Kipper Won't Go and The Flames Heart

Kent Wilson
March 27 2013 10:10AM

Amidst the on-going Iginla melodrama, Nick Kypreos reported last night that Miikka Kiprusoff has told Flames management he won't report to any other team if he's traded at the deadline. Kipper's NTC ran out last summer, but with only one season remaining on his current deal (at $1.5 million in real dollars) Kiprusoff can now play the "I'll just retire if you force me to do anything " card.

Personally, I didn't think the time was right for dealing Kipper anyways. Although there's a non-trivial chance he might take his ball and go home in the summer anyways, the truth is his value has never been lower on the trade market. Kipper's numbers are league and career worst this year, he's almost 37 years old and probably the only residual value he has for a team going into the playoffs is his reputation as a great goalie. 

To be clear, I don't think Kipper is *this bad* in reality, but recent results always count for a lot when you're trying to move somebody. The age thing is just an added layer of risk for a trade partner, to say nothing of another year with a $5.83M cap hit if he chooses to play.

Meaning the return for Kipper right now is likely to be nominal anyways. Pragmatically it would serve the team to try to leverage one of their key pieces from th last decade before he walks into the sunset, of course, but then the club should have tried shopping him a few years ago. For now, Kipper holds all the cards - the final year of his deal in trivial in real dollars relative to his career earnings and he's willing to stick a knife in his final season if circumstances don't suit him.

I'm not sure if I can blame Kiprusoff for this maneuver. On one hand, he's a pro athlete who is compensated millions of dollars and being traded is one of the risks of the job. On the other hand, his priorities at 37 years old have clearly shifted towards other things in life (read: family), so he's using what leverage he has left to ensure those priorities are served.

It's possible Kipper returns for his last year and then accepts a trade at the next deadline (or declines a trade for a second time), but if anyone pushed me, I'd bet on him retiring to Finland in the summer.

Flames Have No Heart!

This is a comment lament in Flamesland these days. Actually, if you tour around other team's messageboards, it's common with pretty much every losing team's fanbase.

Calgary has been legitimately bad recently, to be sure. Very good teams like Chicago and St. Louis have drastically outplayed them. Even Nashville and Phoenix have proven to be overbearing in the last few weeks. It's galling and frustrating and there's a chance the players have indeed accepted the inevitable in the dressing room and are simply playing out the string. 

That said, I almost always reject this line of thinking: specifically that if the team cared more (or had more leadership, will to win, etc) they'd be meaningfully better. First, because we can't possibly know what the true motivations or passion level is of the players in the dressing room. Secondly, because this is a common psychological bias called the error of attribution, which causes people to assume failure in others is due to personal faults rather than situational or circumstantial issues. Thirdly, because if caring a lot predicted success, it would negate the importance of skill (which is clearly doesn't).

Finally, and perhaps most importantly in my view, psychologizing losses and and making it about some kind of character failure (be it acute or chronic) means you stop looking for answers. Let's put it another way: mistakes can be as vital as successes in that they contain information about how to do things right, assuming one can tease apart cause and effect. The problem with thinking that "the Flames could be better if they wanted to be" is that it stops the player and team evaluation process in its tracks. Calgary is good - would be good - if the players wanted to be.

Which is fine, I guess, if it's true and the roster has a congenital case of not giving a crap. I would argue, however, that the collected players just aren't good enough to contend in the league as assembled and that fans and management are better served trying to understand where things have gone wrong.

Other Stuff

- Prospect buff and Bruins writer Kirk Luedeke argues that the Bruins should acquire the Iginla.

- New sponsor WebSim Hockey offered us 12 free subscriptions for Nations Readers. When he revealed that on Monday, they promptly received almost 40 emails looking to claim them. Instead of turning people away, they simply handed out free subscriptions to everyone. Nice!

- Apparently former Flames head coach Mike Keenan was on TV today and said that Kipper and the team "had an understanding" that he would retire for the final season of his contract when it was signed way back when. Matt Fenwick noted this in response on twitter today:

 Meaning, of course, the league could conceivably punish the organization if Kipper actually retires this off-season, assuming they believe Keenan and would be motivated to pursue the issue. Ugh.

