Matt Stajan's Long Road to Redemption

Steve Macfarlane
November 26 2013 09:33AM

 

Backstrom and Stajan Face Off
- pic via clyde

 

If we took a poll of Flames fans a couple of years ago asking whether or not they’d want to keep Matt Stajan on the team beyond the season, nevermind the life of his current contract, the response likely would have been a resounding no. Perhaps not completely unanimous, but certainly overwhelmingly in favour of ditching him in any fashion possible — be it through trade, waivers, assignment to the minors or just wishing for something bad to happen to him.

But five seasons into his stint in Calgary, the 29-year-old centre might be the most popular pending UFA in town. You won’t find a more low-key guy on or off the ice than Stajan, so it’s no wonder the ride on his road to redemption was slow, methodical, and something only whispered about in NHL rinks rather than blazed across newspaper headlines.

Crushed under the thumb of the Sutter regime

In any blockbuster trade there is a centerpiece. When then-Flames GM Darryl Sutter sent Dion Phaneuf to the Toronto Maple Leafs in January 2010, not a single marquee player came to Calgary in return. Stajan, Niklas Hagman, Ian White and Jamal Mayers were the return. With 55 points in 76 games the previous year, and 41 in his first 55 with the Leafs that season, Stajan looked like a promising young player finding his groove in the NHL. Sutter made him the primary piece of the trade on the Flames side with a long-term deal that would pay Stajan $14 million over the next four seasons.

In hindsight, that might have been the worst possible scenario for Stajan.

Nothing short of that 50-point plateau would satisfy the masses, and while Stajan produced 16 points in 27 games the rest of the way, things almost inexplicably soured the next season. Head coach Brent Sutter’s doghouse was an uncomfortable place to sleep, and Stajan was stuck there often. After averaging more than 19 minutes a game with the Flames following the trade, he was given just 14 per contest in 2010-11, and less than a minute on both special teams units.

After spending the first five seasons of his NHL career on the first and second lines, making plays on the powerplay, and skating beside the likes of Phil Kessel and Alexei Ponikarovsky, Stajan found himself centering the fourth line for Sutter, beside guys like Tim Jackman and Tom Kostopoulos.

“I was used in a lesser role with Brent. My mindset was to be the best fourth-line centre I could be for our team during that stretch,” Stajan says now, realizing that his image was tarnished and there was little hope of producing points at any regular pace with the role he was given.

“From the outside, people just look at production and don’t realize the opportunity given. We control what we do out there. That’s all you can do. Your hockey career, every season, and even game to game, it’s a rollercoaster.”

Stajan was given no real explanation for the change in role, but he never griped publicly, never turned down an interview on the topic, never stopped trying to improve his situation. But it wasn’t easy.

“Definitely, it’s hard on you,” he says with a reflective laugh. “There’s down time. You try to leave it all at the rink but we are human beings. We go home, we have families. My wife, I’m sure had some nights where she was pretty annoyed with me because I probably took it out on her. “

Into the unknown — a new era begins

With both Sutters gone, another potential lockout on the horizon and a focus on youth just around the corner for the Flames, Stajan wasn’t sure what to expect following the worst two seasons of his career.
When teams were offered two compliance buyouts before the start of the new season a year ago, Stajan wasn’t sure what his future held.

A buyout was a possibility, although Stajan was hopeful a more promising finish to the previous season under Brent might help his case to stick around under Bob Hartley. He did have a stretch of 14 games through February and March that year that saw him post seven goals and 11 points.

“I didn’t know if a buyout was coming,” Stajan said. “At the end of the season, Brent’s last year, we had a ton of injuries. I started to get more of an opportunity to play. I finished the season — I thought — really well.

“Going into a lockout, you just never know what’s going to happen, what direction the team wants to go. I’m thankful that the new coach that came in, nothing did happen and I was given an opportunity to get back to playing a role I’ve played previously and I’ve been successful at.”

Coming in as the new head coach prior to the lockout-shortened season, Hartley had heard all about Stajan’s difficult years. He told every player they’d get a fresh start and a chance to prove to him what they could do and what kind of role they would ultimately play for him.

“I was pretty happy to hear those words,” says Stajan. “A fresh start is what you need after going through a stretch that wasn’t exactly great for myself.”

Hartley was just as happy to realize what he really had in Stajan — a positive role model for the young kids they wanted to give more responsibility to, and a player who could still produce offensively.

