A Closer Look at John Gaudreau

Kent Wilson
April 10 2013 09:34AM

 

I usually save this sort of analysis for the off-season, but now that Johnny Gaudreau is the Flames most important, high profile prospect outside of Sven Baertschi (and whoever they pick in the top-5 this summer), I didn't want to wait on things. It was recently announced that Gaudreau would be returning to Boston College to play next year (killing any chance of him turning pro any time soon) so this seems topical as well.

As many probably already know, Gaudreau had a massive season this year. He led Boston College in scoring with 51 points in 35 games, won a gold medal with the US team in the World Junior Hockey Championships and is a finalist in the Hobey Baker race (College's "best player" award), something that is almost always bestowed on guys two or three years his senior. Oh, Gaudreau was also named Hockey East's player of the year and BC fans are so enamoured with the 19-year old that they are making shirts in his honor.

Not bad for a tiny guy who was a 4th round pick.

Gaudreau vs Gerbe

The enduring question for any prospect is: will he be able to make it work as a pro? Gaudreau has constantly excelled at every level he has played at thus far despite his diminutive stature, but that's true of a lot of guys until they try to break into the show.

One potential comparable is the NHL's current holder of the "league's smallest dude" title - Nathan Gerbe. Andrew Walker mentioned him as a mirror for Gaudreau on twitter this morning:

 

 

It's a natural comparison. Beyond the size thing, Gerbe was also a big scorer for BC, a Hobey Baker finalist in 2008 and a 5th round pick for the Sabres. Let's see just how close the two players are in the same seasons:

Nathan Gerbe

Season points PPG team rank
18-19 18 0.46 8th
19-20 47 1.15 2nd
20-21 68 1.58 1st

John Gaudreau

Season points PPG team rank
18-19 44 1.00 2nd
19-20 51 1.46 1st
20-21 NA NA NA

As you can see, Gaudreau is tracking ahead of Gerbe at this point in their respective careers. Gerbe developed into a difference maker by his sopohmore season, but Gaudreau was already there as a freshman. The latter's average point-per-game pace in two seasons (1.20) is superior to Gerbe's college career average (1.08), even with that monster final season under Gerbe's belt. At the same age, Gerbe had scored 65 points in 80 games (0.81 PPG). Gaudreau has 95 points in 79.

It's an interesting comparison, although I'm not sure how much we can take from it given it's only a single guy. Still, Gerbe is an NHLer (albeit not a great one) and Gaudreau is ahead of him in similar circumstances.

Other Context

Two other useful bits of context when it comes to prospect's output are percentage of team offense and percentage of points scored at even strength. This information tends to weed out the guys who are riding the coattails of a powerful team or are overly dependent on special teams to prop up their numbers.

For example, former Flames first rounder Greg Nemisz put up superficially good counting stats for Windsor in his OHL career, but the Spitfires were a juggernaut and it turned out he was only in on about 25-27% of his team's scoring in any given season. Legitimate prospects tend to be up over 35% and difference makers usually break 40% or higher. If I recall correctly, Sven Baertschi settled into the 42-43% range for Portland in his final season there.

Luckily I was able to find game-by-game stats for Gaudreau's regular season in college this year. In 29 games, he scored 47 points, while his team totaled 99 - meaning he was in on over 47% (!) of his club's total scoring when he was in the line-up. Gaudreau scored 36 of his 47 points at even strength, meaning about 77% of his points came at 5on5 - another very strong number.

Conclusion

Along with the awards and accolades being showered on Gaudreau, the stats paint a fairly rosey picture of the Flames prospect. Johnny Hockey is tracking well ahead of his closest NHL comprable at the same age and his contextual numbers suggest he's a legitimate difference maker for Boston College who contributes on a high percentage of their scoring and isn't reliant on favorable special teams ice time to put points on the board.

39d8109299a9795cb3b41a4e9b49d501
Former Nations Overlord. Current FN contributor and curmudgeon For questions, complaints, criticisms, etc contact Kent @ kent.wilson@gmail. Follow him on Twitter here.
Avatar
#1 everton fc
April 10 2013, 12:23PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Props
0
props

Just watched the highlight reel. He seems to easily find open ice. He moves without the puck. His stickhandling is superb, as his his passing. Seems to be a good playmaker, with the ability to bury it when the opportunities arise. Likes to go top draw. Seems like a really grounded, decent kid, with good family as a foundation.

Here's hopin'!

