FGD: Things To Do In Denver (When You're Dying To Be Above .500)

Ryan Pike
February 28 2013 01:08PM

 

 

Your Calgary Flames have a bit of a problem, gang. They're seemingly allergic to getting over that hump at the .500 mark. They're 0-3-1 this year in games that could've put them over the top, and have arguably put out their four worst games of the year in those four outings. Heck, the same thing happened early last season and the Flames were only 3-4-2 when entering a game with a .500 record and the “horrible effort” train chugs back to that point last year, most notably the 9-0 mauling by the Bruins.

But the Flames get a second chance tonight, as they head into snowy Denver to tangle with the Colorado Avalanche. These two teams did battle in Calgary earlier this season, with the Flames blowing a third period tie in rather spectacular fashion and losing 6-3. They're hoping to put together a strong effort tonight.

THE LINE-UP

To say the Flames were “flat” on Tuesday against Minnesota would be charitable. The entire team is probably thankful that Joey MacDonald was there to keep them in the game. Through the first 18 games, MacDonald is the only Flames goalkeeper with a respectable save percentage. His start tonight will see him pass Miikka Kiprusoff for the most time in a Flames net this season.

It's been a weird year. Here's the probable lines for tonight, courtesy of Sportsnet's Roger Millions (@rogmillions):

  • Tanguay – Stajan – Iginla
  • Glencross – Cammalleri – Stempniak
  • Baertschi – Hudler – Comeau
  • Aliu – Begin – Jackman

  • Giordano – Bouwmeester
  • Brodie – Wideman
  • Butler – Sarich

  • MacDonald

Aliu's back, at the expense of (likely) Roman Cervenka. Cervenka has been “fine” this year. If you're asking why Blake Comeau is (a) still in the top-nine and (b) has played 17 of the 18 games this year, I have no idea. He's the Anton Babchuk of Flames forwards – he seemed like a decent low-risk pick-up at the time but I have no idea why you re-sign him or retain him in your line-up when the results have been so middling to poor. Particularly in the top-9 rotation.

On the other hand, Matt Stajan continues to be awesome.

THE OPPOSITION

The Avalanche are missing a ton of bodies and are riding a three-game winless streak (all of which took place on the same terrible road trip to California). Now back home, they're hoping to get healthy and get back on track. Like the Flames, Colorado hasn't been above the .500 mark all year, but can get back to the black with a win against the Flames.

Courtesy of the Herald's Scott Cruickshank, here are the probable lines:

  • McGinn – Stastny - Parenteau
  • Landeskog – Mitchell - Jones
  • McLeod – Olver - Hejduk
  • Bordeleau – Kobasew - Palushaj

  • Hejda - Barrie
  • Hunwick - O’Byrne
  • O’Brien - Zanon

  • Varlamov

Matt Duchene didn't practice at Wednesday's optional session, but could slot in for the Avs. He's been out day-to-day with a groin issue. Also out for the Avalanche are Ryan Wilson, Erik Johnson, Steve Downie and the un-signed Ryan O'Reilly.

Despite their mediocre record, the Avalanche aren't a bad team – although that blueline is a tad thin (a product of injuries). Their two top lines are respectable and former Flames pick Chuck Kobasew has carved out a fairly distinguished career for himself. Thursday will be his 548th NHL contest, which makes him noteworthy amongst a string of awful, awful Flames first rounders.

SUM IT UP

With a fully healthy (and signed) roster, the Avalanche are every bit Calgary's equal talent-wise. However, the Flames largely out-played Colorado for 40 minutes at home when they played last month. Sadly, that was followed by a weird, wacky third period where bad luck and inconsistency burned the Flames and gave them a loss.

Life's not full of second chances, but the Flames have a shot to get above .500 once more. Their four previous opportunities to do so were, to be blunt, horrible. Let's hope that's not repeated in Denver.

