FGD: FTC (Attack of the acronyms!)

Justin Azevedo
January 23 2013 02:19PM

 

Well, the past two games haven't gone as well as hoped. 

However, two games is only two games. Sure, 48 is less than 82, but to make as much noise as has been made feels, to me, asinine.

Tonight the Flames play a team with only one more point than they have: the Vancouver Canucks. The Canucks have gotten off to an even shakier start than the Flames, giving up 7 goals on opening night to the Anaheim Ducks and losing in overtime in Edmonton on Sunday. 

Last year, the Flames finished about even with Vancouver for the first time in years (3-2-1). With a Western Conference and division heavy schedule, Calgary will have to make hay against some of their closet rivals in order to make the post-season.

The Line-Up

  • Cammalleri-Backlund-Iginla
  • Glencross-Tanguay-Stempniak
  • Baertschi-Stajan-Comeau
  • Begin-Horak-Jackman

  • Bouwmeester-Giordano
  • Wideman-Brodie
  • Smith-Sarich

  • Kiprusoff

I'm already starting to question Hartley's decision-making when it comes to lines, although to be fair to the new bench boss he's still figuring out what he has with this roster.

That said, the existing set up above seems like it will get murdered if they try and go power versus power, but there's also no line that you can bury. To me, it looks like the Flames have the players for 3 second lines and a third line that you can feed to the wolves, but Hartley is going with 2 second lines, a generic third line and a 4th line. It is nice to see a natural center on the top unit in Backlund, however.

It seems Jones is getting bumped tonight in favor of Steve Begin, although with Hudler and Cervenka slated to return on Saturday, Roman Horak is the good bet to be sent down to Abbotsford given his waivers exepmt (and would be better served playing rather than watching from the pressbox as well).

The defense looks suspect to me as well - as much as I like Brodie, I'm not sure he's better suited to a top-4 role then Butler is, and given the line combos yesterday Butler could be a healthy scratch tonight, which is insane. Giordano had a terrible game one, Bouwmeester had a terrible game two, and Wideman just looks completely lost on the defending side of the red line. A shakeup is needed, for sure, but moving Butler out of the line-up altogether seems unncessarily harsh.

The Opponent

  • Sedin-Sedin-Kassian  
  • Higgins-Burrows-Hansen  
  • Raymond-Schroeder-Weise  
  • Volpatti-Malhotra-Lapierre

  • Hamhuis-Bieksa
  • Edler-Garrison
  • Ballard-Tanev

  • Schneider

There's been a faux-controversy regarding the Canucks' goaltending situation since...well, pretty much since ever. In my opinion, the better goalie started the season on the bench, but the difference between the two of them is probably pretty small. It remains to be seen how Schneider will hold up throughout a whole season, so it's probably a good idea that Mike Gillis held on to Luongo.

Obviously the prominent name missing from the above roster is Ryan Kesler, who is currently rehabbing from both shoulder and wrist surgeries and still has no timetable to return. Kesler is likely the best single player on the team - or, rather, the player that effects the team the most with his consistent Selke-caliber play. David Booth is also out long-term, which means the Canucks highly adept second line has been completely hollowed-out to start the season. As a result, Vancouver is far more vulnerable in the middle of the rotation - to the degree the Flames arguably have the better depth after the top line up front.

Sum It Up

Even if the Flames lose this one, I wouldn't be too worked up about it. They'd have one basically "equal" loss against Anaheim, a loss against a top-5 Western Conference team and another against their most hated rival/top-5 Western Conference team. Point is, two losses to good teams and an even game against another playoff bubble team isn't a big deal. The issue, more than anything, is timing. It's just not good optics for the team to have a start like this after the past three seasons under Brent Sutter. 

Saying that, it's always nice to see those pukes on the West Coast lose. Go Flames.

Enemy Perspective - Thom Drance sets things up from a Vancouver perspective at Canucks Army. Swing by and make sure to brink the smack talk.

A9d138d0e612f28cd46f9b7057ed715d
Justin is a 22-year-old Flames fan who also happens to be pursuing a double major at the University of Calgary. He has played hockey at high levels, enjoys wearing shorts and tends to drink far too much Grasshopper. Please don't hate him.
Avatar
Reply #201 Kent Wilson January 23 2013, 09:51PM
+1 0 props

sad trombone.

