Leafs Trade Joe Colborne to Flames

Justin Fisher
September 28 2013 11:05PM

Joe Colborne is going home. 

The six-foot-five Calgary, Alberta native has been traded from the Toronto Maple Leafs to the Calgary Flames for a 4th round pick in 2014. A former 1st rounder, Colborne couldn't quite nail down a roster spot during the Leafs' preseason.

At first glance, it's a head scratcher. Colborne was one of the key pieces in the Toronto-Boston trade that sent Tomas Kaberle to the Bruins, and put up some solid numbers in the AHL, while looking a little out of place in the NHL. Regardless, to give up on a young center with size and offensive upside, on a $600K, one year contract no less, is nothing short of confusing.

In 211 AHL games split between Providence and Toronto, Colborne scored 50 goals and 125 points. In 16 NHL games, only one goal and five assists. Still, Colborne ranked #2 on The Leafs Nation's Top Twenty Leafs Prospects feature that ran earlier this month.

No matter which way you look at it, this is a big win for Calgary. It's entirely possible Colborne could top out as a middling professional hockey player, but the likelihood of him being worse than who would have been Calgary's 4th round pick in 2014 is slim.

The Leafs get a mid-round pick and a little bit of cap relief.

The Flames move futures for a still young, NHL-ready player. Welcome to Brian Burke's accelerated rebuild, Calgary.

UPDATE:

The pick is a conditional 4th rounder... 

C0293e2b4678f1e929600607efbd5b6b
Justin Fisher is a Toronto-based writer of sorts. He likes hockey and comic books and sriracha sauce. He doesn't like Don Cherry. Follow him on Twitter: @thejustinfisher
Avatar
#1 seve927
September 28 2013, 10:42PM
Trash it!
29
trashes
+1
5
props

Well, I guess I can't say it's bad. But I'm not in the least excited about it. As far as I'm concerned we've got a glut of guys like this.

Avatar
#2 exsanguinator
September 28 2013, 10:47PM
Trash it!
2
trashes
+1
51
props

Wait a minute, Calgary didn't get absolutely fleeced on a trade with Toronto? Chalk this one up as a win.

Avatar
#3 Stockley
September 28 2013, 10:48PM
Trash it!
2
trashes
+1
9
props

@seve927

This fits two bits of criteria. First, it's another mid-round pick to bring in a native Alberta boy. Second, it's acquiring someone Burke is familiar with, the sort of move I imagine we'll see a lot of. Give me this trade any day over someone like Liles. At least Colborne is affordable and not signed to a horrendous contract.

I'm lukewarm on the deal. Low risk, high reward though. Replacing a 4th round draft pick won't be difficult. Lots of replaceable parts will be moved out of Calgary in the next couple seasons, veterans looking for new homes or more competitive teams to call their own.

Avatar
#4 First Name Unidentified
September 28 2013, 10:50PM
Trash it!
2
trashes
+1
16
props

I like this trade. Colborne may just need the change in scenery that Calgary provides, being local, etc. Even if he tops out as a 3C, it's well worth a shot.

This looks like a Burke type of move. Good luck in Cowtown Joe, I'll be cheering you on!

Avatar
#5 Cam Charron
September 28 2013, 10:52PM
Trash it!
11
trashes
+1
10
props

This only took so long because the two general managers were haggling over who would pick up the tab for the two dozen jelly donuts they got at Tim Hortons.

Avatar
#6 FireOnIce
September 28 2013, 10:56PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
1
props

Apparently the 4th round pick isn't set in stone. Looks like it'll be a 3rd rounder if certain conditions are met.

Avatar
#7 Alkali
September 28 2013, 11:03PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
+1
8
props
FireOnIce wrote:

Apparently the 4th round pick isn't set in stone. Looks like it'll be a 3rd rounder if certain conditions are met.

It becomes a 3rd if he gets 10 G or 35 P this season AND Flames make playoffs.

I highly doubt it will be a third round pick going to the Leafs

Avatar
#8 Skuehler
September 28 2013, 11:05PM
Trash it!
2
trashes
+1
3
props

It looks like a win for sure - waiting for the catch. I've seen Colborne play in Jr and he was really good. Thinking he may be a better option than Knight in the near future.

