Breaking - Flames FInally Offer Sheet O'Reilly

Kent Wilson
February 28 2013 03:56PM

 

 

According to Darren Dreger on twitter.

We've covered why this is a good idea here.

More as this develops.

39d8109299a9795cb3b41a4e9b49d501
Kent is the Nations Overlord. For questions, complaints, criticisms, etc contact Kent @ kent.wilson@gmail. Follow him on Twitter here.
Avatar
Reply #52 shutout February 28 2013, 04:17PM
+1 0 props

Bob McKenzie ‏@TSNBobMcKenzie OK, here's everything you need to know about the CGY offer sheet on Ryan O'Reilly:

Bob McKenzie ‏@TSNBobMcKenzie COL has 7 days to match the offer or accept compensation of CGY's 1st round pick and CGY's 3rd round pick.

Bob McKenzie ‏@TSNBobMcKenzie If COL matches the offer, COL cannot trade O'Reilly for one calendar year from day it matches the offer.

Bob McKenzie ‏@TSNBobMcKenzie Structure of deal designed to deter COL. That includes getting a $2.5M signing bonus now and a really low salary ($1M) rest of season.

Bob McKenzie ‏@TSNBobMcKenzie Kicker, tho, is $6.5M salary next season. Ignoring ROR's arb rights, COL would have to qualify him at $6.5M upon expiry of this deal.

Darren Dreger ‏@DarrenDreger A very aggressive move by the Flames. However, other GM's suggest Colorado could have fetched more than a 1st and 3rd via trade.

Avatar
Reply #53 Kurt February 28 2013, 04:18PM
+1 0 props
schevvy wrote:

He's played 3 years for Christ sakes. Jeez

The bottom line is that this guy is no elite superstar to lead the team. They needed it. The only way as the draft, but the org clearly is hell bent on grinding it out with this useless core of crap. Don't get me wrong, he is a great player. But he isn't ELITE. This year was our chance to draft an elite player.

Correct me if I'm wrong but we won't have any picks in the first 3 rounds this year? What if the wheels fall off and we end up in the lottery. It'll be awesome to not even have our own pick.

#FAIL

Avatar
Reply #54 lionlager February 28 2013, 04:18PM
+1 0 props

Wait, a first and third? Wow.

I would guess this means Feaster will be determined to get a 1st back somehow then. I would guess that means Iggy is gone.

Avatar
Reply #55 Fats February 28 2013, 04:19PM
+1 0 props

GREAT MOVE!!! does more than his points say... but he 21 and only getting better.

I think the Avs match it but great move by Jay either way

Avatar
Reply #56 Blob February 28 2013, 04:19PM
+1 0 props

If they match, they can't trade him for a year. Do they want hanging around like an unhappy smell for 12 months?

Avatar
Reply #58 Reidja February 28 2013, 04:22PM
+1 0 props

Kent you are a genius.

Avatar
Reply #59 MC Hockey February 28 2013, 04:23PM
+1 0 props

Glad Flames are trying and will be interesting to see what happens...so does ROR have to wait the full 7 days to play for Flames (I assume yes)!

Avatar
Reply #60 Jonathan Happy February 28 2013, 04:27PM
+1 0 props

What are the odds the AVs match??? Damn, this is exciting

Avatar
Reply #61 Q February 28 2013, 04:30PM
+1 0 props

Wow! Daddy likely! I'm thinking jay and the avs gm are in on this together. This helps both teams as calgary needs a top centre and the avs recoup a first and a 3rd. Avs save face big time with the public and both are happy. Avs will match em though!

Avatar
Reply #62 BurningSensation February 28 2013, 04:31PM
+1 0 props

This is a brilliant move by Feaster and co.!

We either get a young, physical 2nd line center with offense, who can play hard minutes (our own Ryan Kesler!), or we kick a cash strapped rival in the teeth with an artfully constructed contract.

Love. This. Move.

