Flames Scoring Chances - Game 67 vs Montreal Canadiens

Kent Wilson
March 06 2012 09:52PM

 

 

 

Final Score: 5-4 W

Final Summary

Corsi

Head-to-head ice

Faceoffs

Scoring Chances for NHL Game Number 20993

Team Period Time Note CGY Opponent  
CGY 1 16:49 0 4 12 18 27 34 40 14 26 27 31 71 76 5v5
MTL 1 15:59 0 5 13 20 23 25 34 17 22 31 51 67 72 5v5
CGY 1 15:51 0 5 13 20 23 25 34 17 22 31 51 67 72 5v5
MTL 1 15:19 0 6 7 8 26 34 48 15 25 31 63 68 74 5v5
MTL 1 13:11 0 5 12 18 23 34 40 26 31 51 67 72 76 5v5
CGY 1 10:54 0 4 12 18 27 34 40 14 26 27 31 71 76 5v5
CGY 1 9:58 0 5 13 20 23 25 34 31 51 67 68 72 74 5v5
CGY 1 9:54 Moss goal 5 13 20 23 25 34 31 51 67 68 72 74 5v5
CGY 1 7:40 Iginla goal 6 7 12 18 34 40 14 27 31 68 71 74 5v5
CGY 1 6:57 +2 4 5 13 16 34 40 17 22 31 51 67 72 5v5
CGY 1 5:03 +2 6 7 8 26 34 48 26 31 53 57 68 81 5v5
CGY 1 2:12 +2 4 12 18 27 34 40 14 27 31 68 71 74 5v5
MTL 1 0:04 Plekanec goal 4 6 16 34 40   14 22 27 31 76 81 4v5
MTL 2 18:31 +1 6 7 12 16 34 51 17 31 53 57 68 81 5v5
CGY 2 14:53 +1 5 13 20 23 25 34 17 31 51 67 68 72 5v5
CGY 2 9:45 0 6 7 8 16 34 51 15 25 26 31 63 76 5v5
CGY 2 8:49   4 12 26 27 34 51 22 27 31 53 74 81 5v5
CGY 2 7:55   5 12 13 20 34 40 14 26 27 31 76   5v4
CGY 2 6:16 Giordano goal 4 5 12 13 20 34 17 22 31 51 67 74 5v5
CGY 2 1:18 Iginla goal 4 12 27 34 40   14 26 27 31 76   4v4
MTL 2 0:58 +2 5 13 20 23 34   17 31 51 67 68   4v4
MTL 3 18:25 +2 7 8 23 26 34 48 15 17 31 67 72 74 5v5
MTL 3 17:34 +2 6 7 13 16 34 51 26 31 53 57 76 81 5v5
CGY 3 16:18 +2 5 12 13 20 34 40 14 26 27 31 76   5v4
CGY 3 12:44 Glencross goal 5 20 23 25 34 48 31 51 67 68 72 74 5v5
MTL 3 11:03 Eller goal 4 12 27 34 40 51 22 31 57 71 74 81 5v5
MTL 3 9:55 +2 4 16 26 27 34 51 26 31 51 67 72 76 5v5
MTL 3 8:04 +2 5 13 20 23 25 34 22 31 51 67 72 76 5v5
MTL 3 7:55 Pacioretty goal 5 13 20 23 25 34 22 31 51 67 72 76 5v5
MTL 3 5:59 +1 4 13 20 25 27 34 15 17 22 31 67 72 5v5
MTL 3 1:21 +1 4 6 12 18 34 40 14 17 53 57 68 81 5v5

 