Avatar
Reply #202 Kent Wilson January 23 2013, 09:51PM
+1 0 props

Woo! Backs!

Avatar
Reply #203 schevvy January 23 2013, 09:51PM
+1 0 props

F'in yeah!

Avatar
Reply #204 RKD January 23 2013, 09:51PM
+1 0 props

Backlund!!!!!

Avatar
Reply #205 Emir January 23 2013, 09:51PM
+1 0 props

I love it!

Avatar
Reply #206 Vintage Flame January 23 2013, 09:52PM
+1 0 props

THAT'S WHAT I'VE BEEN WAITING FOR!!

Avatar
Reply #207 Ryan Pike January 23 2013, 09:52PM
+1 0 props

Backlund!

Avatar
Reply #208 schevvy January 23 2013, 09:52PM
+1 0 props

That was a surprisingly nice play by Iggy

Avatar
Reply #209 Gunk January 23 2013, 09:53PM
+1 0 props

Good lord. what a mess of a PP that still scores... I'll take it. Kerr always inspires me.

Avatar
Reply #210 Canucks Suck January 23 2013, 09:53PM
+1 0 props

YAY BACKLUND

Avatar
Reply #211 kevin January 23 2013, 09:53PM
+1 0 props

Iggy with the dangle and dish! Wait what?

Avatar
Reply #212 Kent Wilson January 23 2013, 09:54PM
+1 0 props

@schevvy

Yeah quite the deke.

The first unit was generally poor before that. Kinda funny they had about 3 minutes of 5on3 time, only for most of the second unit to come out and score in about 5 seconds.

Avatar
Reply #213 loudogYYC January 23 2013, 09:54PM
+1 0 props

@schevvy

Agreed, those moves rarely work with Iggy's. Baertschi effect?

Avatar
Reply #214 Drad January 23 2013, 09:54PM
+1 0 props

That's actually a terrible goal for the Flames - now Iggy's gonna think he can toe-drag and beat guys one-on-one.

Avatar
Reply #215 Vintage Flame January 23 2013, 09:54PM
+1 0 props

Amazing how the goaltender interference get missed on Kipper and then called 15 sec later on Comeau

Avatar
Reply #216 Gunk January 23 2013, 09:54PM
+1 0 props

Am I the only one who absolutely loves Wideman? what an addition he is, if you thought a rock was solid...

Avatar
Reply #217 Vintage Flame January 23 2013, 09:56PM
+1 0 props
Gunk wrote:

Am I the only one who absolutely loves Wideman? what an addition he is, if you thought a rock was solid...

It would be nicer if Wideman could hit the net more consistantly.

Avatar
Reply #218 ChinookArch January 23 2013, 09:57PM
+1 0 props

Canuck fans are stupid.

Avatar
Reply #219 loudogYYC January 23 2013, 09:59PM
+1 0 props
Gunk wrote:

Am I the only one who absolutely loves Wideman? what an addition he is, if you thought a rock was solid...

I actually like Babchuks slapper more (sorry, everyone).

Avatar
Reply #220 Gunk January 23 2013, 09:59PM
+1 0 props

Wideman's accuracy isn't as bad as Fanoof's is :-)

Avatar
Reply #221 Vintage Flame January 23 2013, 09:59PM
+1 0 props

Gotta love when Simmer starts talking about fisting

Avatar
Reply #222 Gunk January 23 2013, 10:00PM
+1 0 props

...at least he doesnt break teammates arms

Avatar
Reply #223 Kent Wilson January 23 2013, 10:00PM
+1 0 props

Well, Flames are lucky the Nucks took three straight penalties. That said, good on them for taking advantage of their opportunities.

Avatar
Reply #224 schevvy January 23 2013, 10:00PM
+1 0 props
loudogYYC wrote:

I actually like Babchuks slapper more (sorry, everyone).

Shut up loudog :)

Avatar
Reply #225 clyde January 23 2013, 10:01PM
+1 0 props
Vintage Flame wrote:

Gotta love when Simmer starts talking about fisting

during the play too

Avatar
Reply #226 ChinookArch January 23 2013, 10:01PM
+1 0 props

@loudogYYC

Wideman is a very good quarterback, and so far I trust not to get caught flat footed when the puck comes to him. Babchuk is terrible.