- Finally, as noted in the FGD post from yesterday, FN will be at Tilted Kilt on Monday, April 1 to watch the Flames take on the Edmonton Oilers. Of course, if Iginla is still on the team at that point, it could be his final game in Flames colors.

So come out, maybe win a free jersey or a free beer, and hope Iginla can help Calgary beat Edmonton one last time.

39d8109299a9795cb3b41a4e9b49d501
Former Nations Overlord. Current FN contributor and curmudgeon For questions, complaints, criticisms, etc contact Kent @ kent.wilson@gmail. Follow him on Twitter here.
Avatar
#1 suba steve
March 27 2013, 02:21PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
4
props

Kipper, you have my endorsement, do whatever works best for you and your family. You have earned it. Thanks for the best years of your professional life, you were spectacular. If you choose to return next year I will be happy to have you. Hope all is well with your family.

Those with differing opinions, please reassess your priorities.

Avatar
#2 icedawg_42
March 27 2013, 11:47AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
2
props
Petemaherrocks wrote:

It must be real easy to make a ton of dough in the oil business , if Murray Edwards runs his other companies the same way ...HOLY S@#+

Just guessing, but he probably doesn't tell his tool pushes how to do their job. He shouldn't be trying to run anything to do with hockey. He needs to BACK off.

Avatar
#3 RexLibris
March 27 2013, 01:28PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
2
props

I had posted in the GDT last night that, from my perspective, Kiprusoff has earned the right to make this call for himself and his family. Any anger or resentment, while understandable, should be directed at management for mishandling him as an asset.

Avatar
#4 icedawg_42
March 27 2013, 10:19AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
1
props

Keenan's full of sh!t. Everyone can surmise that Kipper will retire just because of the circumstances - final year of his contract, already made all his money, numbers are down, getting injured. The writing's on the wall. Keenan's acting like smut reporter from the Enquirer and sensationalizing a story to further whatever motives are swimming around his little mind. Anywhoo - the NHL is still left with the burden of proof I would imagine.

As far as "heart" on the team - I believe there's a difference between wanting and trying to win a game, and putting EVERYTHING out there and not accepting defeat. Of course they want to win, and of course they try to win every game, but there's another level when you're truly invested. HOWEVER - I DO definitely question the 'heart' of anyone who repeatedly watches their goalie get run. That's code. You protect your goalie. Maybe those days are in the past.

Avatar
#5 sincity1976
March 27 2013, 10:21AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
1
props

The biggest issue is that he Flames have allowed it to come to this. We are near last place, about to lose our two franchise players for very little, and get to deal with drama all season long (O'Reilly, Kipper, Iginla, Cap Circumvention, etc)

I don't like what Kipper is doing. It is clearly manipulation of the system to avoid being moved. He has earned millions from that contract. Time to honor the rest. Why ruin your legacy now?

Season has been a nightmare. Way to avoid becoming the Oiler's Feaster et all.

As we have all (mostly) said. The path to becoming the Oilers wasn't to rebuild. It was to wait until the bottom fell out.

Where there goes the bottom. And here comes a half decade or more of misery. Hooray us.

Avatar
#6 backburner
March 27 2013, 10:37AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
1
props

The only way this situation with Kipper makes any sense is if he plans on retiring in the summer..

I have my doubts though that he would turn down the chance at a Stanley Cup run with another team at this stage in his career.. If Kipper did say that, I would play Taylor for the rest of the year to get some experience and bench Kipper for the rest of the year..

Avatar
#7 mcculb
March 27 2013, 10:57AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
1
props

I agree with backburner. If Kipper is done and going home in a month, where is the gain in playing him anymore? It is like giving 2 weeks notice. Once you have given notice, all you do is have coffee with everyone before you move on. Make sense to have him mentor Taylor (or prospects) while still here. But of course our GM won't do that. Kipper should have been moved 3 years ago or at last years deadline at the very least. Brutal management. Absolutely unacceptable. Going nowhere until the root of the problem is fixed. Iggy trade better be good, or the paying fan base will attempt to siege the castle.

