FGD: FTC (Attack of the acronyms!)

Justin Azevedo
January 23 2013 02:19PM

 

Well, the past two games haven't gone as well as hoped. 

However, two games is only two games. Sure, 48 is less than 82, but to make as much noise as has been made feels, to me, asinine.

Tonight the Flames play a team with only one more point than they have: the Vancouver Canucks. The Canucks have gotten off to an even shakier start than the Flames, giving up 7 goals on opening night to the Anaheim Ducks and losing in overtime in Edmonton on Sunday. 

Last year, the Flames finished about even with Vancouver for the first time in years (3-2-1). With a Western Conference and division heavy schedule, Calgary will have to make hay against some of their closet rivals in order to make the post-season.

The Line-Up

  • Cammalleri-Backlund-Iginla
  • Glencross-Tanguay-Stempniak
  • Baertschi-Stajan-Comeau
  • Begin-Horak-Jackman

  • Bouwmeester-Giordano
  • Wideman-Brodie
  • Smith-Sarich

  • Kiprusoff

I'm already starting to question Hartley's decision-making when it comes to lines, although to be fair to the new bench boss he's still figuring out what he has with this roster.

That said, the existing set up above seems like it will get murdered if they try and go power versus power, but there's also no line that you can bury. To me, it looks like the Flames have the players for 3 second lines and a third line that you can feed to the wolves, but Hartley is going with 2 second lines, a generic third line and a 4th line. It is nice to see a natural center on the top unit in Backlund, however.

It seems Jones is getting bumped tonight in favor of Steve Begin, although with Hudler and Cervenka slated to return on Saturday, Roman Horak is the good bet to be sent down to Abbotsford given his waivers exepmt (and would be better served playing rather than watching from the pressbox as well).

The defense looks suspect to me as well - as much as I like Brodie, I'm not sure he's better suited to a top-4 role then Butler is, and given the line combos yesterday Butler could be a healthy scratch tonight, which is insane. Giordano had a terrible game one, Bouwmeester had a terrible game two, and Wideman just looks completely lost on the defending side of the red line. A shakeup is needed, for sure, but moving Butler out of the line-up altogether seems unncessarily harsh.

The Opponent

  • Sedin-Sedin-Kassian  
  • Higgins-Burrows-Hansen  
  • Raymond-Schroeder-Weise  
  • Volpatti-Malhotra-Lapierre

  • Hamhuis-Bieksa
  • Edler-Garrison
  • Ballard-Tanev

  • Schneider

There's been a faux-controversy regarding the Canucks' goaltending situation since...well, pretty much since ever. In my opinion, the better goalie started the season on the bench, but the difference between the two of them is probably pretty small. It remains to be seen how Schneider will hold up throughout a whole season, so it's probably a good idea that Mike Gillis held on to Luongo.

Obviously the prominent name missing from the above roster is Ryan Kesler, who is currently rehabbing from both shoulder and wrist surgeries and still has no timetable to return. Kesler is likely the best single player on the team - or, rather, the player that effects the team the most with his consistent Selke-caliber play. David Booth is also out long-term, which means the Canucks highly adept second line has been completely hollowed-out to start the season. As a result, Vancouver is far more vulnerable in the middle of the rotation - to the degree the Flames arguably have the better depth after the top line up front.

Sum It Up

Even if the Flames lose this one, I wouldn't be too worked up about it. They'd have one basically "equal" loss against Anaheim, a loss against a top-5 Western Conference team and another against their most hated rival/top-5 Western Conference team. Point is, two losses to good teams and an even game against another playoff bubble team isn't a big deal. The issue, more than anything, is timing. It's just not good optics for the team to have a start like this after the past three seasons under Brent Sutter. 

Saying that, it's always nice to see those pukes on the West Coast lose. Go Flames.

Enemy Perspective - Thom Drance sets things up from a Vancouver perspective at Canucks Army. Swing by and make sure to brink the smack talk.