 

51a8cdc527ce12d222fdc583f3cf4368
Now in his third full season covering the Calgary Flames and the NHL, Ryan Pike is a Calgary native and FlamesNation's managing editor. He's trying to keep his head up, his stick on the ice and is giving it 110% every shift. You can also find his work at The Hockey Writers, the Wrestling Observer and Tough Talk MMA.
Avatar
#51 ChinookArch
February 28 2013, 07:57PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props
ChinookArch wrote:

What ch. is this game on? Shaw.

Never mind. I found it.

Avatar
#52 FireOnIce
February 28 2013, 07:58PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

I thought the Flames practiced their PP recently...

Avatar
#53 schevvy
February 28 2013, 07:58PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

AHHHHHHHH

Avatar
#54 ?
February 28 2013, 08:02PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Wow, they matched already. This sucks

Avatar
#55 ?
February 28 2013, 08:04PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

nice iggy!

Avatar
#56 Kent Wilson
February 28 2013, 08:05PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Flames are getting the bounces in this one for once.

Avatar
#57 schevvy
February 28 2013, 08:05PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Yes boys

Avatar
#58 ChinookArch
February 28 2013, 08:06PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props
? wrote:

Wow, they matched already. This sucks

That's called give'n the Flames 'the bird'.

Avatar
#59 Kent Wilson
February 28 2013, 08:07PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Chances were 6-5 Flames in the first.

Avatar
#60 schevvy
February 28 2013, 08:08PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props
Kent Wilson wrote:

Chances were 6-5 Flames in the first.

Surprised COL had 5

Avatar
#61 ?
February 28 2013, 08:09PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Why didn't the Flames make it a 3-4 year offer on O'REily? That would've made the Avs less likely to match.

Avatar
#62 schevvy
February 28 2013, 08:12PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props
? wrote:

Why didn't the Flames make it a 3-4 year offer on O'REily? That would've made the Avs less likely to match.

I don't know for sure... but I think part of it may be that Landeskog and someone else (can't remember name) are FA's

Avatar
#63 ChinookArch
February 28 2013, 08:17PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

It was a brilliantly crafted deal, which will hurt ht AVs for years to come. I love it, win or loose.

Avatar
#64 Kent Wilson
February 28 2013, 08:18PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

@schevvy

They had three in the first 4 minutes and then only two for the rest of the period.

Avatar
#65 Blob
February 28 2013, 08:19PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Greg Sherman not happy.

Quit crying.

Avatar
#66 Willi P
February 28 2013, 08:20PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

2 year offer sheet almost looks planned (between the GM's). Add an uncomfortable 2nd year clause to make it look good. If they really wanted him, they offer something Avs won't match (4-5 years). Almost sounds like collusion. Given the speed of the match, each GM looks good in the eyes of their fans. Just sayin.

Avatar
#67 ?
February 28 2013, 08:25PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Didn't really see the penalty there, but watever

Avatar
#68 ?
February 28 2013, 08:26PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

flames get lucky on that one

Avatar
#69 Gunk
February 28 2013, 08:27PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

atta boy mac D... !!!

Avatar
#70 Kent Wilson
February 28 2013, 08:28PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

MacDonald getting the love from his posts recently.

Avatar
#71 Gunk
February 28 2013, 08:31PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

ya, we're definitely gettng some serious lucky bounces/calls here...

Avatar
#72 Kent Wilson
February 28 2013, 08:35PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

@ChinookArch

Not recently but I guess I could at some point.

Avatar
#73 ChinookArch
February 28 2013, 08:36PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Crap!

Avatar
#74 Kent Wilson
February 28 2013, 08:37PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Let's just say this...the O'Byrne goal wasn't a legit chance.

Looks like it went off Gio's stick.

Avatar
#75 FireOnIce
February 28 2013, 08:37PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

2nd Avs goal from a defenseman. Flames still slumpbustin'.

And MacD's posts let him down - that one hit the post and went in.

Avatar
#76 ChinookArch
February 28 2013, 08:37PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

@Kent Wilson

I'd appreciate a link to an old one, if it's not too much trouble.

