FlamesNation Roundtable - 2013 Season Halfway Point

Kent Wilson
March 12 2013 10:20AM

(We're at the mid-point of the season, so it's time for another FN roundtable. Ryan Lambert, Ryan Pike, Justin Azevedo, Vintage Flame and Book of Loob all weighed in on a few of the club's current pressing issues.)

1.) Despite some decent showings and a capped out roster, the Flames are currently at the bottom of the Western Conference. Do they hold on as long as possible and hope for the playoffs yet again? Or does the rebuild start now?

Ryan Lambert: I've actually heard and seen more and more talk that People Around The League(!!!) think this is the year they trade Jarome Iginla, actually and finally. That's supported by the Calgary Sun about how they haven't even started talking extension for the captain. I think they still hang on as long as they possibly can to milk a few more bucks out of the fanbase but I think given how bad they've been this year, this really is the last straw. About damn time.

Book of Loob: The team says they have an internal policy not to ever tank out and go full on rebuild, and history suggests this is true, so I doubt that they do, at least not in the way we all typically define a rebuild.

One look up north shows that consistently drafting first overall picks is not necessarily a blueprint for success, so I understand why the team doesn't want to take that path, nor, I think, should they.

As far as guys like Jarome and Miikka go, I'm sure they're available (assuming they'd be willing to waive NMCs), but they're not going to give them away for the sake of getting a return. If they can't get anything they need, they won't trade them.

Vintage Flame: The disturbing thing about this question, is that I don't think anyone in the organization even knows the answer. The logical answer is that nothing is going to change between now and the time playoffs start, so why fool yourselves; in fact nothing has changed over the past four seasons... what are they waiting for? Start the rebuild now.

The problem remains is that who exactly should the team be building around? If they continue to "build" around Iggy and Kipper, then by default you are not building around the likes of Backlund, Brodie and even Baertschi. This problem is going to be compounded every year they wait to fundamentally shift this organization.

Justin Azevedo: To me, it doesn't really matter if they try for the playoffs as long as they don't buy at the deadline. The assets they have to sell, save Iginla, won't make the team appreciably worse than it is already. If they're smart - of which I'm unconvinced - they'll sell in a way where they could actually make the team better. The forwards and defence have been better than the record states, but the goaltending has sunk them. The only goalie who hasn't cost them points in the standings is Taylor - between Kiprusoff, Irving and MacDonald, the Flames are down 5 points compared to replacement level goaltending. Not average, replacement.

If they can get some luck and some replacement-level goaltending, they definitely have a chance to make a push into 7th - hell, they'd be in 9th right now with two games in hand with RLG. I say roll with Taylor and MacDonald and go for it. Lastly - the Flames are 15 goals below replacement level right now. Their goal differential? -16.

Ryan Pike: Let's be honest, the rebuild should have begun a couple of years ago. As soon as Jay Feaster came in, ideally he should've been swinging the wrecking ball. He didn't, because the team's core was competitive. Two years later, they're longer in the tooth and less competitive. If I'm Jay Feaster, I'm listening to any and all offers. I may not shop specific pieces, but I listen to everything.

2.) Who would you trade at the deadline?

RL: Every veteran who's not nailed down.

BoL: Seems to me like most guys are fair game to be traded. If you can shuttle out all the dead weight on the bottom D pairings for, oh, anything, do it.

I think the only untouchables on the roster are Brodie and Baertschi, unless an offer the Flames can't refuse is made. Bouwmeester probably fetches you a pretty big return, I'd probably be dangling him, just to see what bites you get.

That said, I don't see the Flames getting rid of a lot of these guys, because that would in fact be a "rebuild".

VF: If the deal is out there, don't wait for the deadline. But given that's when most team are willing to "overpay" to make a run at the Cup, then the top three targets have to be Iginla, Kiprusoff and I think Mark Giordano.

JA: Giordano and Kiprusoff. Get what you can/waive Comeau, Sarich, Babchuk, McGrattan, Begin and Jackman. You can fill out the roster with Jones and Sven.

RP: I'd make any trade that would (a) improve the team's core going forward or (b) got the team more draft picks. Specifically, I think guys like Curtis Glencross, Mark Giordano and Mike Cammalleri probably get the team a nice return.

3.) How would you grade the Flames major off-season acquisitions (Hudler, Wideman, Cervenka) so far?

RL: Hudler and Wideman have been exactly what I expected, or maybe even a little better. I never thought they weren't serviceable NHL players, but I thought they were overpaid in terms of money and years on their deals, and that their signings were counter to what the team should be doing. The latter roosters are already coming home to roost.

As for Cervenka, when you give him the kind of deal that comes with that cap hit, and then he ends up a healthy scratch a few times, that's not good. We were told he could turn into a top center. He's not close. That was the worst-case scenario in signing a KHL star who had never made it in North America, and it's not looking good for the kid. At least it's only a year.

BoL: I don't know...I guess a C? Cervenka, I think, has had a tough time adjusting to the NHL game, but it doesn't seem like the coaching staff has any faith in him, because he's not getting the opportunities or the ice time anymore. I don't see how you justify parking him on the bench while simultaneously trotting McGrattan out to elbow someone and fight a goon and then not see him for the rest of the game. Cervenka just hasn't been used the right way.

You have to consider this is all a very big transition for him. He is in a new continent, doesn't speak English, and the KHL is not the NHL...it would take anyone time to adjust properly, but it seemed like Cervenka has been on a shorter leash than he should be.

I think Hudler and Wideman have exceeded expectations, but are both significantly streaky as well. Wideman has done what everyone thought he would do on the power play and we've been given the added benefit of him not being a defensive liability, but he's shown that all that good play can dry up, which it can for any player, I guess. Hudler is the same way.

VF: I have liked all three. Hudler was instrumental early in the season when the top line *cough Iginla* wasn't scoring and I have really liked his game in general. Part of what has made this a more exciting season, despite the losses, is the creativity of Hudler and the jump he has brought here. Wideman obviously has been a dramatic improvement on the Flames power-play and it shows. I don't think he's been the defensive liability that many thought he was going to be either. That has to be considered a bright spot. You could see from the start the talent that Cervenka had, he was just tentative and not in game shape. Over the last 5-10 games though, you could see him starting to become more familiar with the North American game and his adjustments to the plays. I think he is going to be something special to watch next year, if the team is able to re-sign him.