Avatar
#8 the-wolf
March 27 2013, 11:00AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
1
props

re: Heart - Flames are a terrible team and have been for decades. That said, I still attribute a lot of their inconsistency to a lack of desire and leadership.

There's a difference between blaming everything on 'something' after the fact because it's convenient and denying human emotions and work ethic altogether.

The Flames didn't go on their Cup run in 2004 because of talent, or circumstances, or even luck alone. They also had a ton of drive that year that overcame or contributed to those things.

And last night, well, that was just a disgrace. Completely outclassed or not, no one can watch that game and objectively state that the team gave it their all, but just happened to suck (that would be the YG era). Faced with a franchise failure record and they mailed it in.

Avatar
#9 fretsey
March 27 2013, 11:21AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
1
props

Another "check your facts" moment for Flames Management.Does anyone even talk to each other in the front office???

King to Feaster..."by the way,Jay,when we signed Kipper we knew he was not going to play his last year,so release a statement that Kipper is NOT on the trade block. That way no one will ever hear about it and the Franchise won't suffer ANOTHER PR blow"

Really a Mickey Mouse operation in Calgary lately.

Avatar
#10 Petemaherrocks
March 27 2013, 11:38AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
1
props

It must be real easy to make a ton of dough in the oil business , if Murray Edwards runs his other companies the same way ...HOLY S@#+

Avatar
#11 Glenn
March 27 2013, 12:07PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
1
props

First off, thank you Kent and the Nation for the Websim Subscription. I havent had a chance to poke around there yet, but it looks like great fun for us armchair GMs.

After last night's debacle, I have to agree the Flames are indeed the WORST team in the NHL. Personally, I have ZERO faith in the current management of this team. Many more years will pass before we approach anything close to respectability.

Feaster and Co could surprise me, but I doubt it. We are going to end up with a bag of pucks at the deadline and no future. I just know it.

We need to FIRE KEN KING immediately. All the others should jump in his suitcase on the way out. I firmly believe I could do a much better job. That is not stroking my own ego, but a very sad statement about those who are running this show!

Avatar
#12 chillout
March 27 2013, 12:39PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
1
props

@backburner

Yeah I hate people who put their family first....

Avatar
#13 FireOnIce
March 27 2013, 02:06PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
1
props

Oh, and Murray Edwards is not exactly the smart businessman everyone thinks he is. He's an oil baron who, like many others, made that money off the backs of other people. This hockey gig is the same thing.

He has billions already, what does it matter if the Flames only make $500M in a year instead of $700? Edwards and King will NEVER go. If they go, I truly think the team goes, because at that point no one gives a sh*t.

If I was Kipper and Iginla, I would've wanted out a long time ago.

Avatar
#14 Veggie Dog
March 27 2013, 02:12PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
1
props
mk wrote:

I feel like some of the outrage isn't necessarily directed at Kipper, but simply the situation the team is in. I commented earlier that "this is lame", but I can't fault Miikka for his choice, but its unfortunate that it leaves the team in this position.

Another reason management has demonstrated they aren't on the ball here.

I am all for hating management. That's a worthy cause for our outrage, and one I think we can all get behind.

Avatar
#15 Colin.S
March 27 2013, 02:21PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
1
props
Sincity1976 wrote:

Buy outs and demotions are rules within the collective bargaining agreement. Kipper is circumventing the rules by manipulating the process. It is dirty pool.

Retirements are also part of the CBA, there is no limits on when a player is allowed or not allowed to retire. There is no circumvention of ANY rules, all he is done is given the Flames an ultimatum. Either let him play the last few games of this season as a Flame or he'll retire early. NOTHING wrong with that, especially given who he is and the position he's in.

Avatar
#16 Veggie Dog
March 27 2013, 02:26PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
1
props
suba steve wrote:

Kipper, you have my endorsement, do whatever works best for you and your family. You have earned it. Thanks for the best years of your professional life, you were spectacular. If you choose to return next year I will be happy to have you. Hope all is well with your family.

