FEDUN IS READY TO COMPETE

Jason Gregor
July 31 2012 12:31PM

Since breaking his leg on September 30th, 2011 Taylor Fedun has been working tirelessly to get back on the ice. Every since that gruesome night in Minnesota the Princeton grad has been focusing on getting back on the ice and hopefully into the NHL. Countless hours with physiotherapists, athletic therapists, chiropractors and numerous other specialists has allowed him to turn that focus into a reality.

Earlier this month Fedun took part in the Oilers annual rookie development camp, the first real opportunity for him to see how far he'd come in his rehab. He felt good off the ice, but getting on the ice against players like Nail Yakupov would be a more accurate test for the 24-year-old.

I caught up with Fedun at Capilano Rehab last Thursday, and talked about the camp, his rehab and if he feels ready to compete for an NHL job.

JG: How important was that for you mentally and physically to get on the ice with some players who are going to be in the NHL next year or soon after?

TF: It was huge. Especially at this point in my rehab I’ve been in the gym for what feels like months on end. It’s important for me to get back on the ice in a relatively competitive environment and just be able to get the reps at this point in the summer.

JG: What did you notice was the biggest thing lacking for you when you got onto the ice?

TF: I think it’s still a matter of trying to get that jump back; that first couple step quickness and the multidirectional stuff. But I honestly felt significantly better as the week went on. So I think that it was an invaluable experience for me to be able to get out there.

JG: Todd Nelson told us that the first day of camp he said, ‘Fedun didn’t look at all like he did last year,’ but then by the end of the week he had noticed a significant difference. What do you think was the difference from the start to the end where you showed a significant improvement?

TF: Honestly I think a huge part of it is just getting those reps. And when you’re away from it for as long as I was, I mean I was obviously getting on the ice as much as I could, but to not be in that type of environment. And to get those valuable reps like that, it’s like anything you take time off from, when you get back to it and being not quite as sharp as you normally would. And so just going through the entire week, I think that that was huge.

JG: Did any drills give you any problems?

TF: No, I don’t think so. I really don’t think about it at all when I’m out there anymore.

JG: After the development camp, you and a few other D-men spent a week working with Steve Serdachny [Edmonton Oilers skating instructor]. What did you work on specifically in that week?

TF: It was defenseman specific sort of things. We worked on a lot of edge work and backwards skating, transition stuff where you kind of make a pass up the ice off of your back foot while you’re transitioning, a lot of dragging and shooting across the blueline trying to keep your head up. Just a lot of things specific to defensemen. And again, by the end of that week I felt even better than I did after the development week. So I think that the reps are huge.

JG: Would these types of drills be something that you would do every summer on your own anyway?

TF: Yeah, probably. Especially now that I’ve got a taste for them and seeing them from Steve. They’re definitely something that when I get an opportunity to be out on the ice that I’m going to do myself or with a few other guys, they’re something that we definitely can always work on. Regardless of whether you’re one of the best guys in the world at it or not, you can always work on it.

JG: So a lot of the fundamental drills essentially. Is this something, had you done this every summer in the past, or was this like going back in time for you?

TF: I don’t think that I had quite done that in a little while. I did work with Steve last summer quite a bit, but the specific defenseman stuff, not so much so it was really good to be able to get that.

REHAB

JG: Are you still rehabbing?

TF: I don’t think that you would call it rehabbing anymore. I’m pretty much at the point where it’s just, I’m back in the summer groove and just working out. Kind of like I would be had nothing happened. I still have to do certain things, like I have to keep on stretches to make sure that it doesn’t tighten up. And there are a few things that I have to do specifically for my right hip, but for the most part it’s more just working out.

JG: When you first broke your leg, I think it was only two weeks afterwards that they had you starting the very basics of rehab. What was the very first thing you were working on ?

TF: I pretty much had everything you could think of. Honestly looking back I don’t think that there’s a technique that at one point or another that I hadn’t had. And actually it was less than a couple of weeks after.

