FGD: Hey, How About A Goal?

bookofloob
January 09 2014 02:37PM

 

 

 

Your Calgary Flames return home tonight, fresh off a sad, tiny road trip where, well okay that Colorado game was great, but goal scoring, as I'm sure you've noticed, continues to be down. After falling 6-0 to the Coyotes in the hockey metropolis that is the great state of Arizona, the Flames have now been shutout 4 times in the past 6 games and scored only 5 goals in that same span.

Needless to say, that is a pressing concern.

And as that old saying about how things get worse before they get better, well brother, things are about to get worse before they get better. The Flames welcome the St. Louis Blues to the Scotiabank Saddledome tonight, and if we're all lucky and send a prayer to all our respective deities (mine's German Titov), we mayhaps see a Flames goal or two tonight.

Maybe. We'll see.

The Offensive Dynamo Calgary Flames

Lineups, as you know and always are, courtesy of our superpals over at Daily Faceoff, and let me tell you, those guys are all fresh sex on wheels.

  • Cammy - Backlund - Stemps
  • Byron - Monahan - Hudler
  • Galiardi - Stajan - Bouma
  • Westgarth - Colborne - McGrattan
  • Brodie - Giordano
  • Smid - Wideman
  • Butler - O'Brien
  • Ramo

More or less the lineup you'd expect to see at this point in the season, given injuries, mind numbing coaching decisions, and organizational philosophies. That second line is one I'm particularly intirgued in, as I think Sean Monahan could get a decent boost from what may be the two most consistent Flames forwards over the past 5 or 6 games. We all know Monarail has struggled a lot since returning from injury, partly because he wasn't 100%, so maybe now that he's healthy that line could be dynamic.

Anytime I see Backlund at 1C I get giddy.

Expect to see a lot of Gio and Brodie tonight. Obviously they're just the two best defensemen on the team and the club's best shutdown option, but also just because the Blues are good and the rest of these guys are more or less scrubs (not you Dennis, I love you). Could be a long night for that duo.

I don't know if Stone Cold Matt Stajan (pictured above), has any designs on exacting revenge on David "Dave" Backes for his terrible knee on knee hit in overtime the last two times these teams hooked up, but supposedly they're friends somehow and if the Franchise has any competitive juices in him at all (and we know he does), well...let's just say I'll be paying extra attention when the two of them are on the ice together.

Karri Ramo is not Reto Berra and that's a good thing.

The St. Louis Bloos

  • Schwartz  - Backes - Oshie
  • Sobotka - Berglund - Tarasenko
  • Paajarvi - Roy - Stewart
  • Morrow - Lapierre - Reaves
  • Pietrangelo - Bouwmeester
  • Shattenkirk - Jackman
  • Cole - Leopold
  • Elliott

Damn, son.

What you're looking at is basically the entire collection of every Olympic country's roster. That is a good looking lineup, and it's easy to see why the Blues are tied for third overall in the whole entire NHL. I mean that 4th line is pretty junky and you kinda see why Calgary would be countering with Westgarth and MccGrattan tonight (aside from they were going to do it anyway), but the Blues in general are a pretty physical team, and I expect a chippy affair tonight. Old school stuff, should be a lot of fun to watch.

Jaro Halak is currently on the shelf, so the Blues turn to one of the other two goalies they've always been comfortable starting. Brian Elliott and Jake Allen are clear steps down from Halak, but the Blues are good enough that no one's ever really been able to notice. Still, if the Flames want to pop a few tonight, it's probably better that Halak's not the one standing in their way.

Playoff Implications

Reinhart or Ekblad?

Players to Watch

I already touched on this, but let's go with Sean Monahan.

Assuming there's any kind of line matching going on, and Ken Hitchcock loves him some matchups, I have no idea who Sean's going to be going nose to nose with all night, but there's not a lot of options to shelter him. That said, I think he's in the best position possible to succeed tonight, and with some nicely skilled players in Byron and Hudler, there's a good chance we see him on form. He did score the other night against Colorado, and hey, he hasn't been bad lately, so maybe he's getting his nice looking rookie campaign back on track. Tonight's game should be a good test for him and the organization to see how his development has come along.

Also, goons. Lots of goons playing tonight. It's going to be a #GRITCHART heavy kind of night.

LE Fin

I think if the Flames scored one goal tonight, the way things have been going, we'd be happy. If they scored two, there might be a parade. I know a lot of fans are ambassadors of Tank Nation, so they're happy to see the way this season is going. Personally, I don't think they're tanking, they're actually just bad enough on merit to be challenging for that first overall pick.

Somehow I feel better about that. I'd sure like to be able to write these FGDs someday and talk about how the team is right in the thick of a division lead. Someday, friends, someday. That bright future horizon is not as distant as it looks right now, I promise you that.