Avatar
#2 Nathan
April 10 2013, 09:43AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

I understand that there is some consternation over the fact that Gaudreau wants to spend another year at BC. Some say he is essentially trying to pull a Justin Schultz type maneuver. I'm not sure if this is the case or not, but it would seem to make sense for Gaudreau to stay in college given the current state of the Flames. I'm assuming he won't burn a year of his ELC if he stays at BC, so it should be of benefit to the Flames as well, no?

Avatar
#4 SeanCharles
April 10 2013, 10:07AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

I thought since he went right to the NCAA after being drafted he cannot pull a Shultz, even if he still could with the new CBA?

Shultz spent another year in the league he was in, during his draft year, after he was drafted and went to NCAA the year after.

This is the loophole that allowed him to jump ship, I believe...

The new CBA may or may not have abolished this loophole, even if it hasnt he seemilgly cannot become an unrestriced free agent anytime soon..

Even if he could I dont think Johnny would ditch us, Shultz was a doosh and planned his exit from Anahiem immediately after being drafted...

Avatar
#5 Mitch2
April 10 2013, 10:15AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Feaster is a genius for drafting this guy (had to write that :)

Often we rip the guy to pieces but since he came aboard we already are seeing better prospect potential, aren't we?

Avatar
#7 the-wolf
April 10 2013, 10:34AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Certainly not reason to panic yet. He does need another year of physical development, no doubt. However, if he doesn't sign immediately after the season, the Flames should start shopping him while they can still sell high. If for no other reason than to see what's out there. If it's crap, than you wait longer.

What does happen after his 4th year?

Avatar
#8 Subz
April 10 2013, 10:35AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Im curious to see what other teams think of Gaudreau as a prospect?

Avatar
#9 Baalzamon
April 10 2013, 10:38AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

The thing about Gerbe though is he's a very physical player. Gaudreau really isn't. No one anywhere disputes Gaudreau's talent level, but the question is whether his game will translate to levels where the physical edge gets ramped up against him.

It's a good sign that he scores so much in college, though, since the average age is something like 21/22 years old. Most college players are very physically mature.

Avatar
#10 Baalzamon
April 10 2013, 10:42AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props
the-wolf wrote:

Certainly not reason to panic yet. He does need another year of physical development, no doubt. However, if he doesn't sign immediately after the season, the Flames should start shopping him while they can still sell high. If for no other reason than to see what's out there. If it's crap, than you wait longer.

What does happen after his 4th year?

as has been mentioned ad nauseum, the Flames CANNOT sign him until he leaves college. This is true of ALL college prospects. Signing a pro contract destroys NCAA eligibility forever. Since he's returning to BC next season, the Flames cannot--and will not--sign him to an ELC.

After he leaves College, the Flames have a few months of holding his rights. If he were to leave college this instant, the Flames would have until the middle of August to sign him.

They have until August to sign Hanowski and Ramage, FYI.

Avatar
#11 McRib
April 10 2013, 10:42AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
1
props

Another thing to consider with the Gerbe/Gaudreau coparisons is Gaudreau is easily 2-3 inches taller than the tiny 5'5"-5'6" Gerbe. The same can also be said after watching him at the World Juniors, when he was playing with Rocco Grimaldi. It may not be a major stat, but considering most smaller players add an inch or two to their respective heights, Gaudreau looks to actually be in the 5'8"-5'9" range compareed to Gerbe/Grimaldi. A couple of inches at that height is a big deal!! Giving him the potential to be more of a Cory Conacher than Gerbe at the next level.

Avatar
#12 Craig
April 10 2013, 10:44AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Gaudreau and Jankowski just need to hit the gym this offseason and start building a commitment to being strong. If they can create that foundation now, they will be much more prepared to hit the pros. For Gaudreau to succeed he's going to have to be one of the strongest guys on the team, to make up for height and weight.

Avatar
#13 Parallex
April 10 2013, 11:01AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

@Baalzamon

Truth be told I don't know if they want to sign Ramage... I've never heard them express any desire to get him signed and I've never heard them trumpet him. He might end up getting passed by.

On a another NCAA non-Gaudreau note Arnold is going to be wearing a letter next year for BC. He'll get one of the Assistent Captains next year.

Avatar
#14 the-wolf
April 10 2013, 11:03AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props
Baalzamon wrote:

as has been mentioned ad nauseum, the Flames CANNOT sign him until he leaves college. This is true of ALL college prospects. Signing a pro contract destroys NCAA eligibility forever. Since he's returning to BC next season, the Flames cannot--and will not--sign him to an ELC.

