FGD: Into the Fire

Kent Wilson
February 02 2013 02:51PM

A lot of consternation in Flamesland after the 6-3 loss to the Avs on Thursday, but from my angle the team has exceeded expectations from many angles through the early going. The results aren't there and the goaltending has been *ahem* questionable, but the club has made a habit of outchancing and outshooting their opponents so far. With a few different bounces and an NHL-average Kipper, the Flames have a much better set of W-L numbers heading into tonight.

Chicago is probably the best team the Flames have faced thus far though. The Sharks are the only other true playoff caliber opponent Calgary has seen and they have some severe depth problems. Not so much for Chicago, who boast starts like Kane, Toews, Hossa, Sharp, Keith and Seabrook at the top-end of the roster and then quality depth options like Viktor Stalberg, Michael Frolik and David Bolland elsewhere.  The addition of Michal Roszival and Johnny Oduya in the off-season solidified their top-4 on the back-end as well, so there really is no obvious weakness to exploit on Chicago's roster.

The Hawks haven't lost in regulation this season, in part because of the quality of their line-up, but also because Corey Crawford is pulling a reverse-Kipper so far. Much maligned last year during an entirely mediocre season, Crawford has some out a put up a .934 SV% in 7 starts, including .930 at ES and a mind-boggling .968% on the PK. Obviously that's not going to continue forever, but it wouldn't surprise me if Crawford is better than what he seemed in 2011-12.

The Line-up

Out are Begin and Sarich, replaced by Comeau and Smith. The Butler-Sarich duo were victimized a couple of times last game and were an obvious sore spot on more than one occassion. Comeau is back to being one of the least popular Flames on the roster, but I think we can all agree he's better than Begin.

  • Cammalleri - Tanguay - Iginla
  • Cervenka - Stajan - Hudler
  • Glencross - Backlund - Stempniak
  • Comeau - Jones - Jackman

  • Bouwmeester - Giordano
  • Wideman - Brodie
  • Smith - Butler

  • Kiprusoff

Word is Cammalleri will get elevated to the Iginla line today. Neither he nor Glencross had great games against Colorado, although that has been par for the course for Cammalleri thus far. He's had a lot of problems executing all over the ice, so maybe Hartley is looking to get him some more ice time to help him find his legs.

With Glencross moving down to the Backlund line, I would suggest tonight would be a good point for the Flames new coach to start burying the bottom-6 in the defesive zone as much as possible. Last game the Iginla trio including Glencross generated the most chances at even strength (6) but also gave up the most against (5), whereas the Backlund unit only saw one chance against all night.

At best the top line is going to be even more "high event" with a struggling Cammalleri on the wing, so it would make sense to give the Backlund and Jones units the bulk of the own-zone draws.

The Opposition

  • Saad - Toews - Hossa
  • Sharp - Kruger - Kane
  • Bickell - Shaw - Stalberg
  • Bollig - Meyers - Frolik

  • Keith - Seabrook
  • Oduya - Hjalmarsson
  • Brookbank - Leddy

  • Emery

Okay maybe I exagerrated when I said there were NO weaknesses on this roster. For example, I have no idea what rookie Brandon saad is doing on the first line and I doubt it lasts more than a period. He's a good quality prospect, but no way can he hang with Toews and Hossa at this point in his young career. Byron Bickell on the third line over Frolik is a baffling decision as well since Frolik has the best relative possession rate amongst regular forwards on the team. He still can't seem to put a puck into the ocean, but even as a pure driver of the play he's wasted on the fourth line.

Chicago's third defense unit is pretty suspect as well, if only because the incorrigible Sheldon Brookbank is on it. 

Also odd in the early going for Chicago is the fact that Patrick Kane is getting his head absolutely beat in in terms of possession (-17.74 corsi/60) and it's not like he is suddenly starting 70% of his shifts in the d-zone or anything. That's the sort of rate goons, grinders and marginal AHLers put up, so it will be interesting to watch him to tonight to see just what is going on. The points are there for him right now, but that's due to an on-ice SH% of 17.73% (which is more than double the league average). When that percentage regresses his results will crater if he continues to spend so much time in his own zone.

Sum It Up

The Hawks have a strong line-up with high-end talent and ga oalie playing over his head right now. The Flames have put together some strong performances but the goaltending has been poor so the record isn't there. The best news for Calgary is the hawks played last night and lost in a shoot-out so they should be tired at least. In addition, Corey Crawford is taking a seat in favor of back-up Ray Emery, so that should help the Flames cause to some degree.