JA: I wasn't happy with the contracts of the first two, but they've played well this year. B for both. I'm not sure if that'll be the case in 2015, but the ink has dried. Wideman's been the Flames' third best dman, which is what he was brought in to be, and Hudler has been a good 2/3 wing option, which is what he was brought in to be. Cervenka is interesting - when he's played, he's been the 2C I thought he would be; but the issue is there's nights where he just hasn't played. It's not due to performance, it's due to conditioning, which is understandable. However, since he can't be out there physically from time to time I have to give him a C.

RP: Hudler's been very good. Wideman's helped out the power-play. Cervenka has been making good plays but watching him, I think he's still trying to get comfortable with the timing and the language barrier.

4.) How would you grade Bob Hartley?

RL: Not well, because his roster management is strange to say the least. But I have to give him a bit of a pass as well given the pile of turds he was asked to make a winner. You see how it's working out. Let's call it a C- because while I had minimal expectations for the Flames overall, he's not even meeting those.

BoL: Bob Hartley confuses the hell out of me, I just don't get what goes through his head a lot of the time. In a lot of ways, he's done some very good things. He's found a diminished role for Jarome lately, and that's allowed Iggy to succeed a little more. He's addressed the notion that Jarome can't be out there in a power vs. power capacity anymore, and that's good. But I don't think he manages his players very well. We've been over Cervenka...I don't understand why he plays Cherv the way he does, why he doesn't put him in a position to succeed. He and Hudler play well together, and I think with Backlund returning, the three of them make a dynamic line that all three were thriving under before Mikael's injury.

The grit factor too, man, I don't know. Blair Jones or Roman Horak are far more capable players than guys like Aliu, Begin, or McGrattan, and if a team like Calgary expects to have any success, they need to assemble the best players they have available every night, and Hartley does not do this. Going those 6 or 8 games where the only option at center was Matt Stajan? That was downright wacky. Bottom line...I was never a fan of the Hartley signing, and I'm still not.

VF: I've liked what Hartley has done so far. He's only had 23 games with virtually no training camp, so I'm not prepared to run him out of town yet. Has he made some questionable calls so far? Absolutely, but what coach hasn't with this team? The fact that he seems to have picked up on how to utilize Jarome properly to avoid playing him PvP and he is scoring now, leads me to believe he knows what he's doing. I'd give him a "B" so far.

JA: He's made some, uh, puzzling decisions at times, but in terms of deployment he's miles ahead of his predecessor. I'll say C+.

RP: I think he's doing the best he can with the roster he's been given.

5.) Can the organization turn this around in a hurry? Or is a re-tool not enough at this point?

RL: They've tried that already, haven't they? Wasn't that what this summer was? Look how it's going. "The core" needs to go, and in turn I'd like to see little attempt to replace them with comparable players. I've heard a lot about what that "culture of losing" is doing to the kids in Edmonton but they're a team that's run phenomenally poorly. While you'd like to think Calgary's a little better-operated than that (given the quality of players drafted in the later rounds the last few years), it all remains to be seen.

BoL: Nothing happens overnight without an influx of talent. Rebuild, or retool, it's going to take time. Calgary has a decent prospect system, but like we're seeing with Sven, they take a long time to develop, seeing as none of them are marquee Crosby kind of players. The Flames can get better with a retool and the right system in place, but it's a steady march, not a sprint.

VF: No they can't. They've been running this hamster wheel for too long already. Every time they go on a late season run and fall short, it just gives them false belief in the way things are being run. That's when we hear the, "We're only one or two pieces away." *Sigh* Honestly though, with this team... what is the difference between a re-build or a re-tool? Personally I think one is a solution and the other is an excuse. The only hope of a re-build starts with #12 and #34 right? So two guys constitute a team re-building? Or is just that trading anyone else falls under the re-tool category and is therefore useless and futile?

JA: The organization's main issue is the lack of young, elite talent. There's probably not any way they can go about getting that except through the draft, so that'll have to come naturally.

They have a ton of depth, which is a good thing. There's three things they need for next season in my eyes: a top-4 dman, a goaltender who can stop 92% of shots taken against him at even strength and a centreman who can handle tough minutes. You don't need more elite scoring talent if you have a line that can take on tough minutes and give high ground to another line. Maybe try and get Brian Boyle from the Rangers for cheap?

If they're smart about it, they could be in the playoffs next year even.

RP: It occurred to me after Saturday's game that this is the group the team has to go to war with. There's no cavalry coming, barring Sven Baertschi returning down the line like a house of fire. Unless this group finds their consistency, I don't think they can turn it around.

6.) The ROR thing was the right move hockey-wise, but a debacle thanks to a misreading of the CBA. Would you have fired Feaster and company as a result?

RL: Well, I'd have never hired them in the first place and fired them long before this, but yeah, they'd have to go. That was embarrassing on a league-wide level and they dodged a fatal bullet only because Greg Sherman is almost as bad a GM as Feaster. Imagine if it had happened; the comparisons would have been Milburyesque.

BoL: Yes, but not because of the ROR thing alone. O'Reilly is just the final nail in the coffin, as far as I'm concerned. Feaster has been all bravado since taking over for Darryl, but he's never had the tools to back up the talk. Every term we've heard Feaster use ("meritocracy" "intellectual honesty", etc.), they've all been just words and have yet to mean anything.

It's too early to tell if his draft record comes out positive, but he has done nothing earth shattering to improve the team. That's not all his fault, of course, but it's his job, and if he can't do it at the level he's expected to do it at, he's got to go.

VF: Hmmm... No I wouldn't have, but that comes with a caveat. From what we have been told, it was the right move. How do you fire a guy for not knowing that the waiver rule was there? If that's the case then there is a line of people that should also be fired. It's not like Jay was the only ignorant one in this matter. Colorado didn't know about it or else they would have told everyone to get rid of any leverage ROR had. Ryan's agent didn't know about it, and I don't believe for a second that Gillis knew about it, despite what he says.

Now the caveat. IF Feaster knew about the waiver predicament but thought that his interpretation was more valid than the guys that wrote the CBA, then that's just stupid. If he thought he had a good case to present in a court of some manner, then that was a careless risk he should not have been willing to take, and he should be fired.

