BACKS IN BUISNESS!

Vintage Flame
November 07 2012 09:26AM

 

Recently I had the chance to talk to Uffe Bodin, the Editor in Chief for hockeysverige.se. Uffe was updating the twitter-verse with the happenings around the various Swedish hockey leagues. I took the opportunity to ask how Mikael Backlund was faring playing with VIK Västerås HK in the HockeyAllsvenskan league. He replied...

 

After a short discussion back and forth, Uffe agreed to do an interview for Flames Nation specifically about Mikael and his start to this season. After all, who doesn't want another article about Mikis, right?

Vintage Flame: What has been your impression of the play of Mikael Backlund so far this year?

Uffe Bodin: He's obviously playing in a league that is far, far away from the NHL when it comes to overall skill, but his game has certainly exceeded my expectations. He had a rough season in the NHL last year and I was uncertain of where he stood after all the injuries. These past few weeks, however, he has probably been the most dominant player in the league. And that's a pretty good thing since guys like Anze Kopitar, Matt Read, Carl Hagelin, Gabriel Landeskog and Patrik Berglund are also playing here.

VF: Last year, because of injuries, Mike didn’t have the opportunity to get off to the quick start that he has had this year. In your opinion, what has been the main reason he has seen early success in VIK Västerås HK?

UB: A lot of players that come to Sweden from the NHL have needed some time to adjust. With Mikael, it seemed like he was able to do everything right away. He had three points in his first game and has just been playing better and better after that. Since Västerås is the only club he ever played for in Sweden, I'd say familiarity is probably the key. He knows all the players and the coaches after working out with them during the summer. That probably helps a lot.

VF: How would you describe Backlund’s role with Västerås in terms of his “time on ice”?

UB: He's playing in pretty much every situation together, not as a centerman but as a leftwinger.

VF: That's an interesting move, going from the middle over to the wing. Is he utilized more as a powerplay guy or a penalty killer?

UB: Powerplay guy, for sure.

VF: Tell us a bit about the guys that play on his line.

UB: Patrik Berglund of the St. Louis Blues is a big, scoring center with a great shot. Mikael Frycklund is the other winger on that line. He's just 19 years old and is probably living is dream right now, playing on a line with two NHL'ers.

VF: Is he the kind of player that benefits from the guys he plays with, or does he elevate the game of his linemates?

UB: I'd say that he has elevated Berglund's game. Berglund came over much earlier than Backlund and has played five games more. He had trouble scoring initially, but ever since Backlund caught fire, the pucks seem to go in for him as well. Backlund has 19 points after ten games and is fifth in the league in scoring. Berglund is 13th with 16 points.

VF: Last year there was concern over Backlund’s game. He wasn’t scoring and even seemed tentative to shoot the puck, leaving him with 4.7 shooting percentage. There were obviously serious confidence issues. As you mentioned, this year he is 2nd in team scoring and 5th in the league after only 10 games, he has to feel somewhat rejuvenated, if a 23 year needs rejuvenation? Talk about, in your opinion, what effect this is having on his mental game.

UB: Just by looking at the way he drives to the net gives you an indication that he's playing with a lot of confidence right now. Still, he's playing in Hockeyallsvenskan, the Swedish equivalent to the AHL, so you can't draw too many conclusions about how the game he is playing right now would transpire to the NHL.

VF: You are very careful to remind us to remember that Backlund is playing in the Allsvenskan. Why is that?

UB: As I said earlier, it's the AHL of Sweden (without the farm team system). You have the SEL (Swedish Elite League) which is the number one league in Sweden and then you have Hockeyallsvenskan. Teams in Hockeyallsvenskan strive for qualification to the SEL, while the teams that are in the bottom of the standings in the SEL strive to avoid relegation to Hockeyallsvenskan.

VF: Do you think there is a correlation in Backlund’s early success and the fact that, to a degree, he may be under less pressure by playing in Sweden’s 2nd tier league rather than the SEL?

UB: To some degree, I've got to think so. The game is very different from the NHL and especially the defencemen that he is playing against are softer. Still, he's producing almost two points per game, which is more than anyone else in that league is producing, including Kopitar and the other NHL players.

VF: After multiple surgeries on his hand, he never seemed to be comfortable shooting last season. How does his shot and stick-work in general look this year?

UB: Great. He has been scoring some really beautiful goals lately, some of them by using that great shot he has.

VF: Not to put you on the spot, but in your opinion how close would Backlund’s numbers look to his current stats, if he was playing for the Flames in the NHL?