39d8109299a9795cb3b41a4e9b49d501
Kent is the Nations Overlord. For questions, complaints, criticisms, etc contact Kent @ kent.wilson@gmail. Follow him on Twitter here.
Avatar
Reply #151 northernstamp February 02 2013, 11:07PM
+1 0 props

@thymebalm

Best on the ice ... really? I must be watching a different game. He gets pushed off the puck every time he touches it.

Avatar
Reply #152 Drad February 02 2013, 11:08PM
+1 0 props

Begin - Jackman - Butler

Avatar
Reply #153 ChinookArch February 02 2013, 11:09PM
+1 0 props

@northernstamp

Stajan's been very good tonight.

Avatar
Reply #154 ChinookArch February 02 2013, 11:09PM
+1 0 props

@northernstamp

Stajan's been very good tonight.

Avatar
Reply #156 negrilcowboy February 02 2013, 11:10PM
+1 0 props

hrudey was bubblin stubblin please write you political representatives idle no more remove hrudey

Avatar
Reply #157 Gunk February 02 2013, 11:10PM
+1 0 props

Hudler looks like he just turned 16

Avatar
Reply #158 thymebalm February 02 2013, 11:11PM
+1 0 props

1-3-2. Nasty.

Avatar
Reply #159 Beeker73 February 02 2013, 11:11PM
+1 0 props

Unjust.

Avatar
Reply #160 ChinookArch February 02 2013, 11:12PM
+1 0 props

Too bad, the boys really deserved a better fate.

Avatar
Reply #161 Gunk February 02 2013, 11:12PM
+1 0 props

Bloody hell. could not buy that game. thats gotta sting for the sad flamers

Avatar
Reply #162 beloch February 02 2013, 11:12PM
+1 0 props

Okay... Whoever stashed a damned Egyptian mummy in the Flames dressing room, please put the #$%@ing thing back where you found it!

Avatar
Reply #163 CLYDE February 02 2013, 11:13PM
+1 1 props

After a very very favorable schedule to start, the Flames are done. No one can actually think any differently. Please start looking at making the deals needed to move this franchise forward.

Avatar
Reply #164 seve927 February 02 2013, 11:14PM
+1 0 props
Kent Wilson wrote:

Despite this going to a shoot-out, the Flames are playing very, very good hockey right now.

Seriously. Everyone talking about intellectual honesty, watch the games. Honestly, they have been playing great. They will win a lot of games if they keep playing like this. Admittedly not the Hawks best game, but still, give the Flames their due. The wins will come.

Avatar
Reply #166 Drad February 02 2013, 11:15PM
+1 0 props

@ Kent Wilson

Yup. I love the way they're playing, and it seems they might have the horses. If that second (Backlund - Stempniak - Glencross) line keeps it up against the toughs, the other three lines should be able to make some hay.

I had tonight as a sure loss. Second of a btb for the Hawks, but they dominated an elite team.

Avatar
Reply #168 Mitch P February 02 2013, 11:16PM
+1 0 props

The Flames have been the better team in 4 of 6 games this year. However that stat won't dry my tears.

Avatar
Reply #169 Vintage Flame February 02 2013, 11:16PM
+1 0 props

@Kent Wilson

What were the scoring chances in OT?

Avatar
Reply #170 Bean-counting cowboy February 02 2013, 11:16PM
+1 0 props

Which Flame offended the hockey gods?

Avatar
Reply #171 FlameinATL February 02 2013, 11:19PM
+1 1 props

As a 40-year Flames fan in Atlanta, I am dying with you guys with each close, and well-played for the most part, loss. Tonight hurts...badly.

But, brighter days are ahead. There is some good, young talent in the system and Hartley is a good coach.

And, while the standings do not reflect it, the Flames are not that far from being a good team.

Regardless, I will always owe them the heady days of the 1970s even though they never won a playoff series. And I will always think fondly of the cup in '89 and the two Finals.

The '04 run will always be my greatest sports memory to the day I leave this mortal coil.

Keep your chin up. Go Flames!

Avatar
Reply #172 Drad February 02 2013, 11:19PM
+1 0 props

I can hear Sutter's voice right now: "we just gotta stick with it".

Although this team looks like they might actually turn it around if they continue to play this way. I love that defensemen are being given the green light to jump up, and Backs is looking like a legit, difference-making center.

Avatar
Reply #173 cLYDE February 02 2013, 11:20PM
+1 0 props

Calgary is 30th. The schedule has been beyond great. We are on our way to our 4rth straight years out of the playoffs. When will the rebuild?

Avatar
Reply #175 Q February 02 2013, 11:20PM
+1 0 props

That's neat that everyone's all excited about 47 shots and all but no win? Wasted night again! It's all about W's ! Nobody's gonna care about efforts or close games come April. How the crap did they lose this with 2 seconds left! Meanwhile, everyone else is racking up points! Put cammi on the hudler line!

