FGD: Blues Travelers

Ryan Pike
November 07 2013 12:37PM

After splitting the first two games of their four-game trip through the Central Division, the Calgary Flames (6-7-2) try to get back to .500 tonight. They face a tough test in the St. Louis Blues (9-2-2). The Blues have been strong of late, winning four of their last five – including their last outing on Tuesday against the Montreal Canadiens. The Flames are in a bit of a slide, having lost three of their last four games – their only victory being Sunday in Chicago.

The Blues have been one of the NHL's best teams this year, bolstered by a strong offensive attack led by Alex Steen. With the Blues' size and speed, the Flames may have their hands full. The puck drops at 6pm MT on Sportsnet Flames and the Fan 960.

THE LINE-UP

Deep breaths everyone. Here are the projected lines via DailyFaceoff.

Bouma – Stajan – Jones
Cammalleri – Colborne – Galiardi
Jackman – Monahan – Hudler
Reinhart – Backlund – McGrattan

Butler – Brodie
Russell – Wideman
Billins – O'Brien

Berra
Ramo

So, no Sven Baertschi. In addition, Tim Jackman and Brian McGrattan slot in, with the “grit” players sprinkled throughout the line-up. Baertschi's parked in the press box for the third straight game. Calgary lost the first two games he sat by identical 5-1 scores. And it's a bit odd considering that Reinhart/Backlund/Baertschi would be a decent line, albeit not a checking line.

The Flames announced earlier today that Curtis Glencross is out with an MCL injury for six weeks, so the Flames are without Breen, Giordano, Stempniak and Glencross. As a result, the lines look a bit lean. The Cammalleri/Colborne/Galiardi line is probably the top line by default and will get leaned on heavily.

Reto Berra starts after giving up five goals in Minnesota. He was drafted by the Blues and they traded him to Calgary, so he may be motivated. After the loss on Tuesday, Bob Hartley noted that the team wasn't that good, so it makes sense to throw Berra back in there. I'd guess Karri Ramo starts in Denver on Friday.

THE OPPOSITION

Via our best pals at DailyFaceoff:

Steen – Backes – Stewart
Roy – Sobotka – Oshie
Schwartz – Berglund – Tarasenko
Cracknell – Lapierre – Reaves

Bouwmeester – Pietrangelo
Jackman – Shattenkirk
Leopold – Polak

Elliott
Halak

St. Louis' top six is really great, full-stop. Alex Steen is the hottest thing in hockey right now, boasting 13 goals and a disgustingly strong 30.2 shooting percentage. The top line has 45 points between the three of them. The third line is also fairly strong, and it's not until the friggin' fourth line that you find some rough spots. This is a blueprint on how to build a hockey team in 2013, gang.

Tons of ex-Flames here. Aside from Jay Bouwmeester and Jordan Leopold, Adam Cracknell was a late, late round pick that worked his tail off and made it to the NHL on a regular basis. I'm resisting the urge to call him an everyday NHLer, but he's close.

SUM IT UP

The Flames need a win tonight to guarantee a .500 record on this road trip. They'll be in tough against the Blues, who have two regulation losses this season and play a very structured game. That said, the Flames have the tools to win, as they showed in Chicago. The key to their success will be out-working the Blues and beating them to loose pucks, something they utterly failed to do in the third period against Minnesota.

51a8cdc527ce12d222fdc583f3cf4368
Ryan Pike is a Calgary native and FlamesNation's managing editor. He's covered the Flames and the NHL since 2010. His work can also be found at The Hockey Writers and The Wrestling Observer.
Avatar
#51 Kent Wilson
November 07 2013, 06:41PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Flames have zero chances so far in this period. They can barely gain the zone.

Avatar
#52 Kent Wilson
November 07 2013, 06:47PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
2
props

Chances 7-0 Blues in the first. Not even close.

Avatar
#53 ChinookArch
November 07 2013, 06:51PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
2
props

Colburne jumping out of the box on a partial break, then getting creamed without taking a shot is a metaphor for the Flames play so far tonight. I hope the Blues fall asleep for period 2 & 3.

Avatar
#54 Kent Wilson
November 07 2013, 06:52PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
1
props

Check that, chances 7-1. The Monahan shot on the 2on1 was counted before the play was blown down.

Avatar
#55 Kent Wilson
November 07 2013, 06:53PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
1
props

@redricardo

Hahahaha.

And I agree with you. Stajan was awful in that period.

Avatar
#56 Kent Wilson
November 07 2013, 07:19PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
3
props

@Dr. Philosophy

Clearly they should have scratched Monahan as well.

