Breaking - Flames FInally Offer Sheet O'Reilly

Kent Wilson
February 28 2013 03:56PM

 

 

According to Darren Dreger on twitter.

We've covered why this is a good idea here.

More as this develops.

39d8109299a9795cb3b41a4e9b49d501
Former Nations Overlord. Current Fn contributor and curmudgeon For questions, complaints, criticisms, etc contact Kent @ kent.wilson@gmail. Follow him on Twitter here.
Avatar
#101 FireOnIce
February 28 2013, 06:16PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

I don't know why everyone assumes that this means Iginla and Kipper are on the move. If anything, this solidifies Feaster & Co.'s belief that they're "one piece away" from a Cup.

ROR is the mythical 1C that Iginla has ALWAYS needed. I think, in this case, Iginla is not moving, this is for him and Kipper.

While this is exciting, I really hope it's just to screw over Colorado. Short term this is good, but long term it won't be good if the stars don't align. Plus, how will other Flames (like the notably pouty GlenX) when ROR is brought in (AN OUTSIDER!) for $6.5M?

They won't like it one bit.

Avatar
#102 ?
February 28 2013, 06:19PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

@Real_ESPNLeBrun: I canvassed execs on 5 NHL teams. 4 believed Colorado would match, 1 figured Avs would take the picks...

Well that's not too encouraging, but at the end of the day, it only matters what 1 GM (and mostly 1 owner) thinks.

Avatar
#103 T&A4Flames
February 28 2013, 06:21PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props
RexLibris wrote:

I won't argue that adding O'Reilly makes the Flames a better team immediately. However, in the long run I am less enthusiastic.

At the very least this will allow the Flames to run O'Reilly, Cervenka, Backlund and Stajan down the middle, which is far and away a better option than, well, whatever it is they have now.

Also, I have to disagree that anything short of a Tavares-level player is equal compensation for O'Reilly. That seems like a bit of a stretch.

For the record, I would have offered up Gagner and a 2nd round pick for O'Reilly, so by no means am I saying that he is a bad player.

However, I see in this move, and the potential repercussions, some troubling signs for the organization. Namely, despite their stated desire to focus on the draft they have knowingly now forfeit their three first picks in what is widely considered to be a deep draft.

The cap hit for O'Reilly is $5 million, when the club has to re-sign Backlund, Cervenka, presumably Iginla, Brodie, Byron, and a host of AHL players and graduating prospects. The team is committed to $48 million out of a projected $64 million next season.

Spending $5 million on a 22 year old centre is hardly a bad move, but taken in concert with the contractual obligations and the fact that the team is at the maximum contract limit should this go through, it foreshadows some problems down the road.

All in all, a good move by Feaster, in light of the organization's refusal to consider other long-term options.

I disagree somewhat, Rex. Feaster has shown some creativity in his tenure here, this offer being a fine example. I'm sure he has a plan to cover the basis and I wouldn't be surprised if somehow the McGratton trade is involved.

I hate losing any draft picks but if ROR pans out then we've added another young top 6 player. That prolonges our need for prospects to develop. I also wouldn't be at all surprised to see CGY trade for a 1st or at least a 2nd. At the very latest I can see JBo moving at the draft.

If COL walks away we will have to move salary. It is just a matter of when and how.

Avatar
#104 Veggie Dog
February 28 2013, 06:23PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Finally. Given our ability to pick stinkers in nearly every draft, I don't care if this costs picks. Even if the draft is deep, there is no guarantee Feaster and company don't go off the rails and select an unknown/ under-aged long term project. I don't trust this management to select quality in the draft, so I am thrilled with the ROR move.

Now as long as he doesn't turn out to prefer being a winger................

Avatar
#105 BurningSensation
February 28 2013, 06:25PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
1
props

So far the naysayers break down as being either Oilers fans, or Flames fans who think we aren't imitating the Oilers failing ways enough.

Avatar
#106 Chris Fairfield
February 28 2013, 06:26PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Yesssssssssssssssss!!!!!

Avatar
#107 Chris
February 28 2013, 06:31PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

From the Denver Post: "Former Avalanche executive Michel Goulet, who is now a scout with the Flames, played a role in the deal. Goulet is a Hockey Hall of Famer who spent the majority of his playing career with the Quebec Nordiques."

