Flames Trade Deadline 2016: Inventory

Ari Yanover
February 22 2016 12:00PM

USATSI_8823952
Photo credit: Sergei Belski/USA TODAY Sports

The day is Feb. 22. That means we are officially T-minus seven days until the trade deadline. Just one more week until the Flames organization is locked into place and left to meet their fate with the personnel they have, whether they miss the playoffs or... yeah, miss the playoffs is probably the only realistic option here.

And what should teams that are going to miss the playoffs do? Buying would be ludicrous; even if there's a single attainable player out there that could make the Flames a playoff team, they're still rather far behind the eight ball.

Standing pat would be even more ludicrous. It's a move we've seen before, primarily in the Jay Feaster #goingfor it years. All it ever left the Flames with were mediocre ninth or 10th place finishes, no playoffs, and an ever-increasingly delayed rebuild.

Teams that miss the playoffs sell. Mathematical life is wonderful and all, but realism needs to trump all: and realism says the Flames need to get what they can for as many players they have who aren't a part of their future plans.

Areas of need

Beggars can't be choosers, and rebuilding teams are rebuilding for a reason: they're missing things across the board. The Flames can use help at all positions, so pretty much every area is an area of need.

Some needs are less pressing than others, though. For example, having centre depth consisting of Sean Monahan, Sam Bennett, Mikael Backlund, and Matt Stajan? Only Stajan is older than 30, and only Stajan probably isn't part of the Flames' future plans among that group. That still leaves three young players down the middle: Monahan, who has some of the best numbers of his draft class and is clearly doing something right; Bennett, who has elite potential; and Backlund, who is probably as excellent as a third line centre as you're ever going to get.

The Flames' top three defencemen are Mark Giordano, T.J. Brodie, and Dougie Hamilton: two under 30 years old, and all three with great scoring potential. Giordano is the steady veteran leader who is still fantastic at the game, Brodie is flat out elite and one of the very best defencemen around, and Hamilton is still growing, but already a high-level player.

But that's about it. The Flames still need to round out their top four with another defenceman; Kris Russell is not the guy. Outside of Johnny Gaudreau for scoring and Michael Frolik for all around play, Calgary is still lacking in quality wingers, although a guy like Micheal Ferland may be able to one day help out - but they still need more elite talent up front.

The two really pressing areas of need? To shed terrible contracts - Ladislav Smid makes more than Jakub Nakladal and Tyler Wotherspoon combined, but may be a worse option than the both of them; expensive players signed to too-long deals have not only inhibited chances for other players, but likely worsened the on-ice roster - and goaltending.

Oh god, do the Calgary Flames need goaltending. Save us Jon Gillies, you're our only hope isn't going to cut it, even if he hadn't just lost almost his entire rookie pro season to surgery.

The market

Since the Flames aren't buyers, they really only have one contribution to the market: players for sale.

Jiri Hudler is a reliable 50-point top six insurance forward at absolute worst. Russell is billed nowadays as a shot-blocking top four defenceman of great character and heart. That makes them the Flames' greatest assets - especially considering how the Flames' other UFAs consist of David Jones (whose plain name matches his abilities: sure, he can contribute, and he's an NHLer, but he's not an exceptional one, and nobody is going to break bank for him), Nakladal (only just now getting actual NHL action), Jonas Hiller (in the worst season of his career to date), and Karri Ramo (RIP).

So if the Flames are going to make any splashes over the course of this week, it's probably going to be off the backs of Hudler and Russell, as we should bid them farewell.

What does one get for a Hudler or a Russell? Picks, prospects, or young, capable roster players, ideally. Anywhere they go is likely to be a team gearing up for a playoff run: Hudler adds scoring depth, Russell adds another mobile body on the backend accustomed to big minutes. They're good pieces to go after.

Now, here's a question in regards to them: do you trade them to two separate teams, or package them together? For example: if the Score's idea of Hudler and Russell to Dallas for Valeri Nichushkin is even remotely feasible (and I have my serious doubts, because that would be a dream come true), then that's pretty much all the excitement I'd need on trade deadline week.

Or they could be traded for picks. The Flames loading up on picks for the upcoming draft would be a good thing to do. It's just not fun to talk about, but it would still be smart.

Cap space

This so happens to be one of the Flames' areas of need. They need to clear salary, not because they're in a Chicago Blackhawks-like situation and have to sell off valuable players for essentially nothing (Patrick Sharp and Stephen Johns for what turned into Jiri Sekac and Rob Scuderi in the AHL is hysterical), but because they have too many bad players taking up too much cap (and roster) space.

Sure, via NHLNumbers, the Flames still have roughly $2.6 million in cap space. That's a bit of change that could allow them to retain salary or take on a bad contract in exchange for a pick or prospect, but it's not much.

