FGD: FTC (Attack of the acronyms!)

Justin Azevedo
January 23 2013 02:19PM

 

Well, the past two games haven't gone as well as hoped. 

However, two games is only two games. Sure, 48 is less than 82, but to make as much noise as has been made feels, to me, asinine.

Tonight the Flames play a team with only one more point than they have: the Vancouver Canucks. The Canucks have gotten off to an even shakier start than the Flames, giving up 7 goals on opening night to the Anaheim Ducks and losing in overtime in Edmonton on Sunday. 

Last year, the Flames finished about even with Vancouver for the first time in years (3-2-1). With a Western Conference and division heavy schedule, Calgary will have to make hay against some of their closet rivals in order to make the post-season.

The Line-Up

  • Cammalleri-Backlund-Iginla
  • Glencross-Tanguay-Stempniak
  • Baertschi-Stajan-Comeau
  • Begin-Horak-Jackman

  • Bouwmeester-Giordano
  • Wideman-Brodie
  • Smith-Sarich

  • Kiprusoff

I'm already starting to question Hartley's decision-making when it comes to lines, although to be fair to the new bench boss he's still figuring out what he has with this roster.

That said, the existing set up above seems like it will get murdered if they try and go power versus power, but there's also no line that you can bury. To me, it looks like the Flames have the players for 3 second lines and a third line that you can feed to the wolves, but Hartley is going with 2 second lines, a generic third line and a 4th line. It is nice to see a natural center on the top unit in Backlund, however.

It seems Jones is getting bumped tonight in favor of Steve Begin, although with Hudler and Cervenka slated to return on Saturday, Roman Horak is the good bet to be sent down to Abbotsford given his waivers exepmt (and would be better served playing rather than watching from the pressbox as well).

The defense looks suspect to me as well - as much as I like Brodie, I'm not sure he's better suited to a top-4 role then Butler is, and given the line combos yesterday Butler could be a healthy scratch tonight, which is insane. Giordano had a terrible game one, Bouwmeester had a terrible game two, and Wideman just looks completely lost on the defending side of the red line. A shakeup is needed, for sure, but moving Butler out of the line-up altogether seems unncessarily harsh.

The Opponent

  • Sedin-Sedin-Kassian  
  • Higgins-Burrows-Hansen  
  • Raymond-Schroeder-Weise  
  • Volpatti-Malhotra-Lapierre

  • Hamhuis-Bieksa
  • Edler-Garrison
  • Ballard-Tanev

  • Schneider

There's been a faux-controversy regarding the Canucks' goaltending situation since...well, pretty much since ever. In my opinion, the better goalie started the season on the bench, but the difference between the two of them is probably pretty small. It remains to be seen how Schneider will hold up throughout a whole season, so it's probably a good idea that Mike Gillis held on to Luongo.

Obviously the prominent name missing from the above roster is Ryan Kesler, who is currently rehabbing from both shoulder and wrist surgeries and still has no timetable to return. Kesler is likely the best single player on the team - or, rather, the player that effects the team the most with his consistent Selke-caliber play. David Booth is also out long-term, which means the Canucks highly adept second line has been completely hollowed-out to start the season. As a result, Vancouver is far more vulnerable in the middle of the rotation - to the degree the Flames arguably have the better depth after the top line up front.

Sum It Up

Even if the Flames lose this one, I wouldn't be too worked up about it. They'd have one basically "equal" loss against Anaheim, a loss against a top-5 Western Conference team and another against their most hated rival/top-5 Western Conference team. Point is, two losses to good teams and an even game against another playoff bubble team isn't a big deal. The issue, more than anything, is timing. It's just not good optics for the team to have a start like this after the past three seasons under Brent Sutter. 

Saying that, it's always nice to see those pukes on the West Coast lose. Go Flames.

Enemy Perspective - Thom Drance sets things up from a Vancouver perspective at Canucks Army. Swing by and make sure to brink the smack talk.

A9d138d0e612f28cd46f9b7057ed715d
Justin is a 22-year-old Flames fan who also happens to be pursuing a double major at the University of Calgary. He has played hockey at high levels, enjoys wearing shorts and tends to drink far too much Grasshopper. Please don't hate him.
Avatar
Reply #351 Gunk January 23 2013, 11:07PM
+1 0 props

GD it.... told you so.. we would lose. bugger me

Avatar
Reply #352 Kent Wilson January 23 2013, 11:07PM
+1 0 props

Well, Im glad the Flames got a point to be honest, especially after the first couple periods. It was a good third period too.