I was still in the hospital and there were two physiotherapists who visited me and we would spend twice a day for half an hour down in the physio. And it literally just started with I would lie on the bed and we would watch my leg and I would try to fire the muscles around my knee and in my hip. And just things like my foot on the ground and trying to drag my heel to my butt, things like that that are so basic, but at a time like that that are huge to just try to get the muscles moving and to eliminate the atrophy as much as you can.

JG: So millimetres or centimetres of movement would be considered a successful day?

TF: Oh absolutely. I had a, I think it was called a continuous passive motion machine, or something like that, and my leg would go inside of that and the machine kind of bent it for me throughout the day. And so every time I went back to the rehab I would be going an extra couple of degrees that I had the day before. So it’s right out of the gate making sure that everything is taken care of.

JG: What was the most painful part of your rehab?

TF: Definitely the first week or two, that was definitely the biggest hump to get through. When you’re in a position where you are really just lying there and you’re uncomfortable. That was definitely the most difficult. Chris Davie (Oilers assistant athletic therapist) helped me a lot. Every week when the doctor told me that I could bare more weight on my leg, Chris would get out a scale and he would perform the exercise in front of me and tell me ‘look this is how much weight you are actually putting on your leg.’

So that would allow me to do it without being worried that I’d pass the threshold. Because honestly even though I was allowed by the doctor to put the weight on, it didn’t feel good to do it. And so to have that in your mind that, ‘yeah it hurts,’ but Chris helped me push that because this new movement was actually in my capable range right now.

JG: I’m sure the power of the mind plays a huge role in rehabilitation where you say to yourself,  I can do this safely, and I can actually do this even though my body may not want to do it?

TF: Absolutely and that’s one of the biggest parts of having someone who knows what they are doing that can kind of coach you along the way. They can say ‘yeah this is uncomfortable or yeah it might hurt a little bit, but it’s good for you. And at the end of the day you are going to be better because you are doing this right now.’

JG: Do you think that you’re mentally stronger now because of this rehab?

TF: I think indirectly there definitely is. The power of positive thinking is unbelievable. When you’re faced with something as dramatic as a broken femur, when you look back at it and realise how important it was to stay positive I think that that will definitely help with any other bumps and bruises along the way.

MAKING A RETURN

JG: You’re done rehab and you mentioned that you’re just in a regular rotation for the rest of the summer. Do you know when the OKC camp would start if there’s no main camp in the NHL?

TF: I’m not positive. I know last year it began at the 27th or 28th of September. So I would assume that it would be within a couple of days of that one way or the other.

JG: How much are you looking forward to that first game, whether it’s pre-season in the NHL or whether it’s regular season in the AHL, whatever it is. Have you thought about that?

TF: Yeah I’ve pretty much thought about that ever since I broke my leg, that’s basically what I’ve been working towards this entire time, so it’s huge. And when I finally do get to step onto the ice I think that I’ll be really excited but it will also be a huge weight lifted off of my shoulders knowing that I’m working to get there. But once I do get there it’s far from over.

JG: You were an unknown to most Oiler fans last year when you came to camp. You had a strong camp and a strong preseason before the injury. Many were left wondering how good you could have been. How do you feel as that player in that situation thinking ‘I was so close, but now I’ve got to reprove myself and start over’?

TF: It was important that I at least had that opportunity though. Now at least I have an idea of what it takes to be there. And yeah I do kind of need to start over and do it all over again, but at least I know that I’m capable of doing that. So I’m very excited to finish off the story I guess.

JG: Did you miss hockey more than you had thought and did it almost reinvigorate you and prove how much you love the game?

TF: Very much so. From the beginning I wasn’t too caught up in it because I knew that there were so many things that I had to take care of before I was even close enough to be thinking  about the games that I was missing. But now that I’m at the point where I’m on the ice, I don’t think that I’ve ever been so excited for my summer holiday to be over. I just want to get back after it because it’s been so long. I feel like I’m a lot hungrier than I’ve ever been.

