FGD: Hey, How About A Goal?

bookofloob
January 09 2014 02:37PM

 

 

 

Your Calgary Flames return home tonight, fresh off a sad, tiny road trip where, well okay that Colorado game was great, but goal scoring, as I'm sure you've noticed, continues to be down. After falling 6-0 to the Coyotes in the hockey metropolis that is the great state of Arizona, the Flames have now been shutout 4 times in the past 6 games and scored only 5 goals in that same span.

Needless to say, that is a pressing concern.

And as that old saying about how things get worse before they get better, well brother, things are about to get worse before they get better. The Flames welcome the St. Louis Blues to the Scotiabank Saddledome tonight, and if we're all lucky and send a prayer to all our respective deities (mine's German Titov), we mayhaps see a Flames goal or two tonight.

Maybe. We'll see.

The Offensive Dynamo Calgary Flames

Lineups, as you know and always are, courtesy of our superpals over at Daily Faceoff, and let me tell you, those guys are all fresh sex on wheels.

  • Cammy - Backlund - Stemps
  • Byron - Monahan - Hudler
  • Galiardi - Stajan - Bouma
  • Westgarth - Colborne - McGrattan
  • Brodie - Giordano
  • Smid - Wideman
  • Butler - O'Brien
  • Ramo

More or less the lineup you'd expect to see at this point in the season, given injuries, mind numbing coaching decisions, and organizational philosophies. That second line is one I'm particularly intirgued in, as I think Sean Monahan could get a decent boost from what may be the two most consistent Flames forwards over the past 5 or 6 games. We all know Monarail has struggled a lot since returning from injury, partly because he wasn't 100%, so maybe now that he's healthy that line could be dynamic.

Anytime I see Backlund at 1C I get giddy.

Expect to see a lot of Gio and Brodie tonight. Obviously they're just the two best defensemen on the team and the club's best shutdown option, but also just because the Blues are good and the rest of these guys are more or less scrubs (not you Dennis, I love you). Could be a long night for that duo.

I don't know if Stone Cold Matt Stajan (pictured above), has any designs on exacting revenge on David "Dave" Backes for his terrible knee on knee hit in overtime the last two times these teams hooked up, but supposedly they're friends somehow and if the Franchise has any competitive juices in him at all (and we know he does), well...let's just say I'll be paying extra attention when the two of them are on the ice together.

Karri Ramo is not Reto Berra and that's a good thing.

The St. Louis Bloos

  • Schwartz  - Backes - Oshie
  • Sobotka - Berglund - Tarasenko
  • Paajarvi - Roy - Stewart
  • Morrow - Lapierre - Reaves
  • Pietrangelo - Bouwmeester
  • Shattenkirk - Jackman
  • Cole - Leopold
  • Elliott

Damn, son.

What you're looking at is basically the entire collection of every Olympic country's roster. That is a good looking lineup, and it's easy to see why the Blues are tied for third overall in the whole entire NHL. I mean that 4th line is pretty junky and you kinda see why Calgary would be countering with Westgarth and MccGrattan tonight (aside from they were going to do it anyway), but the Blues in general are a pretty physical team, and I expect a chippy affair tonight. Old school stuff, should be a lot of fun to watch.

Jaro Halak is currently on the shelf, so the Blues turn to one of the other two goalies they've always been comfortable starting. Brian Elliott and Jake Allen are clear steps down from Halak, but the Blues are good enough that no one's ever really been able to notice. Still, if the Flames want to pop a few tonight, it's probably better that Halak's not the one standing in their way.

Playoff Implications

Reinhart or Ekblad?

Players to Watch

I already touched on this, but let's go with Sean Monahan.

Assuming there's any kind of line matching going on, and Ken Hitchcock loves him some matchups, I have no idea who Sean's going to be going nose to nose with all night, but there's not a lot of options to shelter him. That said, I think he's in the best position possible to succeed tonight, and with some nicely skilled players in Byron and Hudler, there's a good chance we see him on form. He did score the other night against Colorado, and hey, he hasn't been bad lately, so maybe he's getting his nice looking rookie campaign back on track. Tonight's game should be a good test for him and the organization to see how his development has come along.

Also, goons. Lots of goons playing tonight. It's going to be a #GRITCHART heavy kind of night.