Avatar
#57 Dr. Philosophy
November 07 2013, 07:32PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

@Kent Wilson

Sheesh. I thought you could recognize a slippery slope fallacy

Avatar
#58 TRAV
November 07 2013, 07:37PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
2
props

@Colin

The Stanley Cup is the ultimate accomplishment in the sport. I will always have respect for those that have won it. It means that yours was the only team that started with a goal and accomplished it. It means that you were more successful than every other team in the league and it means that you have been a Champion. I agree that a coach needs to be evaluated based on his most recent performance but to suggest that one hasn't earned some measure of respect for winning the Stanley Cup is absurd.

Avatar
#59 Kent Wilson
November 07 2013, 07:37PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Chances 5-3 Flames that time around. Three of the chances on the PP.

Avatar
#60 loudogYYC
November 07 2013, 08:01PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
5
props

@Walter White

WTF WW

Avatar
#61 Colin
November 07 2013, 08:01PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

@TRAV

Respect is one thing, any degree of trust with regards to how he handles the flames based on the fact the he won a cup twelve years ago and since then is quite unacomplished, is another. I don't care that he's won a cup, it won't change my opinion what he's doing with this roster. I respect the fact he won the cup, don't see any relevance in giving him any benefit of the doubt in regards to the Flames because of it though.

To me its the same thing as giving those guys who are naturally 3rd/4th line players massive contracts because they played great that one time in the playoffs(Hi Joel Ward, though this year he's off to a good start). It's a great accomplishment on Hartley's part, but at this point in time it means not much.

Also, Backlund got PP time, is it the return of Backlund??? As well Brodie may end up with as much TOI as Reinhart, Billins, McGratton and Jackman combined, that is some seriously good use of roster spots right there.....

Avatar
#62 Baalzamon
November 07 2013, 08:06PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
2
props

@Bean-counting cowboy

Maybe he just wants Sven to shoot more. That, at least, is something I can agree with.

Avatar
#63 mattyc
November 07 2013, 08:08PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
3
props

Tim Jackman from Shane O'Brien and Chad Billins... You don't hear that very often

Avatar
#64 TRAV
November 07 2013, 08:17PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
4
props

Boy Cammy is good at those one timers off that side. He will help someone down the stretch and should earn a decent return.

Avatar
#65 Sincity1976
November 07 2013, 10:38PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
1
props

@Bean-counting cowboy

Sven was applauded for his attitude before we drafted him, after we drafted him, and all of last season. So if he somehow all of a sudden has a bad attitude it is probably more to do with the fact that he is seeing the same thing everyone else is seeing.

Hopefully he ends up like Kadri. Tough love equaling good performance. Hopefully he doesn't end up like Turris. Poor opportunity equals a hold out and trade to another team that is benefiting from a great player.

Avatar
#66 loudogYYC
November 08 2013, 12:38AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
2
props
Derzie wrote:

If you think the treatment of Sven is a good thing, you're part of the problem. Before Hartley starting messing things up the lines were solid, teamwork was strong and Hudler/Monahan/Sven were the top line. Injuries aside, now it is just a gritchart/worker-bee world where ice time is given out with pats on the heads to the hardworking dullards. Skill need not apply. The drastic change has to be Burke pulling strings. It just doesn't make any sense. I hope every dumbass lineup Hartley puts forward results in a loss. So far, that's been the case. Trash away if you please but it is a vote for Gritchart.

Relax, man. Just cuz the coach is being tough on an underachieving player doesn't mean Burke is making on-ice decisions.

If Baertschi-Monahan-Hudler is the first line then Sven is weighing them down. He has 5 pts compared to Monahan's 11 and Hudler's 17. Granted he's played 3 less games but still. He could and should be a lot better, he's just not showing it yet.

Avatar
#67 Baalzamon
November 08 2013, 09:06AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
2
props

@loudogYYC

"He could and should be a lot better, he's just not showing it yet."

Can he? Or are we just expecting too much too early?

Food for thought.

Also, people seem to willfully forget this, but Hudler started the season playing with Backlund. He didn't start playing with Monahan until I believe the middle of the third period in game 5.

Avatar
#68 piscera.infada
November 08 2013, 09:22AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
1
props

@Baalzamon

"...Or are we just expecting too much too early?"

In short, yes.

That said, I don't think he's been great - which is entirely reasonable for a player given his age and build. So, I don't see a problem with some tough love, but I agree it has to have it's limits. I'm just not a fan of the "set it and forget it" (Ron Popeil would be proud) method of development. Baertschi will be back, and he'll get it.

Comments are closed for this article.