Defending Jay Feaster

Christian Roatis
August 06 2013 08:30AM

When Jay Feaster officially replaced Darryl Sutter as the General Manager of the Calgary Flames in the December of 2010, a collective sigh of relief echoed through Calgary. After all, Sutter's dubious moves were jeopardizing the already down ward spiralling and aging Flames team - one no trade clause at a time.

That feeling of relief, was then quickly substituted by a (possibly pre-mature) sense of optimism. After all, Feaster was at the helm of the Tampa Bay Lightning when they beat out the Flames for the Stanley Cup in '04. What many people didn't know is that Feaster inherited most of the cup winning core. Richards, Lecavalier, Khabibulin, St. Louis and many others were already there when Feaster assumed the commanding role. Yes, he augmented the key pieces with a few additions (namely Daryl Sydor and Ruslan Fedotenko) that were imperative in the Lightning's run to the Stanley Cup Final, but the point is most of the heavy lifting had been done prior to his arrival.

So all the praise and hoopla he earned following the Cup win wasn't all that warranted.

One word I used to describe him when he was named the Interim GM here in Calgary: overrated. Besides his minimal involvement in crafting that one championship team in Tampa, he also carried with him an abysmal drafting record with the Bolts. Excluding the Steven Stamkos pick for obvious reasons, only 4 players drafted under Feaster went on to play over 150 NHL games - none of them becoming more than role/replacement players once reaching the NHL. He did draft Karri Ramo though, so let's hope he hit that one out of the park.

Nonetheless, optimism ran high in Calgary that Jay Feaster would be the man to right the ship and take the Flames to the promised land.

House on Fire

Unfortunately, that hasn't been the case. When Feaster was promoted to the GM role, he was faced with two problems: An unreasonable pressure o win and an aging, sub par, over paid roster. He had a truck load of no-trade clauses to deal and barely any cap space to operate with.

If Feater tried to look to the prospect system for help, he'd be met by only Greg Nemisz, Tim Erixon and Leland Irving. Everything was pretty bleak. He slowly began to cleanse the organization of these trouble spots and mend the tears that Darryl Sutter's madness had created. He also had to do this with the intention of staying competitive and making the playoffs - which has proved to be an impossible task.

Slowly, the prospect system has been rebuilt and cap flexibility has been restored. Yet, a portion of the fan base is still unhappy. Patience has seemingly run out and people want a change. But why? What has Feaster done to merit a pink slip? As my colleague here at FlamesNation Ryan Pike once wisely said, "Feaster inherited a house on fire, put it out and is now taking heat because the house is slightly charred." I couldn't agree more.

All Feaster has done in Calgary is clean up the mess that Sutter left behind and only now is beginning to put his own stamp on the club. My opinion is probably in the minority when I say this but I think Feaster has done an admirable job considering the circumstances.

The Feaster Resume

You may not agree with me, but when you look at the facts, most of what Feaster as done during his time in Calgary has benefited the club. Have a look for yourself:


Trades:

Note: The players acquired by the Flames will be first and both bolded and italicized

Trade:

Date:

Verdict:

Freddy Modin for 2011 7th round pick (#193-Colin Blackwell)

February 28, 2011

Not the best trade as Modin was plagued by injury and only ended up playing 4 games for Calgary. But considering what they gave up, not a big deal.

Roman Horak,

2011 2nd round pick (#45-Markus Granlund),

2011 2nd round pick (#57-Tyler Wotherspoon) for Tim Erixon,

2011 5th round pick (#133-Shane McColgan)

June 1, 2011

After being handcuffed by Erixon's refusal to sign with Calgary, Feaster managed to get excellent value from the New York Rangers. While Erixon still has the potential to be a stud defensemen, Calgary got 3 (very good) prospects in return. Considering neither Erixon nor McColgan are with the Rangers anymore, I'd say Calgary wins this trade.

Chris Butler and

 Paul Byron for Ales Kotalik

 Robyn Regehr

2012 2nd round pick (#44 - Jake McCabe)

June 25, 2011

I don't really want to talk about this. Feaster got fleeced, plain and simple.

Jordan Henry for Keith Seabrook

July 9, 2011

AHLer for AHLer. No real winner or loser here, although Henry did put in good minutes for the Heat during his time there.

Pierre-Luc Letourneau-Leblond for a 2012 5th round draft pick (#135 - Graham Black)

 

Stupid move and Black has put up back to back 50 point seasons in the WHL. This could come back and bite Calgary in the butt. We'll see.

Lee Stempniak for Daymond Langkow

August 29, 2011

Langkow was coming off that gruesome neck injury and was in the twilight of his career anyway. Stempniak is a big part of this Flames team right now and has turned in good value for the Flames. Win for Calgary.

Blair Jones for Brendan Mikkelson

January 6, 2012

Low upside prospect for low upside prospect. I actually thought Jones was filling in that 4th line center role well this year, but the coaching staff seem to agree. Mikkelson also got some NHL games under his bet with the Lightning but has since moved on. I'd call this deal a draw.

Michael Cammalleri,

 Karri Ramo,

2012 5th round pick (Brett Kulak) for Rene Bourque,

 Patrick Holland,

2013 2nd round pick (#36 - Zach Fucale)

January 12, 2012

The winner of this deal will ultimately be decided by the prospects involved. Cammalleri and Bourque have brought relatively the same value to their respective teams, it all lies on what Holland/Fucale and Kulak/Ramo do. At this point, I'd call it a draw but Ramo's performance this season will likely decide it.

Brian Connelly for Brendan Morrison

January 27, 2012

Another low key move, the Flames traded Morrison who no longer had a spot on the team to Chicago for Connelly who helped out the farm team. No winners. No losers. If anything it was a favour to Morrison - finding him a home.

Akim Aliu for John Negrin

January 30, 2012

This deal looked a lot better for Calgary at the end of the 2011/12 season with the way Aliu played those final two games, but now this is just another AHLer for AHLer deal.

2012 1st round pick (#21-Mark Jankowski)

2012 2nd round pick (#42-Patrick Sieloff) for 2012 1st round pick (#14-Zemgus Girgensons)

June 22, 2012

The infamous Jankowski deal that made some Flames fan cringe - when the trade was announced as well as when the 21st pick was made. After all, Finnish dynamo Tuevo Teravainen (projected to go Top 5) was still on the board and Jankowski was projected to go mid 2nd. But now when looking at this deal - Jankowski and Sieloff for Girgensons - it's a win for the Flames. Girgensons doesn't project to be anything above a fringe second line guy while Jankowski could be a Top 6 center and Sieloff a Top 4 defenseman.

Dennis Wideman for Jordan Henry and a 2013 5th round pick

June 27, 2012

That's about market value for the rights of a good NHLer like Wideman so nothing to complain about. Henry's an AHL level guy and the 5th rounder was dealt.