UB: Oh boy, tha't's a tough one. I don't think he would become a high scoring NHL player right away. Depending on which role the Flames were to give him, I'd say he could probably score 15-20 goals, 30-35 points this year. But it all depends on which role and how much ice time he would be given.

VF: In Calgary, Mikael is used more in a defensive role. Most of his zone starts are in Flames end and against the opposition's scoring lines. By your estimation and from what you have seen, do the Calgary Flames utilize Mikael Backlund in the right way? If so, why?

UB: Mikael Backlund has always been at his best when he is used as an offensive player in a top six role. I don't think he'll ever be a good shutdown center or a great penalty killer. He will always be a better player with the puck than without.

VF: Final question for you Uffe. There is a wide range of opinions when it comes to the future of Mikael Backlund and the Calgary Flames. Where would you put Mike’s ceiling based on what you have seen following his career?

UB: If he could find more balance in his game, and by that I mean even out the range between his ups and downs, I could see him become a 20-25 goal scorer in the league. But I'd like to see him against tougher opponents than the ones he's been facing this season before I say anything more. This week, he's playing with the Swedish National Team in Karjala Tournament in Finland. He'll face a lot of good NHL players there. That will probably give us a clue of how good he really is at the moment.

 ... I want to take this moment to thank Uffe for agreeing to do this. It was a pleasure chatting back and forth and I appreciate him taking the time to join us here on Flames Nation. I look forward to being able to do this again sometime.

You can follow Uffe Bodin here on Twitter.

E42f2ca09dfb26046c3060ff46473aff
Vintage Flame is a Calgary based sports junkie that prefers to call hockey a "religion" rather than an addiction. He believes there are two types of hockey fans. Those who cheer for the Flames, and those who don't understand the sport yet. Follow Vintage_Flame on Twitter
Avatar
#1 Kent Wilson
November 07 2012, 10:24AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Good stuff. Nice to hear Backlund looks dominant. Uffe's warnings are true though - the Allsvenskan is a much lesser league.

Avatar
#2 Jai Kiran
November 07 2012, 10:50AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Thanks: good to hear from somebody who's clearly watching closely. It's great to see 2 young Calgary centers (Backs & Horak) tearing it up; less great that they are both doing it as wingers: will we have to wait for Reinhart before we see a Calgary forward that can win a faceoff?

Avatar
#3 Kent Wilson
November 07 2012, 10:52AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

@Jai Kiran

Matt Stajan won 51.8% of his faceoffs last year..........

Avatar
#4 SmellOfVictory
November 07 2012, 11:13AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props
Kent Wilson wrote:

Matt Stajan won 51.8% of his faceoffs last year..........

He said Calgary forward, not Leaf agent saboteur.

Avatar
#5 Kevin R
November 07 2012, 11:40AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Good work VF! I dont think we should get too heads up about the league he's playing in right now. It was probably the perfect tonic to get his confidence that will lead to setting more difficult goals once the NHL starts again. He will be in a much better mental zone to achieve these goals. I have hated how both Sutters have handled this kid & I think we have one last chance to have a pretty good young hockey player in our top 6 we actually drafted. I would love to see a line of Baerschti, Backlund & Cerevenka & see if these young guys can get a chemistry together.

Avatar
#7 T&A4Flames
November 07 2012, 12:13PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props
Kent Wilson wrote:

Matt Stajan won 51.8% of his faceoffs last year..........

Super....

Avatar
#8 Steve
November 07 2012, 01:00PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props
Vintage Flame wrote:

Regardless of the league he plays in or its level of competition, it seems that Vasteras is content in using him as an offensive player. The result is that Mike has been able to show results and I think that is a huge positive for his mental game and his confidence.

There are two main things I have taken away from this interview with Uffe.

1. If Kent is right about the Allsvenskan Equivalincies, then I would be pretty content if Backs came back and scored somewhere around 60 pts next year for the Flames.

2. Like Kevin suggested, if the Flames put Backs with some offensively minded players like say,Baertschi and Cervenka, then he may start to realize some of the potential that so many people have seen in him. He is obviously a player that responds to confident situations. Being paired up with young guys like himself might show that he part of building something with the team and not a band-aid center while the team tries to figure out what the hell its doing out there on the ice.

I would be more than content with 60 points. That could easily be the difference in this team making the playoffs.

I'd be content with 40-45, just some progress.

Avatar
#9 Kent Wilson
November 07 2012, 01:19PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Backlund's point totals in Calgary are going to be heavily influenced by his opportunity. I assume his percentages will bounce, but if he continues to see next to no power play time and/or is deployed as straight-up shut down option, then 35-40 points the upper ceiling for him.