Avatar
#9 Kent Wilson
September 28 2013, 11:09PM
Trash it!
3
trashes
+1
31
props

This is an outstanding trade for the Flames. Im not sure what kind of ceiling Colborne has, but for a 4th (or even a third) rounder, it's a clear win. If he becomes any sort of NHLer, Calgary is ahead. If he's anything above a 4th liner, bonus.

I will have a an in-depth follow-up for FN tomorrow.

Avatar
#10 Primo
September 28 2013, 11:10PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
+1
0
props

Anyone know his stats on face offs??

Avatar
#11 RKD
September 28 2013, 11:13PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
2
props

It's clear who orchestrated this trade, this is the second time Burke has traded for Colborne. If he's given some ice time, at least he has a chance to develop and progress his game some more.

Avatar
#12 Sincity1976
September 28 2013, 11:14PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
10
props

This really came down to the waiver eligibility I think. Colborne only has 16 NHL games and he was guaranteed to be picked up on waivers.

Toronto, or whatever team they traded him to, would have needed to keep him on the active NHL roster to keep him. Given how rough he is right now I don't think there were many teams that were able to do that.

The Flames have bad enough C depth and are rebuilding so they are one of the few that can carry him on the roster.

I think it drove the interest down to a point where the Flames got a player for less then value. Knight and Colborne were both players that the Flames were in a good position to get on the cheap. Good to the Flames on getting both.

Avatar
#13 STAN
September 28 2013, 11:20PM
Trash it!
4
trashes
+1
0
props

Wow. This deal must have been in the works for a while. If Colborne had potted a couple of goals tonight, it might have been a conditional third rounder (bumped up to second with 10 goals and 35 points.) But I think he had three assists.

If the Flames give him a spot and 15-16 minutes a night, I can't see why he won't score 15 goals and get 40 points.

Avatar
#14 schevvy
September 28 2013, 11:22PM
Trash it!
3
trashes
+1
6
props

Good trade. But I think we all know who's calling the shots in the office now

Avatar
#15 ChinookArch
September 28 2013, 11:22PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
+1
5
props
RKD wrote:

It's clear who orchestrated this trade, this is the second time Burke has traded for Colborne. If he's given some ice time, at least he has a chance to develop and progress his game some more.

According to Sports Center it was Burke. The last time a Flames GM fleeced his old team, it was for Mikka Kipprusoff. Adding a NHL calibre center to this team is a big win, no matter where Colborne's ceiling is.

Avatar
#16 Jeff Lebowski
September 28 2013, 11:26PM
Trash it!
3
trashes
+1
9
props

I like this trade. I like it even more because the coilers should have been after him if he was available. Especially at that price. Steal x 2!

Avatar
#17 Robert Cleave
September 28 2013, 11:26PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
+1
5
props
Kent Wilson wrote:

This is an outstanding trade for the Flames. Im not sure what kind of ceiling Colborne has, but for a 4th (or even a third) rounder, it's a clear win. If he becomes any sort of NHLer, Calgary is ahead. If he's anything above a 4th liner, bonus.

I will have a an in-depth follow-up for FN tomorrow.

Given the parameters for making the pick a third, I suspect there's no chance it becomes that. In the unlikely event that it does, it'll move from a good trade to an outright fleecing.

There's still really no downside to this. A 4th rounder turns into someone that plays 100 NHL games something like 15% of the time, so the risk of having sacrificed something of value is pretty low.

I'd also suspect when the Flames sell off Cammy and maybe Stajan this spring, they'll get back a bit more than a 4th, so I can't envision a scenario where the club is short of decent draft picks. Even if Colborne is just another 4th liner in the end, the risk/reward balance is OK on this deal.

Avatar
#18 seve927
September 28 2013, 11:30PM
Trash it!
3
trashes
+1
4
props

I can't believe Edmonton wouldn't have given up more than a 4th for him. They're desperate for a big center.

Avatar
#19 Sincity1976
September 28 2013, 11:39PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

@seve927

I think they might have eyes on Luke Adam.