7th Round Pick (#198 - John Gilmour) for Henrik Karlsson

January 21, 2013

Karlsson had no future in Calgary (he had just lost the back up job to Leland Irving) so turning him into a decent prospect was a job well done by Feaster and the scouting staff.

Mike Testwuide for Mitch Wahl

February 25, 2013

AHLer for AHLer. Nothing to see here folks.

Brian McGrattan for Joe Piskula

February 28, 2013

Well not only did fan favourite Brian McGrattan add needed grit to the team, he also turned into a scoring machine, sniping 3 silky geno's - matching his previous career total (LOL). Ryane Clowe had the same amount of goals as MacGrattan last year and the Rangers paid way more than an AHL defensemen to get him. Yeah, I'd rather have MacGrattan too. Who needs skating anyway? Career defining win for Feaster ;-)

Ben Hanowski, Kenny Agostino and a 2013 1st Round Pick (#28 - Morgan Klimchuck) for Jarome Iginla

March 27, 2013

We're now wading into "wait and see" territory as these latest trades can't be fairly judged for another few years. On the surface though, 2 solid prospects and Hanowski is pretty good return acknowledging the circumstances Iginla was traded in. Getting good return on an average 35 year old NHLer who will only go to ONE team is no easy task. Even if that guy is Jarome Iginla. Iginla is also no longer a member of the Penguins so those 3 pieces for 28 "eh" games of Iggy seems like good, bordering on great value for Calgary. For the record, I would've preferred Boston's deal.

Mark Cundari, Reto Berra and a

2013 1st round pick (#22 - Emile Porier) for Jay Bouwmeester

April 1, 2013

Wasn't a fan of this deal when it happened and frankly, I'm still not one. Bouwmeester is still a premier NHL defensemen and albiet a little over paid, he's worth more than what was acquired. It seemed like Feaster felt like he needed to tear it all down at once and may have rushed this deal a little. Best case scenario is that Berra is a starting goaltender, Cundari a Top 4 D and Porier a Top 6 forward but to me it looks more likely to turn into 3 average guys for Bouwmeester. Many media outlets however reported this was the only deal that included a 1st rounder - which would've been a must - so providing that be true, Feaster did ok. Again though, we can't judge this trade fairly until we see what the three guys turn into.

2013 5th Round Pick (#135 - Eric Roy) for Blake Comeau

April 3, 2013

The fact that Feaster actually got something - let alone a solid prospect - out of a deal for Blake Comeau is magic. Tip of the hat to you sir.

Corban Knight for a 2013 4th Round Pick (#97 - Michael Downing)

June 18, 2013

As of right now, Corban Knight is one of the top prospects in the organization, he fills a massive need at center and most importantly, is better than Michael Downing. Things can however, change. Today, it's a steal for Calgary, but for all we know Knight will bust and Downing will be the next Bobby Orr (he won't but for argument sake go with it).

 David Jones and Shane O`Brien for Cory Sarich and Alex Tanguay

June 27, 2013

We'll have to see how these guys do with their respective teams in 2013/14 but on the surface, Calgary gets younger, faster and harder to play against (Sarich doesn't add toughness from the press box) which are all things they identified as goals. Looks good to me.

 T.J. Galiardi for a 2015 4th Round Pick

July 2, 2013

We won't know the verdict of this one until long down the road but Galiardi is a serviceable NHLer with a little upside still remaining which more than can be said for most 4th Rounders. Still, this one is long from decided.

Kris Russell for a 2014 5th Round Pick

July 5, 2013

Same as Galiardi, Russell is a better player than most 5th rounders will become, but we'll have to wait and see how it plays out.

So of the 22 trades Feaster completed as GM of the Flames, I would say he only got ruined once - on the Reghr deal, although the PL3 trade was a loser the moment it was consummated. Everything else is either fair (in the case of the AHLer for AHLer), good value or to be determined. I joked about MacGrattan being his career defining trade but in reality the Iginla and Bouwmeester moves will be the ones that will define his stay as GM of the Flames. Both look decent at the moment but only time will tell how good the return for the Flames really was.

So the trade record isn't too shabby thus far.

Maybe it's his signings or drafting? Let's take a look.


Signings

During his 3 summers at the helm of the Flames, I'd say Feaster's Free Agent Frenzy activity has been defined more by deals he didn't make than the deals he did. 'Twas just 2 summers ago - in 2011, that Feaster moved heaven and earth to try and sign Brad Richards and rekindle the relationship they had in TampaBay. His failure to do so is currently being praised by every Flames fan on the planet. Having that monster deal attached to that player right now would be disastrous to the rebuild. In fact, if Richards was here there might not even have been a rebuild initiated.

Then there was the curious case of Ryan O'Reilly. What a rollercoaster that was. It went from pure elation "omg we're gonna get a franchise centerman for only a 1st and a 3rd and we're gonna make the playoffs with him" to disappointment "damn they matched" to a mix of horror and relief "we could have given Colorado our 1st and 3rd and then lost the player on waivers?!?! Thank god they matched!".  

Either of those two deals happening would probably result in Feaster losing his job. Imagine if both signings had happened, the franchise would've been in the worst spot of any NHL team in recent memory.

Feaster's actual signings however aren't too bad. Aside from a couple of uncomfortable term and money combinations handed to Alex Tanguay ($3.5M cap hit for 5 years) and Dennis Wideman ($5.25M cap hit for 5 years) it's been mostly recruiting college kids and signing/re-signing guys in the organization, although the Anton Babchuk and Brendan Morrison re-signs were bad bets, albeit not terribly damaging ones.

Feaster also managed to sign Curtis Glencross to incredible hometown discount with a cap hit of $2.55 million for another 2 years which currently seems too good to be true. He took a swing at Roman Cervenka and has taken heat for KHL sniper's flop in Calgary, but it was a decent low risk, medium reward gambit for the Flames. In fact, I'd like to see more of these type of ventures - eventually one of these home run swings will connect.

Juri Hudler's 4 years at 4 million per is another deal that could be a source for criticism because he's now one of the highest paid players on the team and not really the sort of talent that is going to turn the ship around. Hudler performed well last year, though he may not last in town over the long term.

A few notable re-signings include Lee Stempniak, Mikael Backlund (twice) and TJ Brodie to good term, fair money deals. A couple of head scratchers in the form of Anton Babchuck (2 years, $7M) and Cory Sarich (2 years, $4M) but neither did anything more than fill the press box and slightly lighten Murray Edwards' pockets.

Everything else has been relatively low risk and low profile. No real Glen Sather bombs on Feasters resume in Calgary to this point. Yeah, he almost bit the bullet twice with Richards and O'Reilly, but he didn't and in my opinion that's all that matters.

