Flames Scoring Chances - Game 49 vs Edmonton Oilers

Kent Wilson
January 21 2012 10:42PM

 

 

 

Final Score: 6-2 W

Final Summary

Corsi

Head-to-head ice

Faceoffs

Scoring Chances for NHL Game Number 20711

Team Period Time Note CGY Opponent  
CGY 1 17:55 0 5 8 16 19 23 34 14 20 25 33 35 91 5v5
CGY 1 13:33 0 5 11 19 22 34 44 5 20 24 28 35   5v4
CGY 1 13:32 0 5 11 19 22 34 44 5 20 24 28 35   5v4
CGY 1 13:12 Backlund goal 5 11 19 22 34 44 5 20 24 28 33 35 5v5
CGY 1 5:21 +2 5 11 19 22 34 44 20 25 35 57 58   5v4
EDM 1 4:14 +2 5 8 10 19 23 34 4 25 33 35 83 89 5v5
CGY 1 1:08 Stempniak goal 4 10 13 22 34 44 4 14 25 33 35 89 5v5
EDM 1 0:01 +3 4 11 12 34 44 93 4 5 35 58 83 89 5v5
EDM 2 19:47 +3 4 10 13 22 34 44 4 24 35 44 83 89 5v5
EDM 2 18:44 +3 6 7 11 12 34 93 5 10 28 35 58 94 5v5
CGY 2 15:37 +3 4 5 12 13 34 93 5 10 24 35 94   5v4
CGY 2 15:06 +3 4 5 12 13 34 93 5 20 28 35 58   5v4
CGY 2 13:52 +3 7 11 19 22 34 44 24 25 33 35 89 94 5v5
EDM 2 11:19 +3 5 11 18 23 34   4 10 14 35 44 94 4v5
CGY 2 6:34 +3 6 11 12 23 34 93 5 10 28 35 58 94 5v5
CGY 2 3:32 +3 4 5 10 13 22 34 16 24 28 35 44 57 5v5
EDM 2 1:31 +3 6 7 8 16 19 34 14 25 33 35 83 89 5v5
CGY 2 0:36 Stempniak goal 4 10 13 22 34 44 5 14 35 58 89 91 5v5
EDM 3 14:42 +3 5 8 16 19 34 44 14 20 24 40 44 91 5v5
CGY 3 13:00 Bouwmeester goal 4 5 12 13 34 93 5 10 24 40 94   5v4
CGY 3 11:47 +4 4 5 12 13 34 93 5 20 24 28 40   5v4
CGY 3 11:36 +4 4 5 12 13 34 93 5 20 24 28 40   5v4
EDM 3 3:52 +4 5 10 13 22 34 44 5 10 14 40 58 94 5v5
EDM 3 3:45 Smyth goal 5 11 12 23 34 93 5 10 28 40 58 94 5v5
CGY 3 3:17 +3 6 7 8 16 19 34 10 25 28 40 44 94 5v5

 

# Player EV PP SH
4 J. BOUWMEESTER 16:46 3 2 5:12 5 0 1:16 0 0
5 M. GIORDANO 14:32 3 4 5:41 8 0 2:05 0 1
6 C. SARICH 15:57 2 2 0:00 0 0 0:36 0 0
7 T. BRODIE 13:39 2 2 2:54 0 0 0:00 0 0
8 B. MORRISON 15:19 2 3 0:00 0 0 0:00 0 0
10 B. COMEAU 13:34 3 3 0:00 0 0 1:43 0 0
11 M. BACKLUND 10:06 3 3 2:49 3 0 1:16 0 1
12 J. IGINLA 12:11 1 3 5:22 5 0 0:05 0 0
13 O. JOKINEN 12:53 3 2 5:43 5 0 0:05 0 0
15 T. JACKMAN 9:28 0 0 0:00 0 0 0:00 0 0
16 T. KOSTOPOULOS 13:46 2 2 0:00 0 0 0:56 0 0
18 M. STAJAN 9:37 0 0 0:00 0 0 1:34 0 1
19 B. JONES 12:28 4 3 3:21 3 0 0:26 0 0
22 L. STEMPNIAK 12:23 5 2 3:10 3 0 1:17 0 0
23 S. HANNAN 17:19 2 2 0:03 0 0 2:20 0 1
34 M. KIPRUSOFF 47:28 8 8 8:32 8 0 4:00 0 1
44 C. BUTLER 16:52 4 4 3:14 3 0 1:43 0 0
57 L. BOUMA 9:47 0 0 0:00 0 0 0:38 0 0
93 M. CAMMALLERI 10:43 1 3 5:11 5 0 0:00 0 0

 

Period Totals EV PP 5v3 PP SH 5v3 SH
1 6 2 3 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 6 4 4 3 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
3 4 3 1 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Totals 16 9 8 8 8 0 0 0 0 1 0 0

Not a lot happened at ES in terms of chances tonight, although the Flames managed to put shots and such on net when they had the PP. The Oilers couldn't geenrate much even though they were chasing all night and Khabibulin's lousy goaltending hurt them a lot.

Ironically, a couple of the worst Flames at ES this evening were Iginla and Cammalleri. They were fine with the ma advantage, but had a lot of problems moving the puck north and/or putting the puck on net from the scoring area. Sutter basically stopped playing the first line once the team went up for good about mid-way through, thus their relatively low ice time.

39d8109299a9795cb3b41a4e9b49d501
Kent is a published author and the Nations Network Managing Editor. His work also appears at Hockey Prospectus. Catch him regularly on the FAN960 in Calgary and TEAM 1260 in Edmonton. For questions, complaints, criticisms, etc contact Kent @ kent.wilson@gmail. Follow him on Twitter here.
Sort comments by props
Avatar
Reply #1 David Staples January 22 2012, 12:01AM
+1 0 props

I had it 20 to 10 for the Flames in scoring chances, but I include an area extending out in a semi-oval from the midsection of the two faceoff circles back towards the blueline, so i makes sense my numbers are a bit higher than you have.

I include this area because I've noticed from shooting percentage charts that it's a higher percentage area as well.

Avatar
Reply #2 David Staples January 22 2012, 12:03AM
+1 0 props

Oh, I also included the empty-net shot as a chance.

For my records, I use the same definition of "even strength" as the NHL does, so I can compare my plus/minus numbers on scoring players with the official ones.

Comments are closed for this article.