JA: Yes. The fact that the team has access to the MoU, the NHL Executive's Office and NHL's General Counsel and yet still allowed something like this to happen is a total joke. Did no one realize he had played games in the KHL? Did no one ask about that stuff? I don't buy the "we'd challenge the league" excuse, because if the Flames did, they'd lose and it would be decisive as well as even more embarrassing for the franchise.

So it either comes down to they knew about the clause and were willing to risk the player, cash, picks and dignity against 29 other teams and the actual league or they had no idea about it. Either way, both are colossally moronic and would have resulted in the complete destruction of the team.

RP: I'm not going to judge somebody for not reading a CBA that isn't finished yet. That said, somebody either didn't call the right person at the NHL offices or was given the wrong information. That's not necessarily a fireable offense, but it's pretty ugly.

7.) Do you have faith in this management group to make things better going forward?

RL: Not even a little, at least not with what we believe to be ownership's continued interference in their operations. You can't tell the guys cutting the checks to go screw, but at some point someone has to have the autonomy to say enough is enough. They haven't done it yet, and you get the feeling they're little more than marionettes at times.

BoL: Uh..no. It blows my mind that John Davidson was unemployed this summer, and he ended up in Columbus. The day his contract was terminated, the Flames ownership group should have been on the phone with him immediately, offering him the entire world to come save the Flames. Ken King has his fingers far too deep into this cookie jar, and he needs to have them taken out immediately. The Flames now own the Stamps, Hitmen, and Roughnecks, and he's been promoted to oversee all of them and make sure they keep making money. That's great. He'll be good at that. Remove the "President of the Flames" moniker from your LinkedIn profile and get the right people involved.

Obviously that includes Feaster too, and yeah, I'd can Hartley as well. Change starts at the top. If the Flames do intend to rebuild, they'll need to do it with more competent people in place. You can't improve your team if your decision makers don't know how to do it.

VF: If they can show the fanbase that they have the stones to make the tough decisions, like trading Iginla and Kiprusoff, then yes. If they keep trying to snow the fans with the same crap they spew out every year about blatantly ignored cliches like "Meritocracy" and "Intellectual Honesty", not a chance.

JA: See the above answer. That, plus the constant meddling in Hockey Operations by King, Edwards, etc. are all minuses in my book. The drafting record (aside from the best pick they had last year...) looks good, but until those players start making an impact at the NHL level they've done nothing. Throwing away assets, however small, for nothing players (PL3, McGrattan, Modin, etc.), signing insane contracts (Wideman, Sarich), refusing to divest assets before they depreciated (Kiprusoff, Giordano) and making gaffe after gaffe in the media are all just things that lead me to believe that HOPS don't know what they're doing.

In this situation, if you're going to build the team from the ground up, you get rid of everything you can at all levels.

RP: Going forward? Yes. I've had enough conversations with people around the team, particularly relating to player development and drafting, that I think the team will get some nice pieces coming in going forward. I'm just not sure how long that will take.

39d8109299a9795cb3b41a4e9b49d501
Former Nations Overlord. Current Fn contributor and curmudgeon For questions, complaints, criticisms, etc contact Kent @ kent.wilson@gmail. Follow him on Twitter here.
Avatar
#51 Kevin R
March 12 2013, 03:51PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

I have softened on immediate firing Feaster from that Oreilly firestorm. I dont like the optics but thats all it is right now. I do feel Feaster is being set up to fail.

This team is no where near reflecting a Hartley coached team. I give Hartley a free pass, he's doing the best he can with a lot of marginally conditioned athletes in accordance to his standards. I do think conditioning is having a huge impact on the performance of players we are not used to seeing like this. I do not expect this next year.

I am just at a loss as to what this team is going to do in the next few weeks. I dont think many do. I do believe Feaster does not have a say when it comes to Iggy. If I was Feaster & had some real real attractive offers on the table, I guess I would just let it go as well in frustration. Obviously Iggy isnt interested in signing anything until summer. His last contract extension, if Im correct, he extended almost a year ahead of his contract expiring. I have resolved myself to the fact that Iggy will probably walk away come July. Maybe finally King & Edwards, realizing they screwed themselves, will then let Feaster make true hockey moves with any player personnell & be accountable for the year end performance like most GM's are. The valuable pieces we miss out on will be felt for years as we wander in the desert.

Avatar
#52 RexLibris
March 12 2013, 03:53PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

@Justin Azevedo

Totally agree with your estimation of the realistic expectations for the three prospects listed and the team's current crop of younger players.

Baertschi looks to me like an eventual 2nd line scoring winger. Gaudreau a wild card. He could become Linus Omark or Ray Whitney.

Just for my own interest I did a quick comparison of Jankowksi's performance this year against the only other second-tier-junior to college prospect I could think of, Jujhar Khaira.

The comparison did not favour Jankowski. The two are listed here for Jankowski http://www.eliteprospects.com/player.php?player=146518 and here for Khaira http://www.eliteprospects.com/player.php?player=93577.

Age aside, that is still a fair gap between the two forwards with similar positional background. I hope, for Jankowski's sake, that his progress is positive and continual.

I would disagree somewhat with your earlier assertion that the Flames could ice four scoring lines "if they wanted to". Given that they aren't scoring does this imply that the coaching staff is not deploying the forwards appropriately or that the players are performing below their abilities?

I think the Flames do have decent second line options in Cervenka, Tanguay, Backlund, Glencross, and Stempniak. But I don't buy that this qualifies as outstanding depth. By contrast to their elite players, perhaps, but that is an argument of relative values rather than real cross-league comparisons.

Were they to trade some of those bodies at the deadline they could easily supply two or three teams with the coveted scoring depth GMs love to load up on at the deadline. I would be very surprised if that happened though.

Avatar
#53 Parallex
March 12 2013, 04:12PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

@RexLibris

Why not Kreider? I think Kreider is probably the better comp. Same height, same level pre-draft (HS League), close to the same draft slot, same NCAA conference.

That strikes me as a better comp then a guy drafted out of a different stream (Junior A), in a different round, to a different conference.

Avatar
#54 seve927
March 12 2013, 04:24PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
SeanCharles wrote:

That is true, but its better to be excelling, in some cases dominating (Brossoit, Gilles), than to be playing terrible in their respective leagues... Our prospects that were drafted under Feaster have all trended up since being drafted.