Draft

So his drafting record is the only tangible thing (short of the team's performance) left to judge Feaster's time in Calgary and we all now that there's little here that speaks against Feaster and his management team. He's done a masterful job of turning the prospect base into one of the best in the league. Nonetheless, let's take a quick look:

 

#, Year

Name

Status/Potential

13, 2011

F Sven Baertschi

Top 6 NHLer with upside

21, 2012

F Mark Jankowski

Top 10 team prospect with Top 6 upside

6, 2013

F Sean Monahan

Top 2 team prospect with top line potential

21, 2013

F Emile Poirier

Top 10 team prospect with Top 6 potential

28, 2013

F Morgan Klimchuck

Top 10 team prospect with Top 6 potential

45, 2011

F Markus Granlund

Top 15 prospect with Top 6 potential

57, 2011

D Tyler Wotherspoon

Top 15 prospect with Top 4 potential

42, 2012

D Pat Sieloff

Top 15 prospect with Top 4 potential

75, 2012

G Jon Gillies

Top 10 prospect with starting potential

67, 2013

D Keegan Kanzig

Prospect with potential

104, 2011

F Johnny Gaudreau

Top 5 prospect with top line potential

105, 2012

D Brett Kulak

Top 20 prospect with Top 6 potential

124, 2012

D Ryan Culkin

Top 15 prospect with Top 4 potential

135, 2013

D Eric Roy

Top 15 prospect with Top 4 potential

164, 2011

G Laurent Brossoit

Top 15 prospect with starting potential

165, 2012

F Coda Gordan

Top 25 prospect with Top 9 potential

157, 2013

F Tim Harrison

Top 20 prospect with Top 9 potential

186, 2012

F Matt DeBlouw

Top 25 prospect with NHL potential

187, 2013

D Rushan Rafikov

Top 15 prospect with Top 4 potential

198, 2013

D John Gilmour

Top 25 prospect with NHL potential

Overall, it's a very solid group. A gecent mix of talent and depth. Looks like a number of these guys will actually be NHLers one day. Quite the change from the Sutter era.

Conclusion

So why are so many Flames faithful calling for it? My answer is: the way he sometimes handles his business and puts the fans in a crappy spot. Nothing concrete or official, rather little declarations and bold speeches that sometimes put the Flames and their faithful in the cross hairs of critics and trolls league wide. The guarantee that Calgary will make the playoffs? That ridicule lasted right up until Feaster told the world that 21st overall, off the board selection Mark Jonkowski will be the best player to come out of the 2012 Draft. Combine that with the crappy records and underachieving, aging group in Calgary, Flames fans were constant targets for jokes and tease from the rest of the league.

Feaster's rhetoric aside, his tenure in Calgary began on the wrong foot, mostly because the prior regime bungled things so badly. Only now that he's been allowed to clear everything out and start fresh will we really get to see what kind of mark he can make on the organization.

20eba9f84d9905f9b859288e29c3e0a8
Christian Roatis is a European by birth, Calgarian by heart. Other than writing at FlamesNation, he writes about and scouts NHL Draft Prospects at Future Considerations. Follow him on Twitter @CRoatis!
Avatar
#1 Arik
August 06 2013, 09:15AM
Trash it!
58
trashes
Props
22
props

The infamous Jankowski deal that made some Flames fan cringe - when the trade was announced as well as when the 21st pick was made. After all, Finnish dynamo Tuevo Teravainen (projected to go Top 5) was still on the board and Jankowski was projected to go mid 2nd. But now when looking at this deal - Jankowski and Sieloff for Girgensons - it's a win for the Flames. Girgensons doesn't project to be anything above a fringe second line guy while Jankowski could be a Top 6 center and Sieloff a Top 4 defenseman.

This is...awful analysis. Jankowski is tracking worse now than he was before since we've actually seen him in the NCAA and it's been bad.

Furthermore, you completely ignore the fact that Teravainen has looked utterly excellent in WJC camps recently and scored 31 pts in 44 games in the SM-liiga.

Avatar
#2 Arik
August 06 2013, 09:25AM
Trash it!
55
trashes
Props
21
props

Also, listing all the drafted players rankings in terms of the team (Top ten prospect!) is rather silly, given how self evident it is. Feaster could be the worst drafter ever and all his prospects will be top 10/15/20 team prospects because duh.

Avatar
#3 Kurt
August 06 2013, 02:16PM
Trash it!
38
trashes
Props
16
props

Defending Feaster is a joke. The guy should be fired yesterday not defended. You can't start to point out some marginal trades he made or semi successful things and ignore the complete mess we are in now thanks in large part to his ego and inability to see a train coming head on for the past 3 years.

I don't think GMs should be blamed or given too much credit for drafting. A good GM will have a good staff, and trust his staff and drafting really is a group task. Feaster could be blamed (or praised) for the scouting team, and his supporting staff, but pointing out particular players who have or haven't succeeded is IMO unfair.

On the other hand, I think a GM should be highly judged for the direction of the team and the structural issues. I think that Feaster has made so many unforgivable errors in judgement that I honestly can't fathom why he has a job never mind ANY supporters. To name a few...

The ROR saga would result in a pink slip in any normal real world scenario. I don't care whose fault it was, or if they had a different interpretation or whatever. End of the day, Feaster is the boss, and that could have resulting in a DISASTER of epic proportions. I can't believe he still has a job after that.... Then there is the whole mouthing off Edmonton about never rebuilding, then toileting our team and then jumping on the canoe we are riding today. He let ego get in the way of proper hockey decisions leading to being a stubborn mule for 2 years and running his assets into the ground trying to avoid rebuilding at all costs. He could have traded Iggy & JBo 2 years ago (or at least 1) and got exponentially more. He could have traded Kipper. But no, he didn't want to be like Edmonton. Well, how'd that work..... As of today, I wish we were Edmonton. Its great to look back and laugh and point and whatever. But end of the day WE BOTH missed the playoffs for the last 4 years. The only difference is that we have nothing to show for it! We are screwed at ground zero of a rebuild and they are on their way up.... We should be too if Feaster wasn't so cocky, arrogant and stubborn.

The rebuild could be 3 years ahead of where it is today. His ego and inability to see the train wreck coming down the tracks led to ALL OF US living through 5-6 years of hell. And thats being generous. I'd say the last 3 years have been pretty crappy, and we got AT LEAST 3 years of pain ahead of us... As the GM, Feaster should have seen this coming. We COULD have done a mini re-tool on the fly. Instead we are in Edmonton's shoes, 3-4 years behind them with no #1 picks to pad the cupboards. Good thing we have so much cap space! Atta boy Feaster.

Lastly, I think he constantly embarrasses the team with his arrogance. Proclaiming Jankowski is the best player in last years draft on live TV was the peak for me, but I honestly cringe every time I see him on TV. Only Mike Gillis is more of a cocky bumbling fool, and even then Feaster comes across as good competition.