“I don’t think he was in very good books before. It just shows that sometimes it works and sometimes it doesn’t work. There’s no magic formulas for this,” Hartley says, offering communication as the key to their relationship.

“The player is unbelievably committed to team success. He’s a great leader. The good part is that the person is even better than the player. I rarely see a quality human being like Stajan. He cares about everyone. He’s very unselfish. He’s a pro.
“I came in, I had great talks with him. He just took off. He did it. I’m very impressed and I like him a lot.“

Is redemption the end of the road in Calgary?

With 23 points through 43 games last year — a pace that would put him at nearly 44 points over 82 games — Stajan showed Hartley he deserved a bigger role. He’s averaging over 19 minutes this season and is back on the 50-point pace that was expected of him when he came to the Flames.

But his contract expires at the end of this season, and he’s unsure of what that means for his future in Calgary — a place he now considers home, where he and his wife Katie have a house, where their family will grow by one in five or six months when they have their first child.

It’s a city in which he overcame his biggest career obstacle by giving a consistent effort and staying as positive as possible. And given the state of the Calgary Flames, this is a team that may need that type of guy to stick around and share his experience with the young players during the rebuild.

“Through that whole situation I feel like I grew as a player and as a person,” Stajan says. “Now, looking at the whole picture, you see teammates and other guys in the league and friends that are going through the same thing, day in and day out, whether it’s in our profession or in their own lives. Having gone through that, you just kind of be that friend and be that person who tells them, ‘Hey, it’s going to get better.’

“It’s never as bad as it seems and it’s never as good. It’s on you to make sure that mentally you kind of keep yourself in the moment and try to get better. Sometimes it takes longer than you think.”

3d3f7758adff5b9b9ead81bf00567345
Covered the Flames on the newspaper beat from lockout to lockout and continue to do it on my own terms. Follow me on Twitter at @MacfarlaneHKY
Avatar
#51 John
November 26 2013, 01:01PM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Props
3
props

It doesn't matter whether we fans like Stajan or not, Hartley likes him and thinks he is a no 1 center. Of course, he's a good puck possession player whereas i think Backlund sometimes is at a lost on what to do with the puck. I think Backlund given his size, talent should be able to get 50 points each season but he doesn't seem to be able to produce in the offensive zone consistently. Thus its in all probability goodbye to Backlund. I think he is a good player but he can't do anything on the McGrattan line.

Avatar
#52 Byron Bader
November 26 2013, 01:59PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Props
3
props

I'd keep Stajan around for 2-3 more years, at no more than $2.25 - $2.5. We are going to be dreadful at least until 2014-15, might as well have a serviceable guy to show the young guys the ropes. Pass the reigns over to Monahan et al. as they become more comfortable in a year or two.

Avatar
#53 Johnny Be Gaudreau
November 26 2013, 03:31PM
Trash it!
6
trashes
Props
3
props

Backland has not played like a soft Swedish player at all this year though. And Don Cherry is a moron who doesn't know hooey about what he's talking.

The problem with Backlund is the perceived expectation that is not being met. However, it is possible that the expectation from management is too high for that players ability. It does not mean that the player is useless. Just simply not being used in a situation that best fits where he realistically lies skill-wise. The Flames want Backlund to be a scoring 2 way first line centre. The second he slumps a bit though they move him to the fourth line with two boat anchors. I ask you how is he then suppose to score? How is that a productive method of sending the message? Giving a guy 40 minutes to score and then putting him on the 4th line if he doesn't isn't exactly fair. They've been patient with other vets who have slumped. Why not be patient with Backlund especially since it's the first time he's been healthy from the start and his possession numbers suggests that his scoring numbers will come along. The reality is Backlund is a two-way "all situation" centre who can play in all three zones comfortably and he can contribute offensively. He's not likely going to be a 30G scorer but he might get you 20-22/season and 12-15 assists. That's a decent 2nd line production. It's equivalent to what Stajan provides for this team only Backlund is 25 and has potential to still improve. Stajan is 29 and is likely only to digress based on simple physiology.

Let's also not forget that Stajan is probably as much aware as we are that this is his UFA contract year and so padding his stats and trying a little harder to make a difference is on his mind. I hate teams that evaluate UFA's in their last year of their UFA status and subsequently forget the previous 3 years of the 4 year contract. That's bad business.