After he leaves College, the Flames have a few months of holding his rights. If he were to leave college this instant, the Flames would have until the middle of August to sign him.

They have until August to sign Hanowski and Ramage, FYI.

I get that. I'm talking about after this coming season. He may want to stay 4 years, but do you want to take the chance that he signs after the 4th year? Maybe, maybe not. I'm just thinking that if he still doesn't want to turn pro in a year from now you start seeing what he's worth.

Avatar
#15 the-wolf
April 10 2013, 11:06AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props
Craig wrote:

Gaudreau and Jankowski just need to hit the gym this offseason and start building a commitment to being strong. If they can create that foundation now, they will be much more prepared to hit the pros. For Gaudreau to succeed he's going to have to be one of the strongest guys on the team, to make up for height and weight.

Agreed and if the Flames are doing their jobs, both of those guys will be spending this summer and next doing a professionally tailored pure strength building program.

Avatar
#16 Primo
April 10 2013, 11:07AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
2
props

Kent...something smells here! Similar to the Rangers whispering in Tim Erixon's dads ear I can see Chiarelli (Boston) doing same with Gaudreau's daddy.

Flames beware!!!!!!!!!

Avatar
#17 McRib
April 10 2013, 11:09AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props
Baalzamon wrote:

The thing about Gerbe though is he's a very physical player. Gaudreau really isn't. No one anywhere disputes Gaudreau's talent level, but the question is whether his game will translate to levels where the physical edge gets ramped up against him.

It's a good sign that he scores so much in college, though, since the average age is something like 21/22 years old. Most college players are very physically mature.

You may be confusing Gerbe with Ennis, as at least in my opinion I have NEVER seen Gerbe even come close to hitting someone at the NHL level. Gerbe also at 5'5" is legitimately the smallest NHLer ever!! Gaudreau is easily 2-3 inches taller than him at 5’8”-5’9" and plays an entirely different game.

Comparing Rocco Grimaldi to Nathan Gerbe is much more of a valid comparison for me. The only similarities between Gaudreau and Gerbe is they both played for Boston College and are below 5'10". Gaudreau has a much better Hockey IQ, more size and more production so far.

Avatar
#18 Parallex
April 10 2013, 11:16AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

@Primo

Gaudreau's father has zero connections to Chiarelli or the Bruins that we know of... he doesn't even live in Boston. They live in New Jersey.

The only connection the whole family has to Boston the municipality is through Johnny.

Relax nothing fishy going on. The family just values education and Johnny probably wants to get to play with his brother.

Avatar
#19 McRib
April 10 2013, 11:16AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

@Parallex

Former Michigan Tech Defenseman-Steven Seigo is a much more rounded defenseman than Ramage. If the Flames wanted to sign John Ramage, I highly doubt they would have recently signed Siego to an AHL tryout. Seigo had 22 more points in college in a much weaker program than Ramage.

Only Blake Wheeler & Justin Schultz have pulled the NCAA Opt out clause in recent memory. It’s not something that happens very often. When the Flames drafted Gaudreau he was not a celebrated prospect like the other two. Only two/three teams even had him on their radar (Boston was one of them, they were hoping for him in the fifth). But I doubt he screws over a team that took that big of a chance on him. Anaheim also handled Schultz horribly pestering him to leave after his sophomore season. They also gave him a lukewarm Pro Contract Offer. If anything letting Gaudreau make his decision to stay on his own terms helps. Also if the kid doesn't want to play for the Flames then I DONT want him, which I doubt is the case.

Avatar
#20 Tach
April 10 2013, 11:32AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Re: The Schultz Wheeler Rule

This is what I have found.

The old CBA rule that was problematic was Section 8.6 of the CBA which read:

"If a Player drafted at age 18 or 19, who had received a Bona Fide Offer in accordance with Section 8.6(a)(ii) above, becomes a bona fide college student prior to the second June 1 following his selection in the Entry Draft and does not remain a bona fide college student through the graduation of his college class, his drafting Club shall retain exclusive rights for the negotiation of his services until the fourth June 1 following his selection in the Entry Draft."

