Problems up the middle

Ryan Pike
August 10 2012 11:08AM

 

 

When your hockey club misses the playoffs for a third straight season by such a narrow margin, it's natural to take a look at what your club's weaknesses have been and to try to address them. The easy things to look at are the areas measured in percentages – face-offs and special teams.

To be blunt, there is great room for improvements in the face-off dot and some smaller room for improvement on special teams. In fact, a small improvement by the club's centres would've probably gotten the Flames into the playoffs last season.

Calgary missed the playoffs by five points in the 2011-12 season. They boasted the league's worst record in the face-off circle, with an abysmal 46.2 winning percentage. The 29th best team, New Jersey, won just 47.1 percent of their draws but were a lot better than Calgary. The Flames also boasted the league's 13th best power-play (scoring in 17.7 percent of their advantages) and the 9th best penalty kill (killing 84.3 percent of opponent advantages).

EVEN STRENGTH PAIN

Now, these numbers are connected in a couple ways. First-off, the Flames were out-scored at even-strength to the tune of 17 goals. This corresponds with a wide swath of data that says that Calgary was usually out-shot and over-matched at even strength. Add in that only two players won more than half of their draws at even-strength (Jarome Iginla and Matt Stajan) and you can probably figure out that the Flames weren't happy with their performance.

At least Iginla was usually beating the other team's better players in the face-off dot, although the departed Olli Jokinen took more draws against the team's best players, and typically lost them.

SPECIAL TEAMS SUCCESS

Despite all of this, the Flames still managed to put together a winning record. A lot of the credit for this can be attributed to the performance of their special teams. More specifically, the Flames penalty kill was, at times, excellent and the power-play was statistically mediocre, but still good enough to win a few games.

The PP's mediocrity can be seen in a more impressive light when one considers that only one regular player won more than half of their face-offs – Mike Cammalleri. Outside of Cammalleri, the team's regular draw-takers with the man advantage (Iginla and Jokinen) usually lost and the team had to flee the zone and re-group. (For the record, none of Calgary's penalty-killing centres averaged a face-off percentage above 50 percent, yet the group managed to be very effective.)

THE DEVIL IS IN THE DETAILS

The importance of the power-play and winning face-offs can be seen in one important area – one-goal games. The Flames posted a 19-5-16 record in one-goal games last season, finishing in the bottom third of the league in that category for the third straight season. A very small improvement in face-offs across the board – perhaps moving the Flames from being statistically horrible in the dot to being merely bad – would equate with potentially critical goals on the power-play or the reduction of goals at even-strength. Five or six key goals scored (or goals prevented) in the team's one-goal games could have put the team in the playoffs. As it stands, the team's massive under-performance in winning key draws was the most obvious thing keeping them from the post-season.

IS THERE REASON TO BE HOPEFUL?

Looking at the remaining (or expected) centres for the Flames next season, it's a bit of a mixed bag. The team has parted ways with Olli Jokinen, who both took the lion's share of the team's key face-offs...and lost most of them, unfortunately.

The remaining hold-overs from last season include Matt Stajan (51.8 percent), Mike Cammalleri (45.6 percent), Mikael Backlund (45.4 percent) and Blair Jones (42.4 percent). For what it's worth, Cammalleri and Backlund were usually playing against the opponent's first and second lines. The wild-card could be newcomer Roman Cervenka, who played all forward positions in the KHL and won about half of his draws over the past two years.

In short – it doesn't look like much improvement should be expected from the Flames in the face-off circle next season. As such, don't be surprised if the club continues to let points slip away in crucial one-goal games.

51a8cdc527ce12d222fdc583f3cf4368
Now in his fourth season covering the Calgary Flames and the NHL, Ryan Pike is a Calgary native and FlamesNation's managing editor. He's trying to keep his head up, his stick on the ice and is giving it 110% every shift. You can also find his work at The Hockey Writers and the Wrestling Observer.
Avatar
#1 T&A4Flames
August 10 2012, 11:22AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

One thing not mentioned, and an area I believe we will improve on is the shoot-out. If I'm not mistaken we finished last, I think 17 SO losses if memory serves. We have added a significant amount of skill that can help in that area. So, maybe there will be a few more points to be had there.