If you say build houses for a living and you hire a framing crew to construct them for the next 4 years and say the framing crew once they get the contract slacks off for 3 years at half the production with a lot of mistakes along the way and then pumps out 2x as many houses with exceptional work in the last year are you going to rehire that framing crew on the performance of the last year alone? I certainly wouldn't.

If they do trade Backlund then I would say for a simple lack of other options they should keep Stajan (just as insulation) but not for more than a 2 year deal. And I'd also recommend they look for better options in free agency. If Grabovski was available last year surely someone will be available this year.

Avatar
#54 Baceda
November 26 2013, 04:53PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
3
props
kittensandcookies wrote:

Darryl Sutter, is that you?

haha. Oh ya, and a NTC, can't forget the NTC

Avatar
#55 negrilcowboy
November 26 2013, 10:18PM
Trash it!
7
trashes
Props
3
props

matty franchise has always been a replacement level or slightly better centre, have said it all along having watched numerous tarrana games, however brett did screw him over. as for mickis, if ya can move the kid do it, he might benefit from a move. if he doesnt move the kid is finished in 3 years, some benefit from a move and backs is one. look at steen for example, once the virus has set in the only remedy is a move.

Avatar
#56 the-wolf
November 27 2013, 06:35AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
3
props
everton fc wrote:

If we took a could of young free agent forwards, and a few d-men with the cap room we have, blended these in with the likes of Brodie, Monahan, Wideman, Giordano, and so on, you think that would get us 8th? I don't follow. A high-end 1st line centre, and/or forward, would take this team to a different level. Add a few seasoned d-men while the young defenders get seasoned...

When you have cap room and use available assets wisely... A smart management group could get us closer to the Cup sooner than later, and quite wisely, if the right decisions are made.

I personally don't think guys like Colborne get you there. And guys like Galiardi are 4th line guys on my team. If you had guys like Bouma, Galiardi... Those types of guys as 4th liners... Those are as good as any 4th liners on most teams.

This team has a 1st line that's a 3rds line at best with most clubs. Even Stempniak's a 3rd liner on a Cup contender. Perhaps even Hudler. I get this. But with cap room... And assets (moving guys like Cammy, for example, for assets)... You get closer to the Cup...

There are no guarantees on rebuilds, as we see in Edmonton, somewhat in Florida... Other teams. And I'm not convinced the trio of Feaster/Weisbrod/Burke is a Cup winning trifecta. And I'd personally like to give Troy G. a run as head coach, over Hartley. Perhaps you'd see more out of Backlund and Baertschi. Perhaps...

But that's me. We all have our opinions.

I understand your argument, I just think you're looking at it from a perfect scenario point of view.

Like, if Calgary had been able to sign Parise and Suter, for example. But who is out there that wants to come here and is at that level?

Sure, if we sign a 1st line superstar and #1 D and all our kids become stars in the next 3 years it could work, but it just doesn't seem realistic to me. Not every kid will make it, superstars have to be avaialable, kids eventually have to be re-signed, we need far btter goaltending, etc.

Calgary is a bottom 5 team right now, so making the playoffs would be another level, but blowing our cap room on established stars just puts Iginla and Jbo back on the team.

IMO, that cap room should be used to save teams from poor contracts at the price of having to give up a quality pick or prospect.

Avatar
#57 piscera.infada
November 27 2013, 07:55AM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Props
3
props
the-wolf wrote:

I understand your argument, I just think you're looking at it from a perfect scenario point of view.

Like, if Calgary had been able to sign Parise and Suter, for example. But who is out there that wants to come here and is at that level?

Sure, if we sign a 1st line superstar and #1 D and all our kids become stars in the next 3 years it could work, but it just doesn't seem realistic to me. Not every kid will make it, superstars have to be avaialable, kids eventually have to be re-signed, we need far btter goaltending, etc.

Calgary is a bottom 5 team right now, so making the playoffs would be another level, but blowing our cap room on established stars just puts Iginla and Jbo back on the team.

IMO, that cap room should be used to save teams from poor contracts at the price of having to give up a quality pick or prospect.

Exactly, that's basically what Florida did a few years ago.

Not to mention, who are these elite centres? Thornton? Statsny?? Legwand??? There aren't any. Thornton will be signed by San Jose, no doubt.

There aren't many defencemen either. It's pretty much Phaneuf, and if that happens, I'm out.

The only wingers that would fit in to this team (aren't over 29) aren't elite, but could generate some interest, albeit enough to make coming to the Flames a head-scratcher - Callahan (who will be resigned), Moulson. Of course, you could always go after John Scott for your first line left-wing (harr, harr).