"Goulet was fired by Avs president Pierre Lacroix in 2009. Goulet was in line to succeed Francois Giguere, who was fired as Colorado's general manager earlier in 2009, but Lacroix instead hired current general manager Greg Sherman."

If you read between the lines, the Post thinks it's a case of revenge best served cold.

Avatar
#108 ChinookArch
February 28 2013, 06:36PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

QUESTION: it appears that the Avs will not be able to trade ROR until after next years (2014) trade deadline. Is this true?

If this is true, then the Flames have done their very best in attempting to handcuff the AVs into accepting the deal. By matching the offer sheet, means the AVS keep A player they don't want for the entire season next year , plus accepting that fact that ROR's trade value is lowered. 2 reasons: his $6.5M salary in year 2 may sour a lot of potential suitors and therefore lowering ROR trade value for the 2015 season, plus they will be unable to use the trade deadline to extract a willing overpayment.

Excellent strategy, since the worst case scenario is the Avs match the offer and then limits there potential return for a player they would definatley want to unload.

Avatar
#109 backburner
February 28 2013, 06:47PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props
ChinookArch wrote:

QUESTION: it appears that the Avs will not be able to trade ROR until after next years (2014) trade deadline. Is this true?

If this is true, then the Flames have done their very best in attempting to handcuff the AVs into accepting the deal. By matching the offer sheet, means the AVS keep A player they don't want for the entire season next year , plus accepting that fact that ROR's trade value is lowered. 2 reasons: his $6.5M salary in year 2 may sour a lot of potential suitors and therefore lowering ROR trade value for the 2015 season, plus they will be unable to use the trade deadline to extract a willing overpayment.

Excellent strategy, since the worst case scenario is the Avs match the offer and then limits there potential return for a player they would definatley want to unload.

And... correct me if I'm wrong... but at the end of the two year contract, either the Flames or the Aves will have to offer him for at least 6.5 mill for the first year of the next contract, I believe..

It will be definitely interesting how this turns out, personally, I think the Aves should take the picks... but then again, they strike me as a very proud organization that would rather match then loose ROR to the Flames..

I can't see ROR wanting to play for the Aves next year..

Avatar
#110 Kypreos
February 28 2013, 07:15PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Great signing by the flames.

I cannot see Colorado walking away from a player like ROR. He is proven in this league and for a first and a third he would be a steal.

Here is for hoping though......

Avatar
#111 Danger
February 28 2013, 07:20PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

I'm so happy about this, I could nearly forget all about this morning's dancing bear news.

Avatar
#112 backburner
February 28 2013, 07:30PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props
Kypreos wrote:

Great signing by the flames.

I cannot see Colorado walking away from a player like ROR. He is proven in this league and for a first and a third he would be a steal.

Here is for hoping though......

But at the same time, they won't want to qualify him for 6.5 mill, keep him around for a year, which he obviously doesn't want to be there, and it is a deep draft.

Aves were asking too much for ROR, now they have the option to pay him more?? No, he'll walk...

Avatar
#113 ALL THE WAY IN
February 28 2013, 07:30PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

I bet the parade will start on bow trail and end somewhere in Inglewood lol. Love the design of this maneuver. A for effort.

Avatar
#114 Jai Kiran
February 28 2013, 07:41PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

If this goes through, then I don't believe for a second that the wheeling-and-dealing is done. There are too many wingers: one of Stempniak, Glencross or Cammaleri is on the move. These are quality players playing well right now: there will be a real return for them, whether draft picks or young players.

And, Rex Libris: like Big Cap you believe the Flames with O'Reilly finish bottom 10?

Avatar
#115 FireOnIce
February 28 2013, 07:44PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Being reported that Avs matched the offer sheet.

Avatar
#116 Willi P
February 28 2013, 07:45PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

The Avs match

Avatar
#117 Willi P
February 28 2013, 07:49PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
1
props

2 years was stupid IMO. Should have been 4 years.

Avatar
#118 beloch
February 28 2013, 07:49PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Well, color me surprised and disappointed. ROR would have been a great addition. At least Feaster showed some stones in the attempt.

Avatar
#119 Veggie Dog
February 28 2013, 07:49PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Sigh. I got too excited. Should have known better. :'(

Avatar
#120 McRib
February 28 2013, 07:49PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
1
props

Still have our first rounder!!!!!!! WWWWOOOOOTTTTT!!

Avatar
#121 Kurt
February 28 2013, 07:50PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
1
props

Thank goodness....

