FGD: Fishing With Dynamite

Ryan Pike
November 12 2013 12:52PM

After a road trip that netted just a single win, the Calgary Flames (6-9-2) return home to try to bolster their fairly-strong home record and creep back to .500 when they host the San Jose Sharks (10-2-5). The puck drops at 7pm MT on the Sportsnet media properties (I believe it's on Sportsnet West tonight).

The Flames have played just six of their 17 games this season at the Saddledome, which is good because they've produced seven points. The downside is they're still going to play some really strong teams, but for some reason, the Flames have been appreciably better at home over the past few seasons than on the road. (Last year, they were awful on the road.)

After losing three straight on the road, and putting up just two points in their last six games, the Flames need some wins. They'll be facing a similarly desperate San Jose club, who haven't won a game in their last five (they're 0-1-4) and probably view this game as the proverbial slump-buster. The two clubs met in San Jose on October 19, where the Sharks skated away with a 6-3 win (that was closer than the score appeared).

THE LINE-UP

The Flames haven't won since Sunday's 3-2 triumph in Chicago, and have slipped from being a team hovering just over .500 to one falling out of the picture a bit. The team heads into this week 10 points out of a playoff spot, and while they may not have any delusions of a Stanley Cup parade in the near future, they probably want to remain competitive at the very least.

Via our buds at Daily Faceoff, some lines for this evening.

Cammalleri (A) – Backlund – Hudler
Galiardi – Stajan (A) – Jones
Baertschi – Monahan – Stempniak (A)
Bouma – Colborne – McGrattan

Brodie – Butler
Russell – Wideman
Smid – Smith

Berra
Ramo

Tim Jackman, Max Reinhart and Shane O'Brien are your healthy scratches, while Curtis Glencross (knee), Mark Giordano (ankle) and Chris Breen (abdomen) are on the injured reserve. Lee Stempniak returns to the line-up while Ladislav Smid makes his debut in a red jersey after seven years in Edmonton.

The Flames defensive play arguably bottomed-out when they had Giordano, Stempniak and a healthy Mikael Backlund missing from their line-up. With Smid debuting and Stempniak back, expect the team to be better without the puck. That said, this is still a strong Sharks team, so it'll be a big test for their systems (and a test of how Smid can get up to speed). The forward line-up is virtually unchanged from Denver, albeit with Stempniak taking Max Reinhart's spot on the third line. The Backlund/Cammalleri/Hudler line was excellent in the second and third periods.

Keep your eye on the power-play. They haven't scored a goal with the extra man since October 21 in LA (a gulf of nine games, during which they're 2-7-0) and they're probably due, as nobody can be that bad or that unlucky for this long.

THE OPPOSITION

The Sharks have had a rough-ish go of it, by their standards, in recent weeks. They haven't won since October 27 against Ottawa, although they have had points in an overtime loss to Los Angeles and shootout losses against Phoenix, Buffalo and Winnipeg. Much like Calgary, you could argue that the Sharks have merely been unlucky, not out-and-out bad.

Daily Faceoff has line-ups.

Hertl – Thornton (C) – Wingels
Pavelski – Couture – Nieto
Kennedy – Marleau (A) – Havlat
Sheppard – Desjardins – Brown

Vlasic – Braun
Boyle (A) – Irwin
Hannan – Demers

Stalock
Niemi

The key to victory for the Sharks may merely be limiting Calgary's offense – San Jose has allowed four goals in four of their last five games, so perhaps they need to get scored on less to win. Back-up Alex Stalock is expected to get his second start of the year, which may be the change of energy that San Jose needs.

The Sharks are employing some scoring-by-committee, with six forwards (including Wingels) with 10 points or more – contrast with three in Calgary. This will make it a bit of a challenge for Calgary to defend. The big threat on the Sharks may still be Tomas Hertl, the NHL's hottest rookie, but Wingels has been red-hot of late and the Flames defenders should have their hands full defending their top six. And let's face it, San Jose's third line is still pretty solid. San Jose's back end may be their weakness, as many of their blueliners aren't amazingly fleet of foot, but the Sharks have done a credible job of bringing in young faces to bolster their line-up.