Avatar
#58 piscera.infada
November 27 2013, 10:21AM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Props
3
props

@HongKongHockeyFan

I also wouldn't be so quick to call Hickey a "bust". The kid wasn't really given much of a chance in LA due to two debilitating injuries (an Ankle that required surgery, and then a Shoulder that required surgery). After that, he was deemed expendable on a pretty good blueline. He has found his way after becoming an Islander, he's still only 24 (25 in three months), and played his first NHL game in January of 2013. Then again, I played with the guy so I'm a little biased - I hope it works out for him.

Avatar
#59 suba steve
November 27 2013, 10:57AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
3
props

@MichaelD

I say there's absolutely ZERO chance that the Flames (or any other club) will fail to reach the floor next year. If you NEED to spend money, professional sports is an excellent business to be in.

Avatar
#60 Charleston Kingsley
November 26 2013, 01:13PM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Props
2
props

I don't really see Stajan on this team next year. To put it succinctly, Stajan is an okay hockey player and that's that.

Avatar
#61 Jeff In Lethbridge
November 26 2013, 04:05PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Props
2
props
John wrote:

It doesn't matter whether we fans like Stajan or not, Hartley likes him and thinks he is a no 1 center. Of course, he's a good puck possession player whereas i think Backlund sometimes is at a lost on what to do with the puck. I think Backlund given his size, talent should be able to get 50 points each season but he doesn't seem to be able to produce in the offensive zone consistently. Thus its in all probability goodbye to Backlund. I think he is a good player but he can't do anything on the McGrattan line.

i would guess nobody is confusing Stajan with a first line center even if thhats where he is playing. not even stajan.

Avatar
#62 Jeff In Lethbridge
November 26 2013, 04:08PM
Trash it!
6
trashes
Props
2
props
EugeneV wrote:

To channel a little Don Cherry;

Backlund is a Swedish pussy.

please post as tbough you mom is looking over your shoulder... my little kids read over my shoulder... potty mouth. ;-)

Avatar
#63 Kurt
November 26 2013, 04:55PM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Props
2
props
Jeff In Lethbridge wrote:

I really have to check and make sure I am not halucinating - did I really read that the Heat are FIRST in the AHL right now?

How is this possible, given the fact that just a couple short years ago, with Sutter's drafting, we had the worst prospect pool in the NHL??? How times have changed!

Is there really a strong correlation between AHL success and NHL prospects? I'm not questioning you, I'm just asking....

My gut tells me there is very very little correlation since the fortunes of an AHL team and NHL prospects unless a high calibre goalie is involved.

The AHL is a team of 25 guys, maybe 2 or 3 who have a shot at the NHL and even less are high quality guys. So unless you have a superstar can a prospect really impact the team THAT much. And if he is a superstar at the AHL he'd probably be in the NHL.

I see goalies being the 1 exception...

Avatar
#64 EugeneV
November 26 2013, 05:09PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Props
2
props
Jeff In Lethbridge wrote:

i would guess nobody is confusing Stajan with a first line center even if thhats where he is playing. not even stajan.

same about Backlund

Avatar
#65 EugeneV
November 26 2013, 05:13PM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Props
2
props
Jeff In Lethbridge wrote:

please post as tbough you mom is looking over your shoulder... my little kids read over my shoulder... potty mouth. ;-)

You're right, sorry about that. The word Swedish makes a lot of people go green.

Avatar
#66 coachedpotatoe
November 26 2013, 07:59PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Props
2
props

Just heard on TSN that Carolina made an offer for Backs, I wonder what it was. I also heard they want a puck moving D, I wonder if Billings is a possibility.

WW sorry that I missed your favorite Rhino,

Avatar
#67 loudogYYC
November 26 2013, 11:59PM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Props
2
props

This all seems pretty clear to me. Stajan came here as a 24/25 year old and Brent Sutter deployed him as a grinder and never game him a fair shake. The new coach has more time for him and look what's he's done with it! He's very useful now and he'll get us as much as a 2nd round pick at the deadline.

Backlund is in the same boat as Stajan was back then, and there's no guarantees this coach will be here at this time next year. Patience is the name of the game here, Backlund will be fine.

Avatar
#68 wot96
November 27 2013, 08:40AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
2
props

@piscera.infada

I agree with Piscera. I don't think the crop of free agents coming open this year is that great. With the Connor McDavid draft coming along after that, I would have to think long and hard about signing a high end RFA.