01f20cee6c900dc633fe87a421630f41
The Book of Loob is the Nation's resident expert in flim-flammery and twaddle. An unabashed Flames fan, when BoL is not intellectually bankrupting Flames Nation, he can be seen rooting for Blair Jones, often to excess, at Book of Loob. Follow him on twitter here.
Avatar
#51 Carlizzle
January 09 2014, 09:23PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
2
props

On their way to being shutout 5 times in the last 7 games, changes have to be coming soon...right???

Meltdown in full swing!

Avatar
#52 mattyc
January 09 2014, 09:36PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props
seve927 wrote:

I like how Burke has fixed the problem Feaster had of blowing leads.

We haven't had a lead to blow in a while so that's 'progress' right?!?

Avatar
#53 RexLibris
January 09 2014, 09:37PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
1
props
RKD wrote:

How soon before a Flames fan throws their jersey on the ice?

That was so last year.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XQ4_6QV2nhQ

Avatar
#54 KetchupKid
January 09 2014, 09:38PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
4
props

This is going to get worse before it gets better. Welcome to the suck.

Avatar
#55 RexLibris
January 09 2014, 09:42PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

I guess the next set of questions that come to mind are:

- could Burke make this team any worse?

- what are the possible attractions of the Flames to a potential GM?

- does the current lack of offense in any way diminish the market value of the Flames' pending UFAs?

- What area of the roster does Burke believe to be a priority?

Avatar
#56 RexLibris
January 09 2014, 09:43PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

@RKD

I know.

Just funny that it has happened in both Alberta rinks in back-to-back years.

Avatar
#57 RexLibris
January 09 2014, 09:43PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
4
props
Burnward wrote:

It can't get worse.

Speaking from experience.

Yes.

Yes it can.

Avatar
#58 KetchupKid
January 09 2014, 09:46PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
2
props
Burnward wrote:

It can't get worse.

Edmonton is about to move ahead in the standings.

Avatar
#59 Carlizzle
January 09 2014, 09:49PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props
RexLibris wrote:

I guess the next set of questions that come to mind are:

- could Burke make this team any worse?

- what are the possible attractions of the Flames to a potential GM?

- does the current lack of offense in any way diminish the market value of the Flames' pending UFAs?

- What area of the roster does Burke believe to be a priority?

- Yes, he could.

- Given the organization's current state, zero.

- Shutout 4 times at home, 5 in the last 7, who is of any value?

- Everywhere

Avatar
#60 Carlizzle
January 09 2014, 09:58PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
2
props
Carlizzle wrote:

Paper bag night at the dome on Saturday, it's gonna get ugly.

Check that, I meant, Fugly.

Avatar
#61 RexLibris
January 09 2014, 10:01PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
4
props

@Baalzamon

Well, Burke fired Feaster December 12th.

Since that time there have been four moves. Omark for a conditional 6th, Westgarth for Nemisz, Liles for Gleason, and Carcillo for a conditional 7th.

Not a lot happening anywhere, and Burke is hardly the only one in dire straits right now.

He's trying to make moves on the team and interview for a new GM probably all before the trade deadline.

My guess is that there are some predictable moves made March 5th and then this summer is when the Flames start to really make substantive changes.

Avatar
#62 RexLibris
January 09 2014, 10:05PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
1
props

@KetchupKid

Do what I can.

The Oilers are playing better, but they now have a majority of games against the WC, including a bunch against the Pacific teams, and they dug themselves one heck of a deep grave in October and November.

All of that taking in addition to the likelihood they are going to trade away one of Bryzgalov or Dubnyk at the deadline, perhaps move Hemsky and probably Gagner, means that their roster could be thinner by March 6th than it was before.

Personally, I think this year's draft race between Edmonton and Calgary comes down to who gets 2nd overall. Buffalo is pretty bad and I'd be very, very surprised if hey could climb ahead of both Alberta teams by season's end.

That being said, if the Flames keep up their aversion to offense, maybe Sam Reinhart pulls on a Flaming C in June.

Avatar
#63 seve927
January 10 2014, 06:19AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
2
props
EugeneV wrote:

Trade ban just ended.

Also, do you think that a trade of any magnitude doesn't take a bit of time to set up?

I also think he is happy to be where they are in the standings, and doesn't want to rush anyone up from Abbotsford. Look what lots of AHL gmae time has done for Byron.

Let the guys stay on the farm, and take our time making any deals. Look what happened with JBo last year when Feaster gave him away without getting offers from every possible team before jumping into bed with the Blues.

It was a joke.

Avatar
#64 Baalzamon
January 10 2014, 08:41AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
1
props
EugeneV wrote:

?????????????????????????

Seriously????????????????

T......W......A......T!

Seriously????????????????????

That is the reason Burke cited for firing Feaster (well, one of them). It seems hypocritical that he's done NOTHING since.

You don't think so?

And thanks for the nauseating series of "insight". Have you ever actually contributed anything to this site aside from acerbic nonsense?

Don't answer that. It's rhetorical.

Comments are closed for this article.