Even Jankowski was ranked 25th in THN re-draft. Originally he was ranked 2nd round right?

And you could say that about any prospect pool. You never KNOW what prospects are going to be. That's why they're prospects. And there can be little doubt that they are better prospects than we've had previously. Not one of the better pools in the league, but better than we've had.

Avatar
#55 Parallex
March 12 2013, 04:26PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
Justin Azevedo wrote:

regarding the prospects thing: I'm not a big fan of the "he's better than the last guy" because there's a reason the last guy isn't a gm anymore. compare him to other current nhl gms.

@Sean

while it is all well and good that those prospects are excelling in their current leagues many a player has done that and not made the nhl.

the prospect pool looks better, but that doesn't mean it will be better.

Alright... if you're going to make that assertation then put the work in and compare him to other GM's then. Go get the NHLE's & some scouting evaluations (for D-men and goalies since just translating point production doesn't work as well with those guys) for all the other GM's selected players over the last two drafts (The Feaster Drafts) and demonstrate that he's done a bad job. If I were the wagering sort I'd bet he probably comes out as average or above.

Regardless, if you're going to try and tar him for not improving the Flames future prospects then the standard he's being held to IS the last guy... because that's what he has to improve from.

Truthfully, I'm kind of confused... you indict Feaster for not improving the Flames future prospects but now say that the prospect pool looks better? That strikes me as cognitive dissonance. I don't see how those two positions can be simultaniously held.

Avatar
#56 Parallex
March 12 2013, 04:47PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
suba steve wrote:

I hear you, on the Feaster hate. Many "don't trust" him to conduct any kind of rebuild saying he's not a hockey guy. However, the same folks trusted D Sutter (a hockey guy), and look at where he lead the team.

My thought is...Sutter as a hockey guy and an introverted know it all A-hole took advice from no one, and that lead to a few bad moves (really bad).

Feaster, as a "non hockey guy" is always going to bounce hockey moves off of his trusted hockey advisors (whomever they may be). As long as those advisors know the hockey end, I'm comfortable that Feaster and co. can do the job, as more then one opinion will be considered on player moves. That does not mean he will never make a mistake (Sarich, Babs re-signing), but hopefully those he does make have minimal impact (no Dion/Olli type trades).

To be honest I think entrusting the COO position in a company valued in the hundreds of millions of dollars to a "hockey guy" like Sutter is probably a bad idea. Most former players have little education to speak of, no specific business education, & no business background.

I know someone who grew up in Viking, about the same age as the Sutter brothers, knew all the Sutter boys... her exact words: "Not the brightest bulbs in the room".

Avatar
#57 chillout
March 12 2013, 04:51PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

For those ripping on Jankowski give the kid a break he's grown over a foot in the last two years and hasn't filled out his frame at all. Comparing him to more physically developed players is just silly. He's a rack of bones give him a chance to grow into his late blooming body and get some strength. Then when he's physically mature you can start making comparisons.

Avatar
#58 the-wolf
March 12 2013, 04:57PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

When you've got 2 owners, the GM and the Pres in the room after a game (outside of a Cup celebration) you know the team is a complete and total gong show.

KK and Edwards and evryone else not named 'Coach' need to get the hell out of there, I don't care if they're writing the checks.

What I don't get is why the MSM haven't reported this earlier? But read SC's column in the Herald. Yep, CAlgary is going to be Montrela alright. Idiot.

Edwards is the real problem when you get right to the very heart of it. Everything flows from him. But how do you fire an owner?

All we can do is hope he wakes up one morning and realizes what an idiot he really is, stays the hell away from the room, fires KK and Feaster and finds real hockey people to employ.

Not hiring JD was the worst move this org never made. But JD would want to run things his way and OH NO!!!....CAN'T HAVE THAT!!!

Trade Iginla, Tanguay, Cammi, JBo and Gio.

Avatar
#59 Slowmo
March 12 2013, 05:00PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

This is just to repetitive for me we all know that the flames management are not a competent group. IMO Grabbing Jankowski in the first round was just crazy especially when there were more capable picks out there ready to play in the next yr or 2 at most. To pick a player that is not going to be ready for AHL never mind NHL for yrs to come perhaps 5 yrs before he wears an NHL jersey if he makes it that far. As far as ROR goes that I believe is on Owner ship as You say KK has his fingers all the way in which tells me Owner ship makes the final decision. Guess you can't fire owner ship so we as flames fans are screwed

Avatar
#60 RexLibris
March 12 2013, 05:03PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
Parallex wrote:

Why not Kreider? I think Kreider is probably the better comp. Same height, same level pre-draft (HS League), close to the same draft slot, same NCAA conference.

That strikes me as a better comp then a guy drafted out of a different stream (Junior A), in a different round, to a different conference.

Kreider may be a good comparable, but I wasn't immediately familiar with his draft background.

So then, based on his numbers, Kreider's first year NCAA numbers are about 0.05 ahead of Jankowski's pace.

Good call on Kreider.

I suspect that Jankowski may need longer than three years (as in Kreider's case) to fully mature. I hope Feaster's eventual successor is patient with him.

Avatar
#61 Chris Fairfield
March 12 2013, 05:25PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

Colin Dambrauskas wrote:

The Calgary Flames lost again in L.A. last night against the defending Stanley Cup champs. Though the loss wasn’t as bad as Saturday night it’s in no way a positive, and coming home after a 0-3 road trip, it’s time to make some drastic changes in Calgary.

The bottom line is Calgary hasn’t played a full three periods of hockey in a long time and last night was no exception. They were invisible throughout the 1st period, OK in 2nd , and though it was refreshing to watch them play a 3rd period, their attempted comeback was without merit.

Fans were a little shocked to see MacDonald in net and despite a good showing from the backup tender, his team would ultimately let him down. Though one positive was Backlund’s individual effort and goal to cut the lead to one, but it wouldn’t matter because Brown would score on the empty net to put the game away.

When the Flames are down they must score on power plays, it changes the entire pace of the game and shifts momentum in their direction. They have failed to gain any momentum what so ever this season. In fact, just when we think they might get rolling, they fall further back. There is a major disconnect in Calgary, and it manifests in games making the Flames players look lazy and unmotivated.