Avatar
#69 piscera.infada
November 27 2013, 09:49AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
2
props
Parallex wrote:

Interesting that you mention Florida since that's basically what we're going to have to do...

2014-2015 Present Cap Spending is $35,645,417.00 per capgeek. If we presume that that the ceiling will be in the vicinity of $70,000,000.00 (with the stadium series, inflation, and new TV deal I thik that's quite realistic if not a pessimistic projection). Do the math and the team is a significant $ figure below the floor.

I'm not arguing that we'll likely have to sign players to make the floor. The original comment was about finding "elite" players through free agency, allowing us to compete as early as next season - which I don't see.

That said, I'm sure you could come up with a few ways of eating into the cap - such as signing a veteran to a low-term, higher-dollar contract for simply being a "good soldier", if you deem him to be a good player to have around the young kids (ie: Stemps).

I'm not saying don't go out and sign anyone, because that's a little bit ridiculous in today's NHL. But don't sign players as a "quick-fix", finish close to a playoff spot, and trade Monahan for Jokinen.

@HongKongHockeyFan

Would it surprise you to learn that Backlund hasn't been tilting the ice that much more than Stajan? Especially given the fact that Stajan's offensive zone starts are the lowest on the team (yes, lower than Backlund). Again, not a silver bullet. I just think that other then age, and almost-debunked potential, there isn't that much difference.

Avatar
#70 Jeff In Lethbridge
November 26 2013, 12:56PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
1
props

if we give him fifteen million, for fifteen years, and he surprises everyone (the way Kipper did) and retires in 3 or 4 years, hey, that wouldn't hurt anyone. and of course, it WOULD be a complete surprise, just like Kipper.

Avatar
#71 gotommygo
November 26 2013, 01:14PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Props
1
props

@T&A4Flames

'I would consider 3years @ 2.5 per but no more'

I think 3 years is even too long -- that puts him 'post-apex' doesn't it?

Avatar
#72 SmellOfVictory
November 26 2013, 02:00PM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Props
1
props
Kent Wilson wrote:

What this also illustrates is how much role, circumstance and coaching decisions impact a players results, his ability to contribute and, of course, the resultant perception of the player. If Brent Sutter sticks around, there's a better than even chance Stajan is bought out or waiting to play out the string as a 4th liner.

Elite players and lousy players will almost always naturally find their own level in the league. But the huge middle class in between is to some degree dependent on external forces to dictate their output.

The weird thing about Stajan is that he didn't blow anyone away on the 4th line, even from a possession perspective. It's like he got busted down, became sad, and didn't try as hard.

Avatar
#73 Jeff In Lethbridge
November 26 2013, 05:29PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Props
1
props
Kurt wrote:

Is there really a strong correlation between AHL success and NHL prospects? I'm not questioning you, I'm just asking....

My gut tells me there is very very little correlation since the fortunes of an AHL team and NHL prospects unless a high calibre goalie is involved.

The AHL is a team of 25 guys, maybe 2 or 3 who have a shot at the NHL and even less are high quality guys. So unless you have a superstar can a prospect really impact the team THAT much. And if he is a superstar at the AHL he'd probably be in the NHL.

I see goalies being the 1 exception...

PARTY POOPER!!! :-)

OF COURSE YOUR RIGHT... BUT IT FELT GOOD FOR A MINUTE

Avatar
#74 Walter White
November 26 2013, 06:26PM
Trash it!
6
trashes
Props
1
props
coachedpotatoe wrote:

The debate about the Flames center ice position is rather simple; at this point in time we have the most depth we have had in a generation, that's the positive. The negative is that with one exception they are all currently number 3/4 centers. Monahan will be a number 2 with the possibility of being a number 1.

Stajan is a marginal number 2 and both Backs and Colborne are 3/4s although for a short period a couple of games could give a team some higher minutes but not over the long haul.

On the farm(those with NHL games in) you have Street who is a number 4 and Byron an emergency call up for a short period. Then you have three centers with no NHL experience but some potential. Jorris started well but seems to have fallen off lately and it will likely be a couple of years in the minors for him. Granlund started slowly but is playing much better lately, he may have the skill set to be a 2 but his size may limit that. Then there is Knight who has had a strong start to his first pro season, what is his ceiling? I suspect a number 3 much like Backs and Colborne. Backs, Colborne and Knight are all about the same age. One is a proven NHL #3 center, one has a handful of NHL games and is a number 3/4 and the third one has no NHL games.

