The Flames should claim Ty Rattie off waivers

Ryan Pike
January 03 2017 02:00PM

The Calgary Flames have 22 healthy bodies on their roster right now, following the injury to winger Troy Brouwer last week. They've shown a reluctance to recall a player from the American Hockey League's Stockton Heat, likely in part because the Heat are doing so well that it would be a shame to pluck a youngster from that environment.

However, it seems that the waiver wire could be a fantastic place for the Flames to obtain some short-term depth. The St. Louis Blues have placed forward Ty Rattie on waivers and the Flames would be very wise to put in a claim.

Rattie could be a fantastic fit for the Flames for a few reasons.

He's young. He turns 24 next month.

He's local. He was born in Airdrie and only ever left Alberta to play hockey to join the Western Hockey League's powerhouse Portland Winterhawks.

He's a right shot. The Flames have habitually added a bunch of right-shooting forwards since last spring, if only to provide some depth to the position (and ideally to strike it rich when one of them actually clicks).

He's inexpensive. He's on a one-way deal this season that pays him just $650,000. The Flames can easily fit that under their LTIR-infused salary cap. The Flames also have only 45 contracts running right now, well under the league's 50-deal limit. Adding Rattie wouldn't handcuff them at all.

He's been very good at other levels (and is untested at the NHL level). He was a huge part of the powerhouse Portland clubs that routinely went to the WHL championship series, putting up 348 points in 269 games. He's been a superb AHL player with the Chicago Wolves, putting up 137 points in 196 games. He's only played 30 NHL games, though, and has scored eight points while playing 10 minutes or fewer in a bottom six role. He's only played four games this season (the last time on Nov. 28) and has been a frequent healthy scratch.

Right now, the Flames are 12th in the NHL's waiver priority order (ranked by points percentage). The teams ahead of them are Colorado, Arizona, Buffalo, Winnipeg, New Jersey, Vancouver, Detroit, the Islanders, Dallas, Florida and Nashville. Most of those teams could use Rattie, too. Claiming him wouldn't be a guarantee to actually obtaining him. But the Flames have the added benefit of Troy Brouwer's vacated roster spot and time to throw Rattie into the lineup to really evaluate him. If he's not a fit, they can throw him back into the waiver pool and not bat an eye if he gets claimed.

Right now, with some under-performing forwards on their roster and a seeming desire not to want to muck with Stockton's mojo too much, claiming Rattie could give the Flames roster a nice kick in the butt with an extremely minimal risk to the team. He'd be an extremely savvy pickup.

51a8cdc527ce12d222fdc583f3cf4368
Ryan Pike has covered the Calgary Flames since 2010. He's Senior Contributing Editor at FlamesNation, a Senior Writer covering the Flames and the NHL Draft for The Hockey Writers, and a correspondent for the Fischler Report. You can see his hand or the side of his head on TV sometimes.
Avatar
#1 flamesburn89
January 03 2017, 02:12PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Props
36
props

Lol, CanucksArmy just put a similar piece up on why the Canucks should claim Rattie about an hour ago.

Kid will be highly sought after if the acquisition cost is free.

Avatar
#2 OKG
January 03 2017, 02:29PM
Trash it!
47
trashes
Props
3
props

Linden Vey is better. Rattie's hockey sense is lacking.

Avatar
#3 piscera.infada
January 03 2017, 02:36PM
Trash it!
4
trashes
Props
23
props

I don't think there's any chance he makes it the Flames.

Avatar
#4 everton fc
January 03 2017, 02:57PM
Trash it!
6
trashes
Props
22
props

Every one of these waiver "possibilities" the Flames have passed on. Rattie will be no different.

I'm not even sure Yakupov would get picked up off the wavier wire. He's really blown a big (last?) opportunity with the Blues.

Avatar
#5 Prototype369
January 03 2017, 02:59PM
Trash it!
3
trashes
Props
34
props

Quick question, I could be wrong, but don't you move to the bottom of the waiver order after picking a player? So shouldn't Arizona be last because they picked up burmistrov?