On their three game road trip, Calgary only managed to score 3 goals and allowed 13 against. Based on this stat alone, I’d say it’s time to into plan B for this season. There are loyal fans who will object to trading the franchise players Iginla and Kipursoff, but it’s time to realize that it’s become a mutually futile relationship. Iginla’s career is starting to echo that of Mats Sundin. The longer he hangs on in Calgary, the less chance he has at a cup, and the less chance the Flames have at acquiring needed assets.

It doesn’t matter if players are putting the game behind them, or working on conditioning, they can’t win with their current roster and worse, they can barely compete. The Flames are in dead last in the West. TSN went so far as to grad the Flames a D+ so far this season. It’s time to change.

With that being said, there has been some discussion on Twitter over the last few days that there might be mutual interest between the Flames and the Blues with respect to trades. While this is mere speculation at this point, the names being mentioned are Bouwmeester & Stempniak from Calgary and Stewart & Cole from the Blues. Not sure if the two teams can agree to terms on a deal anytime soon, but this could be a solid framework at the very least.

Stewart is the center piece for the Flames in this deal, as he is still a young player who can play at both ends of the nice and offers a gritty game; something the Flames lack. What he doesn’t offer, however, is help up the middle given he plays on the wing. The Flames will certainly be looking to acquire players similar to Stewart; still young and have not necessarily broken out at the NHL level.

Calgary has several older assets to move if they do decide to retool, but the question remains how soon does Feaster pull the trigger? Feaster has admittedly come out and said that he is aware of the current situation with respect to his team and their current trend, but some convincing of owners may be required before anything big happens.

I wrote:

Getting Chris Stewart would be a huge bonus, but would Ian Cole be able to play consistent J-Bo type minutes? While it is nice to speculate about the possibility, there is no way that the Blues part with Stewart or a young defenseman.

Avatar
#62 Justin Azevedo
March 12 2013, 05:30PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

@Parallex

I separate the two: the team's future doesn't necessarily mean the prospect pool's future.

Avatar
#63 aloudoun
March 12 2013, 05:57PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

Stewart and Cole for Jbo and Stemps makes me want to throw up. We need a center.

Also I would say that Hartley has been a huge disappointment for me. His lines and roster choices are very questionable (sometimes downright stupid).

Avatar
#64 negrilcowboy
March 12 2013, 06:31PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

Firstly, great article guys. Realy enjoyable and insightful, secondly the comment thread is amazing. In complete sincerity I think there are some brilliant hockey minds here. Perhaps the Flames braintrust should read this site.

Feaster and his underlings need a big dose of INTELLECTUAL HONESTY, this is far from a playoff calibre team, with prospects how may be several years out.

Personally, I would have fired Feaster on draft day, simply for selecting a project player in Jankowski, beginning to think the selection was more the uncle not the kid.

Avatar
#65 jeremywilhelm
March 12 2013, 06:43PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
Chris Fairfield wrote:

Colin Dambrauskas wrote:

The Calgary Flames lost again in L.A. last night against the defending Stanley Cup champs. Though the loss wasn’t as bad as Saturday night it’s in no way a positive, and coming home after a 0-3 road trip, it’s time to make some drastic changes in Calgary.

The bottom line is Calgary hasn’t played a full three periods of hockey in a long time and last night was no exception. They were invisible throughout the 1st period, OK in 2nd , and though it was refreshing to watch them play a 3rd period, their attempted comeback was without merit.

Fans were a little shocked to see MacDonald in net and despite a good showing from the backup tender, his team would ultimately let him down. Though one positive was Backlund’s individual effort and goal to cut the lead to one, but it wouldn’t matter because Brown would score on the empty net to put the game away.

When the Flames are down they must score on power plays, it changes the entire pace of the game and shifts momentum in their direction. They have failed to gain any momentum what so ever this season. In fact, just when we think they might get rolling, they fall further back. There is a major disconnect in Calgary, and it manifests in games making the Flames players look lazy and unmotivated.

On their three game road trip, Calgary only managed to score 3 goals and allowed 13 against. Based on this stat alone, I’d say it’s time to into plan B for this season. There are loyal fans who will object to trading the franchise players Iginla and Kipursoff, but it’s time to realize that it’s become a mutually futile relationship. Iginla’s career is starting to echo that of Mats Sundin. The longer he hangs on in Calgary, the less chance he has at a cup, and the less chance the Flames have at acquiring needed assets.

It doesn’t matter if players are putting the game behind them, or working on conditioning, they can’t win with their current roster and worse, they can barely compete. The Flames are in dead last in the West. TSN went so far as to grad the Flames a D+ so far this season. It’s time to change.

With that being said, there has been some discussion on Twitter over the last few days that there might be mutual interest between the Flames and the Blues with respect to trades. While this is mere speculation at this point, the names being mentioned are Bouwmeester & Stempniak from Calgary and Stewart & Cole from the Blues. Not sure if the two teams can agree to terms on a deal anytime soon, but this could be a solid framework at the very least.

Stewart is the center piece for the Flames in this deal, as he is still a young player who can play at both ends of the nice and offers a gritty game; something the Flames lack. What he doesn’t offer, however, is help up the middle given he plays on the wing. The Flames will certainly be looking to acquire players similar to Stewart; still young and have not necessarily broken out at the NHL level.

Calgary has several older assets to move if they do decide to retool, but the question remains how soon does Feaster pull the trigger? Feaster has admittedly come out and said that he is aware of the current situation with respect to his team and their current trend, but some convincing of owners may be required before anything big happens.

I wrote:

Getting Chris Stewart would be a huge bonus, but would Ian Cole be able to play consistent J-Bo type minutes? While it is nice to speculate about the possibility, there is no way that the Blues part with Stewart or a young defenseman.

This would be the dumbest trade I have ever seen. Dumber than the Phaneuf trade.

Avatar
#66 Chris Fairfield
March 12 2013, 07:24PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
Kevin R wrote:

I have softened on immediate firing Feaster from that Oreilly firestorm. I dont like the optics but thats all it is right now. I do feel Feaster is being set up to fail.

This team is no where near reflecting a Hartley coached team. I give Hartley a free pass, he's doing the best he can with a lot of marginally conditioned athletes in accordance to his standards. I do think conditioning is having a huge impact on the performance of players we are not used to seeing like this. I do not expect this next year.