Avatar
#4 Clyde Frog
August 06 2013, 10:53AM
Trash it!
26
trashes
Props
11
props

So his drafting record is the only tangible thing (short of the team's performance) left to judge Feaster's time in Calgary and we all now that there's little here that speaks against Feaster and his management team. He's done a masterful job of turning the prospect base into one of the best in the league.

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

Yeah, rose coloured glasses much? I can only imagine how many NHL teams would trade farm systems with Calgary right now....

Lol Janikowski will go down as a lesson to all GM's who get the off-the-board itch.

Avatar
#5 The Last Big Bear
August 06 2013, 04:48PM
Trash it!
19
trashes
Props
10
props

Allow me to retort:

TRADES:

The Iginla trade will not be Feaster's career defining trade. His career defining trade was when he lost one of the worst trades of the decade by shipping out Brad Richards.

In Feaster's OWN opinion, one of his best moves was to NOT acquire Vokoun. Instead he went with the worst goaltending stable in the NHL (including a teenaged Karri Ramo), condemned his team to the bottom of the NHL, and created a goaltending void that the franchise is still struggling to fill nearly a decade later. Meanwhile, Vokoun's recent resume additions include lines like "Usurped the playoff starter position on a cup contending team from a former 1st overall pick who's a decade younger than me."

He lost the Iginla trade. The only qualifier is that it may or may not have been his fault. We don't know the nitty-gritty details, so we have to give him a bit of a Mulligan on this one.

He may or may not have lost the Bouwmeester trade, but that deal hinges on the 3rd best goalie in the Swiss league becoming a legit NHLer, so... yeah.

The Regehr trade was so bad, that a guy writing an article talking about Feaster's moves as a GM says he doesn't want to talk about it.

He *did* win the Langkow for Stempniak trade, though. So there's that, I guess.

SIGNINGS:

Feaster tried to pull the trigger on a deal that would have cost the team the 6th overall pick for nothing in return. He also offered Brad Richards eleventy billion dollars on a contract lasting until the end of time and space.

Now look at the Flames' roster. There is nothing on that bottom-feeding roster that could ever possibly outweigh either one of those two deals going through.

DRAFTING

His draft record in his previous job was (with not a single word of exaggeration) worse than Maggie the Monkey pointing at a TSN Draft Guide.

To this very day, the ONLY guy playing in the NHL full time that was drafted by Feaster was the kid on the cover of The Hockey News. There are no full-time NHLers drafted by Feaster other than Stamkos.

Last year, at a draft where the one thing his team needed more than anything else in the world was to land a sure-thing NHLer, he picked the biggest gamble of the draft.

None of his draftees with the Flames have done anything of note at the NHL level, so maybe it's a *LITTLE* bit early to be patting him on the back for the drafting success that he hasn't had yet. Especially when his prior draft record is so incredibly bad.

CONCLUSION:

Fire Feaster.

Avatar
#6 Arik
August 06 2013, 10:19AM
Trash it!
16
trashes
Props
12
props

@piscera.infada

Yeah that's exactly what I'm saying! I'm clearly making the point Roatis should've ranked the prospects league wide, rather than the much more salient point that ranking prospects for the purpose of this article is a fallacy.

Also you don't know what apropos means.

Avatar
#7 Clyde Frog
August 06 2013, 02:35PM
Trash it!
15
trashes
Props
5
props
Baalzamon wrote:

According to Hockey Prospectus, precisely 20 teams would trade farm systems with Calgary.

Just repeat that 3 times a night and you'll be fine...

The fact that Ben Hanowski and Kenny Agostino are being considered as more than a couple hands to hold the bag of pucks that was that 1st round pick just shows you how far this prospect pool has to go.

People showing "respect" for the Jarome Iginla trade need to remember that Feaster could have traded him earlier for a more substantial return... But got lost twiddling his thumbs until this looked like a "decent" return.

Avatar
#8 RexLibris
August 06 2013, 12:57PM
Trash it!
13
trashes
Props
7
props

Ahem, Acting Chairman of the Jay Feaster Fan Club here...

;-)

Anyway, this is a tough article to manage in one go as there is significant scope when breaking down a manager's record. Unless it's Mike Milbury, that's easy.

I'd argue about projecting Jankowski or Sieloff as high as mentioned (top six center, top four defender) because they are still early in their development and anything can happen.

The earlier comment about the prospect pool improving as a result of simply more draft picks coming in due to trading veterans is fair as well, although Feaster has also sent a few out the door at the same time. One could argue that Weisbrod has improved their draft record, but at the same time the scouting was so poor under the Sutter regime that nearly any movement would have been seen as improvement. And given that there hasn't been much organizational change aside from Weisbrod in that department one should be cautious about the future.

Feaster's record at the draft going back to his days as Lightning GM is beyond atrocious. No team in the NHL has ever struck out at the draft podium as often as Tampa Bay, and over their history the Lightning have been the worst-drafting team in the history of the NHL Entry Draft. Feaster oversaw a reasonable slice of this history as AGM and GM.

There are some good young prospects in the Flames organization, but when viewed in relation to the rest of the league, they have raised their stock to the middle of the pack. When the Flames begin to graduate however many of these players to the NHL will they have the scouting ability and developmental infrastructure to continue finding and feeding talent into the franchise? There is little in the team's history with their current Hockey Ops personnel to suggest so.

Avatar
#9 Monaertchi
August 06 2013, 01:01PM
Trash it!
12
trashes
Props
1
props
Parallex wrote:

Whoa... that's a few baseless assumptions and loaded words right there. The idea that the Flames drafted Poirier with Shinkaruk still on the board just because they didn't think that Shinkaruk would be there is laughable... the Flames like all teams have a list, they took Poirier before Shinkaruk because they had him (Poirier) higher on the list.

I mean... did the 22 other teams that passed on Shinkaruk (or more realistically 12 other teams if you go by Shinkaruk's #10ish ranking on mocks and what not) just get flustered on draft day too?

And now that you've got my dander up, I assume that you have no proof at all that the Flames have a list AND that they take the best player available from that list.

Sounds like you're making a baseless assumption to me.

Avatar
#10 The Last Big Bear
August 06 2013, 08:33PM
Trash it!
12
trashes
Props
7
props

@BurningSensation

1) The only good thing you can say about the Iginla trade is that Feaster's hands were tied. That may or may not have been his own fault, which is why I give him the benefit of the doubt. But Iginla scored 12 points in 15 playoff games. That's worth a lot more than a very very late 1st rounder, and a middling prospect (I wont even include Hanowski, who's all but proven that he will never be an NHLer).

2) Berra will *probably* be worth absolutely nothing to any NHL team. Cundari is an injury replacement on a basement-dwelling team, and simply not big enough to play his game at an NHL level. Which leaves Poirer. Odds on Poirer being an All-Star, regular Canadian Olympic invite, and leading the NHL in any major statistical category (ala Bouwmeester)?