Avatar
#20 Baalzamon
September 28 2013, 11:46PM
Trash it!
4
trashes
+1
13
props

This just in.. the pick becomes a third rounder if the moon falls out of the sky, transforms into a meatball, and lands on Jay Feaster's plate.

Oh, and Colborne turns into Nazem Kadri if the Leafs win the cup.

Avatar
#21 Chris
September 29 2013, 12:08AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
4
props

Great trade. It might not pan out, but it's the kind of trade that good GMs make. Pick up five young "bubble" players with good upside, and odds are you'll get one top 6 forward or top 4 defencemen out of the lot.

Colborne may not turn into Kadri, but as long as he doesn't turn into one of those jelly donuts like Tkachuk did, I'm fine with it. :)

Avatar
#22 Colin.S
September 29 2013, 12:31AM
Trash it!
3
trashes
+1
10
props

I don't know how you can't like the trade, a pick that in all likelihood was never going to be a big time pick anyways for a big center that was a former first round pick that has a decent NHLE using his AHL numbers.

I don't get why Toronto has gone so mild on him, doesn't make a whole lot of sense to me. I think Toronto had better ways to get cap compliant, but whatever, take em where you can get em.

Another bonus to this deal is that maybe the team can sneak Monahan back to the minors without a whole lot of fuss if Colborne can make a decent enough impact with the Flames. Having a big, young center like Colborne might give the team options and let Monahan go develop in the minors if he is not 100% NHL ready yet.

Avatar
#23 Sobueno
September 29 2013, 12:31AM
Trash it!
2
trashes
+1
7
props

Wow, not much to complain about on this one. I guess it makes sense they were trying to get kind of return if TO was going to lose him for nothing via waivers, otherwise this trade makes little sense from Toronto's view. 600k of cap relief doesn't seem like a whole lot to be essentially giving away a 23 year old prospect.

I know many were hoping our trade outcomes would be improved with Burke around. Well IMO this makes him 1 for 1!

Avatar
#24 jeremywilhelm
September 29 2013, 12:35AM
Trash it!
2
trashes
+1
3
props

Niiiiiice.

Avatar
#25 TRAV
September 29 2013, 12:47AM
Trash it!
1
trashes
+1
5
props

Nothing not to like here. If this trade was suggested as a possibility I would have said, "Keep dreaming." Colborne for a fourth is a no lose, with potential to be a big win! Nice!

Avatar
#26 beloch
September 29 2013, 12:55AM
Trash it!
4
trashes
+1
8
props

I bet MacT up in Shelbyville is a little steamed right now. With Gagner and Nuge out for who knows how long, he's got two >25 AHL'ers playing in the NHL, and one of those is barely good enough for the AHL! Picking up a NHL ready center with size and upsize for 600K would have been a very smart move for the Oilers. Too slow, too bad, so sad!

Avatar
#27 Danny Lawson
September 29 2013, 01:03AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
3
props

Mason Raymond beat out Colborne for a position in Toronto ....? Really .....?

Avatar
#28 TRAV
September 29 2013, 01:04AM
Trash it!
2
trashes
+1
32
props

Ill be curious to see how Lambert slams Feaster on this one...

Avatar
#29 vowswithin
September 29 2013, 01:04AM
Trash it!
1
trashes
+1
2
props

Knight was pushing to leave the Panthers because of too much depth in their org, well I imagine that he can't be too happy about this move...

Avatar
#30 bezer
September 29 2013, 01:06AM
Trash it!
2
trashes
+1
2
props

Eff ya.. love the pick up for a mid pick, and we didn't get Liles in the process.

Avatar
#31 everton fc
September 29 2013, 01:07AM
Trash it!
1
trashes
+1
1
props

Colborne and Knight had very similar numbers in the NCAA. I've not been as high on Knight as many here. I see no real difference between Knight and Colborne. Generally speaking.

Yet.

I wonder what this means for Bouma and Horak. If Bouma can play from the right side, that might be an interesting, potentially productive 4th line.

Avatar
#32 HongKongHockeyFan
September 29 2013, 01:07AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
2
props

This is the new reality in the lower Salary Cap world. I won't lose sleep even if we give up a 3rd rounder.

I am just glad we didn't take Lile's salary to boot.