I am just at a loss as to what this team is going to do in the next few weeks. I dont think many do. I do believe Feaster does not have a say when it comes to Iggy. If I was Feaster & had some real real attractive offers on the table, I guess I would just let it go as well in frustration. Obviously Iggy isnt interested in signing anything until summer. His last contract extension, if Im correct, he extended almost a year ahead of his contract expiring. I have resolved myself to the fact that Iggy will probably walk away come July. Maybe finally King & Edwards, realizing they screwed themselves, will then let Feaster make true hockey moves with any player personnell & be accountable for the year end performance like most GM's are. The valuable pieces we miss out on will be felt for years as we wander in the desert.

It's too frustrating to take and frustrating is not even a strong enough word. I thought for sure that after last night's loss and the disaster of a road trip, that something would have been done with the off day, maybe even something that "has been in the works" ( a la Feaster), but nothing. Last in the west, 26th overall, isn't crappy enough, let's stand pat and not do anything to see how much worse this can actually get.

Avatar
#67 negrilcowboy
March 12 2013, 07:26PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

@jeremywilhelm

who would you move and what are the returns?

Avatar
#68 backburner
March 12 2013, 07:33PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
chillout wrote:

For those ripping on Jankowski give the kid a break he's grown over a foot in the last two years and hasn't filled out his frame at all. Comparing him to more physically developed players is just silly. He's a rack of bones give him a chance to grow into his late blooming body and get some strength. Then when he's physically mature you can start making comparisons.

Totally agree... he looks like a stick on skates. I don't know much about Jankowski, but from what I have seen, he has shown flashes of elite talent. He's also just fresh out of high school, I think it will take a couple years before we can get a good comparison. I think he's at the right level developmentally, and the coaches will be working with him to get stronger..

Avatar
#69 Justin Azevedo
March 12 2013, 07:36PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
jeremywilhelm wrote:

This would be the dumbest trade I have ever seen. Dumber than the Phaneuf trade.

plus one here for jw

bouwmeester is the best player on the team. to trade him and not everyone else would be insane.

Avatar
#70 Franko J
March 12 2013, 07:38PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

Halfway point in this season is going exactly the same as the past 3 or so seasons. Different coach, but the same lack of on-ice execution and determination. The only real difference is this season we have a little more skill, but have no grit or I like to call it "sandpaper" to our game.

Our D is very soft and nobody and I mean nobody in the league has any fear of playing this team. What I find most interesting is most teams we have played this year they have no problem starting their backup goalie. I don't know statistically but I haven't seen a season whereby the Flames have faced more teams backup goalies than this season.

While Kiprusoff has carried this team for so long, the irony in a shortened season he has performed far below expectations. While I'm by no means a hockey GM, I would avoid trading for him. To me trading for Kipper at this point in time is only comparable picking up Depietro off waivers from Islanders. I seriously don't think he can carry a team through the playoffs anymore.

As for the second half, I would like see if Backlund can shake the injury bug and show that he along Brodie and Baertschi are this teams real future and start drafting and developing players who can mesh and build upon with them.

The Flames future appears to be a slow, tedius and very daunting task at the very least. They are at the bottom as of right now and with some wise trades, good and lucky draft picks and proper player development there is only one way to go.

Avatar
#71 backburner
March 12 2013, 07:38PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
Chris Fairfield wrote:

Colin Dambrauskas wrote:

The Calgary Flames lost again in L.A. last night against the defending Stanley Cup champs. Though the loss wasn’t as bad as Saturday night it’s in no way a positive, and coming home after a 0-3 road trip, it’s time to make some drastic changes in Calgary.

The bottom line is Calgary hasn’t played a full three periods of hockey in a long time and last night was no exception. They were invisible throughout the 1st period, OK in 2nd , and though it was refreshing to watch them play a 3rd period, their attempted comeback was without merit.

Fans were a little shocked to see MacDonald in net and despite a good showing from the backup tender, his team would ultimately let him down. Though one positive was Backlund’s individual effort and goal to cut the lead to one, but it wouldn’t matter because Brown would score on the empty net to put the game away.

When the Flames are down they must score on power plays, it changes the entire pace of the game and shifts momentum in their direction. They have failed to gain any momentum what so ever this season. In fact, just when we think they might get rolling, they fall further back. There is a major disconnect in Calgary, and it manifests in games making the Flames players look lazy and unmotivated.

On their three game road trip, Calgary only managed to score 3 goals and allowed 13 against. Based on this stat alone, I’d say it’s time to into plan B for this season. There are loyal fans who will object to trading the franchise players Iginla and Kipursoff, but it’s time to realize that it’s become a mutually futile relationship. Iginla’s career is starting to echo that of Mats Sundin. The longer he hangs on in Calgary, the less chance he has at a cup, and the less chance the Flames have at acquiring needed assets.

It doesn’t matter if players are putting the game behind them, or working on conditioning, they can’t win with their current roster and worse, they can barely compete. The Flames are in dead last in the West. TSN went so far as to grad the Flames a D+ so far this season. It’s time to change.

With that being said, there has been some discussion on Twitter over the last few days that there might be mutual interest between the Flames and the Blues with respect to trades. While this is mere speculation at this point, the names being mentioned are Bouwmeester & Stempniak from Calgary and Stewart & Cole from the Blues. Not sure if the two teams can agree to terms on a deal anytime soon, but this could be a solid framework at the very least.

Stewart is the center piece for the Flames in this deal, as he is still a young player who can play at both ends of the nice and offers a gritty game; something the Flames lack. What he doesn’t offer, however, is help up the middle given he plays on the wing. The Flames will certainly be looking to acquire players similar to Stewart; still young and have not necessarily broken out at the NHL level.

Calgary has several older assets to move if they do decide to retool, but the question remains how soon does Feaster pull the trigger? Feaster has admittedly come out and said that he is aware of the current situation with respect to his team and their current trend, but some convincing of owners may be required before anything big happens.

I wrote:

Getting Chris Stewart would be a huge bonus, but would Ian Cole be able to play consistent J-Bo type minutes? While it is nice to speculate about the possibility, there is no way that the Blues part with Stewart or a young defenseman.

Any deal the Flames make with the Blues is going to involve Rattie or Schwartz as the center piece.