(see http://www.sportsworldreport.com/articles/3176/20120629/nhl-free-agents-2012-justin-schultz-cba-loophole-ducks.htm)

It is tough to tell if the new CBA closed this loophole. The "Summary of Terms" states:

Current rules regarding exclusive negotiating rights for College Players will remain status quo. Parties to incorporate NHL/NHLPA Agreement on College Players leaving college prior to graduation (but following the fourth June 1 after date of Draft) (i.e., Goepfert Letter Agreement).

(see http://www.nhlpa.com/inside-nhlpa/collective-bargaining-agreement)

What is the Goepfert Letter Agreement? Good question. Nobody outside the NHLPA or NHL seems to know. I googled it and links like this (http://unitedstatesofhockey.com/2013/01/16/new-cba-unlikely-to-bring-relief-to-college-hockey/) and this (https://twitter.com/cbuckser/status/290332767357632513)

However, because Johnny Hockey entered college straight after his draft year, it appears that he would have to sit out a year if he wants to try and take advantage of the loophole in any event. Schultz and Wheeler's exclusive negotiating periods expired a year relatively earlier because they had started college a year relatively later.

Avatar
#21 rubbertrout
April 10 2013, 11:36AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props
McRib wrote:

Another thing to consider with the Gerbe/Gaudreau coparisons is Gaudreau is easily 2-3 inches taller than the tiny 5'5"-5'6" Gerbe. The same can also be said after watching him at the World Juniors, when he was playing with Rocco Grimaldi. It may not be a major stat, but considering most smaller players add an inch or two to their respective heights, Gaudreau looks to actually be in the 5'8"-5'9" range compareed to Gerbe/Grimaldi. A couple of inches at that height is a big deal!! Giving him the potential to be more of a Cory Conacher than Gerbe at the next level.

Gaudreau is listed at 5'6" and 150 lbs in most hockey publications. He is listed as 5'8" and 153 lbs on the BC website. Typically the stats in the program are inflated somewhat.

I really like him and hope he succeeds but I really think he is going to have a tough time making the transition to playing against men. I think he's a lot closer to being a smaller Braden Kozen than anything else.

Avatar
#22 rubbertrout
April 10 2013, 11:37AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props
the-wolf wrote:

Agreed and if the Flames are doing their jobs, both of those guys will be spending this summer and next doing a professionally tailored pure strength building program.

I don't think they can do this until he is under contract. As soon as he's under contract the NCAA eligibility goes out the window.

Avatar
#23 McRib
April 10 2013, 11:39AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
1
props

@Tach

Good find, kind of thought this loophole was rectified in the new CBA. At least for Blake Wheeler I know the major reason he never signed with Phoenix was that all of the ownership/management that drafted him had changed by the time he left college. Similar to Schultz and Burke leaving Anaheim.

Avatar
#24 McRib
April 10 2013, 11:58AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
1
props

@rubbertrout

The United States World Junior Roster had Gaudreau listed at 5'9", while they had Grimaldi listed at 5'6"... Why would they list Grimaldi at 5'6'" and inflate Gaudreau to 5'9"?? From watching them it also seemed accurate, as Gaudreau was easily two/three inches taller.

I think most of the 5'6" listings are start of freshman year. He has said publicly that he grew a few inches since then.

Regardless Gaudreau is easily three/four inches taller than Gerbe!! Haha. Honestly 5'8"-5'9" isn't that bad for the NHL, thats Cory Conacher/Brendan Gallagher height, i.e. two of the NHLs top rookies. He just needs to put on some weight.

Avatar
#25 Brent G.
April 10 2013, 11:59AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

What was the name of that defender Feaster and Weisbrodt were reportedly trying to sign out of the NCAA. That news broke around the deadline they were pursuing this one guy. Any update on that? How good is he?

As far as Johnny bolting, I dont think it will happen. Even if he has intentions there is nothing us or the Flames can do to change it. In all fairness it is a sport created for the fun and entertainment of all; I dont think this is something getting worked up over. As my boss tells me, just focus on the things you can control. Feaster went through this with douche and I promise you his sensitivity to it is very high to this possibility. That is why we saw him sign Sven hours after he was drafted.

How far away is Bill Arnold? There is a guy who has a much lower ceiling but could be of real value to the Flames if/when he is signed. Much lower ceiling but better odds of reaching that potential as a 3rd line center I would say.

The Flames have some giant holes but if they dont botch this draft they should easily walk away with a #1 center, and 2 top prospects. Add in Backlund and Arnold in the future + Sven and Gaudreau. You can really see how this might all come together quickly with a little luck. What is the draft class the year after this one looking like?

