Gold Jacket, Green Jacket, Who Gives A S--?

bookofloob
September 11 2012 07:37PM

 

 

For all the jokes we've made over the years about your Calgary Flames playing golf, apparently it's a big deal when they actually don't.

If you hadn't heard the news, and you probably didn't because whatever, The Flames are not going to play in their annual charity golf tournament this Thursday.

Or they are.

In a hurricane of controversy with emotions ranging from "Who cares?" to "Huh, well yeah, I guess I didn't know they had a golf tournament", the Calgary Flames Philanthropic Lovefest on the Links featuring none of the Calgary Flames will now feature some Calgary Flames.  

The players were allegedly going to skip the perennial commitment to their Flames Foundation For Life (which to me sounds more like a thinly veiled threat than a charity) so that ALL members of the team, in an unprecedented showing of solidarity, could attend the coinciding CBA meeting between the NHL and the NHLPA in New York. Which would of course be the biggest display of teamwork the Flames have shown in about two and a half years, and a perceived slap in the bouche for all the hockey fans and celebrity gawkers who loyally purchased tickets to the event.

The masses were unsurprisingly nonplussed about this whole calamity. The contigency plan, borrowed from the NFL Referee Strike Survival Kit, was to replace the participating Flames players with "local celebrities" . Which makes sense, because the optics of having to refund money earmarked for the betterment of our city and the people who reside in it look even worse than not staging the contest in the first place.  

But you can understand how ticket holders would be more excited to go rub elbows with Mike Cammalleri than they would be with that guy who does the overnight weekend shift on Shine 88.9 or Buckshot's great niece or any other such local dignitaries.  

(I was still waiting for my invitation, but I assume it was either lost in the mail, or they've seen my short game)

And yet, resolution

Then, like a steed-perched cavalier emerging from the mist of despiar, Matt Stajan, undoubtedly THE embodiment of Flames hockey we all trust and revere the most, set the record straight. With that trademark steadfast timbre that makes us all swoon, Matty Franchise assured us all that those who would not be in New York fighting the good fight would be at the Links of GlenEagles golfing the good golf.

So everyone wins, I guess. The Flames players took A LOT of heat for this one, and I guess they felt the public outrage made them look bad enough from a PR standpoint that it might as well have been an eye-witness account of Sven Baertschi murdering puppies.

Meanwhile, the irony here is that the Flames were to be absentee golfers off in the Big Apple contending with an atrocity which has ignored ten times the fan acrimony that the tournament ever faced. Stajan says it was a mix up and they never intended to have all the players miss the event. Everyone else says the Flames buckled under public pressure and flip flopped their way back into the good graces of Calgary. You, the noble Citizen, probably have your own unique, unencumbered opinion on the whole debacle.  

I know I do. It goes a little something like this:

Who Cares?

Golf or no golf, I think we can give the Flames a pass on this one. The boys in the Flaming C are pillars in the community. You might remember it was around this time last year the team participated in the Gay Pride Parade. Do the Townsend Tigers ring a bell?  Indeed, if the Flames stay true to their impressive list of charity events and community initiatives (not to mention the countless amount of donations and foundations spearheaded by the individual players themselves), surely we, the faceless nobodies who never helped anybody do anything (what a bunch of jerks we all are) can take a breather from our usual dose of scorn.

Because the Flames were going to be sacrificing the tournament in support of another worthy charity: us. They were trying to save hockey, and by extension save The C of Red (and also a percentag of hockey related revenues, but let's not quibble).

Let's face it, we love hockey (or else, what the hell are you doing reading this in the first place, you gomer?).  Professional hockey is played by them, but it's all for us. We pay an excessive amount of our hard earned money on tickets, jerseys, heroin beer, nachos, merchandised golf bags, thongs, and stuffed Jarome Iginla buddies because hockey is a much needed distraction for us. An escape from our grim lives. We turn normal men into heroes, enigmas, and bearded legends and the occasoinal scapegaot because we thrive to romanticize hockey. As kids, we all imagined ourselves lifting up the Stanley Cup when we should have been doing our homework or cleaning our rooms (I'm a grown man who still does this).

Sure we complain about the money they make, or the money we spend, or Anton Babchuk, but at the end of the day, Gary Bettman's theory on the matter rings true: (I'm paraphrasing here, but only a little bit) You all love hockey, so it doesn't matter what we do, you sheep will come back and love us even harder until we do it to you all over again.

It's hockey, and we all need it. Good on the Flames and the rest of the PA for going out to New York and trying to retrieve it for us.

So that's why I'm all for the Flames jumping on the golf grenade, just this once, because they're doing it for the goodwill of all of us. The CBA meeting this week is the fundraising event of the year, and none of us will even remember that the tournament is even a thing if we all have hockey back in our lives, distracting us from that damn periphery that haunts us in the rest of our waking hours.