Avatar
#72 schevvy
March 12 2013, 09:07PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

28th in the league now. Would leave them most likely a 3rd overall pick, which could very well end up being Drouin or MacKinnon. I will never cheer for them to lose, but this is certainly not a terrible scenario. Get a couple of 1st round picks at the deadline/draft, and that could go a long way to rebuilding the team.

The fact is, it would take an incredible amount of luck to get to 8th, and if they somehow got there, they'd probably lose in 5-6 games. In a funny way looking back at it the 2004 run kind of set the team up for failure. During that run they got hot, and expectations got raised. But the fact was, the team still wasn't great. It masked what the team really needed, and still do: good young talent. In Sutter's defence he tried to improve it, but not in the proper way (the Draft).

Sad days right now for Flames fans.

Avatar
#73 mattyc
March 12 2013, 09:18PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
Justin Azevedo wrote:

plus one here for jw

bouwmeester is the best player on the team. to trade him and not everyone else would be insane.

Only way I'd get rid of Bouwmeester is if a young top center is coming in.

Avatar
#74 schevvy
March 12 2013, 09:25PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
mattyc wrote:

Only way I'd get rid of Bouwmeester is if a young top center is coming in.

I agree, but the problem is I don't think they can get a top one for him. Realistically they might get a middle tier prospect and a 1st/2nd for him. I guess it's up to them if they think it's worth it to trade him then. If a middle tier prospect and a 2nd is all I can get, I'd keep him.

Avatar
#75 Jonathan Happy
March 12 2013, 09:35PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

You might be able to pry B.Schenn out of Philly if you offer up Bouwmeester. Philly needs blueline help and they should be a legit playoff contender, not a bubble team like they are now.

Avatar
#76 T&A4Flames
March 12 2013, 09:53PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
Jonathan Happy wrote:

You might be able to pry B.Schenn out of Philly if you offer up Bouwmeester. Philly needs blueline help and they should be a legit playoff contender, not a bubble team like they are now.

I sure would like Philly's 1st; it could be a lottery pick.

How about Jbo, Stempniak and Byron for the Schenns and their 1st?

Avatar
#77 schevvy
March 12 2013, 09:59PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
T&A4Flames wrote:

I sure would like Philly's 1st; it could be a lottery pick.

How about Jbo, Stempniak and Byron for the Schenns and their 1st?

No. Luke Schenn is a younger version of Sarich. I'd prefer the deal if it was only for B. Schenn and the 1st. I guess it depends on L. Schenn's contract. I assume the Flames will have to take back salary, so they might have to take him in that case. But if they don't need to take him, don't take him.

Avatar
#78 Vintage Flame
March 12 2013, 10:02PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

@T&A4Flames

I wouldn't have traded Phaneuf for Luke Schenn. I certainly would not be prepared to give up JBo for him.

Avatar
#79 schevvy
March 12 2013, 10:13PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

Looking at Luke Schenn's contract, absolutely no. Signed at 3.35M until at least 2015/16, according to NHL numbers. So yeah, no, especially when he's another Sarich.

Avatar
#80 T&A4Flames
March 12 2013, 10:14PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
schevvy wrote:

No. Luke Schenn is a younger version of Sarich. I'd prefer the deal if it was only for B. Schenn and the 1st. I guess it depends on L. Schenn's contract. I assume the Flames will have to take back salary, so they might have to take him in that case. But if they don't need to take him, don't take him.

They'll need to take him. If it gets us Brayden and a possible lottery pick, I take him. You may still be able to move him later.

Avatar
#81 Bean-counting cowboy
March 12 2013, 10:20PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

Here's what I think. Go after some Portland Winterhawks players as they have been in a winning environment and have played with eachother.

Iggy to Pittsburg for Pouliot & 2013 1st

Bouwmeester to NYI for Neidereiter (wants out) and 2013 1st (and perhaps some salary back our way) (NY needs to make playoffs)

Kipper to St. Louis for Elliot & Rattie

We suck the rest of the year and take Jones with our pick in the draft.

Baertschi/Neidereiter/Rattie for forwards

Jones/T-spoon/Pouliot for defense.

Let them tear up the A next year, get their confidence up and then 2 years from now, BOOM - competitive again

Avatar
#82 mattyc
March 12 2013, 10:29PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

@schevvy

Agreed. Unless it was a blue chip center it makes the flames a bunch worse off. Bouwmeester is probably the least replaceable player on the team imo.

Avatar
#83 Danglesnipecelly
March 12 2013, 10:31PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
chillout wrote:

For those ripping on Jankowski give the kid a break he's grown over a foot in the last two years and hasn't filled out his frame at all. Comparing him to more physically developed players is just silly. He's a rack of bones give him a chance to grow into his late blooming body and get some strength. Then when he's physically mature you can start making comparisons.

A co-worker of mine out east knows Janko's dad and says he's a mountain of a man... Fists like Xmas hams. Here's hoping... Like father like son! Give him some time, he's just a kid!!

Avatar
#84 suba steve
March 12 2013, 10:34PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

@Bean-counting cowboy

We have all been whining how tough it is to get a stud C, so if given the choice, isn't it wise to take one with this (potential) lotto pick? EDM should look at taking Jones if they get the chance, Calgary NEEDS a high skill C and should take the best one available with their first.

Avatar
#85 mattyc
March 12 2013, 10:36PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

Other thing i think is worth mentioning is that the traditional 'rental' trade is dead. A lot of these players won't be replaceable in the offseason because so few quality players make it to free agency. So if we dump a whole bunch of depth this spring, it probably means a tough go of it next year...

Avatar
#86 Bean-counting cowboy
March 12 2013, 10:50PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
suba steve wrote:

We have all been whining how tough it is to get a stud C, so if given the choice, isn't it wise to take one with this (potential) lotto pick? EDM should look at taking Jones if they get the chance, Calgary NEEDS a high skill C and should take the best one available with their first.

But he's not a Winterhawk :(

..... :)

Avatar
#87 Kurt
March 12 2013, 11:37PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
Bean-counting cowboy wrote:

Here's what I think. Go after some Portland Winterhawks players as they have been in a winning environment and have played with eachother.