Avatar
#26 McRib
April 10 2013, 12:02PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

@Brent G.

Dan Dekeyser?? He signed with his home state Red Wings a week ago, has already played a couple of games. He looked great shutting down Chicago on Saturday. That was just a pipedream for us, Detroit almost signed him last year before he returned to college with a change of heart. Calgary did quitely pickup a solid NCAA defensive prospect Steven Seigo a few weeks ago. Played with him growing up, was always very underrated. He is currently just signed to an amateur tryout agreement. He has two points in five games with Abby.

Avatar
#27 piscera.infada
April 10 2013, 12:05PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props
Brent G. wrote:

What was the name of that defender Feaster and Weisbrodt were reportedly trying to sign out of the NCAA. That news broke around the deadline they were pursuing this one guy. Any update on that? How good is he?

As far as Johnny bolting, I dont think it will happen. Even if he has intentions there is nothing us or the Flames can do to change it. In all fairness it is a sport created for the fun and entertainment of all; I dont think this is something getting worked up over. As my boss tells me, just focus on the things you can control. Feaster went through this with douche and I promise you his sensitivity to it is very high to this possibility. That is why we saw him sign Sven hours after he was drafted.

How far away is Bill Arnold? There is a guy who has a much lower ceiling but could be of real value to the Flames if/when he is signed. Much lower ceiling but better odds of reaching that potential as a 3rd line center I would say.

The Flames have some giant holes but if they dont botch this draft they should easily walk away with a #1 center, and 2 top prospects. Add in Backlund and Arnold in the future + Sven and Gaudreau. You can really see how this might all come together quickly with a little luck. What is the draft class the year after this one looking like?

I'm not sure if you're referring to the same dude. But I know there was a big hub-bub about Danny DeKeyser around the trade deadline.

He signed in Detroit.

Avatar
#28 everton fc
April 10 2013, 12:16PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Some hope; I am beginning to think positive about our Flames. Even though I still would prefer we move Feaster & Wesibrod.

I've decided to look at the future as potentially sunny. I like what I've heard about Bill Arnold. Perhaps he can be like Prust, Dorsett or Clifford for us? Ditto Bouma. We need players like this - not McGrattan's, and not even Jackman's (Jackman's a game fighter, but never seems to win).

Seigo's not real "thick" of body for a 22 year old. And I'm still hoping Ferland becomes something.

Hope we can draft Eric Roy out of Brandon. He'd be a good prospect. Good kid, from what little I've read.

What's Gaudreau's brother's story? He's listed at 5'7" 130 lbs with Omaha in the USHL. Certainly isn't the offencive dynamo his older brother is....

Avatar
#29 the-wolf
April 10 2013, 12:47PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props
rubbertrout wrote:

I don't think they can do this until he is under contract. As soon as he's under contract the NCAA eligibility goes out the window.

Do they have to be under contract to do a strength routine? Under NCAA, th eplayer would have to pay all costs, but that doesn't mean the team can't make training recommendations. Or does it?

Avatar
#30 rubbertrout
April 10 2013, 12:52PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props
McRib wrote:

The United States World Junior Roster had Gaudreau listed at 5'9", while they had Grimaldi listed at 5'6"... Why would they list Grimaldi at 5'6'" and inflate Gaudreau to 5'9"?? From watching them it also seemed accurate, as Gaudreau was easily two/three inches taller.

I think most of the 5'6" listings are start of freshman year. He has said publicly that he grew a few inches since then.

Regardless Gaudreau is easily three/four inches taller than Gerbe!! Haha. Honestly 5'8"-5'9" isn't that bad for the NHL, thats Cory Conacher/Brendan Gallagher height, i.e. two of the NHLs top rookies. He just needs to put on some weight.

I'll reserve judgment until I see him playing against men. Kozen lit up the WHL and is 5'9" 162. Now that he's in the AHL his offensive numbers are much more pedestrian. There are lots of examples of guys at any size that could score in junior/college but couldn't bring it to the next level. There are also a host of players that could score in the AHL but not the NHL. We haven't even seen if he can score at the AHL level.

If he's 5'8" or 5'9" he might still have the same problem and I'm not one of those guys that says you need to be a Coke machine on skates to play in the NHL.

The difficulty for smaller guys is that they have to be top notch offensive players to really succeed. It is tough to be the shut-down defender or two-way player when you are much smaller than many of the other players. If you don't have the physical attributes to be a more multi-dimensional player or to re-define what you bring to the table at the next level you have fewer options.