Avatar
#10 SmellOfVictory
November 07 2012, 01:29PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props
Kent Wilson wrote:

Backlund's point totals in Calgary are going to be heavily influenced by his opportunity. I assume his percentages will bounce, but if he continues to see next to no power play time and/or is deployed as straight-up shut down option, then 35-40 points the upper ceiling for him.

Which is still awesome for a straight shut down option.

Avatar
#11 Kent Wilson
November 07 2012, 01:31PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

@SmellOfVictory

For sure. He'd be Frans Nielsen!

Avatar
#12 arab
November 07 2012, 04:15PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Backlund for Ty Rattie

Avatar
#15 Michael
November 07 2012, 05:01PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

If nothing else, good for his confidence. If and when we get a season, he needs to take that confidence and actually produce points in the NHL. The list of players that can produce in lesser leagues but not in the NHL is mighty long....

Avatar
#16 SmellOfVictory
November 07 2012, 06:18PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props
arab wrote:

Backlund for Ty Rattie

No.

Avatar
#17 jeremywilhelm
November 07 2012, 06:36PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props
arab wrote:

Backlund for Ty Rattie

Silly talk

Avatar
#18 MC Hockey
November 07 2012, 07:44PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Hi all, Long time, no comment. And you may hear more from me in some other way (that's called foreshadowing for literary minions). Anyways, I would love to see Flames use offensive players the right way... on offense. If Backlund has to play left or right wing to be on lines 1 or 2, that's OK. Just stop the Sutter-esque techniques of making every player a "all around, two way guy". That's like using a donut as your dessert in a fancy restaurant - it's good enough right? It works but not really, donuts are for coffee shops.

Avatar
#19 Baalzamon
November 07 2012, 11:08PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

@MC Hockey

except the Flames already have too many wingers. Even with Backlund at center, that still means BOTH Cammalleri and Cervenka have to play center for there MAYBE to be a spot open for Sven. And even without Sven, it's difficult to call that the wrong roster configuration.

Tanguay - Cammalleri - Iginla

Hudler - Cervenka - Stempniak

Glencross - Backlund - Comeau

Bouma - Jones - Jackman

I hesitate to even try to figure out what happens if Backlund shifts to the wing. And it makes me cry a little to see the resulting group of "centers".

Avatar
#20 Rude
November 08 2012, 05:41AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props
Baalzamon wrote:

except the Flames already have too many wingers. Even with Backlund at center, that still means BOTH Cammalleri and Cervenka have to play center for there MAYBE to be a spot open for Sven. And even without Sven, it's difficult to call that the wrong roster configuration.

Tanguay - Cammalleri - Iginla

Hudler - Cervenka - Stempniak

Glencross - Backlund - Comeau

Bouma - Jones - Jackman

I hesitate to even try to figure out what happens if Backlund shifts to the wing. And it makes me cry a little to see the resulting group of "centers".

Your forgetting face off ace, Matt Stajan......

Avatar
#21 Steve
November 08 2012, 07:20AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props
Kent Wilson wrote:

Backlund's point totals in Calgary are going to be heavily influenced by his opportunity. I assume his percentages will bounce, but if he continues to see next to no power play time and/or is deployed as straight-up shut down option, then 35-40 points the upper ceiling for him.

Or perhaps conversely, his opportunity will be heavily influenced by his point totals ;) If he shows finishing ability and creativity, I'm sure he'll get power play time.

Avatar
#22 Kent Wilson
November 08 2012, 08:00AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

@Steve

That's a fair point. Bit of a chicken and egg in a way.

Avatar
#23 the-wolf
November 08 2012, 08:26AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Flames have a long history of ruining offensive talents by burying themon the 3rd and 4th lines. One day, this may change.....

Avatar
#24 Baalzamon
November 08 2012, 07:55PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

@Rude

no I didn't, I just deliberately refrained from mentioning him.

Avatar
#25 RKD
November 09 2012, 12:10PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Well I am happy to hear Backs is dominating even if it is a lesser league he badly needs confidence.

I am interested that he is playing as a LW, maybe when the lockout ends whenever that maybe Hartley could utilize him there.

Sven is a setup guy, I think Backs would benefit being the recipient of Sven's passes. Backs would still be used for face-offs and penalty kills.

Avatar
#26 Baalzamon
November 10 2012, 10:34AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

@RKD

it makes 0 sense for the Flames to convert Backlund to the wing; thin on center and crowded on the wing--especially the left side--as they are.

besides, Baertschi's a LW. For Backlund to benefit from his playmaking, he would have to not play LW.

Comments are closed for this article.