Avatar
Reply #227 Gunk January 23 2013, 10:01PM
+1 0 props

I heard the awkward fisting comment... I think he realized he was walking on ify territory with the whole fisting penalty.. lol

Avatar
Reply #228 Kent Wilson January 23 2013, 10:01PM
+1 0 props

Backlund has less ice time that Comeau and Jones in this contest so far.

Avatar
Reply #231 ChinookArch January 23 2013, 10:03PM
+1 0 props

@Kent Wilson

Maybe he earned a little more time after his goal.

Avatar
Reply #232 Vintage Flame January 23 2013, 10:03PM
+1 0 props

Amazing Calgary is 54% in the FO circle

Avatar
Reply #233 loudogYYC January 23 2013, 10:04PM
+1 0 props
ChinookArch wrote:

Wideman is a very good quarterback, and so far I trust not to get caught flat footed when the puck comes to him. Babchuk is terrible.

Oh I know. Babchuk is one of those players that was blessed with a wicked shot but nothing else. Like Andy Delmore.

Avatar
Reply #234 Kent Wilson January 23 2013, 10:05PM
+1 0 props

@Justin Azevedo

Again, Im surprised it's that close.

Avatar
Reply #235 ChinookArch January 23 2013, 10:06PM
+1 0 props

@loudogYYC

Babchuk has a very heavy shot. Igive him that.

Avatar
Reply #236 Kent Wilson January 23 2013, 10:06PM
+1 0 props

@ChinookArch

Part of it has been the special teams I guess since he doesn't PK or play on the first unit PP.

Avatar
Reply #237 schevvy January 23 2013, 10:06PM
+1 1 props
loudogYYC wrote:

Oh I know. Babchuk is one of those players that was blessed with a wicked shot but nothing else. Like Andy Delmore.

More like Happy Gilmore

Avatar
Reply #238 SmellOfVictory January 23 2013, 10:08PM
+1 0 props
Kent Wilson wrote:

Backlund has less ice time that Comeau and Jones in this contest so far.

I assume that's partially due to Comeau and Jones getting hemmed in for like five minutes straight. Also probably screwed a little bit by the line juggling.

Avatar
Reply #240 ChinookArch January 23 2013, 10:11PM
+1 0 props

I hope for Comeau sake that he finds his game, he has not been good in the 1st three games.

Avatar
Reply #241 loudogYYC January 23 2013, 10:11PM
+1 0 props

K boys what's the verdict, has Calgary already played it's 1 good period or is it coming next?

Avatar
Reply #242 Vintage Flame January 23 2013, 10:13PM
+1 0 props

Yotes lose Mike Smith eh...

Avatar
Reply #243 schevvy January 23 2013, 10:14PM
+1 0 props

Loving how many comments are on here! Good work folks

Avatar
Reply #244 loudogYYC January 23 2013, 10:14PM
+1 0 props

@Vintage Flame

Yandle for Bernier and a pick. Wild guess.

Avatar
Reply #245 Gunk January 23 2013, 10:14PM
+1 0 props

I wish I had faith that the flames will get "inspired" and own the 3rd period. but my money would be on Van to take it. (shhh this is my new reverse jynxing theory)

Avatar
Reply #246 ChinookArch January 23 2013, 10:15PM
+1 0 props

@loudogYYC

I'm not optimistic. Sorry.

Avatar
Reply #247 schevvy January 23 2013, 10:16PM
+1 0 props

Enough with this awful thing Telus.

Avatar
Reply #248 Canucks Suck January 23 2013, 10:17PM
+1 0 props

I am loving that shot by wideman on the powerplay our PP this season alone is one bright spot so far. Its 110% better than last year it seems.

Avatar
Reply #249 Kent Wilson January 23 2013, 10:18PM
+1 0 props

@loudogYYC

I can't imagine they'll be that bad again. The second was their terrible period and luckily the Canucks punctuated it with 3 consecutive penalties.

Avatar
Reply #250 funkyjaman January 23 2013, 10:18PM
+1 0 props

With the way other team players are dropping from injuries this season, if the Flames stay healthy they may get in by default!

Positives!

Comments are closed for this article.