Flames Scoring Chances, Game 1 versus EDM

Scoring Chances for NHL Game Number 20005

Team Period Time Note CGY Opponent  
EDM 1 19:31   3 12 13 28 34 40 6 26 27 35 83 89 5v5
EDM 1 15:39   4 5 8 10 17 34 2 4 10 14 35 49 5v5
EDM 1 13:31   3 12 13 28 34 40 2 27 35 49 83 89 5v5
EDM 1 13:07   7 8 10 17 34 66 2 4 10 14 35 49 5v5
EDM 1 10:57 Brule goal 5 7 20 28 34   6 13 26 35 67 91 4v5
EDM 1 9:56   4 5 10 12 13 34 4 5 10 35 77 83 5v5
EDM 1 9:34   3 8 10 17 28 34 4 6 10 14 26 35 5v5
EDM 1 7:52   5 7 17 20 34   5 27 35 77 83 89 4v5
EDM 1 5:48   3 8 15 28 34 40 6 27 35 77 83 89 5v5
CGY 1 4:13   4 20 28 34 40   4 6 10 14 26 35 4v5
EDM 1 3:42   4 11 28 34 42   4 6 10 14 26 35 4v5
EDM 1 2:55   4 20 28 34 44   6 13 26 35 67 91 4v5
EDM 1 1:39   7 12 13 17 34 66 2 4 10 14 35 49 5v5
CGY 2 19:30   4 5 12 13 34 40 6 16 28 35 49   5v4
CGY 2 19:19   4 5 12 13 34 40 6 16 28 35 49   5v4
EDM 2 18:58   3 8 10 17 28 34 4 5 10 14 35 77 5v5
CGY 2 15:08   4 5 10 12 13 34 4 5 10 14 35 77 5v5
EDM 2 12:55   4 5 12 13 34 40 2 4 10 14 35 49 5v5
CGY 2 9:09   4 7 12 13 34 40 4 6 10 14 35 77 5v5
CGY 2 6:28   7 34 41 42 44 66 2 16 26 28 33 35 5v5
CGY 2 5:20   4 5 12 13 34 40 6 35 77 83 89   5v4
CGY 2 3:57   3 8 10 17 34 66 2 5 10 14 35   5v4
EDM 2 2:23   4 5 10 12 13 34 27 35 49 77 83 89 5v5
EDM 2 2:22   4 5 10 12 13 34 27 35 49 77 83 89 5v5
EDM 2 1:10   5 11 28 34 44   13 26 35 67 77 91 4v5
EDM 2 0:57   5 11 28 34 44   13 26 35 67 77 91 4v5
CGY 3 18:48   3 8 10 17 34 66 2 10 14 35 49   5v4
EDM 3 18:37 Eberle goal 3 8 10 17 34 66 2 10 14 35 49   5v4
EDM 3 17:18 Hemsky goal 4 5 34 41 42 44 5 27 35 77 83 89 5v5
CGY 3 16:26   3 12 13 28 34 40 2 16 35 49 67 91 5v5
EDM 3 16:12   3 8 10 12 28 34 6 16 26 33 35 91 5v5
CGY 3 15:28   4 5 17 34 41 42 5 10 26 28 33 35 5v5
EDM 3 14:57 Eberle goal 4 20 28 34 40   4 6 10 14 26 35 4v5
CGY 3 9:13   4 5 12 13 34 40 2 13 27 35 49 91 5v5
EDM 3 6:25   4 5 34 41 42 44 6 16 35 77 83 91 5v5
EDM 3 1:20   3 10 11 15 34 66 6 27 35 77 83 89 5v5

 