# Player EV PP SH
4 J. BOUWMEESTER 24:02 7 4 1:20 0 0 0:33 0 1
5 M. GIORDANO 16:25 7 5 2:40 2 0 2:00 0 0
6 C. SARICH 16:53 3 4 0:00 0 0 1:09 0 1
7 T. BRODIE 14:30 3 4 1:20 0 0 0:00 0 0
8 K. KOLANOS 9:05 2 2 1:20 0 0 0:00 0 0
12 J. IGINLA 19:52 7 4 2:40 2 0 0:00 0 0
13 O. JOKINEN 16:46 6 6 2:27 2 0 0:00 0 0
15 T. JACKMAN 0:47 0 0 0:00 0 0 0:00 0 0
16 T. KOSTOPOULOS 13:57 2 3 0:13 0 0 1:28 0 1
18 M. STAJAN 15:57 4 2 1:20 0 0 0:50 0 0
20 C. GLENCROSS 17:22 6 5 2:27 2 0 1:17 0 0
23 S. HANNAN 17:06 5 6 0:13 0 0 2:52 0 0
25 D. MOSS 13:24 5 4 1:20 0 0 0:59 0 0
26 G. DESBIENS 12:06 2 3 0:00 0 0 0:00 0 0
27 D. SMITH 16:46 5 3 0:00 0 0 0:00 0 0
34 M. KIPRUSOFF 52:33 15 13 4:00 2 0 3:17 0 1
40 A. TANGUAY 16:42 6 3 2:27 2 0 2:00 0 1
48 G. NEMISZ 8:47 2 2 0:00 0 0 0:00 0 0
51 R. HORAK 11:18 2 4 0:13 0 0 0:00 0 0

 

Period Totals EV PP 5v3 PP SH 5v3 SH
1 9 4 9 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
2 6 2 5 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 2 8 1 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Totals 17 14 15 13 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0

For the second straight game the Flames were the better team at ES. The Canadiens really struggled for the first two periods and only really ran things up when Calgary was defending in the third period. Montreal is a club lacking most of their big guns and with nothing to play for, so this was definitely a game for the Flames to win. It ended up closer than it should have been due to a late flurry and some bad bounces, but for the most part Calgary deserved this one.

39d8109299a9795cb3b41a4e9b49d501
Kent is the Nations Overlord. For questions, complaints, criticisms, etc contact Kent @ kent.wilson@gmail. Follow him on Twitter here.
Sort comments by date
Avatar
Reply #1 maimster March 06 2012, 10:31PM
+1 0 props

Curious on the Habs last goal - wasn't that about as classic a case as 'player in the crease interfering with the goaltender' there could possibly be? I know it wasn't typical since Kipper was flailing, but I must really not understand player in the crease rules if that didn't cause that goal to be disallowed. No?

Avatar
Reply #2 CitizenFlame March 06 2012, 10:31PM
+1 0 props

What is with Montreal's fourth goal? I'm not sure how that stood? If a player is standing in the crease and he went there of his own accord should that not be goaltender interference? Calgary is quite good at blowing leads on their own without help from the officiating.

Avatar
Reply #3 CitizenFlame March 06 2012, 10:33PM
+1 0 props

@maimster

That's funny. Almost the exact same post at the same time. I must not understand the rules because they went to the war room in Toronto and the goal was ruled good.

Avatar
Reply #4 maimster March 06 2012, 11:02PM
+1 0 props

I was shocked that it was ruled good in Toronto (except, of course, that it is in Toronto and well, you know...). I'm wondering if it is because Kipper had moved outside the crease prior to the Hab encroaching and he had given up his right to the space?

Anyway, one more ugly win in a season full of them (and by ugly, I mean beautiful - a win is a win). Lots of ugly losses too, but those are just ugly.

Avatar
Reply #5 PrairieStew March 07 2012, 12:01AM
+1 0 props

not to mention the Campoli takedown on Stajan with the empty net - should easily been a penalty.

Avatar
Reply #6 DT March 07 2012, 07:06AM
+1 0 props

What a terrible game. Two awful teams with very shoddy defence, leaving there goalies to fight the battle themselves. If there ever was a game that both teams could have lost, that was it. Glencross, Iginla's wrap around.

Avatar
Reply #7 Stephan Cooper March 07 2012, 11:32PM
+1 0 props

You were a lot kinder to Montreal than your Habs equivalent. Oliver had the ES at 20-11 in favour of Calgary.

Comments are closed for this article.