That said, I really like the kid and I'm rooting for him (I feel the same way about Kozen) I just think that he's got a really uphill climb to succeed in the NHL.

Avatar
#31 beloch
April 10 2013, 01:14PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Here's a question:

What do the Flames (or other teams) do for/with NCAA prospects? Obviously they call them on the phone now and then and invite them out to the annual training camp. Is there any deeper involvement with somebody like Gaudreau? e.g. Would they (or are they even allowed to) hire him a personal trainer over the summer, etc.? I'm just curious if NCAA prospects on the other side of the continent are developing a relationship with the flames org or if they're treated hands-off and left to develop.

Avatar
#32 rubbertrout
April 10 2013, 01:25PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

@beloch

I think if they hire anyone or provide any kind of service for free it constitutes a "benefit" for the student athlete that is verboten.

Hockey is a little different though because in the other major sports you waive your eligibility by signing with an agent. You can be drafted and not sign with a team (in basketball) but you can't have an agent. Obviously hockey players have agents very early on so there must be some kind of different treatment there.

Avatar
#33 If Only HIs Name Was Olli Postandin
April 10 2013, 01:33PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props
Tach wrote:

Re: The Schultz Wheeler Rule

This is what I have found.

The old CBA rule that was problematic was Section 8.6 of the CBA which read:

"If a Player drafted at age 18 or 19, who had received a Bona Fide Offer in accordance with Section 8.6(a)(ii) above, becomes a bona fide college student prior to the second June 1 following his selection in the Entry Draft and does not remain a bona fide college student through the graduation of his college class, his drafting Club shall retain exclusive rights for the negotiation of his services until the fourth June 1 following his selection in the Entry Draft."

(see http://www.sportsworldreport.com/articles/3176/20120629/nhl-free-agents-2012-justin-schultz-cba-loophole-ducks.htm)

It is tough to tell if the new CBA closed this loophole. The "Summary of Terms" states:

Current rules regarding exclusive negotiating rights for College Players will remain status quo. Parties to incorporate NHL/NHLPA Agreement on College Players leaving college prior to graduation (but following the fourth June 1 after date of Draft) (i.e., Goepfert Letter Agreement).

(see http://www.nhlpa.com/inside-nhlpa/collective-bargaining-agreement)

What is the Goepfert Letter Agreement? Good question. Nobody outside the NHLPA or NHL seems to know. I googled it and links like this (http://unitedstatesofhockey.com/2013/01/16/new-cba-unlikely-to-bring-relief-to-college-hockey/) and this (https://twitter.com/cbuckser/status/290332767357632513)

However, because Johnny Hockey entered college straight after his draft year, it appears that he would have to sit out a year if he wants to try and take advantage of the loophole in any event. Schultz and Wheeler's exclusive negotiating periods expired a year relatively earlier because they had started college a year relatively later.

Tach, you are hundred percent correct regarding Gauderau. Johnny G would have to sit out another year after opting out of college. Wheeler and Schultz did indeed not go to College immediately after the draft like Janko and Johnny.

I read the exact same thing on a TheHockeyNews article.

Good work.

Avatar
#34 Post Apex GM
April 10 2013, 01:45PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props
SeanCharles wrote:

I thought since he went right to the NCAA after being drafted he cannot pull a Shultz, even if he still could with the new CBA?

Shultz spent another year in the league he was in, during his draft year, after he was drafted and went to NCAA the year after.

This is the loophole that allowed him to jump ship, I believe...

The new CBA may or may not have abolished this loophole, even if it hasnt he seemilgly cannot become an unrestriced free agent anytime soon..

Even if he could I dont think Johnny would ditch us, Shultz was a doosh and planned his exit from Anahiem immediately after being drafted...

You wouldn't be callin Schultz a douche if he signed with the flames.

Avatar
#35 Jay in Kelowna
April 10 2013, 01:52PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props
Post Apex GM wrote:

You wouldn't be callin Schultz a douche if he signed with the flames.

How do u figure Schultz was planning an exit from a team one removed from winning the Stanley cup ?

Avatar
#36 Jay in Kelowna
April 10 2013, 01:54PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props
Jay in Kelowna wrote:

How do u figure Schultz was planning an exit from a team one removed from winning the Stanley cup ?

Oops. One year removed.

