FGD: FTC (Attack of the acronyms!)
Justin Azevedo
January 23 2013 02:19PM

Well, the past two games haven't gone as well as hoped.
However, two games is only two games. Sure, 48 is less than 82, but to make as much noise as has been made feels, to me, asinine.
Tonight the Flames play a team with only one more point than they have: the Vancouver Canucks. The Canucks have gotten off to an even shakier start than the Flames, giving up 7 goals on opening night to the Anaheim Ducks and losing in overtime in Edmonton on Sunday.
Last year, the Flames finished about even with Vancouver for the first time in years (3-2-1). With a Western Conference and division heavy schedule, Calgary will have to make hay against some of their closet rivals in order to make the post-season.
The Line-Up
- Cammalleri-Backlund-Iginla
- Glencross-Tanguay-Stempniak
- Baertschi-Stajan-Comeau
- Begin-Horak-Jackman
- Bouwmeester-Giordano
- Wideman-Brodie
- Smith-Sarich
- Kiprusoff
I'm already starting to question Hartley's decision-making when it comes to lines, although to be fair to the new bench boss he's still figuring out what he has with this roster.
That said, the existing set up above seems like it will get murdered if they try and go power versus power, but there's also no line that you can bury. To me, it looks like the Flames have the players for 3 second lines and a third line that you can feed to the wolves, but Hartley is going with 2 second lines, a generic third line and a 4th line. It is nice to see a natural center on the top unit in Backlund, however.
It seems Jones is getting bumped tonight in favor of Steve Begin, although with Hudler and Cervenka slated to return on Saturday, Roman Horak is the good bet to be sent down to Abbotsford given his waivers exepmt (and would be better served playing rather than watching from the pressbox as well).
The defense looks suspect to me as well - as much as I like Brodie, I'm not sure he's better suited to a top-4 role then Butler is, and given the line combos yesterday Butler could be a healthy scratch tonight, which is insane. Giordano had a terrible game one, Bouwmeester had a terrible game two, and Wideman just looks completely lost on the defending side of the red line. A shakeup is needed, for sure, but moving Butler out of the line-up altogether seems unncessarily harsh.
The Opponent
- Sedin-Sedin-Kassian
- Higgins-Burrows-Hansen
- Raymond-Schroeder-Weise
- Volpatti-Malhotra-Lapierre
- Hamhuis-Bieksa
- Edler-Garrison
- Ballard-Tanev
- Schneider
There's been a faux-controversy regarding the Canucks' goaltending situation since...well, pretty much since ever. In my opinion, the better goalie started the season on the bench, but the difference between the two of them is probably pretty small. It remains to be seen how Schneider will hold up throughout a whole season, so it's probably a good idea that Mike Gillis held on to Luongo.
Obviously the prominent name missing from the above roster is Ryan Kesler, who is currently rehabbing from both shoulder and wrist surgeries and still has no timetable to return. Kesler is likely the best single player on the team - or, rather, the player that effects the team the most with his consistent Selke-caliber play. David Booth is also out long-term, which means the Canucks highly adept second line has been completely hollowed-out to start the season. As a result, Vancouver is far more vulnerable in the middle of the rotation - to the degree the Flames arguably have the better depth after the top line up front.
Sum It Up
Even if the Flames lose this one, I wouldn't be too worked up about it. They'd have one basically "equal" loss against Anaheim, a loss against a top-5 Western Conference team and another against their most hated rival/top-5 Western Conference team. Point is, two losses to good teams and an even game against another playoff bubble team isn't a big deal. The issue, more than anything, is timing. It's just not good optics for the team to have a start like this after the past three seasons under Brent Sutter.
Saying that, it's always nice to see those pukes on the West Coast lose. Go Flames.
Enemy Perspective - Thom Drance sets things up from a Vancouver perspective at Canucks Army. Swing by and make sure to brink the smack talk.
Damnit Kent
1 pt so far. Yeah!
Beat you though haha
As per Rob Kerr, this is big boy hockey.
Cmon get the puck
What is Kerr talking about?
I have chances 4-4. corsi -11 (56-67) fenwick -10 (41-51)
Hit the net.. god...
How can that pile of humanity in front of the net lead to zero penalties?
How did Smith put that over the net???
@Kent Wilson
Big boy hockey.
They tackled Iginla
Shootout baby
HOW WAS THERE NO CALLS ON THAT SCRAMBLE
Amazing Smith missed that chance.
Tanguay Backlund Iginla
1-1 in ot.
Stemp/Wideman/Glencross
We are a much better team 4-4 this team, better skating and passing... thanks to Brodie, Wideman, Stemp, Backlund, Baertschi
Tangs Bear Glen
iginla tanguay backlund sven glenx
Well. Sven, Tangs and Backs?
Maybe pull Gelinas off the bench to shoot
Tangs, Stemp, Backlund
sven, backs, stemp
Cammi.?
@Justin Azevedo
Didn't the Flames get at least two chances in that scrum?
We want Lu to play the shootout
needless to say this is a HUGE 2pts on the line>>>
@Kent Wilson
I counted one on tangs, the original iginla didn't get all the way through and smith went over w/o deflection
@MC Hockey
This seems to be his team and moment!
oof
Iggy always slows down... I don't get it.
Booyah
come on cammy
Cammi gonna win it!
close... :-)
Backlund
Stemper? 4th
Oh Cammalleri. You have been a sink hole to start the year.
Henhenh Raymond
Gotta let Baertschi shoot now
god damnit
grrrr.... baertchi now?
This team is awful at this stuff!
Quite the move by Kassian.
Not winnin for Mckinnon still alive and well.
Boo
Second that
Good night gents!