JG: Are you doing a lot of one legged exercises, is that something that you do a lot of when you break your femur?

TF: I was definitely doing a lot more of that before. And then when I got to the point where my legs were a lot closer in terms of how strong they were, relative to each other then I got away from it a little bit. There’s still definitely a single leg component to our workout but it’s not nearly as concentrated as it used to be.

JG: What’s your on ice to off ice ratio right now?

TF: Right now, on the ice three times a week and then we’re in the gym five times a week and then I do an extra run on the weekend.

WRAP UP

Chatting with Fedun it was clear by the tone of his voice and the expression on his face that he's excited about training camp. You can tell he has a lot to prove and his attitude is likely going to be his best asset moving forward. Realistically he's likely to start the season in OKC, due to rust and he's only played a handful of games at the pro level.

He's made an amazing recovery already, but he was adamant that his journey is far from over. His goal is still to play in the NHL and I doubt anyone will question his determination or desire to fulfill it.

His story is one that I will be following closely this season, and one that every Oiler fan is hoping ends with him realizing his dream. 

Ddf3e2ba09069c465299f3c416e43eae
One of Canada's most versatile sports personalities. Jason hosts The Jason Gregor Show, weekdays from 2 to 6 p.m., on TSN 1260, and he writes a column every Monday in the Edmonton Journal. You can follow him on Twitter at twitter.com/JasonGregor
Avatar
#51 Cody anderson
August 01 2012, 12:22PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

@Cowbell_Feva

Chris Pronger publicly demanded a trade which weakens our bargaining power with the other GMs in the league.

We got Lupul, Smid, a 2007 1st rounder, a conditional 1st rounder, and a 2008 2nd rounder.

Not a bad haul. Because of the publicity the Oilers wrongly rushed Smid before he was ready into prime NHL duty. He was a piece of the trade and is now a very valuable piece. Had he been allowed to develop in the AHL and then on 3rd pairing minutes he would not have struggled as much as he did the first few years.

Terr Jones did an article in the Sun that foloowed the assets we recieved in that trade and then assets we received in trades of those assets.

here is a link http://www.edmontonsun.com/2011/11/29/jones-pronger-trade-revisited

The key quote from the article was "Chris Pronger for Jordon Eberle, Ladislav Smid, Colten Teubert, Martin Marincin, Oscar Klefbom, Cameron Abney and a player to be determined."

In retrospect I do this trade all day every day!!!!

Avatar
#52 David S
August 01 2012, 12:48PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
Quicksilver ballet wrote:

Even the hobbled Whitney is better than Smid. Not alot of difference right now in the Oilers 1-4 guys.

I'd debate this ridiculous claim as clearly you weren't actually watching the games last year. But I recently took an arrow to the knee soooo...

Avatar
#53 Quicksilver ballet
August 01 2012, 12:58PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

@ Cody Anderson

Name 3 teams that Smid would be on the 3rd pairing and the 3 guys that would be ahead of him on the depth chart. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

So many Cody, i'll start with the non playoff teams if this is okay.

Calgary-Bouwmeester,Wideman and Giordanno Buffalo-Myers,Regehr and Erhoff. Columbus-Wisniewski,Tyutin and J.Johnson Edmonton-Whitney,Petry and J.Schultz. Montreal-Subban,Markov and Gorges. Tampa Bay-Salo Carle and Hedman. Toronto-Phanuef,Liles and Gardiner. Jets-Byfuglien,Hainsey and Enstrom.

Will work on the "playoff teams" list later...kay?

Avatar
#54 Cody anderson
August 01 2012, 02:16PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

@ Quicksilver ballet.

my statement should have read 4 players per team in order to put him in the 3rd pairing, but let's look at the examples you mentioned. It is obvious you overvalue offesnive d-men and undervalue their defensive counterparts. I would argue that the most important aspect of a Dman's job description is defense. As long as they are strong defensively and have a descent 1st pass they can be very effective.