LE Fin

I think if the Flames scored one goal tonight, the way things have been going, we'd be happy. If they scored two, there might be a parade. I know a lot of fans are ambassadors of Tank Nation, so they're happy to see the way this season is going. Personally, I don't think they're tanking, they're actually just bad enough on merit to be challenging for that first overall pick.

Somehow I feel better about that. I'd sure like to be able to write these FGDs someday and talk about how the team is right in the thick of a division lead. Someday, friends, someday. That bright future horizon is not as distant as it looks right now, I promise you that.

01f20cee6c900dc633fe87a421630f41
The Book of Loob is the Nation's resident expert in flim-flammery and twaddle. An unabashed Flames fan, when BoL is not intellectually bankrupting Flames Nation, he can be seen rooting for Blair Jones, often to excess, at Book of Loob. Follow him on twitter here.
Avatar
#51 Baalzamon
January 10 2014, 08:41AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
1
props
EugeneV wrote:

?????????????????????????

Seriously????????????????

T......W......A......T!

Seriously????????????????????

That is the reason Burke cited for firing Feaster (well, one of them). It seems hypocritical that he's done NOTHING since.

You don't think so?

And thanks for the nauseating series of "insight". Have you ever actually contributed anything to this site aside from acerbic nonsense?

Don't answer that. It's rhetorical.

Avatar
#52 Lordmork
January 09 2014, 03:19PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Props
0
props

To me, the Calgary lines look about as good as they could be with the current roster. Is that because Hartley has finally figured out which of his players are good, or is it just random chance?

Avatar
#53 everton fc
January 09 2014, 03:26PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Props
0
props

And I'm sure we'll see Reaves take on either McGrattan or Westgarth. Typical.

Avatar
#54 Justin Azevedo
January 09 2014, 03:27PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Props
0
props

omg the lego sports video.

Avatar
#55 Byron Bader
January 09 2014, 03:37PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

@bookofloob

Big ups on the Wayne Gretzky's 3D hockey lead off. Brought me right back to the days of 1997.

Avatar
#56 mattyc
January 09 2014, 09:36PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props
seve927 wrote:

I like how Burke has fixed the problem Feaster had of blowing leads.

We haven't had a lead to blow in a while so that's 'progress' right?!?

Avatar
#57 RKD
January 09 2014, 09:41PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Props
0
props
RexLibris wrote:

That was so last year.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XQ4_6QV2nhQ

I was only referring to it because of the recent event in Shelbyville.

Avatar
#58 Burnward
January 09 2014, 09:41PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Props
0
props

@KetchupKid

It can't get worse.

Avatar
#59 RexLibris
January 09 2014, 09:42PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

I guess the next set of questions that come to mind are:

- could Burke make this team any worse?

- what are the possible attractions of the Flames to a potential GM?

- does the current lack of offense in any way diminish the market value of the Flames' pending UFAs?

- What area of the roster does Burke believe to be a priority?

Avatar
#60 RexLibris
January 09 2014, 09:43PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

@RKD

I know.

Just funny that it has happened in both Alberta rinks in back-to-back years.

Avatar
#61 Carlizzle
January 09 2014, 09:49PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props
RexLibris wrote:

I guess the next set of questions that come to mind are:

- could Burke make this team any worse?

- what are the possible attractions of the Flames to a potential GM?

- does the current lack of offense in any way diminish the market value of the Flames' pending UFAs?

- What area of the roster does Burke believe to be a priority?

- Yes, he could.

- Given the organization's current state, zero.

- Shutout 4 times at home, 5 in the last 7, who is of any value?

- Everywhere

Avatar
#62 KetchupKid
January 09 2014, 09:50PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Props
0
props

@RexLibris

Heh. You've cheered me up Rex.

Avatar
#63 EugeneV
January 09 2014, 10:47PM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Props
0
props
Brent G. wrote:

The comment on Sobotka and Schwartz makes me think it's a really poor attempt at trolling by a person who literally knows nothing about hockey (maybe a computer?) lol

Or someone who watches games by looking at stats and never actually "watches" the game.

Avatar
#64 EugeneV
January 09 2014, 11:08PM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Props
0
props
Baalzamon wrote:

what's weird is Burke fired Feaster for not doing this fast enough. What has Burke done since?

Westgarth. yeah.

this streak of futility has to be some kind of record... it really is horrible.

Ken Holland himself couldn't fix this team in a month and you think Burke could do it inside of a month in which no trades could be made for 3 weeks?

Comments are closed for this article.