# Player EV PP SH
3 I. WHITE 14:05 1 7 3:23 2 1 2:56 0 0
4 J. BOUWMEESTER 15:59 4 7 4:25 3 0 3:04 1 3
5 M. GIORDANO 14:20 3 7 4:24 3 0 4:02 0 4
7 A. PARDY 16:40 2 2 0:18 0 0 2:00 0 2
8 B. MORRISON 11:21 0 6 2:40 2 1 0:00 0 0
10 N. HAGMAN 11:51 1 9 3:00 2 1 0:00 0 0
11 M. BACKLUND 11:10 0 1 0:01 0 0 2:59 0 3
12 J. IGINLA 14:34 4 8 5:09 3 0 0:00 0 0
13 O. JOKINEN 12:49 4 7 4:44 3 0 0:16 0 0
15 T. JACKMAN 10:15 0 2 0:01 0 0 1:08 0 0
17 R. BOURQUE 12:07 1 5 2:43 2 1 2:15 0 1
20 C. GLENCROSS 11:13 0 0 0:01 0 0 3:32 1 4
28 R. REGEHR 13:50 1 6 0:01 0 0 3:51 1 6
34 M. KIPRUSOFF 44:01 6 16 7:45 5 1 7:52 1 7
40 A. TANGUAY 11:34 3 4 4:50 3 0 1:45 1 1
41 R. IVANANS 8:20 2 2 0:00 0 0 0:00 0 0
42 B. SUTTER 9:15 2 2 0:00 0 0 2:29 0 1
44 S. MEYER 8:05 1 2 0:00 0 0 1:11 0 3
66 T. BRODIE 13:40 1 3 3:05 2 1 0:00 0 0

 

Period Totals EV PP 5v3 PP SH 5v3 SH
1 1 12 0 8 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 0
2 7 6 3 4 4 0 0 0 0 2 0 0
3 4 6 3 4 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0
4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Totals 12 24 6 16 5 1 0 0 1 7 0 0

 

H2H Ice

 

Flames lines:

Tanguay – Jokinen – Iginla

Hagman – Morrison – Bourque

Glencross – Backlund – Jackman

Ivanans – Sutter – Meyer

 

White – Regehr

Bouwmeester – Giordano

Brodie – Pardy

  • Robert Cleave

    The bottom 6 actually fared decently. Looks like the Bourque-Morrison-Hagman trio got eaten up along with the “top line” of Iginla-Jokinen-Tanguay.

    • PrairieStew

      I thought the bottom 6 were actually very good. The numbers above bear that out and there were a couple of good cycling shifts, even with Thing Two on the ice ( standing up that is).

      So, speaking of Thing Two, he has very quickly become the Latvian Liability. $1.2 M invested over the next 2 years and an epic fail in his first game that counts. His effectiveness has to come from a healthy respect of his abililites, and after that debacle, I don’t think anyone is going to fear him. Certainly not the plumbers in Edmonton. He may not play for quite a while, and time regaining his confidence could mean it’s Christmas before we see the guy chuck knuckles again.

      • PrairieStew

        I thought I’d hate it but i like the thirdl ine trio of Glencross Backlund and Jackman.
        Regehr played decent, I thought Pardy played pretty bad, Gio looked good, and considering the fact that it was Brodie’s first game, I saw some really good defensive plays on his part.

  • BobB

    Yikes, that’s ugly.

    Kipper 0 for 1 on shorthanded shots against. That’ll only take him about 40 games to dig out of that hole. It was a pretty fancy goal by Eberle though.

    As I said in the game posts, player of the game for me was Sutter. Finishes even here, has a good fight, did all right for a ‘rookie’.

    Ian White was awful tonight and these numbers only confirm it. He was absolutely terrible. Pardy was way off as well and Gio was no hell either.

    I still cannot believe the amount of turnovers…NHL.com has the giveaways at 12, actually fewer than Edmonton’s 16, but someone is smoking the heavy, because they have Jokinen down with zero giveaways and I could describe 2, I remember them so well.

    I was thoroughly unimpressed with Meyer, and Jackman and Ivanans (though I hate to say it, I wish him well) were terrible and not very useful. However, nobody looked good up front to me in all honesty.

  • CitizenFlame

    I thought the only Flame defenceman who looked decent was Regher but looking at those totals I guess not. White looked brutal especially trying to fend off Penner on the no-goal that was, and the numbers prove it.
    It would be nice if Gio hit the net tonight, he looked like he was trying to impersonate Mr. High and wide himself.

      • The application I use goes through and applies things indiscriminately to all the player numbers in the game sheet. So the goalie is included as a matter of course since the program doesn’t know who the goalie is or not.

        It’s actually something that is useful the rare times goalies split games – it allows you to see how the team performed in front of one versus the other.