Avatar
Reply #64 mk February 28 2013, 04:32PM
+1 0 props

I'm not huge on the idea of giving up a 1st and 3rd, especially in a year where the Flames could have a lottery pick.

However, if there was a player to do that to, ROR is one. Young (21), a natural center, plays in tough minutes and drives play, natural center, excellent playmaker, natural center, young, natural center, young, natural center...well you get the picture.

Avatar
Reply #65 Blob February 28 2013, 04:32PM
+1 0 props

Interesting timimg with the game tonight.

Just concidence or something else? I love a good conspiracy theory.

Avatar
Reply #66 schevvy February 28 2013, 04:34PM
+1 0 props

FIST FIGHT IN THE PRESS BOX!

Avatar
Reply #67 shutout February 28 2013, 04:35PM
+1 0 props

This move is a great move from a rebuilding/retooling standpoint as well. If Iginla decides that he wants to try out a team that has a better chance at the cup then the Flames still have options in Iginla and Kiprusoff and maybe even Bouwmeester to acquire draft stock to make up for those potentially going out now.

O'Reilly is not a superstar player and does not deserve over $6M but the Flames are terrible at drafting, need youth that can play on the team, and have a huge hole at center.

Unless they end up picking top 5 then it is a good deal.

Avatar
Reply #68 Parallex February 28 2013, 04:36PM
+1 0 props

@MC Hockey

Well he can lay for whomever he wants... but his bedroom practices are really none of our business :)

Kidding... Feasters got some brass ones here. Hope he's in game shape cause I'd like that 1st rounder to be as low as possible (also hope Taylor Cammarata sticks around until the fourth.

Avatar
Reply #69 Scary Gary February 28 2013, 04:36PM
+1 0 props

Trade deadline may be March 4th next year.

Avatar
Reply #70 SadFlamesFan February 28 2013, 04:36PM
+1 0 props

I guess this will solidify our run for the cup this year . . .

Avatar
Reply #71 SmellOfVictory February 28 2013, 04:37PM
+1 0 props

Really would've been a better idea to do this a tad earlier in the season, so they could have won another game or two.

Avatar
Reply #72 John Chambers February 28 2013, 04:38PM
+1 0 props

O'Reilly's signing could also be incentive for Iginla and Kipper to re-sign.

If they fail to make the playoffs and surrender a lottery pick, at least that blow will be tempered by the fact theyphase a ready-made top-line centre for at least four seasons and likely more.

Could also attract other FAs to sign with Calgary in this summer's upcoming bull market.

Avatar
Reply #73 suba steve February 28 2013, 04:41PM
+1 0 props

Timing is interesting. In 2012 the trade deadline was Feb 27/2012. So, it seems that Col is stuck with ROR for the full 2 seasons if they match, then he's a UFA again. Nice.

Avatar
Reply #74 the-wolf February 28 2013, 04:43PM
+1 0 props

Why did the avs not move him yet? They've really painted themselves into a corner.

Avatar
Reply #75 suba steve February 28 2013, 04:45PM
+1 0 props

@the-wolf

because they, like the Flames, battle with periods of ineptitude

Avatar
Reply #76 First Name Unidentified February 28 2013, 04:45PM
+1 0 props

The Avs have one week to match the offer. we would give up a 1st and 3rd.

@Kent: I think the reason they only "offersheeted" for 2 years is because by then the Avs will need to sign Landeskog and Duchene. Which will make it difficult for them to sign ROR too!

I'm so pumped. Hopefully they won't match it. If they really wanted to sign him they could have gone the arbitration route. Now that option is not available to them anymore.

Avatar
Reply #77 icedawg_42 February 28 2013, 04:46PM
+1 0 props

I love it. After the McGrattan deal today I was on a huge low...now im on a total high. Great move. I just hope it pans out

Avatar
Reply #78 Beeker73 February 28 2013, 04:48PM
+1 0 props
suba steve wrote:

Timing is interesting. In 2012 the trade deadline was Feb 27/2012. So, it seems that Col is stuck with ROR for the full 2 seasons if they match, then he's a UFA again. Nice.