Calgary- I will give you Boumeester, and think that Giordanno is debateable. Wideman puts up points but is weak defensively. -8 on a playoff team????

Buffalo- I will concede Erhoff, disagree with Regehr, and think Meyers is a far cry from Smid. He is heavily sheltered and has his warts, but will probably develop into a great Dman some day.

Columbus-Solid d by comittee. Wisniewski is debateable, Tytin was -21!!!!!!!!J Johnson is a descent young Dman

Edmonton- You list only offensive Dmen. Whitney if 100% healthy I would agree. Petry is young and learning and would not be nearly as good without Smid. Schultz is an unproven commodity. I hope you are right with him.

Montreal-Subban will likely develop into a top pairing guy and i would give you Gorges. Markov was a sold offensive Dman 3+ years ago, but you are lucky to get 10 games out of him now.

Toronto-Ask Calgary and Leaf fans how much they value Phanuef. Liles was -14 and Gardiner may well develop into a top offensive Dman but based on one year is probably premature.

Winnipeg-Probably the closest one you suggested. In a defensive role I don't know that I would trust any of them over Smid but they are all good Dmen and bring an aoffesive side as well.

Avatar
#55 Cowbell_Feva
August 01 2012, 02:32PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

@Cody Anderson I'm glad that Quicksilver bullet started a list of teams. I had at least 3 pop into my head right away but they were playoff teams.

I read the Terry Jones article in the actual paper that day. And in retrospect, of course the trade looks a bit better than originally. Hindsight is always 20/20. However, if you look at the trade, we got Smid (who is the source of debate here) and Eberle. I'm a big Ebs fan. Glad to have him.

Smid- Meh, he is an AVERAGE defenseman on a team that has pathetic defense, so.... Every other player listed is a prospect. Here we are 6 yrs later and you are trying to justify the trade by using a pile of young guys that STILL have not played one NHL game, and may very well NEVER play an NHL game. I would not have ever even thought of making that trade once, let alone anyday.

Avatar
#56 Cowbell_Feva
August 01 2012, 02:35PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
+1
0
props

@Cody Anderson. You mentioned in an earlier post that someone had low hockey intelligence, and then you state "Tyler Myers is a far cry from Ladislav Smid".

WOW.

Hello Pot, the Kettle is calling.

Avatar
#57 Cody anderson
August 01 2012, 02:51PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
Cowbell_Feva wrote:

@Cody Anderson. You mentioned in an earlier post that someone had low hockey intelligence, and then you state "Tyler Myers is a far cry from Ladislav Smid".

WOW.

Hello Pot, the Kettle is calling.

I am saying today Myers is a far cry from Smid. I would love to have him as a prospect because he has potential as a franchise Dman and he is huge, but he is not the guy Buffalo trusts with the tough assignments. Smid is our most trusted Dman, and the guy you give the hardest assinments to.

I think saying smid is an average or 5,6,7,8 Dman on a team with pathetic D is crazy.

He played the toughest assignments on a 29th place team with sub-par goaltending and ended up +4. That sounds like it would put him in elite status on many teams.

Avatar
#58 Quicksilver ballet
August 01 2012, 03:01PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

Cody, it's really too bad you can't be Buffalos GM for a day. Tyler Myers for Ladislav Smid straight up?

If Smid is as far superior in your mind, Myers and Miller to Edmonton to make it more even perhaps?

What is it about Smid to you think makes him so valueable? Was it his 3 goals in two yrs, his feared toughness that has forwards avoiding his side of the ice?

Just feel Smid is a 5-6 on a good team. He may move up to a 4 when needed with injuries and all. It's a top 3 bottom 3 for me, big difference value/importance wise, not so much second or third pairing category wise.

Avatar
#59 Cody anderson
August 01 2012, 03:01PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
Cowbell_Feva wrote:

@Cody Anderson I'm glad that Quicksilver bullet started a list of teams. I had at least 3 pop into my head right away but they were playoff teams.

