Flames Scoring Chances - Game 64 vs Phoenix Coyotes

Kent Wilson
March 01 2012 09:50PM

 

 

 

Final score: 4-2 W

Final Summary

Corsi

Head-to-head ice

Faceoffs

Scoring Chances for NHL Game Number 20956

Team Period Time Note CGY Opponent  
CGY 1 18:58 0 7 12 27 34 40 93 14 15 23 28 32 41 5v5
CGY 1 17:32 0 5 10 16 18 23 34 11 13 17 20 26 41 5v5
CGY 1 10:53 0 6 7 12 34 40 93 14 15 23 28 33 41 5v5
CGY 1 6:39 0 5 13 15 20 23 34 3 11 13 17 32 41 5v5
CGY 1 5:52 Cammalleri goal 4 7 12 34 40 93 14 15 23 28 32 41 5v5
CGY 1 2:37 Jokinen goal 5 7 13 23 34 93 3 12 22 32 37 41 5v5
PHX 1 0:36 +3 4 5 16 20 34   13 14 22 23 37 41 4v5
PHX 2 18:43 +3 4 10 18 23 34   3 11 17 23 37 41 4v5
PHX 2 18:33 Torres goal 4 10 18 23 34   3 11 17 23 37 41 4v5
PHX 2 16:30 +2 5 10 16 18 23 34 12 20 22 26 37 41 5v5
PHX 2 16:13 Rozsival goal 4 12 27 34 40 93 11 13 17 23 32 41 5v5
CGY 2 13:47 +1 5 15 23 34 51 57 14 15 23 26 28 41 5v5
PHX 2 12:36 +1 4 10 16 18 27 34 3 11 12 13 33 41 5v5
PHX 2 10:45 +1 5 12 23 34 40 93 14 15 23 28 32 41 5v5
PHX 2 6:30 +1 5 12 23 34 51 57 11 13 17 23 32 41 5v5
PHX 2 3:08 +1 4 6 16 34 40   3 13 19 41 50 89 4v5
CGY 3 19:33 +1 4 12 27 34 40 93 11 13 17 23 32 41 5v5
CGY 3 15:37 +1 6 7 13 20 25 34 3 14 15 28 33 41 5v5
CGY 3 15:11 +1 4 10 16 18 27 34 19 20 26 41 50 89 5v5
PHX 3 13:10 +1 4 12 27 34 40 93 11 13 17 23 32 41 5v5
PHX 3 13:02 +1 4 12 27 34 40 93 11 13 17 23 32 41 5v5
CGY 3 10:41 +1 5 18 20 23 25 34 3 14 15 26 28 41 5v5
CGY 3 8:33 +1 7 13 20 23 25 34 3 13 19 26 41 50 5v5
PHX 3 5:16 +1 4 13 20 23 25 34 3 11 13 17 33 41 5v5
CGY 3 1:08 +1 4 7 13 20 25 34 11 17 23 32 41   5v4

 

# Player EV PP SH
4 J. BOUWMEESTER 17:06 3 5 2:24 1 0 7:41 0 4
5 M. GIORDANO 14:03 5 3 1:11 0 0 5:14 0 1
6 C. SARICH 13:52 2 0 0:00 0 0 3:33 0 1
7 T. BRODIE 13:22 6 0 2:04 1 0 0:00 0 0
10 B. COMEAU 10:43 2 2 0:06 0 0 4:43 0 2
12 J. IGINLA 19:01 4 5 1:14 0 0 0:01 0 0
13 O. JOKINEN 13:13 4 1 2:24 1 0 0:22 0 0
15 T. JACKMAN 6:05 2 0 0:00 0 0 0:00 0 0
16 T. KOSTOPOULOS 11:46 2 2 0:57 0 0 3:52 0 2
18 M. STAJAN 10:24 3 2 0:09 0 0 4:01 0 2
20 C. GLENCROSS 9:49 4 1 2:04 1 0 4:36 0 1
23 S. HANNAN 17:56 6 4 0:09 0 0 6:40 0 2
25 D. MOSS 8:07 3 1 2:04 1 0 2:23 0 0
27 D. SMITH 13:53 3 4 0:00 0 0 0:00 0 0
34 M. KIPRUSOFF 44:50 12 8 3:24 1 0 11:34 0 4
40 A. TANGUAY 14:56 4 4 1:14 0 0 3:08 0 1
51 R. HORAK 7:44 1 1 0:00 0 0 0:00 0 0
57 L. BOUMA 7:08 1 1 0:00 0 0 0:00 0 0
93 M. CAMMALLERI 15:02 5 4 1:00 0 0 0:02 0 0

 

Period Totals EV PP 5v3 PP SH 5v3 SH
1 6 1 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
2 1 8 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0
3 6 3 5 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Totals 13 12 12 8 1 0 0 0 0 4 0 0

What's this? Flames outchance an opponent? Say it ain't so.

Despite a lousy second period (again) the Flames were the better team in the first and third and that was enough for the win. The OMG line did it's job, outchancing the bad guys while the new Iginla line was more or less even on the night. If Calgary had not spent the first half of the game in the penalty box, it probably wouldn't have been so close.

39d8109299a9795cb3b41a4e9b49d501
Former Nations Overlord. Current Fn contributor and curmudgeon For questions, complaints, criticisms, etc contact Kent @ kent.wilson@gmail. Follow him on Twitter here.
Avatar
#1 DT
March 02 2012, 07:16AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

The game wouldn't have been as close? B.S. This is how they've been winning all year: moldy goals and goaltending. Two of the three first period goals were gifts from the Coyotes. If it wasn't for Kipper, they would be a lottery team.

Comments are closed for this article.