Avatar
#37 thprop
April 10 2013, 01:55PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Anyone who is concerned about Johnny hockey...and the fact he is not on an appropriate fitness regime in the NCAA needs to put that idea to bed. The NCAA schools are factories when it comes to strength training etc. He may even have better access to training at BC than Abbotsford.

Avatar
#38 SeanCharles
April 10 2013, 02:01PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props
Post Apex GM wrote:

You wouldn't be callin Schultz a douche if he signed with the flames.

Of course not. I would have been ecstatic if he signed here.

I know its hypocritical but I probably would have seen it as the hockey gods evening out the Erixon debacle for us.

I guess Schultz isnt as big a douche as Erixon, since Erixon never wanted to play here and played it off as if there was no opportunity here. He would be a top 4 here right now for sure.

Schultz was probably mishandled by Anahiem, while we were just sandbagged by Erixon.

I guess the hockey gods did something in sending Erixon to Columbus...

Avatar
#39 SeanCharles
April 10 2013, 02:05PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props
Jay in Kelowna wrote:

How do u figure Schultz was planning an exit from a team one removed from winning the Stanley cup ?

I'm just curious as to why he didnt go to college right after being drafted?

It seems like his agent convinced him it was more beneficial to not goto College right away since he could be a UFA and get more money and choose where he wanted to go...

Avatar
#40 Post Apex GM
April 10 2013, 02:08PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props
SeanCharles wrote:

Of course not. I would have been ecstatic if he signed here.

I know its hypocritical but I probably would have seen it as the hockey gods evening out the Erixon debacle for us.

I guess Schultz isnt as big a douche as Erixon, since Erixon never wanted to play here and played it off as if there was no opportunity here. He would be a top 4 here right now for sure.

Schultz was probably mishandled by Anahiem, while we were just sandbagged by Erixon.

I guess the hockey gods did something in sending Erixon to Columbus...

In that comment, I agree wholeheartedly brother.

Avatar
#41 ClYDE
April 10 2013, 02:15PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props
Subz wrote:

Im curious to see what other teams think of Gaudreau as a prospect?

An old line mate of mine is coaching in the league and says Gaudreau is an outstanding prospect.

Avatar
#42 shutout
April 10 2013, 03:03PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props
rubbertrout wrote:

I think if they hire anyone or provide any kind of service for free it constitutes a "benefit" for the student athlete that is verboten.

Hockey is a little different though because in the other major sports you waive your eligibility by signing with an agent. You can be drafted and not sign with a team (in basketball) but you can't have an agent. Obviously hockey players have agents very early on so there must be some kind of different treatment there.

Hockey players, football players, and basketball players do not have agents when they are in the NCAA. They have family advisors that do not get paid very much and are there to help explain to the family the potential business aspects that come around once their schooling is complete. Slightly different than an agent in terms of how their compensation is laid out.

NCAA athletes are allowed to get nothing other than advise from the teams that drafted them. No payments for strength or conditioning, no equipment, clothes, cars, etc. They can suggest options for a conditioning program, and give them advise on areas to work on, but nothing that would have a monetary benefit.

Avatar
#43 the-wolf
April 10 2013, 03:21PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props
thprop wrote:

Anyone who is concerned about Johnny hockey...and the fact he is not on an appropriate fitness regime in the NCAA needs to put that idea to bed. The NCAA schools are factories when it comes to strength training etc. He may even have better access to training at BC than Abbotsford.

Of course, but I'm talking about a detailed, structured program in the off season. But maybe he stays there through the summer and has access to a team trainer, i don't know. Point is, if he leaves for the summer, he needs to be doing something other than banging out mindless reps. From what shutout says, even giving him a tailored program from Rich H. would constitute a monetary benefit. But they could point him towards an excellent free one on the web.

Avatar
#44 Primo
April 10 2013, 03:58PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props
Parallex wrote:

Gaudreau's father has zero connections to Chiarelli or the Bruins that we know of... he doesn't even live in Boston. They live in New Jersey.

The only connection the whole family has to Boston the municipality is through Johnny.

Relax nothing fishy going on. The family just values education and Johnny probably wants to get to play with his brother.

Relax...hahaha...We lost Erixon our most highly prized prospect and if you think there was no backroom stuff going on well I have some land I want to sell you....cheap price too!

Avatar
#45 chillout
April 10 2013, 05:05PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

@Primo

Erixon's dad played for the rangers. Gaudreau's didn't. Big difference in connections

Comments are closed for this article.