In the immortal words of Happy Gilmore: Talk about a Hole in One

 

01f20cee6c900dc633fe87a421630f41
The Book of Loob is the Nation's resident expert in flim-flammery and twaddle. An unabashed Flames fan, when BoL is not intellectually bankrupting Flames Nation, he can be seen rooting for Blair Jones, often to excess, at Book of Loob. Follow him on twitter here.
Avatar
#1 beloch
September 11 2012, 08:37PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
1
props

I'll cheer for the first side that says, "Hey, let's take a pay-cut to lower ticket prices".

Avatar
#3 Colin.S
September 11 2012, 07:51PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

The people that are pissed at the players over this can go fist themselves and all fist each afterwards.

In fact anyone who isn't pro-players in this drama can go fist themselves. I get to see people on Twitter chipper BizNasty all the time telling him he makes to much money, so the answer to that is to take his money away from him and give it to the owners of the Maple leafs or more to Edwards???? Dumbasses.

The fact is that this tournament may be great for the Flames Foundation for Life, but its a place for a bunch of Rich guys that the Flames want to buy season tickets/box suites and give those guys a chance to rub elbows with the real celebrities to do it all while raising a few bucks for charity generating more publicity for the Calgary Flames.

If you want more that the Calgary Flames just don't give a ****, their back up plan was a bunch of just random local 'celebs'. You know what they should have done, put out a press release that if the players didn't show and they didn't raise as much money as last year that they would have covered it, that would show that this tournament was for Charity rather than just publicity and elbow rubbing.

Avatar
#4 BurningSensation
September 11 2012, 08:27PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

This whole thing is one giant I could give a coitus.

Avatar
#5 Colin.S
September 11 2012, 08:49PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
beloch wrote:

I'll cheer for the first side that says, "Hey, let's take a pay-cut to lower ticket prices".

LMAO, you may as well cheer for not watching hockey, you ever think the owners are going to lower ticket prices??? The Flames are absolute **** to watch and the prices are still going up. From what's been going around the Flames made 30Million last year, you think that Edwards cares about lowering ticket prices if people keep watchingt his turd.

However thinking on it, you may as well cheer for the players, if the owners lowered ticket prices the players would HAVE to take a pay cut cause their salaries are tied to revenues.

Avatar
#6 Kent Wilson
September 11 2012, 09:07PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

@beloch

Haha. I don't think either side is going to help you there.

Avatar
#7 beloch
September 11 2012, 09:21PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

I'm pretty sure I'll be stuck cheering for a conclusion rather than any particular side. ;)

Avatar
#8 kittensandcookies
September 11 2012, 11:07PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

Am I pissed? Nah. Just a little bit of eye rolling. They took a non-issue and made it an issue. If that's how they handle matters by themselves, it's no wonder they need firms like IMG telling them exactly what to say and act.

Avatar
#9 Bean-counting cowboy
September 12 2012, 08:14AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

"buckshot's great niece"

-classic.

Avatar
#10 Captain Ron
September 12 2012, 06:41PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

I like your style BOL. Makes coming to this site a more enjoyable experience.

Avatar
#11 Captain Ron
September 12 2012, 07:30PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
Colin.S wrote:

The people that are pissed at the players over this can go fist themselves and all fist each afterwards.

In fact anyone who isn't pro-players in this drama can go fist themselves. I get to see people on Twitter chipper BizNasty all the time telling him he makes to much money, so the answer to that is to take his money away from him and give it to the owners of the Maple leafs or more to Edwards???? Dumbasses.

The fact is that this tournament may be great for the Flames Foundation for Life, but its a place for a bunch of Rich guys that the Flames want to buy season tickets/box suites and give those guys a chance to rub elbows with the real celebrities to do it all while raising a few bucks for charity generating more publicity for the Calgary Flames.

If you want more that the Calgary Flames just don't give a ****, their back up plan was a bunch of just random local 'celebs'. You know what they should have done, put out a press release that if the players didn't show and they didn't raise as much money as last year that they would have covered it, that would show that this tournament was for Charity rather than just publicity and elbow rubbing.

Your statements about this tournament are completely false. I've played in three of them with my son (who was 16 in the first one we went to five years ago). Taking him to these tournaments had a very positive effect on him at an important age in his life. I am a long way from being a rich guy believe me. There are plenty of average Joe's from the fan base that participate in the tournament. At no time did we feel out of place in any of the three tournaments. Our celebrity golf partners were Regehr, Moss, and Prust who played the whole day in bare feet because he forgot his shoes. We had a great time in each tournament. All of the players and management from the team treated you first class and were there to make sure you enjoyed the day. From there point of view it was all about you and the charity.

I highly recommend participating in this tournament if anyone out there is thinking about it.

Avatar
#12 Kent Wilson
September 12 2012, 07:41PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

@Captain Ron

Thanks for the input CR. Good stuff.

Avatar
#13 rubbertrout
September 13 2012, 01:23PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

I'm not giving them a pass on this. I think it was pretty weak to bail on a charity tournament by saying that it is associated with CBA talks. Especially when about 200 players (of 700 plus) are going. Seems a bit strange that all of the Flames developed such an interest in collective bargaining at the same time.

Comments are closed for this article.