Avatar
Reply #176 ChinookArch February 02 2013, 11:21PM
+1 0 props

@FlameinATL

I've never seen you chime in before. Come again!

Avatar
Reply #177 smith February 02 2013, 11:22PM
+1 0 props

35 to 15. How do you loose with scoring chances like that

Avatar
Reply #178 Q February 02 2013, 11:25PM
+1 0 props

Comeau and butler suuuuuuuuuuck!

Avatar
Reply #179 FlameinATL February 02 2013, 11:26PM
+1 0 props

Thanks Chinook...will do. A good show against Detroit would erase some of our frustration I think.

Avatar
Reply #180 Q February 02 2013, 11:26PM
+1 0 props

We are soooo hosed! We won't win 1 on this trip. Talk about wasting home games!

Avatar
Reply #181 negrilcowboy February 02 2013, 11:27PM
+1 0 props

well they did like charlie simma says pucks to the net kept their feet movin. hawks 3 games in 4 nights, ouch this one stings. emery the story of the game, simply outplayrd kippa

Avatar
Reply #182 seve927 February 02 2013, 11:27PM
+1 0 props
Q wrote:

That's neat that everyone's all excited about 47 shots and all but no win? Wasted night again! It's all about W's ! Nobody's gonna care about efforts or close games come April. How the crap did they lose this with 2 seconds left! Meanwhile, everyone else is racking up points! Put cammi on the hudler line!

Everyone's going to have their slumps. Always seems worse when you start the season with one. But really, who wasn't expecting a slow start with hardly anybody having played this year?

Avatar
Reply #183 Beeker73 February 02 2013, 11:29PM
+1 1 props

Its been a long time since watching a flames game has left me excited to watch the next flames game.

Avatar
Reply #184 seve927 February 02 2013, 11:29PM
+1 0 props
Q wrote:

Comeau and butler suuuuuuuuuuck!

I thought Butler was really good tonight. Comeau? Whatever. Fine on the fourth line.

Avatar
Reply #185 Drad February 02 2013, 11:29PM
+1 0 props

"Corey Crawford is taking a seat in favor of back-up Ray Emery, so that should help the Flames cause to some degree."

Wilson!

Avatar
Reply #186 Q February 02 2013, 11:33PM
+1 0 props

@seve927

Slumps are for 82 game seasons. Chicago is way way way more talented than us and they won on skill despite being tired. Sorry guys but buy the time this team pulls their crap together we may be 25 games in and waiting for our lottery pick! I hate stajan on the line he's on! Put cammi as the center! Such a poor choice for that line! Brick hands!

Avatar
Reply #187 A February 02 2013, 11:35PM
+1 0 props

@seve927

Comeau ain't worth even league minimum! I'd wave him in a second! Butler is just meh!

Avatar
Reply #188 Mitch P February 02 2013, 11:36PM
+1 1 props
Q wrote:

Slumps are for 82 game seasons. Chicago is way way way more talented than us and they won on skill despite being tired. Sorry guys but buy the time this team pulls their crap together we may be 25 games in and waiting for our lottery pick! I hate stajan on the line he's on! Put cammi as the center! Such a poor choice for that line! Brick hands!

I'm unsure if you've been watching, but Stajan has been playing pretty well on that line. Ignore the history and you wouldn't say the same thing. I've liked his jump out there.

Avatar
Reply #189 Q February 02 2013, 11:38PM
+1 0 props

@Beeker73

Wow, that got you excited for a spanking in Detroit? Sorry!

Avatar
Reply #190 Q February 02 2013, 11:39PM
+1 0 props

@Mitch P

Who cares about jump! He has brick hands and zero finish! Horrid player! He's our modern day Gary leeman! Pure garbage!

Avatar
Reply #191 seve927 February 02 2013, 11:48PM
+1 0 props
Q wrote:

Slumps are for 82 game seasons. Chicago is way way way more talented than us and they won on skill despite being tired. Sorry guys but buy the time this team pulls their crap together we may be 25 games in and waiting for our lottery pick! I hate stajan on the line he's on! Put cammi as the center! Such a poor choice for that line! Brick hands!

Fine. Cheer for losses all you want. Don't tell me not to cheer for wins. So if you're sure you get your lottery pick, why are you complaining? I don't understand these posts. Edmonton might be more for you if you love to lose.

Avatar
Reply #192 northernstamp February 02 2013, 11:54PM
+1 0 props
ChinookArch wrote:

Stajan's been very good tonight.

You may like the way Stajan is playing, but he's not a puck possession player and that's the point I was making. He seems to get knocked off the puck very easily so in the final minute of the game, he's not the guy I want on the ice. I admit Stajan is better than last year, but then again he's playing with Hudler and with the way he's playing, he makes everyone look better.