3) I absolutely would have preferred Girgensons. I was very vocal about my hopes that the Flames would choose him, well before the draft. I never dreamed Tervainen would still be available, but OBVIOUSLY would have been very happy to see him selected. I'm not sure how that makes me a pants-wetter.

Conclusion- my underwear has PENGUINS IN CHRISTMAS OUTFITS on it. Your argument is invalid.

Avatar
#11 piscera.infada
August 06 2013, 09:30AM
Trash it!
10
trashes
Props
14
props

@Arik

Yes, he really should have listed every prospect in the system as some sort of league-wide meta-ranking - that certainly would have been an easy task, and not at all open for debate.

But you always seem to be one who gives the most apropos commentary.

Avatar
#12 The Last Big Bear
August 06 2013, 01:56PM
Trash it!
10
trashes
Props
4
props
Parallex wrote:

No, the severity matters. I'm sorry but there is no way in hell that the Regher trade is the metaphorical equivalency in the hockey transaction world of allowing a dog mauling of a child. I can't take seriously anyone who thinks otherwise.

I think giving up 6th overall (Sean Monahan) and a 3rd rounder (Keegan Kanzig) for absolutely nothing in return, pretty much *IS* the hockey GM equivalent of letting a dog bite a kid.

A dog that does that has seen his last day as a dog, and a GM that does that has seen his last day as a GM.

Avatar
#13 please cancel acct
August 06 2013, 06:37PM
Trash it!
9
trashes
Props
1
props
Parallex wrote:

Whoa... that's a few baseless assumptions and loaded words right there. The idea that the Flames drafted Poirier with Shinkaruk still on the board just because they didn't think that Shinkaruk would be there is laughable... the Flames like all teams have a list, they took Poirier before Shinkaruk because they had him (Poirier) higher on the list.

I mean... did the 22 other teams that passed on Shinkaruk (or more realistically 12 other teams if you go by Shinkaruk's #10ish ranking on mocks and what not) just get flustered on draft day too?

Did the 22 other teams that passed on Poierer get flustered as well?

Avatar
#14 Arik
August 06 2013, 10:21AM
Trash it!
8
trashes
Props
7
props

@ChinookArch

Exactly. I'm not saying Jankowski will never amount to anything (which people seem to think I am because people love putting words in my mouth), just that the outlook is grim. I'm a realist, not a "JAY FEASTER POOPS UNICORNS AND RAINBOWS" kinda guy.

What people seem to forget is that I was actually somewhat pro-Feaster when he was first hired. I didn't like the hiring process, but I didn't mind Feaster himself. Obviously, I've become very disenfranchised.

Avatar
#15 Kent Wilson
August 06 2013, 10:22AM
Trash it!
8
trashes
Props
14
props

We should start calling this place FRIENDSNATION amiright?

Avatar
#16 Monaertchi
August 06 2013, 02:53PM
Trash it!
7
trashes
Props
4
props
Parallex wrote:

What has that to do with the Regher trade? Or 14 for 21 + 2nd Rounder since those are the only two things Feaster has done with Buffelo neither one of which is at all an apt metafor for a dog mauling a child.

It has nothing to do with it. It has to do with the ROR offer sheet. The only thing that saved the Flames from sending their 1st and 3rd (Monohan and Kanzig) to Colorado so that Columbus could claim ROR off waivers is Colorado preferring ROR to a 1st and 3rd.

It might just be the stupidest move in Flames history, and that's saying something indeed.

As for Feaster saying that they have a list and pick from it, he also said his directive from on high was to make the playoffs next season, and that by 2022 Janko would be the best player from his draft year.

Never trust a lawyer, or an American, and especially not both.

Just kidding 'Merica.

Avatar
#17 Kenta
August 06 2013, 09:51AM
Trash it!
6
trashes
Props
21
props

@Arik

Having a bad day Arik?

Avatar
#18 bookofloob
August 06 2013, 12:17PM
Trash it!
6
trashes
Props
10
props

It's not his scorecard of moves that makes me question Feaster's ability as a GM (though, my outlook on a lot of these trades are nowhere near as rosy as some of the ones you list here).

If you look at where the Flames are now to where they were when Feaster first took over, it's admittedly better. The team is younger and cheaper, and that's a good thing. They've blown it up, which they finally decided to do. They took way too much time trying to decide which way they wanted to go (blow it up or keep buying) and just stagnated while figuring it out.

My issue with Feaster is one of the things you can actually admire about him: his steadfast refusal to break from his plan. Between him and his team, they've identified how they want to build this team, and refuse to budge from how they're going to do it.

The problem here is that a good GM should be adaptive. The draft was a good example. Poirier was a player they identified they wanted, so they were going to waste a first rounder on him regardless. When a guy like Shinkaruk was still available, something they likely didn't count on, they didn't seem to address the situation. Unwilling to bend. If Poirier ends up being a better player than Shinkaruk, that's great, but right now he doesn't really seem to be trending that way (I know, still too super early to tell)

The issue with this unwillingness to adapt is I'm not sure this management team really knows the right kind of players they need to identify to make this the team they want to build. They want to be bigger and harder to play against; they're certainly bigger, I just don't know if THEY know what harder to play against means. It sounds like a fancy way of saying "grittier" to me. I don't see them really identifying certain skills that ACTUALLY make you harder to play against.

I'm not throwing Feaster under the bus here. This is a really hard job. This was never going to be an easy fix. I'm just not sure he's the guy that truly knows how to do it.

Avatar
#19 Monaertchi
August 06 2013, 12:29PM
Trash it!
6
trashes
Props
0
props
The Last Big Bear wrote:

I have this dog, he's a really great dog, super friendly, obedient, does everything you'd ever want a dog to do.

Except like, two or three times in the last couple years, he's tried to attack a small child. But I happened to have a muzzle so he hasn't actually able to maul any toddlers. Except that one time in Buffalo. And possibly last trade deadline (I don't know how the kid turned out yet, they might be OK).

And the fact that he has tried as hard as he could to do something incredibly stupid, but was stopped by forces beyond his control, means that we should pretend it didn't happen.

I mean, sure, there are some people who say "Judging your dog based on what he *did*, it's clear that he *did* try to attack people. So that's the kind of thing we should expect him to *do* in the future. And while he did happen to have a muzzle two of the three times he's done catastrophically stupid things, he doesn't usually have a muzzle on, so maybe he isn't as good of a dog as you think."

But screw that. If someone tries their hardest to do something really, really stupid, but fails, it doesn't count. We should still consider them competent and continue to rely on their judgement.

This.

Avatar
#20 piscera.infada
August 06 2013, 09:15AM
Trash it!
5
trashes
Props
16
props

D Keegan Kanzig - Prospect with potential.

Great!!

