Flames Must Make a Play For O'Reilly

Kent Wilson
February 13 2013 12:00AM

They probably have for at least a couple weeks now.

There is absolutely no negotiating going on anymore between Ryan O’Reilly and the Avalanche. While the Avs were optimistic right after the lockout ended that they could sign O’Reilly and my sources said he would not be traded, things have changed and it appears a virtual certainty O’Reilly will be traded now.

- Via Adrian Dater

Back when we discussed a potential ROR offer sheet, it was a suggestion made partially in jest since it seemed unlikely the Avalanche would allow this feud with arguably their best (or at least second best) young forward to go too far.

According to Dater and supported by Darren Dreger of TSN, it seems things have come to a head with O'Reilly and Colorado however. The rumor now is the team is looking for a roster player and high-end prospect in a trade for the 21-year old pivot.

Unfortunately for the Avs, they don't have a lot of leverage when it comes to making demands for a quality package. If their wish list outstrips what they would get in return for an offer sheet (a first and third round pick for anything around $5M/year) then the suitor can simply walk away and sign the kid instead.

This is an opportunity the Flames must seriously investigate. Not only do high-end, two-way centers rarely become available, they can almost never be had at an age where you can expect to lock them up long-term and enjoy their peak seasons. Not only that, the kid fills both the present and future needs of an org that is trying to compete with a center depth chart that currently reads Tanguay (winger), Stajan, Byron, Jones, (Horak, Street, Reinhart).

It's a no-brainer for Calgary to make a strong play for O'Reilly at this point. We'll soon see if Jay Featser agrees.

39d8109299a9795cb3b41a4e9b49d501
Former Nations Overlord. Current Fn contributor and curmudgeon For questions, complaints, criticisms, etc contact Kent @ kent.wilson@gmail. Follow him on Twitter here.
Avatar
#51 VK63
February 13 2013, 11:25AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
T&A4Flames wrote:

People are getting pretty excited about this guy. Admittedly, I don't know a whole lot about him. So, I have a few questions that maybe some people here can answer.

1) What's the status of his injury?

2) How was his production in the KHL?

3) I heard his #'s in junior were not particularly great. True?

4) Everyone is saying a 2nd line C. Are we really interested in giving up a potential MacKinnon/Jones draft pick for a 2nd C when we already have Backlund?

I would certainly look to move some pieces for ROR, but I wouldn't break the bank for him. I would go as far as to replace my *earlier offer of Butler + with JBo but that is it and that likely still puts in a lottery position.

*Butler + Granlund/Arnold + conditional 1st **Edit. if throwing in Jbo instead of Butler, we need to get at least a 2nd in return as well.

ROR's strength in junior was feeding guys like Taylor Hall their lunch in head to head match ups. He's that kind of guy and has always been somewhat motivated by being disrespected.

This contract squabble appears to be the manifestation of his wanting to be respected.

Nothing wrong with that as he clearly values himself to a level that the Av's are unwilling to meet financially. He is an intriguing player for every team in the league and he knows it. I wish him luck in his efforts to line up the Brinks truck as I am most certain he will.

Although arguably an excellent fit in Calgary... there is scant evidence to support the abilities of current management to pull it off. But... theres always a first time! :)

Avatar
#52 loudogYYC
February 13 2013, 12:09PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

@the-wolf

O'Reilly will no doubt be the best player in the trade, but that doesn't mean COL is dealing from a position of strength. It's almost like the Luongo fiasco in Vancouver, except O'Reilly fits more teams plans, has a better future and doesn't come with a 10 year cap hit (bonehead signing of the decade).

Baertschi would probably be enough to get Sherman interested, but why would you trade your most promising prospect in 10 years to a team that was pretty much forced to trade?

That's why I brought up Cammy at 50%, Granlund, Nemisz and a 3rd. You can't return equal quality, so you shower them with decent quantity. Nemisz is a player Colorado would probably make a staple on their 3rd line and Granlund is probably a top 50 prospect in the NHL. Cammalleri makes their top 6 better and they only have to spend $3M to have him.

Avatar
#53 exsanguinator
February 13 2013, 12:20PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
loudogYYC wrote:

O'Reilly will no doubt be the best player in the trade, but that doesn't mean COL is dealing from a position of strength. It's almost like the Luongo fiasco in Vancouver, except O'Reilly fits more teams plans, has a better future and doesn't come with a 10 year cap hit (bonehead signing of the decade).