SUM IT UP

The Flames have returned home and open a three-game homestand tonight against San Jose. They will likely have their hands full against the Sharks' high-octane offense. But the return of Lee Stempnak (and Smid's debut) could bolster their defensive game, so it'll be very interesting to see which club can snap out of their recent losing streak.

51a8cdc527ce12d222fdc583f3cf4368
Now in his fourth season covering the Calgary Flames and the NHL, Ryan Pike is a Calgary native and FlamesNation's managing editor. He's trying to keep his head up, his stick on the ice and is giving it 110% every shift. You can also find his work at The Hockey Writers and the Wrestling Observer.
Avatar
#1 Kent Wilson
November 12 2013, 01:38PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Props
13
props

Bumping SOB to the press box is good news.

Avatar
#2 Jeff In Lethbridge
November 12 2013, 01:39PM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Props
3
props

we need to either win more or win less... get in the hunt or focus on rebuild and development and draft.

personally i dont mind losses if we are competing and developing.

anyway, i predict a 4-2 win tonight with an empty netter by stempniak and a fight by smid.

Avatar
#3 Parallex
November 12 2013, 01:42PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
1
props

Geez, San Jose is redonk deep at forward.

I actually have a good feeling about tonight... Home Game, well rested, San Jose back-up in net, Hartley constructing a roster without any "WTF!" placements, Upgrade on D with Smid in (and O'Brien out), Stempniak back, and Backlund likely to get more minutes.

Avatar
#4 negrilcowboy
November 12 2013, 01:46PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
3
props

"gonna need a bigger boat"

Avatar
#5 SeanCharles
November 12 2013, 01:50PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
1
props

Lovin' the lineup!

Would have liked Reinhart in but its kinda pointless if he's on the 4th line so good job Hartley.

Avatar
#6 seve927
November 12 2013, 01:55PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props
Parallex wrote:

Geez, San Jose is redonk deep at forward.

I actually have a good feeling about tonight... Home Game, well rested, San Jose back-up in net, Hartley constructing a roster without any "WTF!" placements, Upgrade on D with Smid in (and O'Brien out), Stempniak back, and Backlund likely to get more minutes.

I was thinking much the same. Depends on goaltending as usual, hold 'em to 2 and we'll win.

Avatar
#7 Bean-counting cowboy
November 12 2013, 01:59PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
5
props
SeanCharles wrote:

Lovin' the lineup!

Would have liked Reinhart in but its kinda pointless if he's on the 4th line so good job Hartley.

I agree, would've loved to see Reinhart in again. Why not swap him with Mcgrattan and spread the minutes a bit more evenly over the bottom three lines. Something like 8-9 minutes for 4th line, 10-11 3rd line and so on.

Avatar
#8 SeanCharles
November 12 2013, 02:10PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props
Bean-counting cowboy wrote:

I agree, would've loved to see Reinhart in again. Why not swap him with Mcgrattan and spread the minutes a bit more evenly over the bottom three lines. Something like 8-9 minutes for 4th line, 10-11 3rd line and so on.

I wouldn't complain. I thought Reinhart played well last game.

But in saying that Hartley would probably then scratch Smith for O'Brien to give us a guy who can fight if need be...Even though I think we all agree Bouma could do the job..

Avatar
#9 cunning_linguist
November 12 2013, 02:13PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Props
1
props

Still don't get why Butler is in the lineup...He's just as bad as SOB but without the physical play. Once Gio is back, I hope they keep Smith over Buttler...or even call up someone who can develop at this level (ie: Cundari) and hasn't peaked at replacement level or below

Avatar
#10 Dave
November 12 2013, 02:16PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
1
props

That 3rd line is exactly what I wanted to see. Stempniak is a guy that I wanna see regularly play with Sven, since he is an established 2 way guy. If Hartley feels Sven has to improve in all 3 zones, putting him with Stemps is a smart move. Good move Hartley

Avatar
#11 Kent Wilson
November 12 2013, 02:23PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Props
10
props

@cunning_linguist

The Butler strategy seems to be "pair him with a mobile puck mover" who can do the bulk of the distribution. With Bouwmeester and Brodie, he looks okay. with guys like O'Brien, he sinks faster than an Italian guy in cement shoes.