Avatar
#33 Deaner_
September 29 2013, 01:10AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

I wonder if Burkie and Joe's agent are buds, perhaps he could have suggested if Colborne had a sub par preseason that he could make it worth his while in cowtown....Regardless it's a clear win for the Flames.

Avatar
#34 Deaner_
September 29 2013, 01:14AM
Trash it!
1
trashes
+1
2
props

Also, what does this mean for the Horak's and Rienhart's of the world, let alone Knight. How does Bill Arnold see things shaping up coming out of College this season?

Avatar
#35 aloudoun
September 29 2013, 01:22AM
Trash it!
1
trashes
+1
12
props

Nothing wrong with this trade.

And for those saying that it creates problems for the other centres in our system. Tough beans. I would way rather have a glut of centres all vying for a spot than having to use a centre that isn't ready because we have no one else. If you want to play in the NHL and on the Flames then you have to earn it. It isnt given out. Centre depth is something Calgary has been lacking for a long time.

For the first time in a long time I am cautiously optimistic that the Flames are building a team right. *knock on wood.

Avatar
#36 aloudoun
September 29 2013, 01:24AM
Trash it!
1
trashes
+1
1
props

And Colborne had 2 assists and was 73% in face-offs tonight. (yes yes I know its preseason... whatever)

Avatar
#37 Deaner_
September 29 2013, 01:27AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

@aloudoun

Agreed, I'm thinking more about a situation like Arnold's, where he could walk and leave us with nothing, does this make a guy like that a tradable asset with so many 3-4 line potential centres.

Avatar
#38 jeremywilhelm
September 29 2013, 03:16AM
Trash it!
4
trashes
+1
8
props

Colboner engaged. I'm now a full time Colbrony.

Avatar
#39 KetchupKid
September 29 2013, 05:01AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

Go Brian!

Avatar
#40 BJ
September 29 2013, 06:19AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
Jeff Lebowski wrote:

I like this trade. I like it even more because the coilers should have been after him if he was available. Especially at that price. Steal x 2!

Yeah, totally.. I would think they are in a position to outbid Calgary as well... no?

Avatar
#41 BJ
September 29 2013, 06:22AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
2
props
aloudoun wrote:

Nothing wrong with this trade.

And for those saying that it creates problems for the other centres in our system. Tough beans. I would way rather have a glut of centres all vying for a spot than having to use a centre that isn't ready because we have no one else. If you want to play in the NHL and on the Flames then you have to earn it. It isnt given out. Centre depth is something Calgary has been lacking for a long time.

For the first time in a long time I am cautiously optimistic that the Flames are building a team right. *knock on wood.

And we saw in preseason how Hartley seems to have no problem playing Reinhart Knight etc.. on the wing.... no I do not think too much Center depth is a concern for us at all? lol

Avatar
#42 beloch
September 29 2013, 06:59AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
1
props

After reading a little more, specifically [1], it sounds like Colborne might bit a bit of a project player. He's received some injuries and might be afraid to get into the dirty areas now. Obviously, it didn't look like he was going to make the Leafs out of camp, which is why it was trade him or watch him go for nothing on waivers. Speaking of which, my understanding is that the Flames are now in the same position as the Leafs were. Whether he's ready or not, Colborne is on the team. There's no way to send him to Abby if he sucks balls.

At least one fan over in Leafdom speculates that Colborne could make a good winger if converted. If he stinks up center-ice on the fourth line that might be the next thing to try. Unfortunately, he shoots left and it's the right flank that's a barren wasteland at the moment.

The Flames really should look at converting a center or two to right wing. Monahan and Reinhart also shoot left, but Corban Knight shoots right, so he might be worth trying out as a RW if Colborne just bumped him out of 4C.

[1] http://mapleleafshotstove.com/2013/09/29/joe-colborne-traded-to-calgary-flames-for-4th-round-pick/

Avatar
#43 MaxPower417
September 29 2013, 07:03AM
Trash it!
1
trashes
+1
7
props

Being a Leaf fan is the worst.

I feel mentally handicapped by association.

