VOICE OF THE NATION - ENOUGH ALREADY

Vintage Flame
February 14 2012 08:37AM

 

 

... Good question. While Saturday’s win against the Canucks was huge for the team in that it got them to within a deuce of the eighth and final playoff seed, the Flames paid a pretty hefty price in doing so. Regardless of how you see Mikael Backlund’s role on this team - an offensive disappointment on a ticking clock, or a key defensive component in need of some time and patience - his injury during the Vancouver game means nothing but trouble for a team that isn’t getting any favours and by no means is taking the easy route to the post-season.

Backlund becomes the fifth of Calgary’s top nine forwards to limp off the ice and on to the IR list. He is the sixth player in total including Derek Smith. If you add that to earlier injuries to Tanguay and Giordano, the total goes up to eight. I’m pretty sure there is a television deal in there somewhere, because by my count... Eight is enough!

Calgary has a half dozen games left before the trade deadline. Three of them are against conference opponents that the Flames need two points against without giving up a loser point. That’s not to say the other three aren’t important as well, but against Toronto (tonight) and Philly, take the points however you can get them. The Edmonton game is what it is as always, but with the depleted line-up, even that contest won’t be a walk in the park.

Calgary has done well to cope with injuries as they have hit, but they are starting to plague the team now. Even though Brent Sutter and Jay Feaster are adamant about not using injuries as an excuse for how the season is going, or turns out, even they have to be shaking their heads about what seems like nothing less of a hex bestowed upon them by the Hockey Gods. Taking a look at the projected lines for the game against the Leafs, that second unit is down right frightening. Cammalleri moved to center and who’s that, Tom Kostopoulos on the wing? Tom Kostopoulos? It doesn’t exactly go uphill after that either.

WHERE TO TURN?

Earlier in the season, when the Flames were struggling with lines, chemistry and just generating shots, fans both here and on twitter often joked that management should switch the Flames out for a much more productive and successful Abbotsford Heat line-up. Well either by divine intervention or a sick joke, we’re getting ready to see that. The third line is all Abbotsford with Roman Horak centering Lance Bouma and Krys Kolanos. All three of these guys have served ably in their short stints with the club. I’ve been really impressed with the play of Bouma in his limited role, but as Rob Vollman showed us in this week’s Black Box, Lance is hardly a difference maker. I thank God that this game is at home, but even then I’m sure you’re going to see Ron Wilson do everything he can to get Phil Kessel’s line out there against the line of “Abby Road” (I just thought up that name).

So what do the Flames have going for them now? It seems that whenever they get close to a playoff spot, something like another injury knocks them back down a few rungs on the ladder. Listening to Eric Duhatschek on the Fan960 recently, he actually had some positive notes on the Flames. Duhatschek talked about how despite the injuries mounting up for Calgary, they still had their core six players healthy and playing well. Iginla, Jokinen, Tanguay and Cammalleri up front, while Bouwmeester and Giordano took care of manning the blueline; it may not be the prettiest scenario and there are many of the opinion that the Flames are just flat out getting lucky in wins like Saturday over Vancouver, but in the end who cares? I’m sure the players weren’t sitting in the dressing room upset that they won a ‘lucky one’, and neither should the fans, if they are in the group that want to see them make the post-season.

The fact remains that Calgary is going to have to not look a gift horse in the mouth. There were two things that made the win vs. the Canucks possible. First, Vancouver came out flat and not ready to play, and second Miikka Kiprusoff was once again, well Miikka Kiprusoff. Not only has Kipper given the Flames a chance to win almost every night, he has been the reason they have won as many games as they have. He’s going to have to continue that trend as well.

February is a pure survival month for Calgary and if you don’t usually tune into Nation Radio, then you should take a listen to this week’s podcast. In Segment Two, Allan talks to Kent about the Flames chance at the playoffs, the play of Kipper and if this is the best he has looked in years. One comment that scares the hell out of me, but fully agree with is that Kent said if Miikka can continue to play up to his current standards (ie. .921 Sv%), then he always gives the Flames a chance. However, if his play slips in a similar manner as last year, then the Flames are done for. That’s a pretty fair and accurate statement.

IN THE END

You can’t do anything about the injury situation, so like Feaster has said there is little point in harping about it, and it just gets redundant complaining about it so in the end, what do the Flames need to do right now, and for the rest of the regular season? The Flames need better health for a playoff push, but that isn’t going to happen until early to mid March, when they start getting back the likes of Stempniak, Glencross and Derek Smith.