Outside the system the top prospect is Arnold and while his college numbers look good one must ask are they inflated by paying with Johny G.

Based upon who we have the best way to go is to roll 4 lines and hope for the best. The other option is to target and find a true NHL # 1 or 2 who is @27 years old and fits Hartley's game plan.

Thank you for not mentioning Max Reinhart...I agree 100% with your omission!

WW

Avatar
#75 everton fc
November 26 2013, 09:02PM
Trash it!
4
trashes
Props
1
props
the-wolf wrote:

Because, that would get us back to 8th which might be what the owners want, but it will never get us a Cup.

If we took a could of young free agent forwards, and a few d-men with the cap room we have, blended these in with the likes of Brodie, Monahan, Wideman, Giordano, and so on, you think that would get us 8th? I don't follow. A high-end 1st line centre, and/or forward, would take this team to a different level. Add a few seasoned d-men while the young defenders get seasoned...

When you have cap room and use available assets wisely... A smart management group could get us closer to the Cup sooner than later, and quite wisely, if the right decisions are made.

I personally don't think guys like Colborne get you there. And guys like Galiardi are 4th line guys on my team. If you had guys like Bouma, Galiardi... Those types of guys as 4th liners... Those are as good as any 4th liners on most teams.

This team has a 1st line that's a 3rds line at best with most clubs. Even Stempniak's a 3rd liner on a Cup contender. Perhaps even Hudler. I get this. But with cap room... And assets (moving guys like Cammy, for example, for assets)... You get closer to the Cup...

There are no guarantees on rebuilds, as we see in Edmonton, somewhat in Florida... Other teams. And I'm not convinced the trio of Feaster/Weisbrod/Burke is a Cup winning trifecta. And I'd personally like to give Troy G. a run as head coach, over Hartley. Perhaps you'd see more out of Backlund and Baertschi. Perhaps...

But that's me. We all have our opinions.

Avatar
#76 RKD
November 27 2013, 12:00AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
1
props

Stajan and Jay-Bo regressed in their play and production in Calgary. Brent Sutter doesn't always know how to get the most out of his player or let them use their strengths to the best of their abilities.

Avatar
#77 Parallex
November 27 2013, 09:33AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
1
props
piscera.infada wrote:

Exactly, that's basically what Florida did a few years ago.

Not to mention, who are these elite centres? Thornton? Statsny?? Legwand??? There aren't any. Thornton will be signed by San Jose, no doubt.

There aren't many defencemen either. It's pretty much Phaneuf, and if that happens, I'm out.

The only wingers that would fit in to this team (aren't over 29) aren't elite, but could generate some interest, albeit enough to make coming to the Flames a head-scratcher - Callahan (who will be resigned), Moulson. Of course, you could always go after John Scott for your first line left-wing (harr, harr).

Interesting that you mention Florida since that's basically what we're going to have to do...

2014-2015 Present Cap Spending is $35,645,417.00 per capgeek. If we presume that that the ceiling will be in the vicinity of $70,000,000.00 (with the stadium series, inflation, and new TV deal I thik that's quite realistic if not a pessimistic projection). Do the math and the team is a significant $ figure below the floor.

Avatar
#78 piscera.infada
November 27 2013, 11:13AM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Props
1
props

@RustyStrombone

The Bantam Royals.

Avatar
#79 SmellOfVictory
November 26 2013, 12:19PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Props
0
props
Rockmorton65 wrote:

I say sign him 3 yrs/ 2.5-3 per. He's been a good soldier for this team. He kept his career going through a nasty situation.

Better yet, trade him for a 2nd or 3rd round pick @ the deadline, let him take his shot at a cup, then sign him in the off-season.

I can't remember how legal this is, but I'd only really support that if the have an understanding that he would want to come back after the playoff run. Otherwise, extending him might be best.

Avatar
#80 Rockmorton65
November 26 2013, 01:50PM
Trash it!
4
trashes
Props
0
props
SmellOfVictory wrote:

I can't remember how legal this is, but I'd only really support that if the have an understanding that he would want to come back after the playoff run. Otherwise, extending him might be best.

I seem to remember Tkachuck doing this a few years ago.

The only way I'd want to see the Flames do this is if the other team was aware of his intentions. That's why I said a 3rd. We get less, but stay respectful as an organization.