P.s. that organization is a s***show

Avatar
#6 Derzie
January 03 2017, 03:02PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
38
props

Wasn't this the guy we wanted in the Jay Bo trade? Yikes.

Avatar
#7 Mike FAIL
January 03 2017, 03:05PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
21
props
Prototype369 wrote:

Quick question, I could be wrong, but don't you move to the bottom of the waiver order after picking a player? So shouldn't Arizona be last because they picked up burmistrov?

P.s. that organization is a s***show

Arizona has a max 50/50 contract currently.

Avatar
#8 Parallex
January 03 2017, 03:05PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Props
4
props

@Prototype369

No, not anymore.

Avatar
#9 supra steve
January 03 2017, 03:14PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
31
props
Derzie wrote:

Wasn't this the guy we wanted in the Jay Bo trade? Yikes.

Yeah, it's almost as if we (FN faithful) really don't know what we're doing, any more than the Flames management staff does. Perhaps even less? But, that can't be, can it? So, what's with that? :)

Avatar
#10 Parallex
January 03 2017, 03:15PM
Trash it!
7
trashes
Props
8
props
Prototype369 wrote:

Quick question, I could be wrong, but don't you move to the bottom of the waiver order after picking a player? So shouldn't Arizona be last because they picked up burmistrov?

P.s. that organization is a s***show

No they aren't. They just don't have any money and are rebuilding. Yeah they suck on the ice but (at least to me) they're obviously tanking so organizationally I can't say they're a s***show because they're doing a good job of it (tanking).

Avatar
#11 ned
January 03 2017, 04:15PM
Trash it!
64
trashes
Props
29
props

Shoulda kept Sven! 11 points in last 10 games!

Avatar
#12 DangleSnipeCelly
January 03 2017, 04:24PM
Trash it!
4
trashes
Props
22
props

I'm sure our boy SVEN is lobbying hard over in Vancouver along with Travis Green. I'd be surprised if he made it passed the Canucks.

Avatar
#13 MontanaMan
January 03 2017, 04:34PM
Trash it!
30
trashes
Props
27
props

In other news, I recall many on FN challenging my position on Shea Weber that he was a legitimate first pairing defence man. Comments like "he wouldn't be a first pairing d-man on any NHL club"; "he's too slow and his best days are behind him." Weber is having a great year and will have many more ahead of him. Shows how little some people know in assessing talent.

Avatar
#14 Brent G.
January 03 2017, 05:09PM
Trash it!
4
trashes
Props
47
props
MontanaMan wrote:

In other news, I recall many on FN challenging my position on Shea Weber that he was a legitimate first pairing defence man. Comments like "he wouldn't be a first pairing d-man on any NHL club"; "he's too slow and his best days are behind him." Weber is having a great year and will have many more ahead of him. Shows how little some people know in assessing talent.

What team do you scout for?

Avatar
#15 cunning_linguist
January 03 2017, 05:35PM
Trash it!
3
trashes
Props
49
props
MontanaMan wrote:

In other news, I recall many on FN challenging my position on Shea Weber that he was a legitimate first pairing defence man. Comments like "he wouldn't be a first pairing d-man on any NHL club"; "he's too slow and his best days are behind him." Weber is having a great year and will have many more ahead of him. Shows how little some people know in assessing talent.

Congrats man! I'm really happy for you

Avatar
#16 Stu Cazz
January 03 2017, 06:08PM
Trash it!
7
trashes
Props
10
props
MontanaMan wrote:

In other news, I recall many on FN challenging my position on Shea Weber that he was a legitimate first pairing defence man. Comments like "he wouldn't be a first pairing d-man on any NHL club"; "he's too slow and his best days are behind him." Weber is having a great year and will have many more ahead of him. Shows how little some people know in assessing talent.

...and your the guy that has been knocking Monahan and man were you off base.....