Avatar
#12 NHL93
November 12 2013, 04:09PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

I like our Top line and Third line. We're almost dressing 4 decent lines tonight. Wow! Where's Nigel Dawes when you need him?

Avatar
#13 RexLibris
November 12 2013, 04:10PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
2
props

@Jeff In Lethbridge

Smid doesn't fight that often.

In fact, I think Gagner has more career tilts than Smid.

He does some nice stickwork to clear his crease though. Doesn't like door-to-door salesmen in the blue paint.

Avatar
#14 exsanguinator
November 12 2013, 04:35PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

I like Smid as a number 5 dman on this team when Gio is healthy but what the hell is Butler doing all the way up there while Smid is way down there? Smid should be given the toughs with Brodie. If he can handle it in Edmonton then he should do just fine in the role with Calgary until Gio gets back.

Anyway, I'm looking forward to his Flames debut. I've always thought that Smid is a pretty good defensive defender.

Avatar
#15 mattyc
November 12 2013, 05:21PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

@Kent Wilson

Why do you think that is? I've definitely noticed it too. He seems to be reasonably good positionally.

Avatar
#16 mattyc
November 12 2013, 05:21PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props
Kent Wilson wrote:

The Butler strategy seems to be "pair him with a mobile puck mover" who can do the bulk of the distribution. With Bouwmeester and Brodie, he looks okay. with guys like O'Brien, he sinks faster than an Italian guy in cement shoes.

Why do you think that is? I've definitely noticed it too. He seems to be reasonably good positionally.

Avatar
#17 Jeff In Lethbridge
November 12 2013, 05:23PM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Props
1
props

anyone else looking forward to next saturday's tilt vs Edmonton?

Hopefully, the current oiler's show up.

Avatar
#18 RKD
November 12 2013, 05:43PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

The debut of Smid should be interesting, I've heard he's a character guy in the dressing room. He will block shots, he's not overly physical or anything but he will chip off the glass and out. Some called him a Czech version of Robyn Regehr, others keep comparing him to Frank Musil. Glad to see SOB sitting, he better get used to sitting in the press box a lot more in the future. SJ started red hot but have cooled off a little, they now sit 5th in the ultra-competitive Western Conference. You might need 100 points this season to make the playoffs in the West. Lucky fans at the dome will get a first hand look at Hertl.

Avatar
#19 Kent Wilson
November 12 2013, 07:01PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
1
props

@mattyc

Butler's just generally bad with the puck. He's mobile, but doesn't have good vision, panics when pressured and doesn't have a good first pass. So if you have a dude with him who can control the play a lot better, then he can just sit back and try not to be a liability.

Avatar
#20 coachedpotatoe
November 12 2013, 07:01PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Props
1
props

I am worried when I read an article that says the Flames need some wins during this rebuilding season. Does this mean you are against the rebuild or just spoiled by the good start. I have no problems during the rebuild with them losing if I can see development and effort, for the most part I can say I have been entertained and happy with the effort. I have embraced the idea of the rebuild.

Avatar
#21 mattyc
November 12 2013, 07:08PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

@Kent Wilson

Hmmm. Yeah I tend to agree. I think it's interesting on a bigger scale because it hints that there is a certain comparability or "chemistry" between certain players. Reminds me of how New Jersey used to have those complementary d pairings that worked so well in the late 90s that some teams (kings to name one) seem to try to emulate.

Avatar
#22 Parallex
November 12 2013, 07:15PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Was that Russell's man? Someone wasn't covering him.

Avatar
#23 Parallex
November 12 2013, 07:24PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Uck, just being dominated territorially.

Avatar
#24 Burnward
November 12 2013, 07:47PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
2
props

That's a paddlin'.

Avatar
#25 Nighteyes
November 12 2013, 07:48PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

That was an absolutely atrocious period by the Flames. Feel kind of bad for Berra, plays real well and still has two pucks put behind him.

Avatar
#26 Kent Wilson
November 12 2013, 07:51PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Ahh yup, the Sharks are elite.

Nobody having a good game in red so far. The Wideman pairing looked uncharacteristically rough.

The Sharks attack is part of the problem. They are always pressuing the puck carrier when the Flames are trying to transition. The back-end can't seem to handle it, so it's causing delays in getting the puck through the neutral zone, which results in giant gaps between the forwards and defenders. That means long passes, bad bets.