Baertschi would probably be enough to get Sherman interested, but why would you trade your most promising prospect in 10 years to a team that was pretty much forced to trade?

That's why I brought up Cammy at 50%, Granlund, Nemisz and a 3rd. You can't return equal quality, so you shower them with decent quantity. Nemisz is a player Colorado would probably make a staple on their 3rd line and Granlund is probably a top 50 prospect in the NHL. Cammalleri makes their top 6 better and they only have to spend $3M to have him.

Plus sending Granlund reunites brothers that performed reasonably well together in Europe. Older Granlund is clearly a player that Colorado wants to keep and having his brother playing there can only help.

I like your trade proposal but I'd want O'Reilly and a 2nd in return. 3mil Squid and Granlund should be worth ROR and Nemisz and a 3rd have got to be worth a 2nd.

Avatar
#54 T&A4Flames
February 13 2013, 12:24PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
loudogYYC wrote:

O'Reilly will no doubt be the best player in the trade, but that doesn't mean COL is dealing from a position of strength. It's almost like the Luongo fiasco in Vancouver, except O'Reilly fits more teams plans, has a better future and doesn't come with a 10 year cap hit (bonehead signing of the decade).

Baertschi would probably be enough to get Sherman interested, but why would you trade your most promising prospect in 10 years to a team that was pretty much forced to trade?

That's why I brought up Cammy at 50%, Granlund, Nemisz and a 3rd. You can't return equal quality, so you shower them with decent quantity. Nemisz is a player Colorado would probably make a staple on their 3rd line and Granlund is probably a top 50 prospect in the NHL. Cammalleri makes their top 6 better and they only have to spend $3M to have him.

If they have interest in Cammi, sure, I would move him. But I wouldn't take 50% of his cap. You have to expect Cammi to be a 25-30 goal scorer and a proven PO performer. At most I would do a 60-40 split; so we would pay 2mil/yr on the remainder of his contract. We still have to sign ROR after all.

Avatar
#55 T&A4Flames
February 13 2013, 12:25PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
exsanguinator wrote:

Plus sending Granlund reunites brothers that performed reasonably well together in Europe. Older Granlund is clearly a player that Colorado wants to keep and having his brother playing there can only help.

I like your trade proposal but I'd want O'Reilly and a 2nd in return. 3mil Squid and Granlund should be worth ROR and Nemisz and a 3rd have got to be worth a 2nd.

Older Granlund is in MIN.

Avatar
#56 exsanguinator
February 13 2013, 12:31PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
T&A4Flames wrote:

Older Granlund is in MIN.

Yes he sure is. I'm a dummy. :(

Avatar
#57 T&A4Flames
February 13 2013, 01:05PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
exsanguinator wrote:

Yes he sure is. I'm a dummy. :(

It was a nice thought. :)

Avatar
#58 Monaertchi
February 13 2013, 01:07PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
exsanguinator wrote:

Yes he sure is. I'm a dummy. :(

That's OK. Now we're talking about a 3 way deal. We can be even more creative for JFeast.

Granlund and 3rd to MIN, Cammy @ 50% and Nemisz to COL. We get ROR, fill in some other MIN to COL stuff to make it work out!

Avatar
#59 loudogYYC
February 13 2013, 01:08PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

@T&A4Flames

I would prefer not to pay 50% of his salary but because they are so damn cheap, it would likely be necessary. They don't want to spend more than $3.4M per season on O'Reilly, I doubt they would spend $4M on Cammy. His contract is up after next season anyway, so it'll kinda have the buy-out effect on Calgary's $64M cap.

Avatar
#60 Derzie
February 13 2013, 01:12PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

Please do something Jay but this list should be off-limits:

Our 1st Round Pick(s) Sven Backlund Hudler Gaudreau Brodie Brossoit Wotherspoon

Avatar
#62 exsanguinator
February 13 2013, 01:23PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

As much as I hate to say it maybe the Flames should employ a Canucks like strategy and keep Stajan on the Czech line to pump his tires a bit and use him as trade bait.

Avatar
#63 Fats
February 13 2013, 01:25PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

If we sign ROR to an offer sheet would he have to clear waivers?