Thanks for this article, I thought I was the only one. While his tenure thus far hasn't been a rousing success, I'm not sure how much better it could have been. Sure, he dodged a few bullets (Richards and ROR), but what GM hasn't? Feaster came in with a deck stacked against him - an organization in crisis and an ownership group that couldn't move on. All tolled, it's slowly but surely moving in the right direction.

Avatar
#21 SmellOfVictory
August 06 2013, 09:48AM
Trash it!
5
trashes
Props
11
props
Arik wrote:

Also, listing all the drafted players rankings in terms of the team (Top ten prospect!) is rather silly, given how self evident it is. Feaster could be the worst drafter ever and all his prospects will be top 10/15/20 team prospects because duh.

In that sort of context I think the better way of looking at it would be that, within a year of the 2011 draft, Feaster's picks already comprised the majority of the top 10 (if I recall correctly). Part of that was due to Erixon being traded, but nevertheless, he's clearly been a better drafter than his predecessor. And it appears as though the Flames may be above average in general over his tenure so far.

2011 for the Flames looks as close to a draft slam-dunk as one can get, at this stage. That obviously could change, but for now there's no real indication that any of the guys picked are going to bust.

Avatar
#22 Arik
August 06 2013, 10:27AM
Trash it!
5
trashes
Props
3
props

Couldn't figure out how to embed, but FRIENDSNATION. http://i44.tinypic.com/35k6aol.jpg

Avatar
#23 prendrefeu
August 06 2013, 10:49AM
Trash it!
5
trashes
Props
9
props
Arik wrote:

Exactly. I'm not saying Jankowski will never amount to anything (which people seem to think I am because people love putting words in my mouth), just that the outlook is grim. I'm a realist, not a "JAY FEASTER POOPS UNICORNS AND RAINBOWS" kinda guy.

What people seem to forget is that I was actually somewhat pro-Feaster when he was first hired. I didn't like the hiring process, but I didn't mind Feaster himself. Obviously, I've become very disenfranchised.

Yes, because everyone on the internet absolutely pays attention to one individual in the midst of everything else going on in life. Forgive us, Arik, for our blunder forgetting where your opinion stood on a topic long ago.

Avatar
#24 The Last Big Bear
August 06 2013, 11:24AM
Trash it!
5
trashes
Props
16
props

I have this dog, he's a really great dog, super friendly, obedient, does everything you'd ever want a dog to do.

Except like, two or three times in the last couple years, he's tried to attack a small child. But I happened to have a muzzle so he hasn't actually able to maul any toddlers. Except that one time in Buffalo. And possibly last trade deadline (I don't know how the kid turned out yet, they might be OK).

And the fact that he has tried as hard as he could to do something incredibly stupid, but was stopped by forces beyond his control, means that we should pretend it didn't happen.

I mean, sure, there are some people who say "Judging your dog based on what he *did*, it's clear that he *did* try to attack people. So that's the kind of thing we should expect him to *do* in the future. And while he did happen to have a muzzle two of the three times he's done catastrophically stupid things, he doesn't usually have a muzzle on, so maybe he isn't as good of a dog as you think."

But screw that. If someone tries their hardest to do something really, really stupid, but fails, it doesn't count. We should still consider them competent and continue to rely on their judgement.

Avatar
#25 Baalzamon
August 06 2013, 12:49PM
Trash it!
5
trashes
Props
11
props
Clyde Frog wrote:

So his drafting record is the only tangible thing (short of the team's performance) left to judge Feaster's time in Calgary and we all now that there's little here that speaks against Feaster and his management team. He's done a masterful job of turning the prospect base into one of the best in the league.

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

Yeah, rose coloured glasses much? I can only imagine how many NHL teams would trade farm systems with Calgary right now....

Lol Janikowski will go down as a lesson to all GM's who get the off-the-board itch.

According to Hockey Prospectus, precisely 20 teams would trade farm systems with Calgary.

Avatar
#26 Sapp Macintosh
August 06 2013, 03:53PM
Trash it!
5
trashes
Props
6
props

I think this is an admirable job of defending Feaster. I think it falls short though for a number of reasons:

1. the trades listed are either inconsequential OR 'cannot be evaluated at this time.' 2. There is more to a trade than the player going and the player coming back. Timing is a relevant factor. 3. ROR 4. Jankowski - sorry but 'could be a top 6 guy' and comparing him to the guy picked in the Flames' draft spot are two fictions. He SHOULD be compared to all available picks at the time. Moreover, we Janko cold potentially still be a top 6F only because he is currently so far out he's just a long shot either which way. It's like saying 'he's 10 stories high if he's a foot!!' 5. What was the purpose of trading Bouwmeester? Why did that need to happen? He was a useful piece on a team that is currently mostly devoid of useful pieces. 6. ARRRGGGHHHHH 7. Overall, I think you've laid out some important points but I'm not convinced.

Avatar
#27 Clyde Frog
August 07 2013, 08:22AM
Trash it!
5
trashes
Props
3
props

Firstly looking at trades of actual NHL players for "Magic Beans" especially in the form of late 1st rounders requires an understanding that your GM has 100% gone into rebuild mode.

Secondly it requires a further understanding that you just lost a productive roster player for the chance at a player in 2-5 years. This player may eclipse your current one, but has almost an equal chance to not even make the NHL roster at any point...

If Feaster had accepted the roster and performance deficiencies earlier, he could have seen a much greater return in prospects with an actual chance to step into the NHL roster.

He didn't, he twiddled his thumbs until the shine wore off Iginla. He waited for the press to shout from the rooftops Jarome's discontent and for the market to essentially collapse.

That's the issue with measuring Feaster's performance, telling yourself again and again that he forced an amazing return out of Pittsburgh requires you to:

A. Terribly undervalue actual NHL players versus prospects with a big shiny future and a small chance of cracking an NHL roster

B.Completely forget he could have made moves much earlier for actual NHL pieces that could have helped your roster then and today

But hey if the new measure of GM success is repeating the mantra,"We will be good in 2 years, just you wait!"

Well then I guess Feaster has started to look not bad.

Avatar
#28 lionlager
August 06 2013, 09:24AM
Trash it!
4
trashes
Props
9
props

Nice overview. I tend to think he's doing alright, but I'm still disappointed he couldn't get Ty Rattie in that deal for Boumeester. Agreed about his rhetoric. I'd say that was actually his biggest strength when he first got the job. It was refreshing to actually hear a GM talk to the fans and the press, and eloquently. But nowadays we know that most of it is just hot air.

Avatar
#29 ChinookArch
August 06 2013, 09:56AM
Trash it!
4
trashes
Props
9
props

I don't like writing young guys off like Jankowski off, but I'd have to agree with Arik and say it's not looking good. I'm obviously hoping that he'll put a big step forward this year - time will tell. Overall Feaster has been average to below average in his trade dealings, but good to very good (at least as far as I can see) at the draft table.

His worst move by far was the Bouwmeester deal. I believe he could have and should have got more, and if the Blues were not going to provide more, he had the option to wait to make the move this coming season. I just hate this deal.