I read the Terry Jones article in the actual paper that day. And in retrospect, of course the trade looks a bit better than originally. Hindsight is always 20/20. However, if you look at the trade, we got Smid (who is the source of debate here) and Eberle. I'm a big Ebs fan. Glad to have him.

Smid- Meh, he is an AVERAGE defenseman on a team that has pathetic defense, so.... Every other player listed is a prospect. Here we are 6 yrs later and you are trying to justify the trade by using a pile of young guys that STILL have not played one NHL game, and may very well NEVER play an NHL game. I would not have ever even thought of making that trade once, let alone anyday.

Back then I agree it looked like we lost the trade, which you usually do when trading the best player in the trade, and especially when that player pubilcly demanded a trade.

Getting a good forward prospect in Lupul, a good defensive prospect in Smid, a 1st rounder, 2nd rounder, and a conditional 1st rounder is not a bad package considering we were backed into a corner.

Now, looking back, with the benefit of hind sight, I think we won that deal for several reasons. With Pronger on our team we would have never rebuilt. He is that good when healthy. We would be in the same spot as the flames now. Plus as those prosepcts develop they all show great promise.

We arguably got 3 top 4 dmen that could all end up being top pairing Dmen if the stars align. We got Eberle, who is a 1st line winger on any team in the league, and it pushed us into the rebuild. Losing your best current asset for future assets and then sucking so bad you can't make the playoffs for multiple years will do that. If

Avatar
#60 Cody anderson
August 01 2012, 03:15PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

@QSB

You do not value a shutdown defenceman by his offence. Smid was very succesful at shutting down the other teams top players. That is the only way you judge a shutdown defenseman.

He was without doubt our top Dman last year.

Sure, I would love him to be more physical, and that part of his game improved quite a bit last year. The problem is that when a Dman is running around looking for the highlight real hit he is often caught out of position resulting in a scoring chance for the other team.

Trading Smid for Myers would probably work out in a couple of years. It is not guaranteed to by any means, but I do believe Myers is a great prospect. In fact I even went as far as to suggest we trade our 1st rounder for a package including Myers before the draft.

That being said, if we are going by last year's performance Smid was a more effective Dman by a large margin. He played more minutes, faced tougher competition, had worse zone starts, on a worse team and he did as well as could have been asked of him. We would simply not be a better team this year with Myers in the lineup instead of Smid.

Myers, while a great prospect, was given soft zone starts, and fed softer competition. He is being groomed to be a great Dman but he is not there yet.

Avatar
#61 Cowbell_Feva
August 01 2012, 03:32PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

@C.A. Keeping Pronger most likely would have kept us from this rebuild. In a few years when we have decent defense and better goaltending, we should be a playoff team. Not until then.

Saying all this, IF we had kept Pronger we MIGHT have made some smaller changes and been a perennial Cup contender. I kid I kid. My point here being, we can say IF and could've been all day, but in the long run I don't feel as though we won that trade. Ask Burkie. He won a Cup because of it and we are wallowing in a "rebuild". Who's further ahead? There are zero guarantees that the Oilers will ever even be a Cup contender. If we keep trying to develop Defense through the draft, the young forwards will have Grey beards by the time this happens. Defensive prospects usually take much longer to develop (ie Seabrook,Keith before the Hawks won)

Long story short, I feel you have Smid placed on a pedestal that I don't think is anywhere near reasonable. I would take Tyler Myers in his rookie season over Smid on his best day. Smid is average. Our defense is bad. If you'd take off the Oiler goggles you would see we have a bunch of 5,6,7,8 guys being forced to try to fill 1,2,3,4 minutes and thus- 30th, 30th,29th!

Avatar
#62 Quicksilver ballet
August 01 2012, 03:46PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

Is there really such a thing as softer zone/competition minutes played when we're talking non playoff teams Cody? Lets see if we can agree on the tools Smid has in his toolbox. According to D's r us rating list i purchased from K-tel

Footspeed-good,could be better, or best.