Avatar
#65 Biz
February 13 2013, 01:55PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

No, I'll pass on this guys. Young kid sitting at home while is TEAM struggles because 3.5 million isn't enough.

No thanks. Would rather trade for players who want to play hockey and have a passion to compete.

Avatar
#66 loudogYYC
February 13 2013, 02:04PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

@Biz

Sounds like you're talking about the WHL. Pro sports have been this way for decades now.

Avatar
#67 Potlicker
February 13 2013, 02:21PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

Wow people! I read this thinking Mr ROR is the next Crosby or something. Take a deep breath and consider the following:

1/Last year the kid had a career year, I call that buying high.

2/Check the standings where the Flames sit, do we "really really want to give up our 1st & 3rds in a phenomenal draft"???

3/Colorado will not trade ROR to any Division rival unless it is an absolute rediculous overpayment. Calgary does not have the young NHL ready "A" prospects to get a deal done.

4/There are a lot of teams needing a 1 or 1A centre, why havent they offer sheeted this kid yet.

I realize many on this site refuse to accept this, but there is a very very good chance Flames are going to be sellers by as early as March 15th. Our Franchise goalie is down. Our Franchise player is up to his usual slow starts at the worst possible time with 1 goal in 10 games & is starting to look frustrated which will turn to disinterest soon enough. As badly as we all want to add a huge shower of hope in the near future, the Flames are simply not in a position to entertain this type move. This team needs to be a seller this year & then we wont have to watch from the sidelines when this happens again next year. We'll have good prospects & cap space to burn & we wouldnt have to burn the house down to put ourselves in that situation.

Avatar
#68 McRib
February 13 2013, 03:09PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

@Potlicker

Could not agree more ROR reminds me of Patrice Bergeron who had his best season of his career at 21 and everyone was comparing him to Crosby. ROR may have just peaked early.

Avatar
#69 Old Soldier
February 13 2013, 03:12PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

O'Reilly would be a great pickup for the Flames, or any other club in this situation, but there is one sticking point. Colorado according to Dreger is only interested in talking to Eastern Conference teams with the possible inclusion of Columbus with the new alignment.

As far as the possible trades listed above, come on, Backlund? Camalleri? be serious. If the kid is drawing the interest of as many clubs as has been indicated, you arent going to get him for bit parts and rusting wheels. You can guarantee any conversation with Col if they were willing to deal with a western team would involve Baerschti and another piece.

I can see him going to Columbus for Johansen and at least one of their 1st rounders, possibly more.

As far as those mentioning offer sheets...the new CBA basically makes them useless. Without being able to frontend a contract with a ridiculous amount of bonus money, any team would match and trade, so why generate the hostility?

Avatar
#70 McRib
February 13 2013, 03:17PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
Derzie wrote:

Please do something Jay but this list should be off-limits:

Our 1st Round Pick(s) Sven Backlund Hudler Gaudreau Brodie Brossoit Wotherspoon

Thats the problem no way we land ROR without giving away these players/pick.

Avatar
#71 McRib
February 13 2013, 03:25PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

Just so everyone knows, by saying you are for signing Ryan O'Reilly to an offer sheet.... You are basically saying.......

Ryan O'Reilly -----> Calgary

Seth Jones/Nathan MacKinnon ----> Colorado

So unless you want to trade a Sven/Gaudreau or two of Backlund, Hudler, Brodie, Brossoit and Wotherspoon its not happening. Because plain and simple if the Flames cannot score two goals on Minnesota they are not getting out of the basement anytime soon.

Avatar
#72 Purple Hazze
February 13 2013, 03:27PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

Come on feaster make this happen! But I wouldn't give up a 1st or anyone on Kent's untouchable list. Seems like a roster player like glencross/stemniak + prospect + 2014 2nd should be a "fair" trade.

We have a decent trading history with the Avalanche, they gave us Reghier for Fluery, Chris Drury and Yelle for Derek Morris, and Tanguy for Leopold. Colorado's been giving us assets for nothing since they moved from Quebec so why stop now? Get on that phone Feaster!

Avatar
#73 MC Hockey
February 13 2013, 04:55PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

Did anyone look at O'Reilly's counting stats for NHL and OHL? Not first line material except last year...could be early peaking talent. But again underlying posession and WOWY stats are good so nod to Kent and others who point that out.

Comments are closed for this article.