Much of the core is already set: Giordano, Brodie, and Hamilton locked up, Gaudreau and Monahan about to be, and a year still to go on Sam Bennett's ELC. But then there are all the dollars Mason Raymond, Dennis Wideman, and even Stajan and Smid are taking up, and it gets ugly, fast. It's these deals that are going to limit the Flames' monetary flexibility, not Gaudreau's upcoming contract for many, many dollars.

Going half-cocked in ill-advised trades or in free agency when the Flames were swimming in cap space limits the Flames' flexibility in this area.

Future assets

The Flames essentially have a full round of picks with which to work in the 2016 draft, and that's it, barring a condition or two here or there. More would be nice; after all, it was the Flames' flexibility in picks garnered via trading Curtis Glencross in 2015 that allowed them to pick up both Hamilton and Oliver Kylington, and those two adds did wonders for Calgary in its quest to better its defence for the future.

The only way any of Calgary's picks go anywhere is if it's an upgrade. And their first probably isn't going anywhere at all; they can't afford that. Not when they're sitting 25th in the league.

Picks are just one piece of the puzzle, though. Picks are great, but usually only when they pan out. Prospects on the cusp of breaking in the NHL - or young players who are already there - count in this category, and count as something the Flames need to collect more of.

But that's not to say the Flames don't have any of their own to offer up. Raymond, for example, was sent down so Markus Granlund could remain in the NHL; Granlund has been a healthy scratch six out of 10 times this month. He's 22 years old. What's his role on this team? Josh Jooris has, undeservedly, been a frequent healthy scratch this season: where is he meant to fit in? If Tyler Wotherspoon is in his third professional year, and is only just now getting his second real shot with the Flames, could he be better utilized on another team?

If the Flames have any young players they aren't sure where to fit in, and they have a chance to include them in a trade that would provide an upgrade, they should pull the trigger. And for a team with a solid handful of bottom six players and AHL-NHL tweeners, this could be a chance to capitalize.

Conclusion

The key to a successful trade deadline for the Flames is very simple: trade Hudler and Russell for future assets. That's the minimum standard.

Anything more would be great, but Hudler and Russell will likely be too expensive to re-sign, and you can't let players of that ability or market value go for nothing. Especially not when you're still looking to the future, and still need help getting there.

They're the best chance to help. That's their future role. You can't let that slip away.

F0c4c8e806b29606c84e319f03049d40
Ari first fell in love with the Flames during the city-wide madness that was 2004. She enjoys thinking about the Flames, writing about the Flames, and dogs. You can find 140-character versions of her yelling at @thirtyfourseven.
Avatar
#1 Graham
February 22 2016, 12:23PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Props
18
props

At this point I would trade for draft picks, accumulating them for use as 'currency' at the draft.

Avatar
#2 Könniek
February 22 2016, 12:25PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
13
props

That trade proposal from the score is too nice

Avatar
#3 piscera.infada
February 22 2016, 12:29PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Props
9
props

@Könniek

Yeah, but then you read the Oiler's trade and you ask "what were they smoking?".

Avatar
#4 ApolloRising
February 22 2016, 12:33PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
7
props

It's time to remove the place holders and start using the players we have been developing. The big issue going forward is that Hartley doesn't see me to like playing rookies. Even if we can make moves to replace the dead weight, I'm worried about how the replacements will (or won't be) be used.

I would love to see a trade for Nichuskin. I'm not sure how we move out our negative assets (we all know who they are). But those players are taking up way too much cap space and preventing better players from playing. I hope Treliving can get creative!

Avatar
#5 everton fc
February 22 2016, 12:40PM
Trash it!
3
trashes
Props
5
props
ApolloRising wrote:

It's time to remove the place holders and start using the players we have been developing. The big issue going forward is that Hartley doesn't see me to like playing rookies. Even if we can make moves to replace the dead weight, I'm worried about how the replacements will (or won't be) be used.

I would love to see a trade for Nichuskin. I'm not sure how we move out our negative assets (we all know who they are). But those players are taking up way too much cap space and preventing better players from playing. I hope Treliving can get creative!

Right wing for right wing swap if the Stars took Hudler and Russell for Nichuskin. Why wouldn't the Bolts take the same for Drouin?? Especially w/Garrison hurt (not sure how long he's on the shelf...?)

I'd take Nichuskin over Drouin.

Avatar
#6 ApolloRising
February 22 2016, 12:54PM
Trash it!
3
trashes
Props
6
props
everton fc wrote:

Right wing for right wing swap if the Stars took Hudler and Russell for Nichuskin. Why wouldn't the Bolts take the same for Drouin?? Especially w/Garrison hurt (not sure how long he's on the shelf...?)