Avatar
#77 FireOnIce
February 28 2013, 08:38PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

@ChinookArch

There's an infographic that basically explains what counts as a scoring chance. It's basically a five-sided figure that stretches out from the goal.

Avatar
#78 FireOnIce
February 28 2013, 08:39PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

@ChinookArch

Here it is: http://assets.sbnation.com/assets/701151/Scoring_Area.jpg

And here is an old article from Kent about this: http://flamesnation.ca/2011/5/3/flames-2010-2011-scoring-chance-results

Avatar
#79 ?
February 28 2013, 08:40PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

For the love of God, what is a schmozzle?

Avatar
#80 FireOnIce
February 28 2013, 08:40PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Just a SHAMOZZLE in front of MacDonald.

Avatar
#81 Kent Wilson
February 28 2013, 08:41PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

@?

It's a perfectly cromulent word.

Avatar
#82 Gunk
February 28 2013, 08:42PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Aren't there several stats that are subjective along with chances though? like what constitutes a shot on net or even faceoff wins?

Avatar
#83 ChinookArch
February 28 2013, 08:42PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

@FireOnIce

Thanks!

Avatar
#84 FireOnIce
February 28 2013, 08:43PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

@Gunk

Yeah, same thing with 'hits'. Very subjective categories and different employees in different rinks count them slightly differently. I remember there was a bit of controversy over Clutterbuck's number of hits, aka the Wild were counting everything as a hit if he even got near something.

Also, didn't realize that 14 years ago TODAY we traded Fleury to Colorado. Huzzah.

Avatar
#85 Gunk
February 28 2013, 08:44PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

is it Begin? or Beige-ann?

Avatar
#86 Gunk
February 28 2013, 08:46PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props
FireOnIce wrote:

Yeah, same thing with 'hits'. Very subjective categories and different employees in different rinks count them slightly differently. I remember there was a bit of controversy over Clutterbuck's number of hits, aka the Wild were counting everything as a hit if he even got near something.

Also, didn't realize that 14 years ago TODAY we traded Fleury to Colorado. Huzzah.

good point. also 3 years ago today was "The Golden Goal!"

Avatar
#87 ?
February 28 2013, 08:46PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Flames: O'Reily ain't coming? Awww well, we might as well make this one interesting

Avatar
#88 schevvy
February 28 2013, 08:46PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

CAN WE RE-OFFER SHEET O'REILLY. Everything is falling apart

Avatar
#89 Gunk
February 28 2013, 08:47PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Dude with long hair and yellow shirt behind Heartly. Class act.

Avatar
#90 Kent Wilson
February 28 2013, 08:47PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Well it's close again.

Avs have dominated this period.

Avatar
#91 FireOnIce
February 28 2013, 08:48PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Is anyone surprised? I don't know why I watch Flames games. We can have a 5-0 lead going into the third period and lose it.

This team is all smoke and mirrors.

Avatar
#92 Kent Wilson
February 28 2013, 08:52PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Chances are 7-1 in this period for Avs. The Flames one chance came on the PP.

Avatar
#93 FireOnIce
February 28 2013, 08:54PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Haha, Avs booing the Flames because their (Colorado) player made a stupid play. Love it.

Avatar
#94 ChinookArch
February 28 2013, 08:54PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Now that was nice.

Avatar
#95 Gunk
February 28 2013, 08:54PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

was that a "chance on net" :-)

Avatar
#96 schevvy
February 28 2013, 08:55PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Iggy! Atta boy

Avatar
#97 RexLibris
February 28 2013, 08:55PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

The Flames seem to have a pretty decent PP this year. Surprising given where they are in the standings.

Avatar
#98 FireOnIce
February 28 2013, 08:56PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

@RexLibris

Consider me trolled.

Avatar
#99 RexLibris
February 28 2013, 08:57PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props
schevvy wrote:

Quit trolling Rex. :)

Sorry, thought I was on ON. =)

Heartbroken over the Avs matching?

Avatar
#100 ChinookArch
February 28 2013, 08:57PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

@RexLibris

Not surprising when you look closely at goaltending.

Comments are closed for this article.