Avatar
Reply #193 seve927 February 02 2013, 11:56PM
+1 0 props

Can't believe Stock points to the Flames 7 hits as the reason they didn't win. Cliche that just doesn't apply here IMO. What, give the puck away so you can hit somebody? The shots were 24-6 in the third, and I don't know how many the Hawks got in the last 30. They obviously were worn down, I just don't see why he'd say the Flames failed because they didn't wear them down.

Why we've been scored on twice now with less than 3 seconds left is another question.

Avatar
Reply #194 RKD February 02 2013, 11:59PM
+1 0 props

Clyde, upper brass isn't going to make any decisions quite yet. If the mandate from Murray Edwards is to win now, Feaster can't do anything different.

It's unfair to Iggy and Kipper, they've given everything and more to this organization. Heck, Edwards might be content for the Flames to finish last and collect draft picks rather than trade veteran guys.

Can't believe they didn't win that game after 47 shots, the Hawks hung on barely. The Flames only had 7 hits, hitting may not be their game but you have to be more aggressive against a team playing the last game of a road trip.

Iggy and Cammy have got to get it going somehow.

Avatar
Reply #195 Scary Gary February 03 2013, 12:07AM
+1 0 props

I'd much rather watch an up-tempo game with a ton of scoring chances and shots than the grind them out hitfests of the last three years.

Say what you will but the flames are playing entertaining hockey, they're just not getting the results.

Avatar
Reply #196 Kevin R February 03 2013, 12:12AM
+1 0 props

Wow, great game to be at, we deserved better. Cant believe this team is in 30th place after watching this game. Last years team definitely looked like a 30th place team especially the first 6 weeks. This team not. Not sure if anyone will agree, but Hudler & Cerevenka are finally giving us a lethal 2nd line since the 2004 run. If we had this kind of line in 05 or 06 or 07, we may have had some other long runs. I just get a feeling we are too late for Iggy. I must say, I like Hartley as the coach and if we do fall this year, this guy is the coach for our future as well. So unSutterlike.

Remember, like Colorado, we got a very tired team on the back end of a B2B & 3 games in 4 nights & drawing their backup goalie. We needed 4 points not just 1. Coming up, it is going to be us on the road, playing #1 goalies and us a tired hockey club. Before we blow everything to hell, lets see them perform this month. We are about to see what we really have.

Last tidbit, when was the last time we saw our backup goalie go in play on his freaking head & win us a game? Quite frankly, I cant really remember.

Avatar
Reply #197 schevvy February 03 2013, 12:14AM
+1 0 props

Flames win 99% of the time if they play like this. What are the odds Glencross misses that many 10-bell chances like that again? I thought they played terrific, and in all honesty, they can make the playoffs if they continue to play this way. But, Chicago was gassed. They could barely skate. That had a lot of influence as well. Let's see how they come out vs Detroit: disheartened or upbeat and playing well.

Avatar
Reply #198 schevvy February 03 2013, 12:16AM
+1 0 props

@Kevin R

Flames back-up goalie that stole a game? Um...well...Freddie Brathwaite maybe? I honestly have no idea. We haven't had a MEDIOCRE back-up since Roman Turek.

Avatar
Reply #199 Franko J February 03 2013, 12:18AM
+1 0 props

Why does this team even try at the shootout? Convince me otherwise, but since the implementation of the shootout is there a team in the league with a lower record than Calgary? What is it 10 or 11 straight loses in the shootout?

As exciting as the third period was, the Flames were once again too soft on the opposition. While I like the pace Calgary is beginning to play at they still are struggling with shutting down their opponents. 34 seconds left in the game with a chance to get the puck out their zone and they get scored on. Again this team seriously lacks the grit and killer instinct to win games. No matter how well they did play, unfortunately for the Flames the can't win the puck battles necessary to beat their opponents.

That being said after 6 games I sure like the way Hartleys' system is structured and implemented. Now with a little more execution, the W's might come. Until then I suggest Calgary should hire a specialist for the shootout.

Avatar
Reply #200 the forgotten man February 03 2013, 12:19AM
+1 0 props

Iginla and Cammi were the worst forwards tonight from my viewpoint...I watched the game with mt Dad and lost count of how many times he cursed Iginla's name.

Cammi just isn't bringing it.

The two guys are simply paid to bring it and they are veterans...so sad when the Czechs, Backs, even Stajan for Gods sake are coming to play only to be let down by efforts from the big guns...I would be pissed if I was on the team.

Anyways, more to be happy about than sad with this Club and even better is the fact they are bringing it without Iggy...time to say goodbye to him at trade deadline.

Comments are closed for this article.