Avatar
#30 Arik
August 06 2013, 10:17AM
Trash it!
4
trashes
Props
4
props

@Kenta

No, quite good actually. Why do you ask?

Avatar
#31 piscera.infada
August 06 2013, 10:20AM
Trash it!
4
trashes
Props
0
props

@Arik

Thanks for that bud.

Avatar
#32 Arik
August 06 2013, 10:22AM
Trash it!
4
trashes
Props
0
props

@piscera.infada

You are welcome :)

Avatar
#33 McRib
August 06 2013, 12:41PM
Trash it!
4
trashes
Props
6
props

@Arik

"Teravainen has looked utterly excellent in WJC camps recently and scored 31 pts in 44 games in the SM-liiga."

Teravainen had four points against a Team USA Blue Split Squad?!?! How is that utter excellence?!?!?! Half of that team USA Blue sqaud was cut yesterday!!! USA also had Collin Olson in for 3 of the 4 goals... He is a sive that had a 3.09 GAA last year and was pulled from more games than he won. Lets see how Teravainen looks against USAs full squad in December or for that matter Canada's squad.

Avatar
#34 McRib
August 06 2013, 12:56PM
Trash it!
4
trashes
Props
8
props

Sean Monahan scored two goals, Emile Poirier also got a goal helping Team Red to a 3-2 win in Hockey Canada's intersquad game yesterday!! The Flames are shaping up to have two guys in Canada's Top Six and Jankowski/Klimchuk could make the bottom six with good starts to the season. When was the Last time the Flames had 4 forwards with legitamite shots at making the Canadian World Junior Team???

It also looks like Pat Sieloff is going to be USAs Captain and Jon Gillies their starter in net.

Anyone who says Calgarys Prospect Pool is not at least Top. 10 in the league is sleeping!! Even Corey Pronman has us in his Top. 10 Farm Systems and he doesn't like Emile Poirier nearly as much as others. Seen people have us as high as 3 or 4.

Avatar
#35 Parallex
August 06 2013, 01:05PM
Trash it!
4
trashes
Props
5
props
Monaertchi wrote:

Yes, "This".

The hyperbole was almost certainly used to illustrate the point, not compare severity. That's what hyperbole is for and how it should be used.

I agree 100% with the point, that trying to do something that is very stupid but failing is not a positive attribute.

No, the severity matters. I'm sorry but there is no way in hell that the Regher trade is the metaphorical equivalency in the hockey transaction world of allowing a dog mauling of a child. I can't take seriously anyone who thinks otherwise.

Avatar
#36 BurningSensation
August 06 2013, 06:55PM
Trash it!
4
trashes
Props
15
props
The Last Big Bear wrote:

Allow me to retort:

TRADES:

The Iginla trade will not be Feaster's career defining trade. His career defining trade was when he lost one of the worst trades of the decade by shipping out Brad Richards.

In Feaster's OWN opinion, one of his best moves was to NOT acquire Vokoun. Instead he went with the worst goaltending stable in the NHL (including a teenaged Karri Ramo), condemned his team to the bottom of the NHL, and created a goaltending void that the franchise is still struggling to fill nearly a decade later. Meanwhile, Vokoun's recent resume additions include lines like "Usurped the playoff starter position on a cup contending team from a former 1st overall pick who's a decade younger than me."

He lost the Iginla trade. The only qualifier is that it may or may not have been his fault. We don't know the nitty-gritty details, so we have to give him a bit of a Mulligan on this one.

He may or may not have lost the Bouwmeester trade, but that deal hinges on the 3rd best goalie in the Swiss league becoming a legit NHLer, so... yeah.

The Regehr trade was so bad, that a guy writing an article talking about Feaster's moves as a GM says he doesn't want to talk about it.

He *did* win the Langkow for Stempniak trade, though. So there's that, I guess.

SIGNINGS:

Feaster tried to pull the trigger on a deal that would have cost the team the 6th overall pick for nothing in return. He also offered Brad Richards eleventy billion dollars on a contract lasting until the end of time and space.

Now look at the Flames' roster. There is nothing on that bottom-feeding roster that could ever possibly outweigh either one of those two deals going through.

DRAFTING

His draft record in his previous job was (with not a single word of exaggeration) worse than Maggie the Monkey pointing at a TSN Draft Guide.

To this very day, the ONLY guy playing in the NHL full time that was drafted by Feaster was the kid on the cover of The Hockey News. There are no full-time NHLers drafted by Feaster other than Stamkos.

Last year, at a draft where the one thing his team needed more than anything else in the world was to land a sure-thing NHLer, he picked the biggest gamble of the draft.

None of his draftees with the Flames have done anything of note at the NHL level, so maybe it's a *LITTLE* bit early to be patting him on the back for the drafting success that he hasn't had yet. Especially when his prior draft record is so incredibly bad.

CONCLUSION:

Fire Feaster.

If you would rather have 28 games of Jarome Iginla in rapid decline than Klimchuk/Hanoswki/Agostino than you are flat out insane. Anyway you cut it the Iginla deal is pure win.

He's already won the JBo deal as well, Poirier, Bera and Cundari are worth more to a rebuilding team than JBo and his massive salary are.

And clearly you are one of the pants-wettiers when it comes to trading down to select Jankowski and Seiloff. Presumably you would have preferred Girgensons - a surefire 3rd liner, instead of a potential 1st liner (albeit with significant risk).

Me, I prefer a GM who swings for the fences than one who insists on playing it as safe as possible.

Conclusion - you should change your undergarments and put some big boy underwear on.

Avatar
#37 ChinookArch
August 06 2013, 10:01AM
Trash it!
3
trashes
Props
25
props

The article misses a couple of important elements that the GM should be judged by as well. I like what he's done from an organization point of view. The Flames are no longer a one cowboy show, instead feaster has expanded the team management and appears to have given each of his guys a real opportunity to make decisions. Decisions appear to be a committee of talents. I applaud this move.

Feaster made the AHL farm team a priority and began improving the team immediately after getting the top job. Hiring Troy Ward in my view was also an important move in this regard.

Avatar
#38 Ryan Pike
August 06 2013, 10:48AM
Trash it!
3
trashes
Props
22
props

To a certain extent, Calgary's WILDLY improved drafting is a combination of (a) Feaster and John Weisbrod giving scouts clear instructions on how to evaluate players for their internal list and (b) actually LISTENING to their scouts about what they come back with.

Avatar
#39 Clay
August 06 2013, 11:04AM
Trash it!
3
trashes
Props
15
props

I'm on board with Christian.

My feelings reside mostly with the fact that Feaster, while we hate his rants, remains a man of action. We aren't kickstarting this rebuild with Tambo at the helm.

