Flames Scoring Chances - Game 72 versus Edmonton Oilers
Kent Wilson
March 16 2012 10:16PM

Final: 3-1 L
Scoring Chances for NHL Game Number 21063
| Team | Period | Time | Note | CGY | Opponent | |||||||||||
| EDM | 1 | 19:36 | 0 | 5 | 12 | 18 | 23 | 37 | 40 | 5 | 14 | 28 | 40 | 58 | 93 | 5v5 |
| EDM | 1 | 17:10 | 0 | 5 | 12 | 18 | 37 | 40 | 47 | 15 | 20 | 28 | 40 | 58 | 5v4 | |
| CGY | 1 | 15:04 | 0 | 12 | 13 | 23 | 27 | 37 | 40 | 15 | 24 | 40 | 56 | 83 | 89 | 5v5 |
| EDM | 1 | 14:32 | 0 | 4 | 16 | 27 | 37 | 47 | 48 | 10 | 15 | 20 | 24 | 40 | 94 | 5v5 |
| EDM | 1 | 9:48 | Nugent-Hopkins goal | 4 | 13 | 20 | 23 | 25 | 37 | 14 | 25 | 40 | 44 | 56 | 93 | 5v5 |
| EDM | 1 | 4:42 | Eberle goal | 4 | 5 | 12 | 18 | 37 | 40 | 5 | 14 | 40 | 56 | 58 | 93 | 5v5 |
| CGY | 1 | 4:03 | -2 | 4 | 6 | 10 | 13 | 20 | 37 | 6 | 15 | 28 | 40 | 83 | 89 | 5v5 |
| EDM | 1 | 2:05 | -2 | 4 | 20 | 23 | 25 | 37 | 10 | 14 | 40 | 44 | 93 | 94 | 4v5 | |
| CGY | 2 | 19:21 | -2 | 4 | 6 | 12 | 18 | 37 | 40 | 5 | 14 | 40 | 56 | 58 | 93 | 5v5 |
| CGY | 2 | 19:15 | -2 | 4 | 6 | 12 | 18 | 37 | 40 | 5 | 14 | 40 | 56 | 58 | 93 | 5v5 |
| EDM | 2 | 16:23 | -2 | 4 | 6 | 10 | 20 | 37 | 10 | 14 | 40 | 44 | 93 | 94 | 4v5 | |
| EDM | 2 | 13:02 | -2 | 4 | 5 | 20 | 25 | 26 | 37 | 6 | 15 | 20 | 28 | 40 | 93 | 5v5 |
| CGY | 2 | 11:46 | -2 | 6 | 12 | 18 | 27 | 37 | 40 | 5 | 10 | 24 | 40 | 58 | 94 | 5v5 |
| EDM | 2 | 8:53 | -2 | 4 | 6 | 10 | 13 | 37 | 47 | 6 | 14 | 15 | 40 | 83 | 89 | 5v5 |
| EDM | 2 | 2:09 | -1 | 4 | 6 | 12 | 18 | 37 | 40 | 5 | 40 | 56 | 58 | 83 | 89 | 5v5 |
| CGY | 2 | 1:37 | -1 | 5 | 12 | 18 | 23 | 37 | 40 | 5 | 24 | 28 | 40 | 83 | 89 | 5v5 |
| EDM | 3 | 10:43 | -1 | 10 | 27 | 33 | 37 | 47 | 51 | 6 | 14 | 15 | 28 | 40 | 93 | 5v5 |
| EDM | 3 | 10:36 | -1 | 5 | 13 | 20 | 23 | 25 | 37 | 6 | 14 | 15 | 28 | 40 | 93 | 5v5 |
| EDM | 3 | 10:36 | Nugent Hopkins goal | 5 | 13 | 20 | 23 | 25 | 37 | 6 | 14 | 15 | 28 | 40 | 93 | 5v5 |
| EDM | 3 | 4:41 | -2 | 4 | 5 | 12 | 18 | 37 | 40 | 10 | 15 | 37 | 40 | 58 | 94 | 5v5 |
| EDM | 3 | 3:31 | -2 | 6 | 20 | 23 | 37 | 6 | 10 | 14 | 40 | 89 | 93 | 3v5 | ||
| EDM | 3 | 2:30 | -2 | 5 | 23 | 37 | 40 | 6 | 10 | 14 | 40 | 89 | 93 | 3v5 | ||
| EDM | 3 | 1:14 | -2 | 5 | 10 | 12 | 13 | 23 | 37 | 5 | 10 | 15 | 20 | 40 | 93 | 5v5 |
| CGY | 3 | 0:56 | -2 | 4 | 10 | 12 | 13 | 33 | 40 | 5 | 10 | 14 | 15 | 20 | 40 | 5v5 |
| # | Player | EV | PP | SH | ||||||
| 4 | J. BOUWMEESTER | 22:58 | 4 | 7 | 0:29 | 0 | 0 | 5:04 | 0 | 2 |
| 5 | M. GIORDANO | 16:48 | 1 | 7 | 1:33 | 0 | 1 | 1:22 | 0 | 0 |
| 6 | C. SARICH | 13:46 | 4 | 2 | 0:00 | 0 | 0 | 4:46 | 0 | 1 |
| 10 | B. COMEAU | 12:43 | 2 | 3 | 0:29 | 0 | 0 | 2:00 | 0 | 1 |
| 12 | J. IGINLA | 24:50 | 6 | 5 | 1:31 | 0 | 1 | 0:05 | 0 | 0 |