Avatar
#17 Just.Visiting
January 03 2017, 06:37PM
Trash it!
4
trashes
Props
18
props

I don't see where he's a material uplift relative to the options we already have in hand at Stockton.

I have a concern about cluttering up the roster with depth players that take away potential ice time from others who are developing.

Avatar
#18 MontanaMan
January 03 2017, 07:08PM
Trash it!
21
trashes
Props
9
props

I know of at least three people that were clearly wrong in their assessment of the trade. Better luck next time Stu Cazz, cunning linguist and Brent G.

Avatar
#19 Stu Cazz
January 03 2017, 07:29PM
Trash it!
3
trashes
Props
16
props
MontanaMan wrote:

I know of at least three people that were clearly wrong in their assessment of the trade. Better luck next time Stu Cazz, cunning linguist and Brent G.

All in good fun Monty...I like Shea Webber as well but like Gio age will become a major factor well before the contract term ends...that's where Nashville with Subban has an advantage, if any....

Avatar
#20 FerdaFlames
January 03 2017, 07:37PM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Props
13
props

Why not then we can stop playing chaser top 6 line minutes

Avatar
#21 MontanaMan
January 03 2017, 07:40PM
Trash it!
5
trashes
Props
6
props
Stu Cazz wrote:

All in good fun Monty...I like Shea Webber as well but like Gio age will become a major factor well before the contract term ends...that's where Nashville with Subban has an advantage, if any....

All good Stu. Time will tell but I think Weber's got more in the tank than most people think. For now, the Habs are the clear winners but we'll see what it looks like in three years.

Avatar
#22 Stu Cazz
January 03 2017, 07:43PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
16
props
FerdaFlames wrote:

Why not then we can stop playing chaser top 6 line minutes

You are absolutely correct! Then Chiasson makes the 4th line better. Like most views I doubt Rattie will be available by the time the Flames can claim. As well prior to the Blues placing him on waivers I'm sure the Flames and others were notified but not interested in giving up any kind of draft choice for him...perhaps he is rated lower than current prospects....

Avatar
#23 MarbledBlueCheese
January 03 2017, 10:12PM
Trash it!
3
trashes
Props
11
props

By this time tomorrow Rattie will be a Vancouver Canuck.

Avatar
#24 Parallex
January 03 2017, 10:42PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Props
9
props
MarbledBlueCheese wrote:

By this time tomorrow Rattie will be a Vancouver Canuck.

While I'd like to hope the Flames are the successful claim I suspect you're right... early twenty-somethings with some of the prospect shine worn off is almost a Jim Benning fetish acquisition.

Avatar
#25 Stu Cazz
January 03 2017, 11:11PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
5
props
MarbledBlueCheese wrote:

By this time tomorrow Rattie will be a Vancouver Canuck.

Yup...Rattie and Sven were a deadly combination in Junior.....

Avatar
#26 Arminius
January 04 2017, 12:54AM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Props
6
props

This will never happen. Why do people get their hopes for the waiver wire. When has Calgary even plucked someone off it that's been of any excitement value. I can't recall any?

Avatar
#27 Denscafon
January 04 2017, 10:42AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
5
props

Rattie claimed by the Canes

Avatar
#28 jakethesnail
January 04 2017, 12:05PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
1
props

Yeah Carolina was one of 13 teams in the NHL below the Flames in the standings. No chance of Flames picking up ANY decent players on waivers.

Interesting to note for 'Nuck fans that Vancouver (tied with Carolina at 39 points but ranked lower than Carolina) passed on Rattie.

Avatar
#29 piscera.infada
January 04 2017, 01:35PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
2
props

@jakethesnail

Interesting to note for 'Nuck fans that Vancouver (tied with Carolina at 39 points but ranked lower than Carolina) passed on Rattie.

They made the interesting--and kind of strange--decision to pick up Boucher instead. Considering their track-record as NHLer's and both being the same age, Boucher may have been the better pick up here. That said, they could have pick him off waivers about 25 other times this season.

Comments are closed for this article.