our partner brands so please don't hesitate to email me at affiliates@FrontlineGamingPartners.com

Thanks again and we look forward to hearing back from you soon!

Regards,

Marcelo Costa FGP/betED

Avatar
#17 wattree
April 25 2011, 01:14PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

I think that the plan with Kipper almost has to be to muddle through another season with him, and then try to target the teams that struggle to get to the salary cap floor for trades. The fact that they are only paying 6.5m over 2 seasons, but will get credit for 11.6m is probably pretty attractive for teams like Columbus and NYI. As long as he doesn't fall all the way off the cliff, they can try to sell his past glories when they bring him in.

Comments are closed for this article.