Those with differing opinions, please reassess your priorities.

100% with you

Avatar
#17 Colin.S
March 27 2013, 02:40PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
1
props

@the-wolf

1.) Yes, he's very adequately compensated and that's what the team chose to pay him, because they signed him to that contract. No where in that contract does it say he's not allowed to retire if he no longer like his circumstances.

2.) Yes he does have a year on his contract, but should he choose to retire, that year no longer exists, he's doesn't have to play and the team doesn't have to pay him for that choice.

3.) Getting traded is NOT part of the contract, it's part of the CBA that allows for trades. No where in Kipper's contract does it state that if the team is crap and they need draft picks and prospects because management is worse than the product on the ice that Kipper is forced to accept a trade.

You know what Sundin did honour his contract and he got ROASTED for it, he chose to stay in the place he signed for, used his NTC to even stay there and they roasted him. So even if you do the right thing and honour the contract he apparently did the wrong thing.

The guys are also human, they don't have to bend over backwards to do everything for their teams, especially when their teams are disturbing their lives for what management believes is the betterment of their team. If these guys feel their lives will be better, like in Kippers case, by just forgoing the money owed in the rest of the contract by retiring he has all the right in the world to do so.

Avatar
#18 Avalain
March 27 2013, 02:50PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
1
props
icedawg_42 wrote:

MOST people who put family first would have no choice but to accept a transfer. Pro atheletes are paid ridiculously, and part of that is because the have to face being traded. - Now to completely contradict myself here, I'm not PO'ed at Kipper at all for some strange reason. Probably because I figure his career is going to finish in a few weeks anyway. Leave him be.

Maybe I'm not most people, but I do put my family first. If my company was going to transfer me across the country right after my kid was born, I'd quit and find something else. Maybe we just have different concepts of what putting family first means.

As for the whole pro athlete issue, well, I only sort of agree with you. The risk of being traded is part of the reason that their pay is so high, but it's really only the difference between players with NTC contracts and those without. Personally, I think that the risk of being traded is more a cost players have to accept for the chance to play hockey as a full time job. In this case, Kipper is willing to give up playing hockey to not be traded. Every player has the right to walk away from the game. That seems fair to me.

Avatar
#19 CM
March 27 2013, 03:09PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
1
props

@FireOnIce

Wow - a lot of vitriol on Murray Edwards. Do all of you who make comments on his ability and how he made his money actually know him? Is this why you sound so sure about his motivations - "made money off the backs of other people" - what kind of comment is that? Is there resentment creeping in - are you trying to rally a group of anarchists to your cause? Is Buzz Hargrove listening?

I don't know Murray Edwards. I have no idea what he was or is thinking and I have no idea how involved he is in the Flames hockey management. I suspect you all don’t either.

I am very disappointed with the Flames and they have to get better. And I really like the discussion on this site. I am just wondering about the level of support for the comments being made about Murray Edwards. I just think it hurts the credibility of all the other good information presented.

Avatar
#20 chillout
March 27 2013, 03:12PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
1
props

@icedawg_42

haha yeah but a player at the end of his career can make that choice, just like a normal person in the same boat can do. or even if you're not close to retirement you can tell your bosses that if they transfer you, you won't go due to family reasons. If you've been the backbone of the company for 8 or so years then they'll probably be like hey ok no problem maybe even if you're just a good employee they'll do the same. I've actually seen companies bend over backwards for their employees especially when there is a health issue with somebody in the family

Avatar
#21 icedawg_42
March 27 2013, 03:15PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
1
props

@the-wolf

I have to echo the-wolf's sentiments here - I don't like being told I owe a millionaire anything. Again - to clarify my stance, if his intent is to retire at the end of the season (and I'm fully convinced it is) - then he's made the right move and I'm fine with it. If he's "threatening to take his ball and go home", then that's completely backwards. When you become a professional athlete, the fact you may be traded becomes a fact of life, just like when you become a famous rock star, paparazzi and garbage 'newspapers' become a fact of life.