A9d138d0e612f28cd46f9b7057ed715d
Justin is a 22-year-old Flames fan who also happens to be pursuing a double major at the University of Calgary. He has played hockey at high levels, enjoys wearing shorts and tends to drink far too much Grasshopper. Please don't hate him.
Avatar
Reply #101 Vintage Flame January 23 2013, 08:52PM
+1 0 props

Cammalleri looks like Fat Falloon so far this year! #DrinkPink

Avatar
Reply #103 Kent Wilson January 23 2013, 08:57PM
+1 0 props

Decent shift by the Stajan line. Baertschi has had a good first.

Not much else going on though. I think they generated 2 ES scoring chances in that period, none by the top 6.

Avatar
Reply #104 schevvy January 23 2013, 08:57PM
+1 0 props

@Justin Azevedo

So the shots don't reflect the way the game is going?

Avatar
Reply #105 Vintage Flame January 23 2013, 08:57PM
+1 0 props

Leave it to Stajan to try a slapshot on his backhand

Avatar
Reply #106 Emir January 23 2013, 08:57PM
+1 0 props

Baertchi is looking good, and stajan doesnt look like a complete plug out there.

Avatar
Reply #108 jeremywilhelm January 23 2013, 08:58PM
+1 0 props

@schevvy

Canucks owning puck. Not shooting much.

Avatar
Reply #109 Kent Wilson January 23 2013, 08:58PM
+1 0 props

@Justin Azevedo

Not as bad as I thought it would be.

Avatar
Reply #110 jeremywilhelm January 23 2013, 08:59PM
+1 0 props

Darn.

Avatar
Reply #111 schevvy January 23 2013, 08:59PM
+1 0 props

Ah get the backhand in the air Iggy

Avatar
Reply #112 negrilcowboy January 23 2013, 08:59PM
+1 0 props
Vintage Flame wrote:

Cammalleri looks like Fat Falloon so far this year! #DrinkPink

loophole broke his arm tonight, maybe the leafs would take cammy in exchange for a first round pick

Avatar
Reply #113 Vintage Flame January 23 2013, 08:59PM
+1 0 props

So much for Backlund staying on the Iginla line...

Avatar
Reply #114 Kent Wilson January 23 2013, 08:59PM
+1 0 props

Can't believe Iginla didn't bury that one. Nice save by Schneider though.

Avatar
Reply #115 jeremywilhelm January 23 2013, 08:59PM
+1 0 props

Flames looking better.

Avatar
Reply #116 Vintage Flame January 23 2013, 09:01PM
+1 0 props

Nice to see the Flames doing better over the FO dot. 8-7 Nucks and all 8 are probably Malholtra

Avatar
Reply #118 Emir January 23 2013, 09:02PM
+1 0 props

I didn't think backlund looked bad; I thought cammi was the weak link on that line.

Avatar
Reply #119 Kent Wilson January 23 2013, 09:02PM
+1 0 props

The first 15 minutes were uninspired but they limited the damage and were decent to end the period.

Avatar
Reply #120 jeremywilhelm January 23 2013, 09:02PM
+1 0 props

I was leery early on. But that actually ended up being a better period than I had hoped.

Avatar
Reply #121 kevin January 23 2013, 09:02PM
+1 0 props

Iggy should have atleast 3 goals this year...UGH

Avatar
Reply #122 schevvy January 23 2013, 09:02PM
+1 0 props
Emir wrote:

I didn't think backlund looked bad; I thought cammi was the weak link on that line.

Agreed. Cammy looks awful. Iggy and Backlund were fine

Avatar
Reply #123 Emir January 23 2013, 09:04PM
+1 0 props

I want a full period of Baertchi-Backlund-Iginla

Avatar
Reply #124 Ryan Pike January 23 2013, 09:05PM
+1 0 props

Flames get a B- for the period.

They got hemmed into their own zone but didn't seem like they were in any trouble. They created chances but couldn't bury them. They had bad luck with wonky passes once again. But Kiprusoff was good.

Avatar
Reply #125 jeremywilhelm January 23 2013, 09:05PM
+1 0 props

Also this team relies completely on chemistry. Complete discombobulation as soon as lines are jumbled.

Avatar
Reply #126 Vintage Flame January 23 2013, 09:05PM
+1 0 props

I'm really hoping at some point, we get to see Baertschi - Backlund - Cervenka on Saturday

Avatar
Reply #127 ChinookArch January 23 2013, 09:08PM
+1 0 props

Who are we playing Saturday?