I'd take Nichuskin over Drouin.

After all that's happened with Drouin I personally wouldn't want to trade for him. Seems like he has too much of an attitude and is overrated. He hasn't been able to compete at an NHL level and refuses to play in the AHL. Most players play in the AHL to develop. It's not a punishment, it's a right of passage. So for those reasons I don't want him. I really hate players with poor attitudes.

Avatar
#7 everton fc
February 22 2016, 01:13PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
7
props
ApolloRising wrote:

After all that's happened with Drouin I personally wouldn't want to trade for him. Seems like he has too much of an attitude and is overrated. He hasn't been able to compete at an NHL level and refuses to play in the AHL. Most players play in the AHL to develop. It's not a punishment, it's a right of passage. So for those reasons I don't want him. I really hate players with poor attitudes.

I agree. Not to mention Nichuskin's a big unit.

One can dream...

Avatar
#8 Backburner
February 22 2016, 01:21PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Props
9
props

To me it will be interesting to see if Treliving can shed some salary at the deadline..

Dumping anyone of: Raymond, Smid, Wideman, Stajan or Engelland's contracts would be a huge Victory in my opinion.

With Gaudreau and Monahan due for big contracts, not to mention having to sign a Goalie (or two). This should be high on their list of things to do.

I also think we'll see Colborne moved, as they won't be able to resign him.

Avatar
#9 fretsey
February 22 2016, 01:26PM
Trash it!
4
trashes
Props
2
props
everton fc wrote:

I agree. Not to mention Nichuskin's a big unit.

One can dream...

lol... you said "big unit"

careful what you share about your dreams ;)

I kid of course!

Avatar
#10 everton fc
February 22 2016, 01:35PM
Trash it!
4
trashes
Props
5
props
fretsey wrote:

lol... you said "big unit"

careful what you share about your dreams ;)

I kid of course!

In comedy, timing is everything. Well done!

Avatar
#11 ginwarrior
February 22 2016, 01:54PM
Trash it!
4
trashes
Props
6
props

With the problems in net the Smid for laurent brossoit doesn't look like such a good deal. Edmonton definitely won that trade. Brossoit is playing very well in the AHL and was an all-star this year. looks to be an nhl'er next year

Avatar
#12 suba steve
February 22 2016, 02:06PM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Props
16
props
ginwarrior wrote:

With the problems in net the Smid for laurent brossoit doesn't look like such a good deal. Edmonton definitely won that trade. Brossoit is playing very well in the AHL and was an all-star this year. looks to be an nhl'er next year

Boissoit's year sounds a little bit like Ortio's season last year. Brossoit may end up being a full time NHLer, but till he gets there, it's a little early to be declaring the deal a huge loss.

But, I admit, it would be nice if we could just have a do-over on that one.

Avatar
#13 flames2015
February 22 2016, 02:56PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
7
props

My biggest concern is the Flames potentially overvaluing Hudler and Russell's trade value. Surely offers have already been made by other teams by now. Sure, we can wait till the deadline for a chance at a higher return, but we also run the risk of the Cammalleri situation and lose these 2 guys for nothing as potential buyers could shift to oher teams and players if we are playing too much hardball. Polak fetched Toronto a 2nd rounder so surely Russell could get that and maybe better? I think Toronto has done a good job at shifting assets early on before the deadline. If it makes sense, just do it.

Avatar
#14 brodiegio4life
February 22 2016, 02:59PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
12
props

shinkaruk to the flames for granlund!

Avatar
#15 Parallex
February 22 2016, 03:00PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
4
props

The teams A-list wants should (IMO) be in this order...

1: Young NHL'ers with top 6 upside - (Nichuskin, Hayes, Drouin etc. etc.)

2: Blue Chipish Prospects on the cusp of being NHL'ers (Matt Murray would be a good example of this)

3: Draft Picks

The team should be moving towards repectability.

Hmm buzz on the phone says we just got Shinkaruk for Granlund.

Avatar
#16 Backburner
February 22 2016, 03:07PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
3
props
brodiegio4life wrote:

shinkaruk to the flames for granlund!

Oh! I thought your were joking!

This is a weird one.. but I like it!

Avatar
#17 The Real Slim Brodie
February 22 2016, 03:22PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
8
props

Gonna miss granlund but shinkaruk might fit well nice trade

Avatar
#18 PrairieStew
February 22 2016, 03:55PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
5
props

I would include Joe Colborne in the list of players available. He's making well below the league average and is an RFA at the end of the year, is still relatively young and has some offensive production. He could be added to a deal with UFA's to give the team something cheap to show for it next year. So if that Hudler + Russell for Nicushkin deal is not happening, add Big Joe in there to see if that puts it over the top.

Comments are closed for this article.