Until then, they have two weeks and six games to fully commit to being either buyers or sellers at the trade deadline. The three conference games should give them that answer. They now sit three points behind Phoenix after the Coyotes gained a point in a shootout loss to the Canucks, and have a game in hand. Those only matter if you win them, so putting something together against the Maple Leafs tonight would be a good start.

To make up for the loss of Backlund, the Flames have recalled Paul Byron from Abbotsford. He’ll draw in on the fourth line. Personally I’d rather see him with Cammalleri and Comeau over Kostopoulos, but all the lines will be thrown in the blender eventually anyways, so I don’t think it matters too much at this stage.

Whether the flames make an impact deal or just a couple of depth moves at the deadline remains to be seen, but at the moment they are in the thick of a playoff battle, and they still have a shot at things. Lately I have been referred to as the “homer fanboy”, and I’m okay with that - I still think they have a decent shot at the playoffs and I think Feaster is working on a bigger deal rather than depth moves. The Flames will have some supproting when guys return in March, so what Calgary needs right now is that shot of offensive adrenaline that gets them over the hump.

Is that Jeff Carter or Michael Frolik, or even someone else? We’ll see over the course of the next two weeks.

E42f2ca09dfb26046c3060ff46473aff
Vintage Flame is a Calgary based sports junkie that prefers to call hockey a "religion" rather than an addiction. He believes there are two types of hockey fans. Those who cheer for the Flames, and those who don't understand the sport yet. Follow Vintage_Flame on Twitter
Avatar
#1 bookofloob
February 14 2012, 09:11AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
1
props

With the injuries this year, Jarome's slow start, the team's subsequent suckitude, a bunch of kids and hacks from the farm, questionable management, suspect coaching, Chris Butler, Scott Hannan, Anton Babchuk, Matt Stajan, and a general lack of skill and character, the Flames are still within a Bertuzzi of the playoffs.

That is outstanding.

In related news, I love that Miikka Kiprusoff.

Avatar
#2 Kent Wilson
February 14 2012, 09:20AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

@bookofloob

The Glencross and Jokinen hot streaks helped a lot too. And Jay Bouwmeester has been an integral part of keeping this team afloat as well.

Avatar
#3 bookofloob
February 14 2012, 09:51AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

@Kent Wilson

Definitely.

Players seem to be popping in and doing something positive at opportune times.

Like Roman Horak. Who in the hell thought Roman Horak was going to pot such an important goal against the Canucks?

Avatar
#4 Bob in the Abbey
February 14 2012, 10:22AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
1
props

One of the concerns I have is that by being in the play-off hunt despite the numerous injuries, ownership and management could view this roster as being OK the way it is (imagine how good we could be if everyone was healthy??? I'm hearing fans say this now). Almost a repeat of last year with the mandate being to stay the course. That could lead to ownership to put pressure on Feaster to resign some of our upcoming UFA's that we were suspecting would be changing addresses this summer.

I know it's easy to beat a dead horse, but while we have seen some of our young prospects come in and hold thier own...we don't have 1 or 2 difference makers that can come in and have the torch passed to them in 2-3 years from Iggy and Kipper. Who's the next face(s) of this franchise? So much has been made the past few years about being a "competitive" team that just misses out of the play-offs...I want to be a contender!

Avatar
#5 wawful
February 14 2012, 11:13AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

Cabbotsford Fleat. Half Calgary Flames. Half Abbotsford Heat. All Canuck slayers!

Avatar
#6 mayhemsince1977
February 14 2012, 11:45AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

"Abby Road" Hahaha, I love it! We need to make this the temporary name for the Red Mile until we make the playoffs again.

Avatar
#7 negrilcowboy
February 14 2012, 12:00PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

firstly, will mickey backwards be that big of a loss to the lineup? this team is actually a bad vegas act, all smoke and mirrors with stellar play from the core and onion thin everywhere else. the resultant product is the work of darwood sutter and his myopic hockey vision of veterans over skill and we all know the reality of the situation is that things truly suck in flames country. teasing with a playoff spot with a collection of ham n eggers yet another year and an aging core.the irony is that the only remaining piece from diongate is matt"aint playin" stajan as calgary hosts a playoff bound leafs squad. the time to blow it up is upon us again,seems like tax time and why not rebuild hit at the same time year in year out. right now the only carter that would want to be a flame is fat old nell.

Avatar
#8 SmellOfVictory
February 14 2012, 12:40PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

negril, it's totally okay to chill out on the rhetoric. But yes, it's highly likely that the only injuries that will have had a greater impact this season are those of Tanguay and Glencross.