Avatar
#81 Kent Wilson
November 26 2013, 02:41PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Props
0
props

@SmellOfVictory

I know, though Stajan has never been great at possession in his career...aside from this year so far. Which is why I expect his underlyings to fall a bit before the end of the year.

Avatar
#82 Jeff In Lethbridge
November 26 2013, 04:12PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Props
0
props
Kent Wilson wrote:

Keep in mind the Heat we re first in their conference through the first couple of months last year as well.

is that good or bad?????

:-P

Avatar
#83 the-wolf
November 26 2013, 05:01PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props
everton fc wrote:

I don't mind Backlund, but also don't see him as more than 3rd line centre. There are plenty of these in the league, and probably coming up through our farm system down the road. If he has potential, others may have the same. It's not like we're moving an elite player if we move him.

Burke likes grit. That's a fact. Doesn't bode well for Backlund. And maybe not so well for Baertschi, as well. I like them both, but that's how I see it.

I'd personally rather have Stajan as my 3rd line centre during a rebuild than Backlund. And if you play your assets right, not to mention free agency... We have a lot of cap room. Enough for a legitimate 1st line centre. And perhaps a linemate, or legitimate 1-4 d-man. Monahan stay as your #2. Stajan as #3. But I think Colborne gets a look at #3, so Stajan may be gone, as well. But I'd rather have Stajan, than Colborne, during a rebuild. I do see the arguments for Backlund over Stajan, but Backlund has yet to prove himself consistently. And if this organization is not the right "fit" for his skill set, best both parties part ways sooner, than later.

A good 4th line would have Bouma on LW, Colborne at centre, and maybe someone like Ferland on the right side. Or Street, if Ferland proves to be a 3rd line option, which he may very well pan out to be. Street is a player I'd like to see get minutes on a 4th line. A 4th line of Bouma/Colborne/Street - pretty good line, even on a competitive team.

If you look at asset management and cap room, the Flames could easily parlay both into a competitive team far faster than your average, so-called "rebuild". And that's probably how Burke sees it. Why wait 3 years, when you may be set up to be competitive next year? Again, with all this cap space, why not think this way?

Because, that would get us back to 8th which might be what the owners want, but it will never get us a Cup.

Avatar
#84 MichaelD
November 27 2013, 10:10AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

@Parallex

What's the penalty for not reaching the floor? Is it draft picks?

Avatar
#85 RustyStrombone
November 27 2013, 11:03AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

@piscera.infada

What level did you play at with Hickey?

Avatar
#86 mk
November 27 2013, 11:44AM
Trash it!
4
trashes
Props
0
props

Matt Stajan to Vancouver would be hilarious - their fans would go ape. It wouldn't be an awful plan for them (increase center depth w/Stajan at 3C) but riots would happen.

Try Backlund at D and see what happens. He wouldn't be worse than O'Brien or Butler.

Avatar
#87 everton fc
November 27 2013, 11:49AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props
piscera.infada wrote:

I'm not arguing that we'll likely have to sign players to make the floor. The original comment was about finding "elite" players through free agency, allowing us to compete as early as next season - which I don't see.

That said, I'm sure you could come up with a few ways of eating into the cap - such as signing a veteran to a low-term, higher-dollar contract for simply being a "good soldier", if you deem him to be a good player to have around the young kids (ie: Stemps).

I'm not saying don't go out and sign anyone, because that's a little bit ridiculous in today's NHL. But don't sign players as a "quick-fix", finish close to a playoff spot, and trade Monahan for Jokinen.

@HongKongHockeyFan

Would it surprise you to learn that Backlund hasn't been tilting the ice that much more than Stajan? Especially given the fact that Stajan's offensive zone starts are the lowest on the team (yes, lower than Backlund). Again, not a silver bullet. I just think that other then age, and almost-debunked potential, there isn't that much difference.

I should have added finding elite players, as well, through trades, to relieve cap space. And I wouldn't call signing these types of players "quick fixes". I'm not a fan of the quick fix. But the wrong management group, with the wrong scouts, can make for a horrific rebuild. See Edmonton. Others.

My thought is that we may not have found the best kids. Until Baertschi shows more, he's still an project. And we've all read about Backlund.

I'm also not convinced you want a guy like Hartley on a rebuild. "Just me".

Avatar
#88 the forgotten man
November 27 2013, 12:01PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

FGD?

Comments are closed for this article.