Avatar
#2 FireOnIce
August 10 2012, 11:29AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

This is a point my friend constantly harps on - the Flames CANNOT score without winning faceoffs. It's a simple piece of logic that requires no advanced stats to figure out. If you don't have the puck and you're constantly fighting for it back, then you cannot score. Simple.

Why the Flames didn't sign someone like Jay McClement is beyond me. Dude only makes $1.5M, plays all roles (PK, PP, ES), plays the top competition, and wins facoffs.

I can only assume the lack of room, contract-wise, is the reason that never happened, and not something else like Feaster thinking we were going to still get Brad Richards a year later.

Avatar
#3 FireOnIce
August 10 2012, 11:33AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

@T&A4Flames

Good point T&A. The Flames were 6 points out the playoffs (5 points behind LA, but I think they would've won all tie breakers). So, if we had only won in the shootout 6 of those 17 times, Flames would've squeaked in, and the Kings awesome playoff run would've never occurred.

If, would've, should've, could've, but DIDN'T. Damn this team is frustrating.

Avatar
#4 the-wolf
August 10 2012, 11:44AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

The problem with that line of thinking (if we just improve in one area we would've/could be this year in the playoffs) is that you also have to subtract all of the things that went Calgary's way, but aren't likely to again. For example, Kipper's great season.

Not to say the team shouldn't be diligently working at improving themselves in those areas that need improving, just that it's never that simple.

Avatar
#5 Kent Wilson
August 10 2012, 11:45AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

@T&A4Flames

Although they are a few players that seem to have better than average skill on the shoot-out, the S/O is almost entirely random variance when it comes down to the team level. It's a coin toss that tends to level out over time, so Calgary may better at this year as a matter of regression.

Avatar
#6 MD
August 10 2012, 12:01PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

On the teams record in one goal games. Isn't it more meaningful to look at point percentage rather that win percentage. Only losing 5 one goal games in regulation earned them a lot of points.

A quick calc has them 7th best in point percentage, which I think would be expected to fall if anything? Though may be out weighed by improved shootout luck.

Just some food for thought.

Avatar
#7 RKD
August 10 2012, 12:03PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

The Calgary Flames are severely lacking depth down the middle.

Mike Cammalleri is not a #1 center, he's there by default. Cervenka is slotted as a #2 center who has not played a single NHL game.

They lost of a lot of size with Jokinen and Moss going elsewhere. It's going to be tough sledding at even strength.

Avatar
#8 Kent Wilson
August 10 2012, 12:19PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

@MD

That's actually a solid point MD. In some ways, the Flames were unlucky to lose that bonus point so often. On the other, they may have been lucky to make it to extra time at all.

Avatar
#9 Steve
August 10 2012, 12:55PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props
RKD wrote:

The Calgary Flames are severely lacking depth down the middle.

Mike Cammalleri is not a #1 center, he's there by default. Cervenka is slotted as a #2 center who has not played a single NHL game.

They lost of a lot of size with Jokinen and Moss going elsewhere. It's going to be tough sledding at even strength.

Depth they have. Cammalleri, Cervenka, Backlund, Jones, Stajan, Horak (throw in Reinhart too, as another potential callup). Just no clear number one. Not to say one of those guys couldn't be a capable #1, we just haven't seen it yet.

Avatar
#10 FireOnIce
August 10 2012, 12:56PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

@RKD

How does losing a player who is hurt for 50+ games a season hurt the Flames? Sure, Moss was part of the OMG line and they used to kill it, but Moss didn't play much this past season.

There was no guarantee Moss could ever come back and play enough games to be a difference maker. If you're constantly coming back from an injury and taking time to get up to speed, you'll never be a real contributor. His 20 goal season was an aberration. Moss is a plug and easily replaced (though the Flames don't seem likely to do so).

Avatar
#11 RKD
August 10 2012, 02:09PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props
FireOnIce wrote:

How does losing a player who is hurt for 50+ games a season hurt the Flames? Sure, Moss was part of the OMG line and they used to kill it, but Moss didn't play much this past season.