As to the character of Murray Edwards - I have no idea how deep into the decision making he is..but if he is, he needs to stop right now. If he isn't he needs to assess whether the people making the decisions are doing a good job. The Fanbase is getting angry, and worse, in some cases apathetic.

Avatar
#22 Colin.S
March 27 2013, 03:18PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
1
props

@vowswithin

Being traded is NOT is his contract, it's in the CBA, as is the option to retire from the sport if he no longer wants to play. And if he doesn't feel motivated to play in an entirely new city while have a young family that's his choice. Also he's not entitled to any of the remaining money owed in his contract if he retires. You don't just sign a contract and retire the next day and get all the money(unless you got a signing bonus or something). The Flames gave Kipper money, he gave them some of the best goaltending the Flames have ever seen, now he wants to retire, that's his choice.

And no, no one owe's Kipper anything, much in the same sense, Kipper owe's you or anyone else in the fanbase or anyone in management anything either. You all act like he somehow owes us the draft picks from trading him, no, he really doesn't

Avatar
#23 Alt
March 27 2013, 07:14PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
1
props
RKD wrote:

Kipper just had another baby and there are stories circulating there were birth complications which would explain why he would want to remain near his wife and child.

Even if they tried to move Kipper last year or a few years ago he still could have rejected a trade. Maybe Kipper planned to have a baby around this time and knew he would be able to use an out if the team was doing poorly and that he would be used as trade bait.

Never say never, even if he is traded eventually he could report to the team. Would be terrible for a playoff team. Eventually, Nabokov and Visnovsky despite their refusals, both end up reporting to the Isles.

That,s over the top.Kipper planned to have a baby at this time,so he could use it as an out.

ARE YOU SERIOUS?

Avatar
#24 Betsy
April 07 2013, 06:23PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
1
props

It was apparently always understood, as in right from the beginning, that Kipper would likely or possibly NOT play out that last year. They are accepting it because it comes as no surprise. They knew this was the case, he isn't messing anyone about. They knew this is probably what would happen. If he chooses to go it will not surprise them as unofficially it was agreed that this was a possibility or even a likelihood.

Avatar
#25 Betsy
April 07 2013, 08:37PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
1
props

Bad mouthing a guy who has done for the Calgary Flames what Kipper has done is just bad behaviour. Shall we say if there was a behind the scenes agreement that he might not play out the last year, it is hardly something unheard of and I would think that Keenan said that to point out that Kipper wasn't doing something his team didn't want him to do. He wasn't really refusing to go because they likely didn't expect him to as supported by the fact that they easily accepted his not choosing to go. It was all worded as he asked their permission not to go and they gave it to him. He's older now and like all athletes, his skills and abilities aren't what they used to be. It happens to the best of them. It's really unfair not to mention mean spirited behaviour to turn on the guy because he isn't the goalie he was when he was younger. Kipper was our hero and as far as I'm concerned he always will be.

Avatar
#26 Colin.S
March 27 2013, 10:20AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

If they punish the Flames, they have to punish EVERY other team that has one of those stupid back diving contracts. Regardless of what Keenan says it's still just speculation on his part because he's not Sutter of Kipper and didn't negotiate the deal.

Also with regards to Kipper refusing to be dealt, good for him, I appreciate all he's done for Calgary, but if this city and his family is more important to him than trying to win the cup in who knows what city, I have no problems with that. And for people going on about how it's bad on Kipper for not helping the Flames get prospects/picks, that's not Kippers job, he's the goalie, not the GM, he can't help it if we have bad GMs.

Avatar
#27 icedawg_42
March 27 2013, 10:21AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

- But I do 100% agree with you that 'heart' isn't even part of this equation...they just.aren't.good.enough.

Avatar
#28 icedawg_42
March 27 2013, 10:29AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Jussi Jokinen cleared waivers.

Avatar
#30 backburner
March 27 2013, 10:39AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Great article Kent,

I for one have questioned the team's "heart" as of late, but I agree that we shouldn't put everyones character in question..

