Flames Scoring Chances – Game 18 versus Chicago Blackhawks

 

 

 

Final Score: 5-2W

Final Summary

Corsi

Head-to-head ice time

Scoring Chances for NHL Game Number 20273

Team Period Time Note CGY Opponent  
CHI 1 15:51 0 5 13 20 22 23 34 2 5 19 25 50 81 5v5
CHI 1 15:31 0 5 11 12 23 34 40 2 8 13 19 29 50 5v5
CGY 1 14:20 Stempniak goal 6 7 22 34 40 51 2 5 28 29 36 50 5v5
CHI 1 13:16 Stalberg goal 4 13 17 20 34 44 4 8 19 25 50 81 5v5
CHI 1 11:25 0 6 7 22 32 34 51 20 28 29 32 36 50 5v5
CHI 1 10:39 0 5 11 12 15 34 40 4 8 19 50 81   5v4
CGY 1 9:49 0 5 13 20 23 34   2 8 19 50 81   4v4
CHI 1 7:23 0 5 17 18 23 32 34 2 5 10 13 50 88 5v5
CGY 1 4:34 0 6 7 12 18 34 40 2 5 15 16 22 50 5v5
CGY 1 3:46 0 4 13 17 20 34 44 10 13 20 32 50 88 5v5
CGY 1 0:24 0 5 11 12 23 34 40 2 5 10 13 50 88 5v5
CGY 1 0:18 0 5 11 12 23 34 40 2 5 10 13 50 88 5v5
CGY 2 19:20 Bourque goal 5 13 17 20 23 34 2 19 20 25 50 81 5v5
CGY 2 19:04 Byron goal 6 7 22 32 34 51 4 8 28 29 36 50 5v5
CHI 2 17:42 +2 6 7 15 16 18 34 2 5 15 16 50 81 5v5
CHI 2 17:41 +2 6 7 15 16 18 34 2 5 15 16 50 81 5v5
CHI 2 17:00 +2 5 13 17 20 23 34 4 5 19 25 50 81 5v5
CHI 2 16:52 +2 5 13 17 20 23 34 4 5 19 25 50 81 5v5
CHI 2 15:48 +2 5 12 34 40 44   2 4 10 50 88   4v4
CHI 2 15:14 +2 5 20 23 34     2 19 36 50 81   3v4
CHI 2 14:58 Hossa goal 5 20 23 34     2 19 36 50 81   3v4
CGY 2 14:23 +1 6 7 22 32 34 51 2 5 15 29 36 50 5v5
CGY 2 12:40 +1 5 11 12 23 34 40 4 8 10 19 25 50 5v5
CGY 2 8:56 Glencross goal 4 13 17 20 34 44 2 10 13 20 50 88 5v5
CHI 2 7:22 +2 5 12 23 34 40   4 8 19 25 50   4v4
CGY 2 3:12 +2 4 11 12 34 40 44 2 5 10 13 50 88 5v5
CHI 3 17:14 +2 5 22 23 32 34 51 2 5 15 16 28 50 5v5
CGY 3 16:15 +2 4 15 18 20 34 44 19 20 25 32 50 81 5v5
CGY 3 15:21 +2 6 7 11 12 34 40 5 8 10 13 50 88 5v5
CGY 3 15:02 +2 6 7 11 12 34 40 5 8 10 13 50 88 5v5
CGY 3 14:10 +2 4 13 17 20 34 44 19 20 25 32 50 81 5v5
CGY 3 13:14 Glencross goal 4 13 17 20 34 44 2 5 19 25 50 81 5v5
CHI 3 6:15 +3 5 13 17 20 23 34 2 19 25 32 50 81 5v5
CGY 3 5:31 +3 11 12 23 34 40 44 2 10 13 32 50 88 5v5

 

# Player EV PP SH
4 J. BOUWMEESTER 19:37 6 1 0:48 0 0 2:28 0 0
5 M. GIORDANO 20:15 5 9 1:37 0 1 1:24 0 2
6 C. SARICH 13:32 6 3 0:00 0 0 0:00 0 0
7 T. BRODIE 13:24 6 3 0:59 0 0 0:00 0 0
11 M. BACKLUND 14:26 7 1 1:25 0 1 0:56 0 0
12 J. IGINLA 16:59 8 3 1:25 0 1 0:11 0 0
13 O. JOKINEN 14:51 6 5 1:00 0 0 0:10 0 0
15 T. JACKMAN 9:21 1 2 0:35 0 1 0:00 0 0
16 T. KOSTOPOULOS 10:03 0 2 0:11 0 0 0:53 0 0
17 R. BOURQUE 14:45 5 5 1:16 0 0 0:42 0 0
18 M. STAJAN 10:13 2 3 0:05 0 0 0:12 0 0
20 C. GLENCROSS 14:20 7 5 0:39 0 0 1:17 0 2
22 L. STEMPNIAK 11:04 3 3 1:00 0 0 1:01 0 0
23 S. HANNAN 19:32 6 8 0:05 0 0 1:06 0 2
32 P. BYRON 10:25 2 3 0:00 0 0 0:00 0 0
34 M. KIPRUSOFF 53:15 18 13 2:30 0 1 3:34 0 2
40 A. TANGUAY 17:32 9 3 1:05 0 1 1:20 0 0
44 C. BUTLER 20:10 7 2 0:18 0 0 2:10 0 0
51 R. HORAK 10:44 3 2 0:00 0 0 0:00 0 0

 

Period Totals EV PP 5v3 PP SH 5v3 SH
1 6 6 6 5 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 6 8 6 6 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0
3 6 2 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Totals 18 16 18 13 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 0

Flames best game of the season considering the quality of their opponent. They led for a majority of the match and still ended up outchancing the Hawks at ES 18-13. It helps when pucks go in, but not falling back into the hard shell when you have that lead helps too. The Hawks also eschewed chasing hard in the third when Glencross scored (instead rolling 4 lines to they could rest their stars for tomorrow) but it’s still worth mentioning that the Flames were full value for the win.

Ironically, the Iginla line had their best game of the year by this metric, but couldn’t cash in so their offensive struggles continue. The rest of the line-up was just decent, but made good on their chances. The Hawks were very loose in their own end for the second straight contest versus the Flames and this time Calgary made them pay. Chicago is still a scary good club with the puck on their sticks north of the red line, but they have some work to do ont he defensive side of things if the games against Calgary are at all indicative.

Im not sure how often we can expect the Flames to play at that level – this is likely as good as they get…but it’s nice to see nonetheless.