There was no guarantee Moss could ever come back and play enough games to be a difference maker. If you're constantly coming back from an injury and taking time to get up to speed, you'll never be a real contributor. His 20 goal season was an aberration. Moss is a plug and easily replaced (though the Flames don't seem likely to do so).

Fair enough, Moss not so much but Jokinen's loss will be felt a little a bit more so.

Avatar
#12 RKD
August 10 2012, 02:14PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props
Steve wrote:

Depth they have. Cammalleri, Cervenka, Backlund, Jones, Stajan, Horak (throw in Reinhart too, as another potential callup). Just no clear number one. Not to say one of those guys couldn't be a capable #1, we just haven't seen it yet.

I agree there is no clear #1 one. That depth is ok, remember Cervenka has no NHL experience. Stajan was pretty terrible all year until he turned it up at the end of the season.

Cammy is a skilled goal scorer, but he lacks size. Montreal went with smaller forwards for a couple of years. They got hot in the playoffs with Halak, but everything went downhill last season.

What did Montreal do? They end up adding three gritty players. Not saying Calgary doesn't have grit, just that their depth centers have a long way to go.

Avatar
#13 negrilcowboy
August 10 2012, 02:39PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

lack of depth down the middle has been the flames achilles heel for a spell now, come to think of it so has scoring as well. mcclement would have been a sound move.

Avatar
#14 First Name Unidentified
August 10 2012, 03:04PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Re: Flames centers.

here is how some of the top teams' center positions look: Hawks: Toews, Sharp, Bolland, Frolik Flyers: Giroux, Briere, Schenn, Coutourier Pens: Crosby, Malkin, Sutter, Kennedy Sharks: Thornton, Pavelski, Couture, Handzus Kings: Kopitar, Richards, Carter (can play center), Stoll, Fraser Bruins: Bergeron, Krejci, Marchand, Horton Rangers: Richards, Stepan, Boyle, Halpern Blues: Oshie, Berglund, Arnott, McDonald Caps: Backstrom, Rebeiro, Johanssen, Laich Canes: E Staal, J Staal, Skinner, Tlusty

I think those are pretty good players down the middle for those teams. Do Flames' centers stack up against those players at all? A make-shift #1 center, a european import, a young player coming off arguably his worst season so far, and a bunch of plugs..these are who we expect to perform as pivots for the entire season?

I wouldn't be surprised if we are the laughing stock of the league next season, if there is an NHL season.

Avatar
#15 the forgotten man
August 10 2012, 03:13PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

1989...Nieuwendyk, Otto, The Killer, Hrdina and Berezan

2012... Mini-me, Cervenka, Backlund, Jones, Bag of Pucks

Main reason this team is going nowhere...double face palm.

Unless Kent & Lambert fire up the Delorean and they bring Jankowski back from the year 2020?? I have some plutonium sitting around in the shed.

Avatar
#16 negrilcowboy
August 10 2012, 03:24PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

all the cup winners or strong contenders since joe malone and newsy lalonde donned the blades have had 2 premier centres. esposito/sanderson. lemieux/francis, messier/garagekey. kopitar/richards. feel free to add to the list, you don't contend in the nhl unless you have depth down the middle. the kings are going to feast on feasters pivots.

Avatar
#17 Douglas
August 11 2012, 11:41PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props
T&A4Flames wrote:

One thing not mentioned, and an area I believe we will improve on is the shoot-out. If I'm not mistaken we finished last, I think 17 SO losses if memory serves. We have added a significant amount of skill that can help in that area. So, maybe there will be a few more points to be had there.

Shootout is more of a coin toss/wheel spin kind of thing than actually winning according to a teams skill level. This past season the Flames had almost zero luck in the shootout, while in the 2011 season the team was one the best shootout teams. Did the Flames somehow lost all their skill from 2011 in 2012? Nope, the luck just started going the other way for a change.

Avatar
#18 Steve
August 12 2012, 09:46AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Doesn't this seem like pretty good set of centers under the age of 25? 1st line potential - Jankowski 2nd/3rd line potential - Reinhart, Backlund, Arnold, Horak 4th liner - Jones

Doesn't do much for the win now, but I don't think the future is as dim as most people are saying.

Comments are closed for this article.