Nathan McKinnon is WAY better than Ryan OReilly.

Avatar
#122 Jai Kiran
February 28 2013, 07:51PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Well that's a letdown that the Avs matched. I got real excited for a few hours. I do believe the Flames have put the Avs in serious salary disorder come the end of next season. Not even close to as good as having a great centre in Flames colours next week, but it's something.

Avatar
#123 Danger
February 28 2013, 07:52PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
1
props

On the plus side, at least the Avs are now stuck paying what they refused to pay for a player who probably does not want to play for them, and they can't trade him, and he may be a free agent in just two years. With any luck, he'll remember who helped him get paid this time.

Avatar
#124 FireOnIce
February 28 2013, 07:53PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

@Jai Kiran

Avs are right near the salary floor. They have plenty of room to pay for their young guys, the ownership is just cheap. Salary disorder is not an issue I don't think.

Avatar
#125 Subversive
February 28 2013, 07:54PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Nice that they did it. Kind of lame that they made it so easy to match. If you're going to do this, I think you need to make an offer that you don't think Colorado will match. 2 years is easy to match.

Another Brad Richards "we tried really hard" smoke screen?

Avatar
#126 Captain Ron
February 28 2013, 07:56PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
1
props

You are dreaming if you think we get McKinnon in the draft.

Avatar
#127 Jai Kiran
February 28 2013, 07:58PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

@FireOnIce:

You're right, but that cheap owner is going to have to pay O'Reilly 6.8 mill and pay Duchene and Landeskog and Stastny (who's gotta be trade bait right now)...

Avatar
#128 RexLibris
February 28 2013, 08:29PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
1
props
Jai Kiran wrote:

@FireOnIce:

You're right, but that cheap owner is going to have to pay O'Reilly 6.8 mill and pay Duchene and Landeskog and Stastny (who's gotta be trade bait right now)...

Good point, now perhaps Feaster can come to Sherman with a trade proposal for Stastny.

With Colorado likely to be moving to a new division/conference next season, there shouldn't be as much reticence to trade to a northwest division partner.

Good for Feaster to have made the offer, but it will be better for the Flames in the long run to retain the picks.

Avatar
#129 SydScout
February 28 2013, 08:37PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
1
props

Is this the straw that breaks the (very large Feasting) camels back? Now we missed that gilt edged opportunity to fix the centre and give Iggy a red hot go (ahem) at the Cup, trading he and Kipper for picks in a deep draft can now only be the most sensible option

Avatar
#130 MC Hockey
February 28 2013, 08:47PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props
Scary Gary wrote:

That's what I had heard due to the Olympics pushing back the deadline but I may be wrong. Trying to find clarification.

I guess next year's trade deadline could be late Feb as Avs matching offer already indicates.

Avatar
#131 SadFlamesFan
February 28 2013, 09:06PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

A completely stupid move by the Flames. It reeks of desperation on the part of the team and only serves to piss off every other GM in the league except in Phili. Unbelievable!!! The Flames ship is taking on water damned fast.

Avatar
#132 MC Hockey
February 28 2013, 09:09PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props
FireOnIce wrote:

Avs are right near the salary floor. They have plenty of room to pay for their young guys, the ownership is just cheap. Salary disorder is not an issue I don't think.

Does anyone really know if the Avs are a money-losing team? If they are really bleeding money, which I doubt, then they may refuse but obviously not the case

Avatar
#133 MC Hockey
February 28 2013, 09:11PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
1
props
SadFlamesFan wrote:

A completely stupid move by the Flames. It reeks of desperation on the part of the team and only serves to piss off every other GM in the league except in Phili. Unbelievable!!! The Flames ship is taking on water damned fast.

It only really pisses off Colorado as they have drawn out the process too long.

Avatar
#134 SmellOfVictory
February 28 2013, 09:11PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
1
props
SadFlamesFan wrote:

A completely stupid move by the Flames. It reeks of desperation on the part of the team and only serves to piss off every other GM in the league except in Phili. Unbelievable!!! The Flames ship is taking on water damned fast.

The only GM it might've pissed off is Colorado's. And given the extended negotiations, I don't even know if he's mad about it.

Avatar
#135 Fleury4pm
February 28 2013, 09:18PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Why does everyone want McKinnon..druin is twice the player

Avatar
#136 RKD
February 28 2013, 09:27PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Just heard Feaster during the first intermission, he first tried to acquire ROR via a trade but Colorado's asking price was so steep it apparently would have jeopardized the Flames future.