Iggy to Pittsburg for Pouliot & 2013 1st

Bouwmeester to NYI for Neidereiter (wants out) and 2013 1st (and perhaps some salary back our way) (NY needs to make playoffs)

Kipper to St. Louis for Elliot & Rattie

We suck the rest of the year and take Jones with our pick in the draft.

Baertschi/Neidereiter/Rattie for forwards

Jones/T-spoon/Pouliot for defense.

Let them tear up the A next year, get their confidence up and then 2 years from now, BOOM - competitive again

Phillis first rounder AND Pouliot. Good luck.. Keep dreaming. If iggy gets a 1st rounder and prospect, that prospect will be a flyer not a top 10 pick from last year. WAAAAY overvaluing rental Iggy.

Avatar
#88 Kevin R
March 13 2013, 12:10AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
Jonathan Happy wrote:

You might be able to pry B.Schenn out of Philly if you offer up Bouwmeester. Philly needs blueline help and they should be a legit playoff contender, not a bubble team like they are now.

I thought maybe Couturier could be had for JBO in the deal as he's found himself on the 3rd line & his numbers arent overwhelming from a points & +- point of view. We would have to take some salary back to make that work for Philly.

Avatar
#89 Mack
March 13 2013, 02:05AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

I have heard Couturier may be available from PHI if we are planning a trade with them he may be a good guy to go after big and YES HE PLAYS C!!! thoughts?

Avatar
#90 Kurt
March 13 2013, 08:30AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
Mack wrote:

I have heard Couturier may be available from PHI if we are planning a trade with them he may be a good guy to go after big and YES HE PLAYS C!!! thoughts?

Couturier would be awesome! I just doubt we have assets to get it done... When was the last time an elite prospect with that pedigree was traded? Especially a C. I think it would take moving an elite prospect back (we have none) or our 1st rounder (terrible idea). But if feaster could pull off getting a young kid like Couturier for any combination of any vet that would be a nice step towards rebuilding a new young core.

Avatar
#91 suba steve
March 13 2013, 08:36AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
Mack wrote:

I have heard Couturier may be available from PHI if we are planning a trade with them he may be a good guy to go after big and YES HE PLAYS C!!! thoughts?

PHI is in a tough position to make the playoffs. I would think if they are desperate enough to move Couturier, they would do it sooner, rather then later. And yes, you're gonna see all kinds of support (on FlamesNation) for a trade like JBo for Couturier, it just makes sense.

Avatar
#92 Kurt
March 13 2013, 09:35AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
suba steve wrote:

PHI is in a tough position to make the playoffs. I would think if they are desperate enough to move Couturier, they would do it sooner, rather then later. And yes, you're gonna see all kinds of support (on FlamesNation) for a trade like JBo for Couturier, it just makes sense.

Support from Flames fans yes. Of course. But I just think its wishful thinking. Teams don't give up on 20yr old elite C prospects.

I get it that we are starved for some elite young prospects. So as fans we are dreaming up ways to get them. I still believe the ONLY way to do it, is to draft them. I suppose LA traded Brayden Schenn, but Mike Richards was 26 and a bigger bargaining chip than any Flame.

We just don't have the assets to trade for a prospect. Unless we pull a Brian Burke and trade away our 1st round picks. And we all know how that worked for Toronto (see Tyler Seguin & Douggie Hamilton).

I hope Feaster can prove me wrong, but I think as fans we are setting ourselves up for disappointment if we think Iggy or anyone is going to get us any elite prospects, especially 20 year old C with the pedigree of Couturier. If we want a guy like that, we are going to need to draft him ourselves and quit trying to shortcut the process.

The thing is, that once we trade Iggy & Jbo & others for prospects/picks we are going to be a really bad team for a few years. Make no mistake about it.... So whats the rush? Why not trade them for 1st round draft picks and do this thing properly.

People need to get over the idea of being good next year. Or even the year after. Burke tried for 5 years to shortcut the rebuild in Toronto. It still took 5 years and now they are just OK instead of loaded up with sick talent (see Oilers).

Avatar
#93 Kevin R
March 13 2013, 10:19AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
Kurt wrote:

Support from Flames fans yes. Of course. But I just think its wishful thinking. Teams don't give up on 20yr old elite C prospects.

I get it that we are starved for some elite young prospects. So as fans we are dreaming up ways to get them. I still believe the ONLY way to do it, is to draft them. I suppose LA traded Brayden Schenn, but Mike Richards was 26 and a bigger bargaining chip than any Flame.

We just don't have the assets to trade for a prospect. Unless we pull a Brian Burke and trade away our 1st round picks. And we all know how that worked for Toronto (see Tyler Seguin & Douggie Hamilton).

I hope Feaster can prove me wrong, but I think as fans we are setting ourselves up for disappointment if we think Iggy or anyone is going to get us any elite prospects, especially 20 year old C with the pedigree of Couturier. If we want a guy like that, we are going to need to draft him ourselves and quit trying to shortcut the process.

The thing is, that once we trade Iggy & Jbo & others for prospects/picks we are going to be a really bad team for a few years. Make no mistake about it.... So whats the rush? Why not trade them for 1st round draft picks and do this thing properly.

People need to get over the idea of being good next year. Or even the year after. Burke tried for 5 years to shortcut the rebuild in Toronto. It still took 5 years and now they are just OK instead of loaded up with sick talent (see Oilers).

Well Philly are pretty set for Centre. They have Giroux & Brayden Schenn who arent going anywhere. They have Timmonen who is like 37 or 38 as their top dman on the PP. They need a big name dman & JBO fits the billing, especially the way he has been playing as of late. The thing is Philly has got their nuts against the cap & if we took back some salary, they have some dman in the AHL burning 2.5 mill of cap space this year & we take back 2.0mill of JBOs, there could be a fit. & Holmgren is one guy with the balls to do something like that if he thinks that is what it would take to help his team.

Avatar
#94 the-wolf
March 13 2013, 11:38AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

I've heard the Couturier rumor as well. Hard to believe on on ehand, but I could see it for JBo.

Avatar
#95 Kevin R
March 13 2013, 11:53AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
the-wolf wrote:

I've heard the Couturier rumor as well. Hard to believe on on ehand, but I could see it for JBo.

Well quite truthfully, I would rather give up JBO & Irving & eat some of his salary or take back a short term crap contract for Couturier than give away our 1st & 3rd for ROR.

Comments are closed for this article.