Oh man, that's dirty. I love it!

Avatar
Reply #79 Scary Gary February 28 2013, 04:50PM
+1 0 props
suba steve wrote:

Timing is interesting. In 2012 the trade deadline was Feb 27/2012. So, it seems that Col is stuck with ROR for the full 2 seasons if they match, then he's a UFA again. Nice.

Possibly a Mar 4 2014 trade deadline and you mean RFA.

Avatar
Reply #81 NateBaldwin February 28 2013, 04:53PM
+1 0 props

@Scary Gary

fan is reporting deadline is expected to be between feb 25-27th and he meant RFA

Avatar
Reply #82 RKD February 28 2013, 04:53PM
+1 0 props

Wow, I am truly stunned. Anytime the Flames go after a big fish they don't always land them, i.e. Feaster offered Brad Richards more money and he still went to NYR for less.

I am interested to see if Colorado will match, Pierre LaCroix is behind the scenes and immediately matched when NYR signed Joe Sakic to an offer sheet in 1999.

Is ROR the guy that can take the Flames over the top? More importantly, is Jay Feaster listening to Kent Wilson! I'm more concerned about ROR's attitude, his father's ala Eric Lindros influence. Will he be a headcase and/or a guy who doesn't want to play for the Flames down the road.

Avatar
Reply #83 Scary Gary February 28 2013, 04:55PM
+1 0 props
Kent Wilson wrote:

Pike and I discussed that possibility too.

I'm giddy (not to be confused with giggy)!

Interesting timing, I had just started to try sell some of my flames tickets...maybe some of those last minute ticket packs will actually sell now.

Avatar
Reply #84 Dank February 28 2013, 05:05PM
+1 0 props

The way Darren Dreger reported it on TSN, the Flames move was basically evil genius smart. I love it!!

Avatar
Reply #85 KleptoKlown February 28 2013, 05:08PM
+1 0 props

The Avs can't afford to let O'Reilly go to a divisional rival. I understand that if the NHL's proposed realignment takes effect, the Avs and Flames will no longer be in the same division, but that is one hell of a gamble to take.

If the Flames finish near the bottom, and that 1st round pick turns into a lottery pick, then it's a good deal for the Avs, but again, that's one hell of a gamble.

1 option I haven't seen anyone mention is a trade. The Avs and Flames can still work out a deal that involves more than a 1st and 3rd round pick.

Either way, the team that has to qualify ROR at 6.7 million in 2 years has a cap burden on there hands.

Avatar
Reply #86 Dank February 28 2013, 05:09PM
+1 0 props

OMG. If this pans out, and Backlund comes back soon, I think this team makes the playoffs.

Avatar
Reply #87 Jano February 28 2013, 05:10PM
+1 0 props

Flames finish in the bottom 10 has to mean that Feaster gets canned. No picks until the 4th round... PLEASE let Colorado match this.

Avatar
Reply #88 jeremywilhelm February 28 2013, 05:14PM
+1 0 props

Does anyone really think the Flames will finish in the bottom 10? Really?

Avatar
Reply #89 shutout February 28 2013, 05:20PM
+1 0 props
jeremywilhelm wrote:

Does anyone really think the Flames will finish in the bottom 10? Really?

IF they keep their first round pick then they will end up picking 12th or 13th. If their pick goes in this deal or another deal then they will have a top five pick. For this franchise its the only possible way it can work out. Same sort of karma as Toronto had in the Kessel deal.

Avatar
Reply #90 Baalzamon February 28 2013, 05:20PM
+1 0 props

@KleptoKlown

You don't have to qualify an RFA to re sign him.

Avatar
Reply #91 Big Cap February 28 2013, 05:23PM
+1 0 props

@jeremywilhelm

Yes I do believe they will finish bottom 10.