My guess is Colorado was looking for a first round pick, and then some combo of at least two with Baertschi, Backlund, Irving, Taylor, Brodie etc.

Are we shocked Colorado matched, no. LaCroix matched the offer sheet Joe Sakic signed with NYR back in 1999. Why would they let ROR go for nothing and especially to division rival. BTW offer sheets aren't necessarily the way to rebuild your team, keep developing your prospects and improve your scouting.

Yes, Ottwawa got Kyle Turris in a trade but really it's guys like Zibanejad and Silfverberg stepping up.

Avatar
#137 Q
February 28 2013, 09:41PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Implosion time! 3-0 leads are so helpful!

Avatar
#138 clYDE
February 28 2013, 09:43PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props
Q wrote:

Implosion time! 3-0 leads are so helpful!

Glad to see this foolishness end. As we are seeing, this is a lottery team.

Avatar
#139 Q
February 28 2013, 09:46PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

@clYDE

Got that right!

Avatar
#140 clYDE
February 28 2013, 09:47PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

I am so glad the Oil took RNH and not this beast we can't handle tonight.

Avatar
#141 Q
February 28 2013, 09:58PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Everyone's giving jay props for being so aggressive yet he's still signed no one significant! Barf! Up 3-0 and a loss! EVERY GAME MATTERS my A$$!

Avatar
#142 McRib
February 28 2013, 10:05PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Brutal game, lets just get a lottery pick already!!! We can't win this game we can't win anything!!! Best thing that could have happened to us was the Avs matching that offer sheet, time to rebuild!! Stop kidding yourselves. What a horrid effort tonight!! Booooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo. Thats the closest the Flames are getting to the Playoffs this season. Now time to go play Vancouver and get hammered again.

Avatar
#143 Q
February 28 2013, 10:12PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

LOTTERY! LOTTERY! Time to take a break from this team til next October! HORRID HORRID TEAM! Re-hashing old crap players and zero heart!

Avatar
#144 McRib
February 28 2013, 10:15PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

@Q

ZZEERROO HHHEEAARRTTT!!!!!

Avatar
#145 clYDE
February 28 2013, 10:15PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

I hope the last 6 hours was enough to convince everyone including management that the flames will have to do some tearing down before building up. This team cannot compete and we still tried to mortgage a Jones/Mckinnon/Drouin for a 22 year old with one season of over 50 points but under 20 goals.

Avatar
#146 McRib
February 28 2013, 10:18PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

@clYDE

I was a firm believer that we could just retool before the season started, but after the last 15+ games I no longer think so. Today hopefully taught the Flames how hard it is to get good young talent these days. Colorado showed us tonight that we just cannot complete with the young talent that is all over the league. We were outworked, outmatched, out skilled and out played tonight period!!

Everyone keeps saying the Flames deserve better results so far this season, but at the end of the day the one common denominator is good teams get bounces, old no effort teams do not.

Trade Iggy while his value is up please!!

Avatar
#147 Chris Fairfield
February 28 2013, 10:23PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Kicked in the nuts twice today, losing after having a 3-0 lead and the avaldouche matching the Flames offer sheet.

Avatar
#148 McRib
February 28 2013, 10:29PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

@Chris Fairfield

The Flames have been kicking us in the nuts for three/four years!! Time to lower expectations at least it is bearable, the hope of maybe making the players every year is killing me.

Avatar
#149 Chris Fairfield
February 28 2013, 10:35PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

I don't know how to understand this crap anymore. Two good pieces of news, offer sheet O'Reilly, a chance to immediately address their center ice woes and what happens, offer sheet matched, Calgary blows a lead and slip into complacency and inconsistency, yet again, nothing to show after starting the game like they actually gave a sh@#t. It was from being on a high to an extreme low.

Avatar
#150 clYDE
February 28 2013, 10:58PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props
Chris Fairfield wrote:

I don't know how to understand this crap anymore. Two good pieces of news, offer sheet O'Reilly, a chance to immediately address their center ice woes and what happens, offer sheet matched, Calgary blows a lead and slip into complacency and inconsistency, yet again, nothing to show after starting the game like they actually gave a sh@#t. It was from being on a high to an extreme low.

That is what you get from this group. They are consistently inconsistent.

Comments are closed for this article.