| 13 | O. JOKINEN | 16:14 | 3 | 5 | 1:05 | 0 | 0 | 0:13 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | T. KOSTOPOULOS | 9:07 | 0 | 1 | 0:00 | 0 | 0 | 2:54 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | M. STAJAN | 17:09 | 4 | 4 | 0:28 | 0 | 1 | 0:06 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | C. GLENCROSS | 12:10 | 1 | 4 | 1:05 | 0 | 0 | 3:16 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | S. HANNAN | 13:26 | 2 | 5 | 0:00 | 0 | 0 | 2:20 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | D. MOSS | 9:50 | 0 | 4 | 0:00 | 0 | 0 | 2:47 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | G. DESBIENS | 2:55 | 0 | 1 | 0:00 | 0 | 0 | 0:00 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | D. SMITH | 16:35 | 2 | 2 | 0:00 | 0 | 0 | 0:00 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | A. BABCHUK | 15:16 | 1 | 1 | 0:27 | 0 | 0 | 0:15 | 0 | 0 |
| 37 | L. IRVING | 48:36 | 6 | 12 | 2:00 | 0 | 1 | 6:46 | 0 | 2 |
| 40 | A. TANGUAY | 22:21 | 6 | 4 | 1:31 | 0 | 1 | 1:56 | 0 | 0 |
| 47 | S. BAERTSCHI | 6:23 | 0 | 3 | 0:55 | 0 | 1 | 0:00 | 0 | 0 |
| 48 | G. NEMISZ | 4:18 | 0 | 1 | 0:00 | 0 | 0 | 0:00 | 0 | 0 |
| 51 | R. HORAK | 7:59 | 0 | 1 | 0:27 | 0 | 0 | 0:00 | 0 | 0 |
| Period | Totals | EV | PP | 5v3 PP | SH | 5v3 SH | ||||||
| 1 | 2 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 2 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 3 | 1 | 7 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Totals | 7 | 17 | 7 | 12 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
Not much to say about this one. Flames haven't been generating a lot of shots and chances recently, but this was another level of flaccid. Tanguay and Iginla actually finished in the black somehow (mostly because Tanguay seemed to be the only guy with his legs under him) but none of the Flames were really in this one for whatever reason.
Comments are closed for this article.
Damn, just when I thought everything was going so well. I knew they wouldn't win every game from here to the end of the season but was hoping they could beat the cellar dwellars. They just have to make sure they don't go on a lengthy slump here (no more than 1 loss in a row?). Here's hoping they pound Columbus and can go on another streak.
It's always bad to lose to Edmonton , but seven chances against that crap outfit? Good night to be out of the damn country. Columbus was always a must win in the way all games seem to be in March, but that one is win or else now, given the road trip that follows. Oy.
I think that this is called foreshadowing unless the Flames GM can pull a dozen rabbits out of his hat.
this may be the best comment I've read all week.