Avatar
#31 Colin.S
March 27 2013, 10:39AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props
sincity1976 wrote:

The biggest issue is that he Flames have allowed it to come to this. We are near last place, about to lose our two franchise players for very little, and get to deal with drama all season long (O'Reilly, Kipper, Iginla, Cap Circumvention, etc)

I don't like what Kipper is doing. It is clearly manipulation of the system to avoid being moved. He has earned millions from that contract. Time to honor the rest. Why ruin your legacy now?

Season has been a nightmare. Way to avoid becoming the Oiler's Feaster et all.

As we have all (mostly) said. The path to becoming the Oilers wasn't to rebuild. It was to wait until the bottom fell out.

Where there goes the bottom. And here comes a half decade or more of misery. Hooray us.

So when teams buy out players, or when they moved to the minors or whatever why aren't teams HONOURING contracts, or is that only for players. Retirement is an option for him that is more than allowed, if he doesn't want to play somewhere else that is more than his choice. In fact I give him props for saying something so that there isn't an ugly mess after he is traded.

Avatar
#32 icedawg_42
March 27 2013, 10:39AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props
Kent Wilson wrote:

Amazing.

There must be some kinda package deal in the works. Why else would you pass that up?

Avatar
#33 Colin.S
March 27 2013, 10:41AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props
Kent Wilson wrote:

Amazing.

Only because he wasn't a UFA next year, he'll find a new home in the summer once teams know their cap situation, top cap teams don't want to add a piece they may not be able to move in the summer, bottom teir teams don't want to add salary right now.

Avatar
#34 T&A4Flames
March 27 2013, 10:42AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

@icedawg_42

How the hell did he clear waivers?

Avatar
#35 DieHard
March 27 2013, 10:45AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Top 4 pick for Calgary will take the sting out of the season. And a top pick in the second round could be good too.

Avatar
#36 Colin.S
March 27 2013, 10:53AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props
DieHard wrote:

Top 4 pick for Calgary will take the sting out of the season. And a top pick in the second round could be good too.

You are aware we've traded that to Montreal in the Bourque trade right?

Avatar
#37 DieHard
March 27 2013, 11:02AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props
Colin.S wrote:

You are aware we've traded that to Montreal in the Bourque trade right?

Sorry, but the Iggy trade will bring a similar pick. 26th - 34th

Avatar
#38 the-wolf
March 27 2013, 11:08AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props
mcculb wrote:

I agree with backburner. If Kipper is done and going home in a month, where is the gain in playing him anymore? It is like giving 2 weeks notice. Once you have given notice, all you do is have coffee with everyone before you move on. Make sense to have him mentor Taylor (or prospects) while still here. But of course our GM won't do that. Kipper should have been moved 3 years ago or at last years deadline at the very least. Brutal management. Absolutely unacceptable. Going nowhere until the root of the problem is fixed. Iggy trade better be good, or the paying fan base will attempt to siege the castle.

Normally, a player doing what Kipper has done would drive me over the edge, not sure why I don't care in this case.

Maybe because of his contributions over the years, maybe because of those contributions the team can't/won't embarass him (bench) until he retires regardless, so why get upset?

Avatar
#39 MWflames
March 27 2013, 11:15AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

I find it hard at this point to really blame this Flames team for not having the 'heart' to win games.

People are saying how eery it is just be in the stands at the Flames games these days. I can't imagine what it's like in that locker room. I don't know to what extent the players are informed with all the trade talks, but it is probably expected that Iggy, face of the franchise, is gone this time next week. Which is a clear message from management that this team of skilled veterans has completely failed in their eyes. In addition, every veteran in that locker room probably thinks there is a decent chance they are moved or at least asked to waive their NTC any day now.

I'm not saying its fun to watch a disinterested flames team get totally out classed, but I understand that there's a ton of unknown and emotion flying around that locker room and that makes it extremely tough to focus.

Avatar
#40 Scary Gary
March 27 2013, 11:20AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

I guess that explains why Feaster may be looking at Bernier or Subban.