And, of course, the Sharks are excellent at managing the puck in the offensive zone as well.

Avatar
#27 coachedpotatoe
November 12 2013, 07:52PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Worst effort of the year. Best line of the night was Bouma, Colbirne McG on their first shift. This does not look promising

Avatar
#28 RKD
November 12 2013, 07:54PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

The Sharks are on pace for 51 shots! The Flames better get their act together or it could be another 9-2 SJ massacre or maybe 9-0 like that time in Beantown.

Avatar
#29 Burnward
November 12 2013, 08:13PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Smid looking solid so far. Like his patience coming out of the zone.

Avatar
#30 Kent Wilson
November 12 2013, 08:18PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
3
props

I can't even say the Flames are playing bad. They're just...not in the same league.

Avatar
#31 Burnward
November 12 2013, 08:24PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

@Kent Wilson

Yep. Sharks haven't let off the gas at all. Impressive looking hockey team.

We definitely could show a little more jump though. Too much letting them skate around in our zone.

Avatar
#32 Veggie Dog
November 12 2013, 08:27PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props
Kent Wilson wrote:

I can't even say the Flames are playing bad. They're just...not in the same league.

Yeah, and 5 shots in 1.5 periods isn't going to get much.

Avatar
#33 Veggie Dog
November 12 2013, 08:27PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props
Kent Wilson wrote:

I can't even say the Flames are playing bad. They're just...not in the same league.

Yeah, and 5 shots in 1.5 periods isn't going to get much.

Avatar
#34 funkyjaman
November 12 2013, 08:27PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Dump and Wait, Dump and wait...

Avatar
#35 ChinookArch
November 12 2013, 08:39PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Yay! It's still only 2 - 0.

Avatar
#36 Kent Wilson
November 12 2013, 08:42PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
1
props

Chances 7-1 in the second.

Yeah.

Avatar
#37 Kent Wilson
November 12 2013, 08:42PM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Props
0
props

Chances 7-1 in the second.

Yeah.

Avatar
#38 Burnward
November 12 2013, 08:57PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Props
2
props

Easy there, Francis. The AHL team plays up Highway 2.

Avatar
#39 Burnward
November 12 2013, 09:09PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Our defense has looked pretty good tonight, all things considered.

That first was an abomination, but that was all on San Jose pressure. Haven't been too many plays where I've yelled at the screen.

/knockswoood

Avatar
#40 funkyjaman
November 12 2013, 09:09PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Props
1
props

I dont say this easy...but Sven needs to go back to Abby and Monahan needs to sit a game or two.

Avatar
#41 Burnward
November 12 2013, 09:12PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

KRIS FREAKIN RUSSELL!!!

Avatar
#42 EugeneV
November 12 2013, 09:14PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Who is Backlund up against in the circle most, I see he is 1 & 7?

Avatar
#43 Veggie Dog
November 12 2013, 09:17PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Has anyone else noticed the weird backpass that the flames have been making when they are trying to enter the zone? They have been doing it for quite a few games now.

The guy carrying the puck up the ice will pass back to a trailing player, and then seem to stop dead on the redline with the other players, and wait for the guy who he dropped the puck to, to enter the O-zone.

I can't say it has been terribly effective, and it looks god-awful.

Avatar
#44 ChinookArch
November 12 2013, 09:18PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
1
props

The first minute of Calgary's 2nd PP was very good. Creative.

Avatar
#45 ChinookArch
November 12 2013, 09:18PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

The first minute of Calgary's 2nd PP was very good. Creative.

Avatar
#46 Burnward
November 12 2013, 09:18PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Loving that zone entry we're using on the power play. Really effective the last few games.

Avatar
#47 ChinookArch
November 12 2013, 09:20PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Who does this team think they are the Leafs!

Avatar
#48 Burnward
November 12 2013, 09:20PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
1
props

Ha! Veggiedog...we're not seeing that same game! Funny how that works out sometimes.

Avatar
#49 Burnward
November 12 2013, 09:21PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

I LOVE THIS TEAM!

Avatar
#50 Burnward
November 12 2013, 09:33PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Is Smid tripping anyone else out tonight.

I keep thinking I see Phaneuf out there.

Comments are closed for this article.