Defensive abilities- Capable of playing against the toughs, still progressing, could stay but needs sheltered minutes in the defensive zone.

Offensive abilities- top pairing potential, hockey sense or PP abilities, shutdown d hopeful.

Toughness- Intimidating to play against, Picks his spots, avoids beastly activity at all cost/ easily intimidated.

I'll go first, could be better,capable of playing against the toughs, shutdown d hopeful and picks his spots. Overall rating of average, average NHL salary eligible..

Avatar
#63 Cody anderson
August 01 2012, 04:07PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
Quicksilver ballet wrote:

Is there really such a thing as softer zone/competition minutes played when we're talking non playoff teams Cody? Lets see if we can agree on the tools Smid has in his toolbox. According to D's r us rating list i purchased from K-tel

Footspeed-good,could be better, or best.

Defensive abilities- Capable of playing against the toughs, still progressing, could stay but needs sheltered minutes in the defensive zone.

Offensive abilities- top pairing potential, hockey sense or PP abilities, shutdown d hopeful.

Toughness- Intimidating to play against, Picks his spots, avoids beastly activity at all cost/ easily intimidated.

I'll go first, could be better,capable of playing against the toughs, shutdown d hopeful and picks his spots. Overall rating of average, average NHL salary eligible..

The only one I would disagree with is Footspeed. Certainly not the best, but it doesn't hinder his game. I would say good.

I would add some categories

Drive- Willing to block a shot with his face for the team, reasonable consistant effort, needs to improve consistancy

Positioning-Always in the right spot, rarely cought out of position, constantly scrambling and caught out of position.

On drive I would say the 1st one and on positioning I would say somwhere between the 1st and 2nd.

There is absolutley still softer zone starts and competition for non playoff teams. This show how much the coach trusts you and often reflects the strength of your game. Obviuosly Smid's plus/minus would look better playing against 3rd and 4th line. Also if not being relied on to shut down the other team's top players you are much more likely to step up into the play and take some risks to contribute to the offence.

I think Smid's offence will improve as our D gets better and he is relied on less defensively (covering for a young offensive Dman) but he will never be confused with an offensive stud.

With Zone starts, it is common for young, unproven, or imature D to be sheltered to whatever extent possible. They are put on for faceoffs in the offensive zone as often as possible and kept off the ice when possible for defensive zone faceoffs.

This is not any different then us sheltering Nuge and Eberle and does not mean he is not a good prosepct. It simply means he is being put in the easiest spots to succeed possbile where Smid is being put in the hardest.

Avatar
#64 Cody anderson
August 01 2012, 04:21PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

@Cowbell_Feva

I actually don't think we have a current 1st pairing dman that would be a 1st pairing Dman on most other teams.

I think Whitney when healthy could be an option, but none of us know if he will ever be 100%

I think Smid, Petry, and N. Schultz are all solid 2nd pairing guys, and I agree that due to lack of depth in the role Petry and Smid are fullfilling 1st line duty.

I am hopfeul that at least 2 of J Schultz, Klefbom, or Marincin will also be at least capable 2nd pairing guys. Obviously it would be great if a couple of them develop into obvious 1st pairing guys, but I think we would be ok with a group of 6 2nd paring Dmen backed by some legit 3rd pairing guys for injury coverage.

Avatar
#65 The Two Bit Donkey
August 01 2012, 09:46PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

Mr Fedun sounds like a wonderful chap. He is an excellent role model for anyone overcoming an ailment. Good luck my boy and may the force with you.

Avatar
#66 OutDoorRink
August 03 2012, 09:54AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

Smid has still not reached his potential, but I think that we will see that this year, and I think that his value will have risen significantly by the end of the year.

Yes, Taylor Fedun is a wonderful lad who would be good for a few pints down at the pub.

Comments are closed for this article.