Trade Kipper conditionally; if he reports you get a 2nd and a 3rd, if he doesn't you get a 5th. Or some other iteration along those lines.

Avatar
#41 Colin.S
March 27 2013, 11:36AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props
DieHard wrote:

Sorry, but the Iggy trade will bring a similar pick. 26th - 34th

That's a big ole MAYBE there, we don't know what Iggy fetches yet, it may just be prospects and a roster player, especially if its LA, they don't have a 1st in 2013.

Avatar
#42 SmellOfVictory
March 27 2013, 12:17PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props
the-wolf wrote:

re: Heart - Flames are a terrible team and have been for decades. That said, I still attribute a lot of their inconsistency to a lack of desire and leadership.

There's a difference between blaming everything on 'something' after the fact because it's convenient and denying human emotions and work ethic altogether.

The Flames didn't go on their Cup run in 2004 because of talent, or circumstances, or even luck alone. They also had a ton of drive that year that overcame or contributed to those things.

And last night, well, that was just a disgrace. Completely outclassed or not, no one can watch that game and objectively state that the team gave it their all, but just happened to suck (that would be the YG era). Faced with a franchise failure record and they mailed it in.

They've been bad for about 2 years, mediocre for the preceding couple of years, and good for about five years prior to that. They haven't been "terrible... for decades."

People can rabble all they want about not making it out of the first round, but it's been circumstance more than the team being bad. Either Kipper has sunk the team in a given year, or injuries have (and I mean a LOT of injuries at a bad time).

Avatar
#43 backburner
March 27 2013, 12:23PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

This Kipper situation is leaving a bad taste in my mouth... I love Kipper, but can't stand the selfish attitude, least he could do is accept a trade and retire in the summer..

Avatar
#44 lionlager
March 27 2013, 12:36PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Can't blame Kipper at this point. He gave the Flames a ridiculous amount of starts and stole quite a few games. He's 37, got a new kid, maybe some health issues with the family, so I'm fine that he gave himself the no trade. Deserves it.

Avatar
#45 icedawg_42
March 27 2013, 12:48PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props
chillout wrote:

Yeah I hate people who put their family first....

MOST people who put family first would have no choice but to accept a transfer. Pro atheletes are paid ridiculously, and part of that is because the have to face being traded. - Now to completely contradict myself here, I'm not PO'ed at Kipper at all for some strange reason. Probably because I figure his career is going to finish in a few weeks anyway. Leave him be.

Avatar
#46 the-wolf
March 27 2013, 12:58PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props
icedawg_42 wrote:

MOST people who put family first would have no choice but to accept a transfer. Pro atheletes are paid ridiculously, and part of that is because the have to face being traded. - Now to completely contradict myself here, I'm not PO'ed at Kipper at all for some strange reason. Probably because I figure his career is going to finish in a few weeks anyway. Leave him be.

After listening to the Fan this morning I have to agree with Morganti. It's part of what you're paid ridiculous amounts of money to do. And part of being a pro. It does screw the team over. Who knows what that draft pick could turn into, for example.

And yet, same as you, I'm just not that mad about it. Should be, but I'm not. Apathy.

Avatar
#47 icedawg_42
March 27 2013, 01:02PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

@the-wolf

.........yeah, who knows..maybe it's apathy, cause that is a very strong point.

Avatar
#48 Justme
March 27 2013, 01:11PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

I am sure Murray Edwards ran his business to make money. Which he is doing with this hockey team. Maybe a drop in ticket sales and merch would change how things were run.

Avatar
#49 Alt
March 27 2013, 01:14PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props
icedawg_42 wrote:

Just guessing, but he probably doesn't tell his tool pushes how to do their job. He shouldn't be trying to run anything to do with hockey. He needs to BACK off.

Doubt his ego would allow him to back-off

Avatar
#50 icedawg_42
March 27 2013, 01:16PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props
Alt wrote:

Doubt his ego would allow him to back-off

yup. unfortunately for us.

Comments are closed for this article.