Avatar
#44 Jeremy Ian
September 29 2013, 07:18AM
Trash it!
1
trashes
+1
2
props

Good trade for all sides, but better for Calgary. Colborne was not breaking into the Leaf ranks this year, so he needs a restart. Calgary gets his potential; but that potential now has a shorter and shorter fuse. Leafs have to figure out what to do with the 4th line.

Avatar
#45 whichonespink
September 29 2013, 07:57AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
3
props
beloch wrote:

After reading a little more, specifically [1], it sounds like Colborne might bit a bit of a project player. He's received some injuries and might be afraid to get into the dirty areas now. Obviously, it didn't look like he was going to make the Leafs out of camp, which is why it was trade him or watch him go for nothing on waivers. Speaking of which, my understanding is that the Flames are now in the same position as the Leafs were. Whether he's ready or not, Colborne is on the team. There's no way to send him to Abby if he sucks balls.

At least one fan over in Leafdom speculates that Colborne could make a good winger if converted. If he stinks up center-ice on the fourth line that might be the next thing to try. Unfortunately, he shoots left and it's the right flank that's a barren wasteland at the moment.

The Flames really should look at converting a center or two to right wing. Monahan and Reinhart also shoot left, but Corban Knight shoots right, so he might be worth trying out as a RW if Colborne just bumped him out of 4C.

[1] http://mapleleafshotstove.com/2013/09/29/joe-colborne-traded-to-calgary-flames-for-4th-round-pick/

I am from Leafdom and I agree, Joe might benefit from time on the wing. For 2 games in the playoffs last yr, he looked good. He took the body and was rarely out of position. There is less ground to cover at the wing so starting him off there wouldn't be a bad idea. Just giving him 40 games or so at the NHL level to let him play and make mistakes, and grow. He could be a hellofa player for you Calgary, Im all for helping you out with the flood, but this is taking it too far.

Avatar
#46 coachedpotatoe
September 29 2013, 08:19AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
1
props

For a team void of big centers this looks like a good move. I wonder why Eakin's in Edmonton was not all over this as he would know him from the Marlies; with the injuries at center it would have made sense for them.

I wonder how this went down between Feaster and Burke? Did Jay go to Feaster for insight or did Burke go to Feaster with a suggestion. While some may not think this matters it does in understanding the dynamics in the front office.

Who on the roster does this impact the most; I would suggest Horak at this point as I would see him being sent down. I have read on other sites that it probably means Monahan will be sent down but they seem to bring different skill sets.

It will be interesting to see the new lines and how the coaching staff utilizes what they have. Again I'm hoping for them to roll 4 lines. I'm still excited to watch the development of the young guys and now we have a new one to watch. Good luck to him and all the young kids; remember you are expected to compete each and every shift.

Avatar
#47 ChinookArch
September 29 2013, 08:26AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
3
props
aloudoun wrote:

Nothing wrong with this trade.

And for those saying that it creates problems for the other centres in our system. Tough beans. I would way rather have a glut of centres all vying for a spot than having to use a centre that isn't ready because we have no one else. If you want to play in the NHL and on the Flames then you have to earn it. It isnt given out. Centre depth is something Calgary has been lacking for a long time.

For the first time in a long time I am cautiously optimistic that the Flames are building a team right. *knock on wood.

Exactly. The other benefit from having too many centers on the team is that the Flames may have young talent to trade now. This might serve to set up another cap relief trade to a team that needs to give up a quality RFA and wants a quality prospect in return.

Avatar
#48 Kmp
September 29 2013, 08:32AM
Trash it!
14
trashes
+1
2
props

Can't see the logic here, is he better than Horak, Knight or Reinhart. No and he has to clear waivers, waste of a 4th rounder IMO.

Avatar
#49 jeremywilhelm
September 29 2013, 08:45AM
Trash it!
2
trashes
+1
1
props

@Kmp

Er, hes far better than 2 of 3. Horak is probably a better player than he is.

Avatar
#50 Jeff In Lethbridge
September 29 2013, 08:46AM
Trash it!
1
trashes
+1
1
props

the Flames though are in the same boat as the Leafs... leave him on the team or risk him on the waivers... technically this is a good deal for the Flames... but at his age I would have liked to see more promise from him... I don't have high hope personally

Comments are closed for this article.