His drafting record in Calgary speaks for itself. Before you criticize individual selections like Jankowski remember that every pick is more likely to not be a serviceable NHLer than will be. The proof is in the average. We have gone from a bottom 5 system to a top 10 as per Pronman, with a couple of mid round picks having homerun potential. Personally, I'd rather see the team select Jankowski and Poirier when they have conviction on the player, than walk up and take Teravainen and Shinkaruk because that is where Bobby Mac's phone calls say he's the best player available. Having conviction shows homework was being done, and the Flames arent just picking a guy because he's the next Western Leaguer on the list.

Avatar
#40 Parallex
August 06 2013, 12:34PM
Trash it!
3
trashes
Props
12
props

@bookofloob

Whoa... that's a few baseless assumptions and loaded words right there. The idea that the Flames drafted Poirier with Shinkaruk still on the board just because they didn't think that Shinkaruk would be there is laughable... the Flames like all teams have a list, they took Poirier before Shinkaruk because they had him (Poirier) higher on the list.

I mean... did the 22 other teams that passed on Shinkaruk (or more realistically 12 other teams if you go by Shinkaruk's #10ish ranking on mocks and what not) just get flustered on draft day too?

Avatar
#41 Monaertchi
August 06 2013, 12:56PM
Trash it!
3
trashes
Props
0
props

@Parallex

Yes, "This".

The hyperbole was almost certainly used to illustrate the point, not compare severity. That's what hyperbole is for and how it should be used.

I agree 100% with the point, that trying to do something that is very stupid but failing is not a positive attribute.

Avatar
#42 T&A4Flames
August 06 2013, 01:05PM
Trash it!
3
trashes
Props
10
props
Christian Roatis wrote:

In my defense on the Tuevo thing, I wrote this before he blew the doors down at the WJC camp.

I enjoyed reading this article; something postive and not numbers based to prove how crappy the organization or certain players prospects are. Perhaps viewed through rosey colored glasses and rah rah homeristic, but pleasant.

Avatar
#43 T&A4Flames
August 06 2013, 03:10PM
Trash it!
3
trashes
Props
6
props
Kurt wrote:

Defending Feaster is a joke. The guy should be fired yesterday not defended. You can't start to point out some marginal trades he made or semi successful things and ignore the complete mess we are in now thanks in large part to his ego and inability to see a train coming head on for the past 3 years.

I don't think GMs should be blamed or given too much credit for drafting. A good GM will have a good staff, and trust his staff and drafting really is a group task. Feaster could be blamed (or praised) for the scouting team, and his supporting staff, but pointing out particular players who have or haven't succeeded is IMO unfair.

On the other hand, I think a GM should be highly judged for the direction of the team and the structural issues. I think that Feaster has made so many unforgivable errors in judgement that I honestly can't fathom why he has a job never mind ANY supporters. To name a few...

The ROR saga would result in a pink slip in any normal real world scenario. I don't care whose fault it was, or if they had a different interpretation or whatever. End of the day, Feaster is the boss, and that could have resulting in a DISASTER of epic proportions. I can't believe he still has a job after that.... Then there is the whole mouthing off Edmonton about never rebuilding, then toileting our team and then jumping on the canoe we are riding today. He let ego get in the way of proper hockey decisions leading to being a stubborn mule for 2 years and running his assets into the ground trying to avoid rebuilding at all costs. He could have traded Iggy & JBo 2 years ago (or at least 1) and got exponentially more. He could have traded Kipper. But no, he didn't want to be like Edmonton. Well, how'd that work..... As of today, I wish we were Edmonton. Its great to look back and laugh and point and whatever. But end of the day WE BOTH missed the playoffs for the last 4 years. The only difference is that we have nothing to show for it! We are screwed at ground zero of a rebuild and they are on their way up.... We should be too if Feaster wasn't so cocky, arrogant and stubborn.

The rebuild could be 3 years ahead of where it is today. His ego and inability to see the train wreck coming down the tracks led to ALL OF US living through 5-6 years of hell. And thats being generous. I'd say the last 3 years have been pretty crappy, and we got AT LEAST 3 years of pain ahead of us... As the GM, Feaster should have seen this coming. We COULD have done a mini re-tool on the fly. Instead we are in Edmonton's shoes, 3-4 years behind them with no #1 picks to pad the cupboards. Good thing we have so much cap space! Atta boy Feaster.

Lastly, I think he constantly embarrasses the team with his arrogance. Proclaiming Jankowski is the best player in last years draft on live TV was the peak for me, but I honestly cringe every time I see him on TV. Only Mike Gillis is more of a cocky bumbling fool, and even then Feaster comes across as good competition.

You should just cheer for the Oilers and be done with it.

Your beloved Oilers organization have made their share of blunders as well, you know.

Avatar
#45 SeanCharles
August 06 2013, 07:32PM
Trash it!
3
trashes
Props
8
props

Years from now we will see more clearly how much Feaster improved this organization.

He inherited a sinking ship and did a good job of repairing it.

I only hope an article like this will enlighten some because I've grown tired of all the Feaster hate.

He is a smart GM and I truly believe he is one of the best in the league.

TB was a learning experience and he has greatly improved his managing since taking the helm here.

Avatar
#47 coachedpotatoe
August 07 2013, 07:36AM
Trash it!
3
trashes
Props
3
props

@BurningSensation

Actually where the Flames win by trading is acquiring a second round pick who seems to be possible top 4 defenseman. If Janko makes the NHL this will be a great move.

Avatar
#48 TheRealPoc
August 07 2013, 10:32AM
Trash it!
3
trashes
Props
0
props

Subtract Sieloff, Jankowski and Poirier from that list, and replace them just with Shinkaruk and Teravainen/Hertl. 3 for 2.

I'd argue we'd have the best prospect pipeline in the entire league if that were the case.

Avatar
#49 mslepp
August 06 2013, 10:49AM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Props
1
props

Yikes.

Avatar
#50 Clay
August 06 2013, 11:08AM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Props
7
props
Clyde Frog wrote:

So his drafting record is the only tangible thing (short of the team's performance) left to judge Feaster's time in Calgary and we all now that there's little here that speaks against Feaster and his management team. He's done a masterful job of turning the prospect base into one of the best in the league.

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

Yeah, rose coloured glasses much? I can only imagine how many NHL teams would trade farm systems with Calgary right now....

Lol Janikowski will go down as a lesson to all GM's who get the off-the-board itch.

Hampus Lindholm will then reaffirm that sometimes, "off the board" is a phrase reserved for analysts without the jobs in hockey ops they desire. It is a fabrication. Those draft lists are just averages of a survey of scouts, not actual opinion of the hockey analyst. To come up with an average, some teams have a player higher, other's lower. Therefore some guys rise, and some fall. A player may be taken "off the board" by one team, but had that team not taken him, been drafted very soon after anywys. Those scout samples are also severely prone to bias and based on personal relationships.

Comments are closed for this article.