Avatar
#9 Emir
February 14 2012, 01:14PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

no backlund means more time spent in our end and more shots against. That game turned around for the nucks once backs was out. Only one line that can move the puck then, and even that is a pig with lip stick on.

Avatar
#11 Emir
February 14 2012, 02:16PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

@Vintage Flame

careful VF, the feast could hear that and trade our first!

Avatar
#13 Bob in the Abbey
February 14 2012, 03:22PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
Vintage Flame wrote:

Emir, Like I said, I think there is a deal in the works, whether it's significant enough to warrant their 1st rounder, I'm skeptical.

VF, I think your right...a big deal could be in the works. What worries me is that I think it involves Jeff Carter...and based on the attitude he's exhibited since his trade to Columbus, I'm not convinced he's what this team needs.

Avatar
#14 Redd3vil
February 14 2012, 03:25PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
Kent Wilson wrote:

The Glencross and Jokinen hot streaks helped a lot too. And Jay Bouwmeester has been an integral part of keeping this team afloat as well.

ya he's a real deal at like 6.something mil a season.

Avatar
#15 Emir
February 14 2012, 03:32PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

I know there is a deal in the works. I just really wonder what does that deal look like. My biggest fear is that we overpay. I'm ok with giving up our first rounder, i really am. But for what is the question. Its thin in Abby and we can't put all our eggs in one basket with Sven either.

If it is a deal for a 2nd or 3rd line player, what are we trading is all I wonder. I can't even put a deal together in my little mind. The only person who we want to trade and isnt injured is stajan. After that its Comeau. And can we really afford to trade a roster player for a roster player? No we can't, because we are just spinning tires then. The only thing we want to trade and can get value for is our first, and I don't like that even a little bit.

Unless the feast can do another Jones-ish trade, that i'm fine with.

Avatar
#16 SmellOfVictory
February 14 2012, 03:32PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
Vintage Flame wrote:

With all the woulda, coulda, shoulda's... I still have a sympathetic shoulder for the injury situation.

Mediocre team or not.. I refuse to believe this team wouldn't be in a better position if 55% of the core group wasn't on IR. 250+ man games lost to injury is going to have effects on your points and standings.

Agreed. I think people say "injuries aren't an excuse" simply because they're an expected part of a given NHL season.

Avatar
#19 rubbertrout
February 14 2012, 04:19PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
Vintage Flame wrote:

I think it's absolutely ludicrous to assume that many injuries don't have an effect on your season.

BY NO MEANS am I comparing Calgary to Boston but, the Bruins have lost 32 man games to injury. Where would they be if they were at the 250+ level that Calgary is?

Vintage, Does that Man game total include Ivanans? You need to be fair when you refer to man games. That really isn't a loss although it shows up as a lost man game. Have the Flames had injuries? you bet, but I don't think the number is quite as bad as 250 implies when a big chunk of that is tied to a non factor who has been on IR so long that he's inactive.

Carter isn't the kind of passing centre this team needs ten year contract notwithstanding.

Avatar
#20 SmellOfVictory
February 14 2012, 05:51PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
Vintage Flame wrote:

I think it's absolutely ludicrous to assume that many injuries don't have an effect on your season.

BY NO MEANS am I comparing Calgary to Boston but, the Bruins have lost 32 man games to injury. Where would they be if they were at the 250+ level that Calgary is?

Saying there's no effect and saying they're not an excuse are two different things, good sir. ;)

Avatar
#21 PrairieStew
February 14 2012, 06:30PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

Boston's 32 games lost obviously don't include Marc Savard. Imagine what they would be with a healthy Savvy.

Avatar
#23 the-wolf
February 15 2012, 07:39AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
Vintage Flame wrote:

I think it's absolutely ludicrous to assume that many injuries don't have an effect on your season.

BY NO MEANS am I comparing Calgary to Boston but, the Bruins have lost 32 man games to injury. Where would they be if they were at the 250+ level that Calgary is?

Except that the Flames have been exceptionally healthy the past few seasons and still not done much. Other teams face injuries too.

If the Flames do land a top 6 player it's guaranteed the team comes out in the summer and says "injuries, Cammi for a full season, plus Sven now, plus (name of player traded for)."

And, I suppose, they'll be right in a sense. But it had better be a pretty significant player they bring in because they won't rebuild and hanging out in no mans land ad nauseum is killing me.

Comments are closed for this article.