Avatar
Reply #353 schevvy January 23 2013, 11:07PM
+1 0 props

God the Flames shooters aside from Tangs were very unimaginative

Avatar
Reply #354 Rubberbadger January 23 2013, 11:08PM
+1 0 props

It's like they've never practised this before

Avatar
Reply #355 funkyjaman January 23 2013, 11:08PM
+1 0 props

4 Shots in a shoot out! Man! Im lost with these guys. Just sad.

Avatar
Reply #356 schevvy January 23 2013, 11:08PM
+1 0 props

Why no Sven??

Avatar
Reply #357 Colin.S January 23 2013, 11:08PM
+1 0 props

Seriously now, is it really THAT difficult to NOT just shoot it directly at the goalie. UGH the shootout the bane of the Flames.

Avatar
Reply #358 clyde January 23 2013, 11:08PM
+1 0 props

Good to see we left our creative and skilled youngsters on the bench.

Avatar
Reply #359 Drad January 23 2013, 11:08PM
+1 0 props

Cervenka Hudler Reinhart

Avatar
Reply #360 funkyjaman January 23 2013, 11:08PM
+1 0 props

Soooo predictable.

Avatar
Reply #361 Benny January 23 2013, 11:09PM
+1 0 props

Why didn t they put Baertchi for a change instead of the same old same old?

Avatar
Reply #362 schevvy January 23 2013, 11:09PM
+1 0 props

Oh well. At least we got 1.

Avatar
Reply #363 loudogYYC January 23 2013, 11:09PM
+1 0 props

F*ckin f*ck!

I can say that right?

Avatar
Reply #364 Gunk January 23 2013, 11:10PM
+1 0 props

Agreed Kent, there are definitely some positives to take out of this game even though they didn't get the W. pretty entertaining game. G-night guys its been a slice :)

Avatar
Reply #365 clyde January 23 2013, 11:10PM
+1 0 props

We went with the same old same old because we still have the same old same old.

Avatar
Reply #366 kevin January 23 2013, 11:12PM
+1 0 props

Really boys??? shootout was just god awful..Why not put out Sven Or Backlund? WTF

Avatar
Reply #367 Jibmeister January 23 2013, 11:13PM
+1 0 props

SVEN. WHERE WAS SVEN.

Avatar
Reply #369 Vintage Flame January 23 2013, 11:22PM
+1 0 props

Really not sure why the shootout order didn't go Tanguay - Sven - Backs

Avatar
Reply #370 Steve January 23 2013, 11:35PM
+1 0 props

Just look at how Schneider played them! He didn't even know where the shots were going, they just hit him, they didn't have any room. For God's sakes someone make a deke! When Glencross came out I knew it was going to be more of the same.

Since I mention Glencross, I can't help but feel frustrated every time I see him standing still, arms hanging at his side, one hand on the stick... That's the image I have of him after this game - what's that magic phrase, "Keep your *#&@$in' feet moving!".

Kipper, Gio were back on tonight I thought. JayBo, better. Most everybody was decent, but a bit of laziness (mostly GlenX!). Still a bit of fumbleitis, and now we get to add a couple more rusty forwards into the lineup. Oh well, call it a night.

Avatar
Reply #371 the forgotten man January 23 2013, 11:38PM
+1 0 props

Seriously, the Flames may want to invest in a breakaway coach. It would probably return more points per season than any player signing and it doesn't go against the Cap. Hockey needs to go even more like the NFL and have sub specialty coaches for specific things. The players have obviously shown they have no confidence or creativity when put in a breakaway situation...with that the case you then implement a former player or specialist who can "design" up to 10 scripted moves to begin. Then have your 6-7 best skilled guys practice these ad nauseam. Sad it comes to this when you are paying some of these guys the jack they get.

Avatar
Reply #372 Kevin R January 23 2013, 11:48PM
+1 0 props
the forgotten man wrote:

Seriously, the Flames may want to invest in a breakaway coach. It would probably return more points per season than any player signing and it doesn't go against the Cap. Hockey needs to go even more like the NFL and have sub specialty coaches for specific things. The players have obviously shown they have no confidence or creativity when put in a breakaway situation...with that the case you then implement a former player or specialist who can "design" up to 10 scripted moves to begin. Then have your 6-7 best skilled guys practice these ad nauseam. Sad it comes to this when you are paying some of these guys the jack they get.

Sounds like a job for Theo Fleury.

Comments are closed for this article.