Avatar
Reply #128 Emir January 23 2013, 09:08PM
+1 0 props

@Vintage Flame

Im just curious to see cervenka period. I really wonder what kind of player he is. But I think we most likely see hudler with cervenka

Avatar
Reply #129 Vintage Flame January 23 2013, 09:10PM
+1 0 props
ChinookArch wrote:

Who are we playing Saturday?

The Oil

Avatar
Reply #131 Kent Wilson January 23 2013, 09:11PM
+1 0 props

@ChinookArch

The dreaded Oil.

Avatar
Reply #132 Vintage Flame January 23 2013, 09:11PM
+1 0 props
Emir wrote:

Im just curious to see cervenka period. I really wonder what kind of player he is. But I think we most likely see hudler with cervenka

Me too. And, ya, I can see him at least starting with Hudler. Maybe those two with Stemps?

Avatar
Reply #133 Baalzamon January 23 2013, 09:13PM
+1 0 props

Hartley juggled the lines too fast. Just when the Glencross-Tanguay-Iginla unit was starting to show flashes of usefulness.

Avatar
Reply #134 Kent Wilson January 23 2013, 09:13PM
+1 0 props

@Justin Azevedo

I wonder what is was prior to the one faceoff win? Probably double digits.

Avatar
Reply #135 Cp January 23 2013, 09:14PM
+1 0 props
Cp wrote:

Is there a way to stream this game to a computer? Can't use a tv tonight.

So no live stream anywhere?

Avatar
Reply #136 Emir January 23 2013, 09:16PM
+1 0 props

@Vintage Flame

Based on cammi's play as of late I would probably go with Backlund in the middle with cervenka and hudler.

I'm doubtful they put cervenka up the middle right away.

Avatar
Reply #137 Emir January 23 2013, 09:18PM
+1 0 props

Also do the flames passes just seem terrible? The flames have never been known for their passing ability but right now its a 50% chance of working out.

Avatar
Reply #138 ChinookArch January 23 2013, 09:18PM
+1 0 props

Man there were a lot of posts in the 1st.

Avatar
Reply #139 ChinookArch January 23 2013, 09:20PM
+1 0 props

Great, here comes the sister act . . .

Avatar
Reply #140 Kent Wilson January 23 2013, 09:20PM
+1 0 props

Sneaky play by JayBo there.

Avatar
Reply #141 jeremywilhelm January 23 2013, 09:23PM
+1 0 props

Kipper looks better.

Avatar
Reply #142 jeremywilhelm January 23 2013, 09:24PM
+1 0 props

How do the Flames constantly get caught by the slow up on the wing and cut in. EVERYTIME!!!!

Avatar
Reply #143 Vintage Flame January 23 2013, 09:24PM
+1 0 props

Haha.. That's funny them trying to set up Kassian on the backdoor play

Avatar
Reply #144 Emir January 23 2013, 09:25PM
+1 0 props

backlund should have shot that.

Avatar
Reply #145 ChinookArch January 23 2013, 09:26PM
+1 0 props

Oh god Sarich was trying to jump up on the play.

Avatar
Reply #146 jeremywilhelm January 23 2013, 09:26PM
+1 0 props

MAKE A F*CKING PASS!

Avatar
Reply #147 Kent Wilson January 23 2013, 09:26PM
+1 0 props

Flames just can't seem to transition through the neutral zone.

Avatar
Reply #148 Vintage Flame January 23 2013, 09:26PM
+1 0 props
Emir wrote:

Based on cammi's play as of late I would probably go with Backlund in the middle with cervenka and hudler.

I'm doubtful they put cervenka up the middle right away.

I wouldn't mind seeing that experiment.

Avatar
Reply #149 Emir January 23 2013, 09:27PM
+1 0 props
jeremywilhelm wrote:

MAKE A F*CKING PASS!

Flames fans are in mid season form

Avatar
Reply #150 Kent Wilson January 23 2013, 09:28PM
+1 0 props

Uhh, is Baertschi benched? And, if so, why?

Comments are closed for this article.