Your 3 game point steak will not continue all season.

What will happen with Iggy at the Deadline?

Is Joey macDonald the long term answer?

To many questions...Not enough answers.

****And I say this as an Oiler fan who I realize have enough of our own problems to worry about.

Avatar
Reply #92 KleptoKlown February 28 2013, 05:32PM
+1 0 props

@Baalzamon

Based on ROR's entire hold out thus far, do you really think he's going to sign for even a nickle less than the minimum he can get? His next contract is going to start where this current offer sheet ends.

Avatar
Reply #93 Joe February 28 2013, 05:33PM
+1 0 props

Glad to see some movement. Backlund and ROR make a huge difference to the line-up. If they don't match, please, can we sit/trade Stajan or Comeau?!

Avatar
Reply #94 Big Cap February 28 2013, 05:34PM
+1 0 props
Scary Gary wrote:

Thanks for stopping by Mr. Positive! I guess when Hall and Nugent-Hopkins have 4 goals combined on the year you start trolling for kicks...

No...I'm really not. My post #72 commends Feaster and the Flames.

Im just sour the Oilers sat by and let a young center go by with no attempt at trying to land him.

Avatar
Reply #95 Dank February 28 2013, 05:35PM
+1 0 props

According to Bob Mckenzie, if the NHL goes to the 2014 Olympics, the trade deadline next year would get pushed backed, which would certainly help the Avalanche

Avatar
Reply #96 MC Hockey February 28 2013, 05:37PM
+1 0 props
Scary Gary wrote:

Possibly a Mar 4 2014 trade deadline and you mean RFA.

How do you know Mar 4/14 is trade deadline for next season? If so, then Avs match today or tomorrow and can still ship him out by the deadline right? Kent?

Avatar
Reply #97 Dank February 28 2013, 05:45PM
+1 0 props

I really truly wonder if the Avs match. This guy, along with Landeskog, is their best player, but with all the obstacles the Flames threw at the Avs, it seems tough for Colorado to do so.

And why did Colorado decide to be so cheap with O'Reily? They throw a bucketload of money at Parenteau in the off-season, but when it comes to their #1 centreman, they try and play hardball? Strange... And btw, has anyone been able to find O'Reily's advanced stats? I've tried on behindthenet, but it doesnt seem to be working for him.

Avatar
Reply #98 Scary Gary February 28 2013, 05:49PM
+1 0 props
MC Hockey wrote:

How do you know Mar 4/14 is trade deadline for next season? If so, then Avs match today or tomorrow and can still ship him out by the deadline right? Kent?

That's what I had heard due to the Olympics pushing back the deadline but I may be wrong. Trying to find clarification.

Avatar
Reply #99 John Chambers February 28 2013, 05:57PM
+1 0 props

@Kent Wilson

Although after thinking about it I really can't see why the Avs wouldn't match unless they were hell-bent on rebuilding through the draft.

Like, why wouldn't Stan Bowman offer Seabrook and his 1st rounder in exchange for ROR and say Jan Hejda. There are tons of teams who can match the value of Cgy's 1st and 3rd and who could use a top-2 C. The Islanders could offer up Niedereiter and a 1st, Winnipeg could offer up Scheifele and a 1st, Ottawa could put together a package.

Also, I thought there was only a 20% difference allowed between different years on a contract. How cam Calgary offer 3.2 then 6.8?

Avatar
Reply #100 SmellOfVictory February 28 2013, 05:57PM
+1 0 props
Big Cap wrote:

I hate Feaster and I hate the Flames.

However, I give him mad props as at least he had the stones to go for it.

Our boy, Tambi, sits and waits and waits and waits....

Oilers would've been a solid team for targetting him. He's the type of guy they need, right in their age range. Then they'd just have to try to pick up one or two defencemen along the way.

Comments are closed for this article.